Environmental Savings Potential from the Use of Bahareque (Mortar Cement Plastered Bamboo) in Switzerland

Article Preview

Abstract:

The urgency for energy and material efficiency in the building sector increases every day. In the case of Switzerland, a buildings main energy demand occurs during its use/operation phase and is mainly related to heating demands during the winter season. As a means of reducing these demands, current building practice in Switzerland is to insulate with 30cm of foam and to mechanically control indoor environments. Recent research has shown, however, that alternatives to current practice are readily available. With these alternative techniques, natural materials with low embodied energy are used to produce high efficiency building envelopes. The bahareque construction method (bamboo plastered with mortar cement) studied in this paper has been identified as a promising technology both in terms of producing energy efficient building envelopes and also with regards to reducing the environmental impact associated with the construction of buildings in Switzerland. The main objective of the research presented here was to identify the Environmental Savings Potential (ESP) of bahareque in comparison with state of the art technologies in Switzerland. The calculations were geographically limited to Switzerland and the main data sets used for the life cycle assessment models corresponded to this region. Specific datasets were developed for bamboo and bahareque to account for transoceanic transportation. The results showed that bahareque achieves an ESP of 32% compared with clay brick construction and 40% when compared with concrete block construction. It was shown that it is feasible to develop highly efficient building envelopes with low embodied energy that can be used within the Swiss context.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

21-33

Citation:

Online since:

March 2014

Export:

Price:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] UNEP. Industry and Environment Vol. 26 Nr. 2-3. (2003).

Google Scholar

[2] Goto Y, Wakili K, Frank T, Stahl T, Ostermeyer Y, Ando N, et al. Heat and moisture balance simulation of a building with vapor-open envelope system for subtropical regions. Build Simul. 2012; 5: 301-14.

DOI: 10.1007/s12273-012-0086-3

Google Scholar

[3] Goto Y, Ostermeyer Y, Zea E, Wallbaum H. Economic, Ecological and Building physical Optimization of the Wooden Building Envelope for Subtropical Regions. WCTE 2012. Auckland, New Zealand (2012).

Google Scholar

[4] Zea Escamilla E, Wallbaum H. Environmental savings from the use of vegetable fibres as concrete reinforcement. 6th International Structural Engineering and Construction Conference. (2011).

Google Scholar

[5] SCLCI. EcoInvent Database. Dübendorf: Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories (2011).

Google Scholar

[6] Pre-Consultants. SIMA Pro v7. 3. 3. (2012).

Google Scholar

[7] Finnveden G, Hauschild MZ, Ekvall T, Guinée J, Heijungs R, Hellweg S, et al. Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment. Journal of Environmental Management. 2009; 91: 1-21.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.06.018

Google Scholar

[8] ISO14040. Environmental Management- Life Cycle Assessment- Principles and Framework. In: ISO, editor.: ISO; (2007).

Google Scholar

[9] MINERGIE. MINERGIE® Building Association. (2011).

Google Scholar

[10] DeFlander K, Rovers R. One laminated bamboo-frame house per hectare per year. Elsevier. (2008).

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.01.004

Google Scholar

[11] Salzer C. A life cycle assessment for alternative building technologies. Construction methods for low income inhabitants in the Philipines [Master Thesis]. Zürich: Swiss Federal Institute of technology; (2011).

Google Scholar

[12] Frischknecht RS, R.; Jungbluth, N. The Ecological Scarcity Method Eco-Factors 2006, A method for impact assessment in LCA. Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN). (2009).

Google Scholar

[13] BAFU. Bundesamt für Umwelt BAFU. (2012).

Google Scholar

[14] Jolliet O. MM, Charles R., Humbert S., Payet J., Rebitzer G., Rosenbaum R. IMPACT 2002+: A New Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methodology. International Journal of LCA. 2003; 8: 324 - 30.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02978505

Google Scholar

[15] Bösch ME HS, Huijbregts MAJ, Frischknecht R. Applying Cumulative Energy Demand (CExD) Indicators to the ecoinvent Database. Int J LCA. 2007; 12: 181-90.

DOI: 10.1065/lca2006.11.282

Google Scholar

[16] Frischknecht R, Jungbluth N, Althaus H-J, Bauer C, Doka G, Dones R, et al. Implementation of Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methods, Data v2. 0 (2007). EcoInvent Report No 3. Dübendorf: EcoInvent Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories; (2007).

DOI: 10.1557/proc-1041-r01-03

Google Scholar