Improving Accuracy in Aluminum Incremental Sheet Forming of Complex Geometries Using Iterative Learning Control

Article Preview

Abstract:

Incremental Sheet Forming is a flexible process characterized by low costs and higher process times with respect to traditional forming technologies. It is therefore suitable for prototypes, small series or custom mass productions. Its flexibility derives from the use of a hemispherical punch that is moved by a CNC machine and gradually deforms the sheet in presence, or not, of a counter die. As a consequence, the sheet clamping is reduced and the part accuracy is lower than traditional sheet forming process as stamping. Therefore, the improvement of the part accuracy in Incremental Sheet Forming is a relevant research topic and solutions for error reduction are required for improving the process quality.The present paper describes the use of an Iterative Learning Control (ILC) algorithm for compensating the ISF part geometrical error. In particular, it iteratively corrects the part geometry on the basis of the error map obtained as the difference between formed and target part geometries. The ILC uses the target geometry to form a first trial part, it measures the obtained geometry and estimates the geometrical error map. Then the error map is used to modify the target geometry and another part is formed. This procedure gets iterated until the desired geometrical tolerance is achieved.The correction algorithm was experimentally tested in forming both axisymmetric and not axisymmetric parts using aluminum sheets. Results showed that in few iteration steps it was possible to significantly improve the part accuracy and to achieve geometrical tolerances comparable with the traditional sheet forming processes.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 651-653)

Pages:

1096-1102

Citation:

Online since:

July 2015

Export:

Price:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] J. Jeswiet, F. Micari, G. Hirt, A. Bramley, J. Duflou, J. Allwood, Asymmetric single point incremental forming of sheet metal, Annals of the CIRP 54/2 (2005) 623-649.

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)60021-3

Google Scholar

[2] M. Mitsuishi, J. Cao, P. Bartolo, D. Friedrich, A.J. Shih, K. Rajurkar, N. Sugita, K. Harada, Biomanufacturing, Annals of the CIRP42/2 (2013) 585-606.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2013.05.001

Google Scholar

[3] A. Fiorentino, R. Marzi, E. Ceretti, Preliminary results on Ti Incremental Sheet Forming (ISF) of biomedical devices: biocompatibility, surface finishing and treatment, Int. J. of Mechatronics and Manuf. Systems 5/1 (2012) 36-45.

DOI: 10.1504/ijmms.2012.046146

Google Scholar

[4] A. Fiorentino, A. Attanasio, R. Marzi, E. Ceretti, C. Giardini, On forces, formability and geometrical error in metal incremental sheet forming. Int. J. of Mat. and Product. Tech. 40/3-4 (2011) 277-295.

DOI: 10.1504/ijmpt.2011.039936

Google Scholar

[5] A. Attanasio, E. Ceretti, C. Giardini, L. Mazzoni, Asymmetric two points incremental forming: Improving surface quality and geometric accuracy by tool path optimization. J. of Material. Proc. Tech. 197 (2008) 59-67.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.05.053

Google Scholar

[6] R. Malhotra, A. Bhattacharya, A. Kumar, N.V. Reddy, J. Cao, A new methodology for multi-pass single point incremental forming with mixed toolpaths, Annals of the CIRP 60/1 (2011) 323-326.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2011.03.145

Google Scholar

[7] Z. Fu, J. Mo, F. Han, P. Gong, Tool path correction algorithm for single-point incremental forming of sheet metal. Int. J. of Adv. Manuf. Tech. 64/9-12 (2013) 1239-1248.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-012-4082-7

Google Scholar

[8] B. Lu, J. Chen, H. Ou, J. Cao, Feature-based tool path generation approach for incremental sheet forming process, J. of Mat. Proc. Tech. 213/7 (2013) 1221-1233.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.01.023

Google Scholar

[9] R. Bahloul, H. Arfa, H. Belhadjsalah, Application of response surface analysis and genetic algorithm for the optimization of single point incremental forming process, Key Engineering Materials 554 (2013) 1265-1272.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.554-557.1265

Google Scholar

[10] M. Bambach M, B.T. Araghi, G. Hirt, Strategies to improve the geometric accuracy in asymmetric single point incremental forming, Production Engineering 3 (2009) 145-156.

DOI: 10.1007/s11740-009-0150-8

Google Scholar

[11] A.K. Behera, J. Verbert, B. Lauwers, J.R. Duflou, Tool path compensation strategies for single point incremental sheet forming using multivariate adaptive regression splines, CAD Computer Aided Design 45 (2013) 575-590.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cad.2012.10.045

Google Scholar

[12] A. Fiorentino, G.C. Feriti, E. Ceretti, C. Giardini, C.M.G. Bort, P. Bosetti, Development of tool path correction algorithm in Incremental Sheet Forming, Key Engineering 622-623 (2014) 382-389.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.622-623.382

Google Scholar

[13] K.L. Moore, Iterative Learning Control for Deterministic System, Springer-Verlag, London, (1993).

Google Scholar

[14] A. Fiorentino, C. Giardini, E. Ceretti, Application of artificial cognitive system to incremental sheet forming machine tools for part precision improvement, Precision Engineering 39 (2015) 167–172.

DOI: 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2014.08.005

Google Scholar

[15] Attanasio A., Fiorentino A., Mazzoni L., Ceretti E., Giardini C., Design of an equipment for forces measurement in TPIF process, Proceedings of 9th ICTP (2008), 1783-1788.

Google Scholar