Comparison of One-, Two- and Three-Dimensional Models of a Metallic Insert in a Composite

Alexander Herwig; Malte Woidt; Peter Horst

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.713.175

Paper Titles

Effect of Side Grooves on Plane Stress Fracture Behavior of Compact Tension Specimens Made of Ultra-High Strength Steel
p.159

Experimental Assessment of Residual Fatigue Life of High Pressure Pipeline Section Containing Longitudinal Cracks
p.163

Shear-Mode Viscoelastic Damage Formulation Interface Element
p.167

The Effectiveness of Polymer Damper in Damage Reduction of Temporary Steel Grandstand
p.171

Comparison of One-, Two- and Three-Dimensional Models of a Metallic Insert in a Composite
p.175

Anti-Plane Interfacial Crack with Functionally Graded Coating
p.179

Creep Damage and Fracture in Advanced Tungsten Modified 9%Cr Ferritic Steel
p.183

Practical Method for Estimating Time-Dependent Corrosion Depth of Uncoated Carbon Steel Plates under Various Atmospheric Environmental Conditions Using Fe/Ag Galvanic Couple Corrosion Sensor
p.187

Optimal Sensor Positioning for Damage Detection in Composite Sensorised Panels
p.191

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vol. 713Comparison of One-, Two- and Three-Dimensional...

Comparison of One-, Two- and Three-Dimensional Models of a Metallic Insert in a Composite

Abstract:

For a set of applications, thin metallic sheets are used in fibre composite materials to reach higher load introduction capacities. The paper deals with a simplified generic problem of this kind. The main subject is the comparison of results of three types of models, namely, a 1D-, 2D- and a 3D version. What can be shown is the fact that results are quite similar with respect to behaviour along the loading direction, but very different in the actual values.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Advances in Fracture and Damage Mechanics XV

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volume 713)

Pages:

175-178

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.713.175

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

September 2016

Authors:

Alexander Herwig*, Malte Woidt, Peter Horst

Keywords:

Delamination, Hybrid CFRP Composites, Insert, Joining, Mechanical Fastening

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions:

Request Permissions

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] Thoppul, S. D., Finegan, J. u. Gibson, R. F.: Mechanics of mechanically fastened joints in polymer–matrix composite structures – A review. Composites Science and Technology 69 (2009) 3–4, S. 301–329.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.09.037

Google Scholar

[2] Herwig, A., Horst, P., Groß, L., Gonzalez, J. S., Meiners, D., Denkena, B. u. Schmidt, C.: Entwicklung eines mehrlagigen Inserts für dünnwandige Hochleistungs-CFK- Strukturen. Lightweight Design 9 (2016) 1, S. 22–27.

DOI: 10.1007/s35725-015-0064-7

Google Scholar

[3] Camanho, P. u. Tong, L.: Composite joints and connections. Principles, modelling and testing. Woodhead Publishing in materials. Cambridge: Woodhead Pub (2011).

Google Scholar

[4] 527 - 5; Januar 2010. Kunststoffe – Bestimmung der Zugeigenschaften – Teil 5: Prüfbedingungen für unidirektional faserverstärkte Kunststoffverbundwerkstoffe (ISO 527-5: 2009); Deutsche Fassung EN ISO 527-5: (2009).

DOI: 10.31030/1560314

Google Scholar

[5] Cytec Engineering Materials: CYCOM 977-2 Epoxy Resin System, (2012).

Google Scholar

[6] Reifsnider, K.: Damage in composite materials. ASTM International (1982).

Google Scholar