Determination of Real Space Residual Stress Distributions σij(z) of Surface Treated Materials with Diffraction Methods Part II: Energy Dispersive Approach

Article Preview

Abstract:

The detection of near surface residual stress gradients in real space requires high depth resolution for any orientation of the diffraction vector with respect to the sample co-ordinate system. In order to meet this demand, the slits are no longer being fixed in the laboratory co-ordinate system as in strain scanning experiments but directly coupled with the sample. Hence, the gauge volume orientation within the sample remains constant and allows performing depth-resolved sin2ψ measurements in real space. The method’s accuracy is determined by the gauge volume definition, which is investigated in detail. Apart from the evaluation of the σ(τ) versus σ(z) relation, which is of fundamental interest in X-ray residual stress gradient analysis, the method will be shown to have a unique applicability in rather delicate sample geometries such as multilayer systems.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 524-525)

Pages:

37-44

Citation:

Online since:

September 2006

Export:

Price:

[1] Ch. Genzel, I.A. Denks, M. Klaus: elsewhere in these proceedings.

Google Scholar

[2] J. Gibmeier, T. Manns, B. Scholtes: elsewhere in these proceedings.

Google Scholar

[3] H. Dölle, V. Hauk, Härterei Tech. Mitt. 34 (1979), 272 - 277.

Google Scholar

[4] Ch. Genzel: Phys. Stat. Sol. (a) 156 (1996), pp.353-363.

Google Scholar

[5] P.J. Withers, P.J. Webster: Strain Vol. 37 (2001), pp.19-33.

Google Scholar

[6] U. Lienert, H.F. Poulsen, R.V. Martins, A. Kvick : Materials Science Forum Vol. 347 - 349 (2000), pp.95-100.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.347-349.95

Google Scholar

[7] W. Reimers, M. Broda, G. Brusch, D. Dantz, K. -D. Liss, A. Pyzalla, T. Schmackers and T. Tschentscher: J. Non. Dest. Eval. 17 (1998), pp.129-140.

DOI: 10.1023/a:1022607030355

Google Scholar

[8] A. Pyzalla : Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation Vol. 19 (2000), pp.21-31.

Google Scholar

[9] M. Croft, I. Zakharchenko, Z. Zhong, Y. Gurlak, J. Hastings, J. Hu, R. Holtz, M. DaSilva and T. Tsakalakos: Journal of Applied Physics Vol. 92 (2002), pp.578-586.

DOI: 10.1063/1.1483373

Google Scholar

01 0. 02 0. 03 0. 04 0 20 40 60.

Google Scholar

01 0. 02 0. 03 0. 04.

Google Scholar

[76] 0.

Google Scholar

[76] 2.

Google Scholar

[76] 4.

Google Scholar

[76] 6.

Google Scholar

[76] 8 Intensity [cts/sec] Peak position [keV] Depth [µm] Integral width [keV].

Google Scholar

01 0. 02 0. 03 0. 04 0 20 40 60.

Google Scholar

01 0. 02 0. 03 0. 04.

Google Scholar

[76] 0.

Google Scholar

[76] 2.

Google Scholar

[76] 4.

Google Scholar

[76] 6.

Google Scholar

[76] 8.

Google Scholar

01 0. 02 0. 03 0. 04 0 20 40 60.

Google Scholar

01 0. 02 0. 03 0. 04 0 20 40 60.

Google Scholar

01 0. 02 0. 03 0. 04.

Google Scholar

[76] 0.

Google Scholar

[76] 2.

Google Scholar

[76] 4.

Google Scholar

[76] 6.

Google Scholar

[76] 8.

Google Scholar

01 0. 02 0. 03 0. 04.

Google Scholar

[76] 0.

Google Scholar

[76] 2.

Google Scholar

[76] 4.

Google Scholar

[76] 6.

Google Scholar

[76] 8 Intensity [cts/sec] Peak position [keV] Depth [µm] Integral width [keV] ● Peak position + Integral intensity ◊ Integral width layer I layer II Fig. 8 The diffraction analysis of a typical diffraction line of the two identical layers show that the two neighbouring layers can be clearly distinguished.

Google Scholar