Joining by Forming with a Flat Counter Tool - A New Way of Joining Magnesium Components

Article Preview

Abstract:

Joining by forming of magnesium alloys is restricted by the limited forming capability of magnesium at room temperature. For this reason heating of the parts to temperatures of 220 °C or more is required to form joints without cracks. State-of-the-art joining by forming methods (such as clinching or self-pierce riveting) are usually working with a contoured die as a counter tool. Researches on these joining methods have shown that a minimum heating time of 3 to 6 seconds is needed to achieve joints of acceptable quality. In this paper two new clinching methods “dieless clinching” and “dieless rivet-clinching” shall be introduced. Both methods work with a flat anvil as a counter tool, thus offering important advantages for the application in joining of Mg/Mg, Al/Mg or Fe/Mg joints. In joining by forming with a flat counter tool the proportion of crack inducing tensile stresses in the bottom part during the joining process is very low. Moreover the heat transfer between the heated anvil and the parts is comparatively fast. That makes it possible to decrease the heating time in joining by forming with a flat counter tool to only one second or less. The dieless clinching process was simulated using the Finite Elements Method (FEM) to analyze the influence of geometrical parameters of the punch and the process parameter clamping force. Furthermore the limitations of the new dieless joining method were investigated.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 539-543)

Pages:

3949-3954

Citation:

Online since:

March 2007

Export:

Price:

[1] J. Ruge: Handbuch der Schweißtechnik. Band I (Springer-Verlag, Germany, 1991).

Google Scholar

[2] P. Bohling, S. Jüttner, M. Kaiser, G. Meschut and S. Schumann: Eigenschaften von thermisch und wärmearm gefügten Al-/Mg-Verbindungen für den strukturellen Karosserieleichtbau. (7th Paderborner Symposium Fügetechnik Mechanisches Fügen und Kleben, Germany, 12. -13. October 2000).

Google Scholar

[3] C. Kammer: Magnesium-Taschenbuch (Aluminium-Verlag Düsseldorf, Germany 2000).

Google Scholar

[4] J. Mutschler: Über die Sicherung der Erzeugnisqualität in der Durchsetzfügetechnik insbesondere bei Einsatz flexibler Fertigungseinrichtungen. (Dissertation, TU Hamburg-Harburg Germany, 1994).

Google Scholar

[5] O. Hahn, W. Voelkner: Untersuchungen zur Optimierung des Stanznietens mit Halbhohlniet als universelles Fügeverfahren zum Verbinden von Blechen und Profilen. Bericht Nr. 85 (Europäische Forschungsgesellschaft für Blechverarbeitung e.V., Hannover Germany 1996).

Google Scholar

[6] S. Hübner: Clinchen moderner Blechwerkstoffe (Diss., Univ. Hannover Germany, 2005).

Google Scholar

[7] S. Dietrich, R. Mauermann, W. Voelkner: Weniger ist oft mehr - Clinchen ohne Matrize. Blech InForm 4/2003, Carl Hanser Verlag, München Germany, pp.50-52.

Google Scholar

[8] R. Neugebauer, R. Mauermann, S. Dietrich: Chances and challenges in joining by forming with flat a counter tool. Advanced Materials Research, Vol. 6-8 (2005), pp.203-208.

Google Scholar

[9] R. Neugebauer, R. Mauermann, S. Dietrich: Spot-Joining - New technologies in the field of joining by forming. Journal of the JSTP, Vol. 44 (2003), pp.370-371.

Google Scholar

[10] R. Neugebauer, S. Dietrich and C. Kraus: Matrizenloses Clinchverfahren verkürzt Prozesszeiten beim temperierten Fügen von Magnesiumbauteilen (12th Paderborner Symposium Fügetechnik, Germany, 23. -24. November 2005).

Google Scholar