Effects of Shielding Gas and Magnetic Field on Characteristics of AZ31 Magnesium Alloy by TIG Welding

Article Preview

Abstract:

The effects of shielding gas and external longitudinal magnetic field on arc shape and weld quality of AZ31+1%Ce+1%Sb magnesium alloy TIG welding were investigated. The results show that a weld joint with a good appearance, few defects and enough penetration can be obtained under the protection of helium-argon gas mixture, especially when the helium ratio is about 50%. However, the weld quality is significantly decreased by adding additional CO2 or N2 in He-Ar gas mixture. The weld seam consisted of fine equiaxed grains which mostly grow in a certain direction were formed when a longitudinal magnetic field is added, due to its electromagnetic stirring in weld pool. The grains of weld seam formed under the alternating current longitudinal magnetic field are much finer than those under the direct current magnetic field. A weld joint with good formability and finer microstructure is obtained when the exciting voltage of AC longitudinal magnetic field is 20 V. The average microhardness of the corresponding weld joint is 68.5 HV0.1, and its average tensile strength is 220 MPa which is up to 88% of that of the base plate.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 704-705)

Pages:

1186-1196

Citation:

Online since:

December 2011

Export:

Price:

[1] Aghion E, Bronfin B, Friedrich H, et al.: Magnesium Technology 2004 [C], USA: TMS (The Materials, Metals& materials Society). 2004, pp.167-172.

Google Scholar

[2] Sun Z, Pan D: Science and technology of welding and joining, Vol. 7(2002), pp.343-351.

Google Scholar

[3] Padmanaban G, Balasubramanian V and Sarin Sundar J K: Journal of materials engineering and performance, Vol. 19(2010), pp.155-165.

Google Scholar

[4] Zhang Zhao-dong, Liu Li-ming, Hao Sun, et al.: Journal of materials science, Vol. 43(2008), pp.1382-1388.

Google Scholar

[5] Pareek M, Polar A, Rumiche F, IndacocheaJ E., et al.: Journal of materials engineering and performance, Vol. 16(2007), pp.655-662.

Google Scholar

[6] Abderrazak K, Salem A W B, Mhiri H, Bournot P, et al.: Metallurgical and materials transactions B, Vol. 40B(2009), pp.54-61.

Google Scholar

[7] Chi Chao-ting, Chao Chuen-guang, Liu Tzeng-feng, et al.: Materials science and engineering A, Vol. 435-436(2006), pp.672-680.

Google Scholar

[8] Munitz A, Cotler C, Stern A, et al.: Materials science and engineering A, Vol. 302(2001), pp.68-73.

Google Scholar

[9] Xiao L, Liu L, Zhou Y, et al.: Metallurgical and materials transactions A, Vol. 41A(2010), pp.1511-1522.

Google Scholar

[10] Liu Li-Ming, Wang Ji-feng and Song Gang: Materials science and engineering A, Vol. 382(2004), pp.129-133.

Google Scholar

[11] Nakata, Kazuhiro.: Journal of light metal welding and construction,Vol. 39(2001), pp.26-35.

Google Scholar

[12] Marya B Y M, Edwards G R., AND LIU S: Welding journal, Vol. 83(2004), pp.203-212.

Google Scholar

[13] LIU Sheng-xin, CHEN Yong, WANG Xi-he, et al.: Metal hotworking technology, Vol. 36(2007), pp.12-14.

Google Scholar

[14] Li Hai-gang, Yin Xian-qing, Luo Jian, et al.: Transactions of the china welding institution, Vol. 19(1998), pp.100-105.

Google Scholar

[15] DING Jiang-hua: Science and Technology of Magnesium Alloy ( Science Press, Bei Jing 2007).

Google Scholar

[16] CHEN Zhen-hua, YAN Hong-ge, CHEN Ji-hua, et al.: Magnesium Alloy [M] (Chemical Industry Press, Bei jing 2004).

Google Scholar

[17] Li Guo-dong, LiZhuo-xin, Wei Qi, et al.: Journal of Materials Engineering, Vol. 3 (2007), pp.38-41.

Google Scholar

[18] LIU Zheng-jun, SUN Jing-gang: Welding, Vol. 5(2008), pp.41-43.

Google Scholar

[19] Manuel Marya, Louis G. Hector, Ravi Venua: Materials Science and Engineering, Vol. 41(2006), pp.341-356.

Google Scholar