Bacterial nanocellulose: the future of controlled drug delivery?

Papers of special note have been highlighted as: • of interest; •• of considerable interest

References

• 1 Klemm D, Kramer F, Moritz S et al. Nanocelluloses: a new family of nature-based materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50(24), 5438–5466 (2011). •• Provides an overview about modifications and applications of nanocelluloses.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 2 Duran N, Lemes AP, Seabra AB. Review of cellulose nanocrystals patents: preparation, composites and general applications. Recent. Pat. Nanotech. 6(1), 16–28 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 3 Schlufter K, Schmauder H-P, Dorn S, Heinze T. Efficient homogeneous chemical modification of bacterial cellulose in the ionic liquid 1-N-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride. Macromol. Rapid. Comm. 27(19), 1670–1676 (2006).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 4 Barud HS, Ribeiro CA, Crespi MS et al. Thermal characterization of bacterial cellulose–phosphate composite membranes. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 87(3), 815–818 (2007).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 5 Lin N, Dufresne A. Nanocellulose in biomedicine: current status and future prospect. Eur. Polym. J. 59, 302–325 (2014).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 6 Jeong SI, Lee SE, Yang H, Jin Y-H, Park C-S, Park YS. Toxicologic evaluation of bacterial synthesized cellulose in endothelial cells and animals. Mol. Cell. Toxicol. 6(4), 370–377 (2010).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 7 Helenius G, Backdahl H, Bodin A, Nannmark U, Gatenholm P, Risberg B. In vivo biocompatibility of bacterial cellulose. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A. 76(2), 431–438 (2006).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 8 Schumann DA, Wippermann J, Klemm DO et al. Artificial vascular implants from bacterial cellulose: preliminary results of small arterial substitutes. Cellulose 16(5), 877–885 (2009).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 9 Almeida IF, Pereira T, Silva NHCS et al. Bacterial cellulose membranes as drug-delivery systems: an in vivo skin compatibility study. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 86(3), 332–336 (2014). • Presents a clinical study about the use of bacterial nanocellulose (BNC) for skin applications.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 10 Frost & Sullivan. Emerging applications of nanocellulose technology. https://store.frost.com/emerging-applications-of-nanocellulose-technology.html.
  Google Scholar
• 11 Mosti G, Mattaliano V, Schmitz M. New antimicrobial wound dressing with polyhexanide Suprasorb^® X + PHMB, first in vitro and clinical results. Presented at: Annual Congress of the German Society for Wound Healing and Wound Care. Berlin, Germany, 9–10 March 2007.
  Google Scholar
• 12 Bruckner M, Schwarz C, Otto F, Heillinger J, Wild T. Evaluation of cellulose and polyhexamethylene biguanide (Suprasorb^® X+PHMB) in therapy of infected wounds. EWMA J. (Suppl.) 8(2), 54 (2008).
  Google Scholar
• 13 Bowil Biotech Sp. z o.o. www.bowil.pl.
  Google Scholar
• 14 Silva NHCS, Rodrigues AF, Almeida IF et al. Bacterial cellulose membranes as transdermal delivery systems for diclofenac: in vitro dissolution and permeation studies. Carbohyd. Polym. 106, 264–269 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 15 Moritz S, Wiegand C, Wesarg F et al. Active wound dressings based on bacterial nanocellulose as drug-delivery system for octenidine. Int. J. Pharm. 471(1–2), 45–55 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 16 Trovatti E, Freire CS, Pinto PC et al. Bacterial cellulose membranes applied in topical and transdermal delivery of lidocaine hydrochloride and ibuprofen: in vitro diffusion studies. Int. J. Pharm. 435(1), 83–87 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 17 Ullah H, Santos HA, Khan T. Applications of bacterial cellulose in food, cosmetics and drug delivery. Cellulose 23(4), 2291–2314 (2016). •• Presents a summary of drugs incorporated into BNC.
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 18 Wiegand C, Moritz S, Hessler N et al. Antimicrobial functionalization of bacterial nanocellulose by loading with polihexanide and povidone-iodine. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 26(10), 245 (2015).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 19 Ahmad N, Amin MCIM, Mahali SM, Ismail I, Chuang VTG. Biocompatible and mucoadhesive bacterial cellulose-g-poly(acrylic acid) hydrogels for oral protein delivery. Mol. Pharm. 11(11), 4130–4142 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 20 Müller A, Ni Z, Hessler N et al. The biopolymer bacterial nanocellulose as drug-delivery system: investigation of drug loading and release using the model protein albumin. J. Pharm. Sci. 102(2), 579–592 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 21 Sampaio LMP, Padrão J, Faria J et al. Laccase immobilization on bacterial nanocellulose membranes: antimicrobial, kinetic and stability properties. Carbohyd. Polym. 145, 1–12 (2016).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 22 Wu S-C, Wu S-M, Su F-M. Novel process for immobilizing an enzyme on a bacterial cellulose membrane through repeated absorption. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 92(1), 109–114 (2017).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 23 Ullah H, Badshah M, Mäkilä E et al. Fabrication, characterization and evaluation of bacterial cellulose-based capsule shells for oral drug delivery. Cellulose 1–10 (2017).
  Google Scholar
• 24 Huang L, Chen X, Nguyen TX, Tang H, Zhang L, Yang G. Nano-cellulose 3D-networks as controlled-release drug carriers. J. Mater. Chem. B 1(23), 2976–2984 (2013).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 25 Yoshino A, Tabuchi M, Uo M et al. Applicability of bacterial cellulose as an alternative to paper points in endodontic treatment. Acta Biomater. 9(4), 6116–6122 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 26 Rouabhia M, Asselin J, Tazi N, Messaddeq Y, Levinson D, Zhang Z. Production of biocompatible and antimicrobial bacterial cellulose polymers functionalized by RGDC grafting groups and gentamicin. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 6(3), 1439–1446 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 27 Liyaskina E, Revin V, Paramonova E et al. Nanomaterials from bacterial cellulose for antimicrobial wound dressing. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 784(1), 012034 (2017).
  Google Scholar
• 28 Shao W, Liu H, Wang S et al. Controlled release and antibacterial activity of tetracycline hydrochloride-loaded bacterial cellulose composite membranes. Carbohyd. Polym. 145, 114–120 (2016).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 29 Shi X, Zheng Y, Wang G, Lin Q, Fan J. pH- and electro-response characteristics of bacterial cellulose nanofiber/sodium alginate hybrid hydrogels for dual controlled drug delivery. RSC Adv. 4(87), 47056–47065 (2014).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 30 Trovatti E, Silva NH, Duarte IF et al. Biocellulose membranes as supports for dermal release of lidocaine. Biomacromolecules 12(11), 4162–4168 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 31 Cacicedo ML, Cesca K, Bosio VE, Porto LM, Castro GR. Self-assembly of carrageenin–CaCO₃ hybrid microparticles on bacterial cellulose films for doxorubicin sustained delivery. J. Appl. Biomed. 13(3), 239–248 (2015).
  Google Scholar
• 32 Müller A, Wesarg F, Hessler N, Müller FA, Kralisch D, Fischer D. Loading of bacterial nanocellulose hydrogels with proteins using a high-speed technique. Carbohyd. Polym. 106, 410–413 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 33 Mohite BV, Suryawanshi RK, Patil SV. Study on the drug loading and release potential of bacterial cellulose. Cell. Chem. Technol. 50(2), 219–223 (2016).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 34 Alkhatib Y, Dewaldt M, Moritz S, Nitzsche R, Kralisch D, Fischer D. Controlled extended octenidine release from a bacterial nanocellulose/poloxamer hybrid system. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 112, 164–176 (2017). •• First description of BNC for the use as long-term release systems for antiseptics.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 35 Aramwit P, Bang N. The characteristics of bacterial nanocellulose gel releasing silk sericin for facial treatment. BMC Biotechnol. 14, 104 (2014).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 36 Cacicedo ML, León IE, Gonzalez JS, Porto LM, Alvarez VA, Castro GR. Modified bacterial cellulose scaffolds for localized doxorubicin release in human colorectal HT-29 cells. Colloid. Surface. B 140, 421–429 (2016).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 37 Li J, Wan Y, Li L, Liang H, Wang J. Preparation and characterization of 2,3-dialdehyde bacterial cellulose for potential biodegradable tissue engineering scaffolds. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 29(5), 1635–1642 (2009).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 38 Hu W, Chen S, Yang J, Li Z, Wang H. Functionalized bacterial cellulose derivatives and nanocomposites. Carbohyd. Polym. 101, 1043–1060 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 39 Alosmanov R, Wolski K, Zapotoczny S. Grafting of thermosensitive poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) from wet bacterial cellulose sheets to improve its swelling-drying ability. Cellulose 24(1), 285–293 (2017).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 40 Pavaloiu R-D, Stoica-Guzun A, Dobre T. Swelling studies of composite hydrogels based on bacterial cellulose and gelatin. U.P.B. Sci. Bull. Ser. B 77(1), 53–62 (2015).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 41 Pavaloiu R-D, Stoica-Guzun A, Stroescu M, Jinga SI, Dobre T. Composite films of poly(vinyl alcohol)–chitosan–bacterial cellulose for drug controlled release. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 68, 117–124 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 42 Numata Y, Mazzarino L, Borsali R. A slow-release system of bacterial cellulose gel and nanoparticles for hydrophobic active ingredients. Int. J. Pharm. 486(1–2), 217–225 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 43 Luo H, Ao H, Li G et al. Bacterial cellulose/graphene oxide nanocomposite as a novel drug-delivery system. Curr. Appl. Phys. 17(2), 249–254 (2017).
  Google Scholar
• 44 Sukhtezari S, Almasi H, Pirsa S, Zandi M, Pirouzifard M. Development of bacterial cellulose based slow-release active films by incorporation of Scrophularia striata Boiss extract. Carbohyd. Polym. 156, 340–350 (2017). • Description of using cyclodextrins as carrier in BNC for poorly soluble substances.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 45 Berndt S, Wesarg F, Wiegand C, Kralisch D, Müller FA. Antimicrobial porous hybrids consisting of bacterial nanocellulose and silver nanoparticles. Cellulose 20(2), 771–783 (2013).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 46 Khalid A, Khan R, Ul-Islam M, Khan T, Wahid F. Bacterial cellulose-zinc oxide nanocomposites as a novel dressing system for burn wounds. Carbohyd. Polym. 164, 214–221 (2017).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 47 Scholz P, Müller A, Heßler N, Kralisch D, Fischer D. Freeze dried bacterial nanocellulose as potential drug-delivery system for peroral application of sensitive drugs. Presented at: CRS Local German Chapter Annual Meeting. Würzburg, Germany, 29–30 March 2012.
  Google Scholar
• 48 Phisalaphong M, Tran T-K, Taokaew S et al. Nata de coco industry in Vietnam, Thailand, and Indonesia. In: Bacterial Nanocellulose – From Biotechnology to Bio-Economy. Gama M, Dourado F, Bielecki S (Eds). Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 231–236 (2016).
  Google Scholar
• 49 Piazodo MES. Nata de coco industry in the Philippines. In: Bacterial Nanocellulose – From Biotechnology to Bio-Economy. Gama M, Dourado F, Bielecki S (Eds). Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 215–229 (2016).
  Google Scholar
• 50 Kralisch D, Hessler N, Klemm D, Erdmann R, Schmidt W. White biotechnology for cellulose manufacturing – the HoLiR concept. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 105(4), 740–747 (2010). •• First description of a (semi-)continuous upscale of BNC production.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 51 Wu SC, Li MH. Production of bacterial cellulose membranes in a modified airlift bioreactor by Gluconacetobacter xylinus. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 120(4), 444–449 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 52 Lee KY, Buldum G, Mantalaris A, Bismarck A. More than meets the eye in bacterial cellulose: biosynthesis, bioprocessing, and applications in advanced fiber composites. Macromol. Biosci. 14(1), 10–32 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 53 Zeng M, Laromaine A, Roig A. Bacterial cellulose films: influence of bacterial strain and drying route on film properties. Cellulose 21(6), 4455–4469 (2014).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 54 Qiu Y, Qiu L, Cui J, Wei Q. Bacterial cellulose and bacterial cellulose-vaccarin membranes for wound healing. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. Mater. Biol. Appl. 59, 303–309 (2016).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 55 Müller A, Zink M, Hessler N et al. Bacterial nanocellulose with a shape-memory effect as potential drug-delivery system. RSC Adv. 4(100), 57173–57184 (2014).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 56 Kaplan E, Ince T, Yorulmaz E, Yener F, Harputlu E, Laçin NT. Controlled delivery of ampicillin and gentamycin from cellulose hydrogels and their antibacterial efficiency. J. Biomater. Tiss. Eng. 4(7), 543–549(547), (2014).
  Google Scholar