Nutr Res Pract. 2012 Feb;6(1):28-34. English.
Published online Feb 29, 2012.
©2012 The Korean Nutrition Society and the Korean Society of Community Nutrition
Original Article

Analysis of dietary insoluble and soluble fiber contents in school meal

Dongsoon Shin
    • Department of Food & Nutritional Science, 11 Woryeongbuk 16-gil, Masanhappo-gu, Changwon, Gyeongnam 631-701, Korea.
Received November 03, 2011; Revised January 15, 2012; Accepted January 25, 2012.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to estimate the contents of dietary insoluble and soluble fiber in school meal. Samples of the school meals were collected from May to June in 2008. Three elementary schools and three middle schools around Masan area were selected for analysis. Dietary soluble and insoluble fibers in the school meals were analyzed directly by the AOAC method. From the initial experiment phase, we used cellulose and pectin as a standard of dietary fiber, and average recovery rate of insoluble fiber and soluble fiber was calculated. The recovery rate was observed, the cellulose 109.7±11.7% (range 90~150%) and pectin 77.8±10.8% (range 64.7~96.7%), respectively. The amounts of insoluble fiber and soluble fiber were analyzed in the total of 66 dishes, which included 7 kinds of cooked rice (bab) made with some cereal products and vegetables, 19 kinds of soup (guk) made with meats or vegetables, 11 kinds of kimchi, 21 kinds of entrées or side dishes, and 8 special dishes. Conclusively the school meal, per serving size, would provide above 75% KDRI of total dietary fibers through mainly soups and special menu, with the exception to fruits. In addition, it might be expected that children could consume more soluble fiber from the meals with the special dishes than from the regular ones.

Keywords
Dietary fiber; insoluble fiber; soluble fiber; school meal

Introduction

The health benefit of dietary fiber, as a kind of phytochemical, is no longer an issue any more. In recent, the dietary fiber is considered to be the most important nutrient, especially in preventing obesity, which is a worldwide epidemic disease [1]. Further, the intake of dietary fiber five or six times a day is also believed to prevent chronic diseases, like cancer, cardiovascular disease and diabetes mellitus. Dietary fiber is food's component that are rich in whole grain, various vegetables, and some fruits and seaweeds.

In fact, the main physiological function of dietary fiber is that it expands the stomach to provide a powerful satiety signal, allowing the feeling of being full and satisfied [2]. The other functions of dietary fiber are supporting the fermentation of bacteria and the increment of the fecal volumes, mainly in the large intestine which stimulate peristaltic contraction and thus, allowing the excretion of the feces more easily [3]. This effectiveness of dietary fiber is the key point of treatment for metabolic syndromes, especially obesity. Recently, one of the critical public health problems is the increasing prevalence of obesity in younger population in Korea, as similarly observed many developed countries [4]. Therefore, their consumption of dietary fiber is recommended in school meal in addition to at home.

According to KDRIs [5], the adequate intake (AI) for dietary fiber in all groups over the age of 12 years is determined as 25 g for male, 20 g for female, while AI of the age group between 6 and 11 years is 20 g for boys, and 15 g for girls. It means that each school meal has to provide dietary fiber approximately, from 5 g to 8 g. DRI of dietary fiber was determined by AI of total fiber only, without the differentiation of insoluble and soluble fiber.

Total dietary fiber (TDF) are determined independently, or are obtained from the amount of insoluble dietary fiber (IDF), plus the amount of soluble dietary fiber (SDF) by enzymatic procedures of AOAC method [6]. However, in some samples, soluble fiber determination often has the problem of filtration, so the two methods mentioned above can't reach the same values of dietary total fiber. Therefore, the recovery rate of soluble fiber should be considered to obtain an accurate analysis.

The main objective of this study was to quantify dietary fibers in each school menu, through direct analysis and to figure out the providing amounts of insoluble and soluble fiber from the school meals.

Materials and Methods

Sample collection and pretreatment

Total of 130 school-lunch dishes were collected randomly from primary and middle schools around the Masan area in Changwon city. The amount of insoluble fiber and soluble fiber were analyzed in 66 dishes, which included 7 kinds of cooked rice (bab) made with some cereal products and vegetables, 19 kinds of soup (guk) made with various meats or vegetables, 11 kinds of kimchi, 21 kinds of entrées and side dishes and 8 special dishes. The samples were stored -80℃ before analysis was conducted.

Analysis of dietary fiber

The fiber was extracted enzymatically by AOAC method from fat-extracted samples, using Soxlet's method [6]. Dry sample was homogenized with 40 ml MES/TRIS (pH 8.2) solution and α-amylase solution was added. Then heating with 95℃ water bath was carried out. After which, the reactants was cooled at room temperature and washed with distilled water, adding protease solution in 60℃ water bath. It was mixed with 5 ml of 0.56 N HCl solution, adjusted at pH 4.0. After then, 300 ul of amyloglucosidase solution was added and stirred at 60℃ hot plate. To extract the insoluble fiber, the solution was filtered using glass filter, with 1 g celite, and the filtrate was washed with 78% ethanol, 95% ethanol and acetone in turn. After overnight, the residue in the glass filter was weighed for the insoluble fiber. The filtrate collected was added 95% ethanol and distilled water. For extract of soluble fiber, the solution was filtered using a glass filter with celite and the filtrate was washed with 15 ml of 78% ethanol, 95% ethanol and acetone, in turn. After overnight, the residue in the glass filter was weighed for the soluble fiber. All chemicals were bought as HPLC grade (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA).

Recovery rate of fiber analysis

For the recovery rate of fiber analysis, cellulose and pectin were used as standard materials for insoluble and soluble fiber, respectively. And the relationship, between the amount of fiber analyzed and the eluted amount, was expressed as an equation for the recovery rate. The recovery rate of standard dietary fibers was conducted to sustain the reliability and the reproducibility of the experimental data.

Statistical analysis

Dietary fiber contents per 100 g of each dish were attained by duplication of the experimental analysis and the average values were calculated. The serving amount and intake of the dietary fiber were obtained by multiplying fiber concentration of each dish, by serving size of the meals. All data were managed automatically by using SPSS v.14. The graphs were drawn by Microsoft Excel.

Results

Recovery rate of dietary fibers

As shown in Fig. 1, the recovery rate was obtained quite differently between the insoluble fiber and the soluble fiber. The recovery rate of the cellulose was 109.7 ± 11.7% (range 90-150%) and that of pectin was 77.8 ± 10.8% (range 64.7-96.7%), respectively. There are various soluble fibers in the foods and it is difficult to correctly adjust the recovery rate of the data. However, it could provide the reliability and reprodutivity of all data.

Fig. 1
Recovery rates of insoluble fiber (cellulose, A) and soluble fiber (pectin, B). In Fig. 1A & 1B, the X axis represents the existent amounts (unit; g) of two fibers and Y axis represents the recovery rate through standard experiment.

Total, insoluble and soluble dietary fiber content per serving size in each dish

Table 1-Table 5 shows the content of total, insoluble and soluble dietary fiber per serving size in each dish. These values were calculated from the data analyzed, per 100 g in the laboratory, and actual serving amount of the school meals.

Table 1
Dietary fiber contents in cooked rice

Table 5
Dietary fiber contents in special dishes

The content range of total dietary fibers for the cooked rice, entrée & side dish, soup, and kimchi per serving size were 0.6-5.5 g (average 3.1 g), 0.0-12.7 g (average 3.3 g), 2.8-15.2 g (average 8.5 g), 0.3-6.7 g (average 1.2 g), respectively, and in the special dishes 1.1-24.1 g (average 7.6 g). The content range of insoluble dietary fiber in cooked rice, entrees & side dishes, soup and kimchi per serving size were 0.6-5.0 g (average 2.8 g), 0.2-12.7 g (average 3.2 g), 2.3-14.3 g (average 8.0 g), 0.2-5.6 g (average 1.0 g), respectively, and in the special dishes 0.8-21.0 g (average 6.2 g). Further, the content range of soluble dietary fiber in cooked rice, entrees & side dishes, soup, and kimchi per serving size were 0.0-0.7 g (average 0.3 g), 0.0-0.8 g (average 0.2 g), 0.0-1.1 g (average 0.5 g), 0.0-1.1 g (average 0.2 g), respectively, and in special the dishes provided 0.0-5.2 g (average 1.4 g).

In Table 6, the regular meal, per serving size, provided the total fiber of approximately, 16.0 g, while meal with the special dishes provided 17.2 g, including the soup and kimchi. In addition, the regular meal per serving size provided the soluble fiber of approximately 1.3 g, while meal with the special dishes provided 2.1 g. Considering of actual intake of soluble fiber, it might be expected that children could be provided total fiber of above 75% RDA, except the consumption of fruits, and the meal with the special dishes contains more fiber than the regular meal.

Table 6
Dietary fiber contents in school meal

The soup and the special dishes were the important for providing sufficient dietary fiber in the school meals. The high-fiber containing items with above 10 g per serving size were only a few in the menu category of entrées & side dishes and not found in the cooked rice. In contrast, there were a total of seven items in the soup category. For example, soup containing beef & bone, mandu, seamustard, seasoned red pepper, and hot soup with shell clam, dried small shrimps & mallow, soft tofu. Moreover when providing the special dishes, the cooked rice with radish leaf kimchi and noodles with black bean paste were the highest items. Fig. 2 shows the list of 15 high-fiber containing menu in the school meals.

Fig. 2
The list of high-fiber containing menu in the school meals

Discussion

These data suggest that the school meals, per serving size, would provide above 75% KDRI of total dietary fibers, through mainly the soups and the special dishes conclusively. In addition, it might be expected that children could consume more soluble fiber from the meal with special dishes rather than the regular meals.

Nowadays, it is well-known that a high fat, low carbohydrate diet might be one of the more important factors to cause metabolic imbalance that underlies for the problem of obesity, cardiovascular disease and several cancers. In western society, where fat consumption has been relatively higher than in the Asian countries, it is recommended that fat intake of less than 30% of total energy will lower the risk of such related diseases [7]. However, some researchers suggested that there is no evidence of increased risk with the increased fat intake through the national survey in about 13,000 persons [8-9].

Traditionally for Koreans, most energy comes from carbohydrates, and fat has only contributed approximately 15%-20%. However, the food consumption pattern has been changed, gradually for over the past three decades. People tend to consume more animal foods and less plants, and the prevalence of obesity, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes mellitus, along with prostate cancer and breast cancer have increased during that time [10, 11]. In the same period, fat intake increased three times as much, according to the steady increase of animal food intake. According to KNHANES IV, in general, food intakes of Koreans showed to reach the peak in 2001-2005, and after which, mainly the intake of plant foods reduced, except potatoes and sweet products. However, animal foods such as meats, milk & milk products or eggs showed an increasing trend [11].

Therefore, interest in the source of dietary fiber has been growing dramatically. Thus, consumption of vegetables and fruits, as well as seaweeds has been on the rise for the average consumers. These foods are nutrient-rich sources, such as fiber, vitamins or minerals and/or phytochemicals. However, the consumption of seaweeds and vegetables, which are fiber-rich foods, has been reduced since 2001 for ten years. The range of dietary fiber intake were 6.4-7.2 g/d, which was approximately 30% of AI for KDRIs [10, 11].

In school, foods need to provide the children with sufficient overall nutritional dietary intake and to teach them about nutrition, as well as, social aspects of eating. Recently, children have been enjoying chips, burgers and other high-fat content dishes, such as cakes and soft drinks; with only a very select few opting for fruits and vegetables [12]. As a result, the nutritional quality of school meal has been blamed for having too much saturated fat and non-milk extrinsic sugar or salt, and not enough fruits and vegetables etc. [13, 14]. In school meal, the detrimental factor of total dietary fiber intake was the menu selection and the preference for entrees and side-dishes or special dishes. It is much needed to enhance both the interest in food, while improving the variety and the quality of food provided in schools, which will be an effort to reverse some of the deterioration in the dietary habits of school children. Ultimately, halt the increase in obesity and associated health problems [15, 16]. The range of carbohydrates consumed provides the body, not only with glucose to maintain blood levels for central and peripheral nervous system function, but also as a dietary fiber. It is also a food source for colon health [17-19].

The main dietary fiber definition, in current use, highlights the benefit to the physiological functionality. Dietary fiber consists of the plant cell wall-associated fibers, naturally occurring in fruits, vegetables, and cereal products, in addition to the isolated fibers that are added to processed foods [7]. Dietary fiber has been frequently classified as soluble and insoluble. The distinction is due to the chemical properties of fiber sources and analytical quantification; it does not necessarily reflect the physiological effects [20, 21]. The fiber definition also includes lignin and other associated compounds that are intrinsic and intact in the plant cell wall. Insoluble fiber reaches the colon, largely unchanged, and is not fermented by bacteria. The water-holding characteristics of the insoluble fiber meant that together, with the large bacterial mass, the total intra-colonic mass is greater and thereby, leads to an increased peristaltic action, which increases the speed of movement of the contents in the colon. This action reduces overall transit time through the gastrointestinal tract, and contributes to the overall laxation effect [22, 23]. In the large intestine, soluble fiber is acted upon by the bacterial flora. This process of fermentation releases a number of SCFA: propionic acid and acetic acid are metabolized in the liver, but butyric acid is used locally by the gut colonocytes, as an essential source of energy. The multiplication of the bacterial flora increases the bulk and the water content of the stools. Besides, diets that are rich in fiber encourages chewing, which both slows the process of eating and increases saliva flow, which contributes to the satiation and promoting dental health, as well. As dietary fiber travels through the small intestine, bile acid and divalent cations, such as calcium, zinc and iron, are bound to the surface of the fiber, which may reduce their availability for absorption [24-28].

Traditionally, fiber has been analyzed using the AOAC Official Method of Analysis 985.29, or with other AOAC methods. This method is a generally accepted method of analysis for the quantification of dietary fiber. However, there is no consensus of the definition regarding whether the non-digestible polymers with a degree of polymerization in the range of three to nine should be defined as fiber. In the EU definition, these are included, but the Codex definition leaves it up to the national authorities to decide about their inclusion. The European Union and the Codex Committee on Nutrition and Foods for Special Dietary Uses (CCNFSDU) and the Codex Executive Committee Definitions, as well as that of AACC International (formerly the American Association of Cereal Chemists), include isolated fibers and synthetic polymers, but with the condition that they possess beneficial physiological effects [21, 29-31].

Now, the discussion regarding dietary fiber is not an easy task. The chemical heterogeneity may often cause the confusion of as to the definition and the physiological function. Moreover, their physicochemical properties can change during cooking or digestion. Therefore, dietary fiber is continuously needed to develop the analytical methods and epidemiological research for the accurate analysis of specific fiber quantitatively and qualitatively [21].

Nevertheless, considering the above mentioned facts, these results might be used as a nutritional assessment for the dietary intakes of insoluble fiber, as well as, soluble fiber in children via school meal in the near future.

Tables

Table 2
Dietary fiber contents in entrees or side-dishes

Table 3
Dietary fiber in soup

Table 4
Dietary fiber contents in kimchi

Notes

This study was supported by 2009 Research Funds of Kyungnam University.

Acknowledgments

I thank to Mi-Jung Choi and Min-Jung Park for the assistant of experiment.

References

    1. National Institutes of Health. National Heart Lung and Blood Institute. National Institute of Health Publication Number 00-4084. Bethesda, MD. USA: 2000. Clinical Guideline on the Identification, Evaluation and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults-the Evidence Report.
    1. Shin D. The effect of seamustard on blood lipid profiles and glucose level of rats fed diet with different energy composition. Nutr Res Pract 2009;3:31–37.
    1. Martini FH, Ober WC, Garrison CW, Welch K, Hutchings RT. In: Fundamentals of Anatomy and Physiology. Applications Manual. 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall; 1995. pp. 410.
    1. Gordis L. In: Epidemiology. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2009. pp. 45-47.
    1. The Korean Nutrition Society. Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans. Seoul: The Korean Nutrition Society; 2010.
    1. Prosky L, Asp NG, Furda I, DeVries JW, Schweizer TF, Harland BF. Determination of total dietary fiber in foods and food products: collaborative study. J Assoc Off Anal Chem 1985;68:677–679.
    1. Food and Nutrition Board, Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids, Cholesterol, Protein, and Amino Acids. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2005.
    1. Byers TE, Mokdad AH. Dietary fat and the risk of cancers of the breast, prostate and colon in a 17 year prospective study [abstract]. FASEB J 1991;5:A563.
    1. Lewis CJ, Yetley EA. Health claims and observational human data: relation between dietary fat and cancer. Am J Clin Nutr 1999;69:1357S–1364S.
    1. Ministry of Health and Welfare. The third Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHNES III). Seoul: Ministry of Health and Welfare; 2006.
    1. Ministry of Health and Welfare. The fourth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHNES IV). Seoul: Ministry of Health and Welfare; 2008.
    1. Grimm ER, Steinle NI. Genetics of eating behavior: established and emerging concepts. Nutr Rev 2011;69:52–60.
    1. Zivkovic AM, German JB. Metabolomics for assessment of nutritional status. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2009;12:501–507.
    1. Grundy SM. The optimal ratio of fat-to-carbohydrate in the diet. Annu Rev Nutr 1999;19:325–341.
    1. Howarth NC, Saltzman E, Roberts SB. Dietary fiber and weight regulation. Nutr Rev 2001;59:129–139.
    1. Heck AM, Yanovski JA, Calis KA. Orlistat, a new lipase inhibitor for the management of obesity. Pharmacotherapy 2000;20:270–279.
    1. Cummings JH, Englyst HN, Wiggins HS. The role of carbohydrates in lower gut function. Nutr Rev 1986;44:50–54.
    1. Dotson CD, Zhang L, Xu H, Shin YK, Vigues S, Ott SH, Elson AE, Choi HJ, Shaw H, Egan JM, Mitchell BD, Li X, Steinle NI, Munger SD. Bitter taste receptors influence glucose homeostasis. PLoS One 2008;3:e3974.
    1. Arora T, Sharma R. Fermentation potential of the gut microbiome: implications for energy homeostasis and weight management. Nutr Rev 2011;69:99–106.
    1. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes: Proposed Definition of Dietary Fiber. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001.
    1. Raninen K, Lappi J, Mykkänen H, Poutanen K. Dietary fiber type reflects physiological functionality: comparison of grain fiber, inulin, and polydextrose. Nutr Rev 2011;69:9–21.
    1. Artiss JD, Brogan K, Brucal M, Moghaddam M, Jen KL. The effects of a new soluble dietary fiber on weight gain and selected blood parameters in rats. Metabolism 2006;55:195–202.
    1. Gemen R, de Vries JF, Slavin JL. Relationship between molecular structure of cereal dietary fiber and health effects: focus on glucose/insulin response and gut health. Nutr Rev 2011;69:22–33.
    1. Jo MW, Shin DS. Effects of dietary fat level and pectin on body weight, vitamin A storage and serum catecholamine profiles in growing rats. J Basic Sci 2006;23:77–87.
    1. Kim IW, Shin DS. Effects of the diet with apple peel powder on fat accumulation and serum lipid profile in growing Sprague-Dawley rats. J Basic Sci 2002;16:75–88.
    1. Bligh EG, Dyer WJ. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can J Biochem Physiol 1959;37:911–917.
    1. Lim BO, Yamada K, Nonaka M, Kuramoto Y, Hung P, Sugano M. Dietary fibers modulate indices of intestinal immune function in rats. J Nutr 1997;127:663–667.
    1. Pittler MH, Ernst E. Dietary supplements for body-weight reduction: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr 2004;79:529–536.
    1. European Union. Commission directive 2008/100/EC. Off J Eur Union 2008;L285:9–12.
      Available from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu.
    1. FAO/WHO. Codex Alimentarius Commission. ALINORM 09/32/26. 2009. Report of the 30th Session of the Codex Committee on Nutrition and Foods for Special Dietary Uses.
    1. American Association of Cereal Chemists. The definition of dietary fiber. Report of the dietary fiber definition committee to the board of directors of the American Association of Cereal Chemists. Cereal Foods World 2001;46:112–126.

Metrics
Share
Figures

1 / 2

Tables

1 / 6

PERMALINK