Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access March 21, 2016

Idealizations of Uncertainty, and Lessons from Artificial Intelligence

  • Robert Elliott Smith EMAIL logo
From the journal Economics

Abstract

At a time when economics is giving intense scrutiny to the likely impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on the global economy, this paper suggests the two disciplines face a common problem when it comes to uncertainty. It is argued that, despite the enormous achievements of AI systems, it would be a serious mistake to suppose that such systems, unaided by human intervention, are as yet any nearer to providing robust solutions to the problems posed by Keynesian uncertainty. Under the radically uncertain conditions, human decision-making (for all its problems) has proved relatively robust, while decision making relying solely on deterministic rules or probabilistic models is bound to be brittle. AI remains dependent on techniques that are seldom seen in human decision-making, including assumptions of fully enumerable spaces of future possibilities, which are rigorously computed over, and extensively searched. Discussion of alternative models of human decision making under uncertainty follows, suggesting a future research agenda in this area of common interest to AI and economics.

JEL Classification: B59

References

Bayes, T., and Price, R. (1763). An Essay towards Solving a Problem in the Doctrine of Chances. By the Late Rev. Mr. Bayes, F. R. S. Communicated by Mr. Price, in a Letter to John Canton, A. M. F. R. S. Philosophical Transactions (1683-1775), 53: 370–418. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/105741.Search in Google Scholar

Beinhocker, E. (2007). The origin of wealth: The radical remaking of economics and what it means for business and society. Harvard Business Review Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bentley, R., O’Brien, M., and Ormerod, P. (2011). Quality versus mere popularity: A conceptual map for understanding human behavior. Mind and Society: Cognitive Studies in Economics and Social Sciences, 10(2): 181–191. URL http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:minsoc:v:10:y:2011:i:2:p:181-191.Search in Google Scholar

Box, G. E. P., and Draper, N. R. (1986). Empirical model-building and response surface. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Buchanan, B. G. (1984). Rule-based expert systems: The MYCIN experiments of the Stanford Heuristic Programming Project. Addison-Wesley.Search in Google Scholar

Campbell, M., Hoane, A. J., Jr., and Hsu, F.-H. (2002). Deep Blue. Artif. Intell., 134(1–2): 57–83. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0004-3702(01)00129-1.10.1016/S0004-3702(01)00129-1Search in Google Scholar

Carhart-Harris, R. L., and Friston, K. J. (2010). The default-mode, ego-functions and free-energy: A neurobiological account of Freudian ideas. Brain, 133: 1265–1283.Search in Google Scholar

Cecere, G. (2015). The economics of innovation: A review article. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(2): 185–197. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10961-013-9319-6.10.1007/s10961-013-9319-6Search in Google Scholar

Chickering, D. M. (1996). Learning Bayesian networks is NP-complete. In D. Fisher., and H-J.Lenz (Eds.), Learning from Data: AI and Statistics. Springer- Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Clancey, W. L. (1997). Situated cognition: On human knowledge and computer representations. Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Conte, A., and Hey, J. (2013). Assessing multiple prior models of behaviour under ambiguity. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 46(2): 113–132. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11166-013-9164-x.10.1007/s11166-013-9164-xSearch in Google Scholar

Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Doya, K., Ishii, S., Pouget, A., and Rao, R. P. N. (2007). Bayesian brain: Probabilistic approaches to neural coding. Computational neuroscience. Cambridge, Mass. MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ferrucci, D. A., Brown, E. W., Chu-Carroll, J., Fan, J., Gondek, D., Kalyanpur, A., Lally, A., Murdock, J. W., Nyberg, E., Prager, J. M., Schlaefer, N., and Welty, C. A. (2010). Building Watson: An overview of the DeepQA project. AI Magazine, 31(3): 59–79. URL http://www.aaai.org/ojs/index.php/aimagazine/article/view/2303.Search in Google Scholar

Feynman, R. P. (2000). Lecture notes on computation. Westview Press.Search in Google Scholar

Frey, C. B., and Osborne, M. (2016a). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Discussion paper, Oxford Martin School.10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019Search in Google Scholar

Frey, C. B., and Osborne, M. (2016b). Technology at Work v2.0: The future is not what it used to be. Discussion paper, CITI GPSwReports.Search in Google Scholar

Friedman, D. (1998). Evolutionary economics goes mainstream: A review of the theory of learning in games. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 8(4): 423–432. ISSN 0936-9937. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s001910050071.10.1007/s001910050071Search in Google Scholar

Friston, K. (2010). The free-energy principle: A unified brain theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(2): 127–138. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrn2787. Future of Life Institute (2015). An Open Letter on AI. URL http://futureoflife.org/misc/open_letter.Search in Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, G., and Brighton, H. (2009). Homo Heuristicus: Why biased minds make better inferences. Cognitive Science, 1: 107–143.Search in Google Scholar

Gleick, J. (2011). The information: A history, a theory, a flood. Pantheon.Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, D. E. (2002). The design of innovation: Lessons from and for competent genetic algorithms. Norwell, MA, USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978-1-4757-3643-4Search in Google Scholar

Hastie, T., R. Tibshirani, R., and Friedman, J. (2009). The elements of statistical learning: Data mining, inference and prediction. Springer, 2 edition. URL http://www-stat.stanford.edu/~tibs/ElemStatLearn/.10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7Search in Google Scholar

Hayden, B. Y., and Platt, M. L. (2009). The mean, the median, and the St. Petersburg paradox. Judgment and Decision Making, 4(4): 256–272. URL http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:jdm:journl:v:4:y:2009:i:4:p:256-272.Search in Google Scholar

Hopkins, J. (2012). Psychoanalysis representation and neuroscience: The Freudian unconscious and the Bayesian brain. In A. Fotopoulu, D. Pfaff, and M. Conway (Eds.), From the couch to the Lab: Psychoanalysis, neuroscience and cognitive psychology in dialoge. OUP.Search in Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Search in Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2): 263–291. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/1914185.Search in Google Scholar

Kauffman, S. A. (2000). Investigations. Oxford University Press Oxford, New York.Search in Google Scholar

Keynes, J. M. (1936). The general theory of employment, interest and money. Macmillan. 14th edition, 1973.Search in Google Scholar

Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Co. URL http://www.econlib.org/library/Knight/knRUP.html.Search in Google Scholar

Koestler, A. (1963). The act of creation. Hutchinson.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Lane, D. A., and Maxfield, R. (2005). Ontological uncertainty and innovation. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 15(1): 3–50. DOI 10.1007/s00191-004-0227-7. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00191-004-0227-7.10.1007/s00191-004-0227-7Search in Google Scholar

McCarthy, J. (1974). Professor Sir James Lighthill, FRS. Artificial intelligence: A general survey. Artif. Intell., 5(3): 317–322. URL http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/journals/ai/ai5.html#McCarthy74.Search in Google Scholar

McDermott, D. (1976). Artificial intelligence meets natural stupidity. SIGART Newsletter, 57.10.1145/1045339.1045340Search in Google Scholar

Minsky, M. L., and Papert, S. (1988). Perceptrons: An introduction to computational geometry. Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press, expanded ed. edition.Search in Google Scholar

Mirowski, P. (2002). Machine dreams: Economics becomes a cyborg science. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521775267. URL https://books.google.it/books?id=GkrYxL0QtpcC.Search in Google Scholar

Mitchell, T. M. (1997). Machine Learning. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1 edition.Search in Google Scholar

Newell, A., and Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Search in Google Scholar

Oaksford, M., and Chater, N. (2009). Precis of Bayesian rationality: The probabilistic approach to human reasoning. Behavioral And Brain Sciences, 32: 69–120.Search in Google Scholar

Oxford Dictionaries Online (2015). Definition of “Heuristic”. URL http://www. oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/heuristic.Search in Google Scholar

Pearl, J. (1988). Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. San Francisco, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. ISBN 0-934613-73-7.Search in Google Scholar

Rosenblatt, F. (1957). The Perceptron – A perceiving and recognizing automaton. Discussion paper 85-460-1, Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory.Search in Google Scholar

Savage, L. J. (1954). The foundations of statistics. New York: Whiley.Search in Google Scholar

Schwab, K. (2016). The fourth industrial revolution: What it means, how to respond. URL http://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-what-it-means-and-how-to-respond.Search in Google Scholar

Shannon, C. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27: 379–423, 623–656.10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb00917.xSearch in Google Scholar

Silver, D., Huang, A., Maddison, C. J., Guez, A., Sifre, L., van den Driessche, G., Schrittwieser, J., Antonoglou, I., Panneershelvam, V., Lanctot, M., Dieleman, S., Grewe, D., Nham, J., Kalchbrenner, N., Sutskever, I., Lillicrap, T., Leach, M., Kavukcuoglu, K., Graepel, T., and Hassabis, D. (2016). Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search. Nature, 529: 484–503. URL http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v529/n7587/full/nature16961.html.Search in Google Scholar

Simon, H. (1978). Rationality as process and as product of thought. American Economic Review, 68(2): 1–16. URL http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:68:y:1978:i:2:p:1-16.Search in Google Scholar

Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1): 99–118. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1884852.10.2307/1884852Search in Google Scholar

Smith, G. D., and Ebrahim, S. (2002). Data dredging, bias, or confounding. BMJ, 325(7378): 1437–1438.Search in Google Scholar

Tuckett, D. (2011). Minding the markets : An emotional finance view of financial instability. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York: Palgrave Macmillan. URL http://www.worldcat.org/search?qt=worldcat_org_all&q=0230299857.10.1057/9780230307827Search in Google Scholar

Tuckett, D., Smith, R. E., and Nyman, R. (2014). Tracking phantastic objects: A computer algorithmic investigation of narrative evolution in unstructured data sources. Social Networks, 38: 121–133. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2014.03.001.10.1016/j.socnet.2014.03.001Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-05-29
Accepted: 2016-03-14
Published Online: 2016-03-21
Published in Print: 2016-12-01

© 2016 Robert Elliott Smith, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 27.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2016-7/html
Scroll to top button