Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T14:02:46.531Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Business ethics, CSR, sustainability and the MBA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2015

Norman S Wright  and
Hadyn Bennett
Norman S Wright
Affiliation:
Woodbury School of Business, Utah Valley University, Orem, UT, USA
Hadyn Bennett
Affiliation:
Ulster Business School, University of Ulster, Antrim, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The issues of business ethics, corporate social responsibility and sustainability have come to attract increasing attention in management education in recent years, at least from the perspective of potential employers, accrediting bodies and business school alumni. This paper examines the extent of penetration of these three subjects in to global MBA curricula through an examination of course content and structure pertaining to the Financial Times Global MBA Rankings top 100, the Australian Financial Review BOSS top 17 ranked Australian MBAs, and the seven MBA programmes currently offered by universities in New Zealand. The findings reveal that: a variety of delivery modes are utilised; while the teaching of ethics has achieved considerable penetration, only about fifty percent of MBA programmes include it as a required subject (and even then it may only constitute part of a larger subject); and that the teaching of sustainability has achieved much lower penetration, with only six percent of MBA programmes examined incorporating the topic into their core curriculum. Implications for the design of MBA programmes and future research directions are then discussed within the context of a business environment in which increasing prominence is being given to these subject areasx.

Keywords

management educationsustainabilityethicscorporate social responsibility
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 17 , Issue 5: Educating for Sustainability and CSR: What is the role of business schools? , September 2011 , pp. 641 - 655
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alsop, R. J. (2006). Business ethics education in business schools: A commentary. Journal of Management Education, 30(1), 11–14.Google Scholar
AMBA–Durham Business School. (2010). The post downturn MBA: An agenda for change. AMBA/Durham Business School, UK. Accessed 04 29, 2010, from http://www.mbaworld.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=505&itemid=461Google Scholar
Australian Financial Review. (2009). BOSS MBA survey 2009. Accessed 04 27, 2010, from http://www.afrboss.com.au/mbaschool/Google Scholar
Bernreuter, R. G. (1933). Validity of personality inventory. Personality Journal, 11, 383–386.Google Scholar
Beyond Grey Pinstripes (2010). Aspen Institute Center for Business Education. Accessed 04 28, 2010, from http://www.aspencbe.org/documents/BeyondGreyPinstripesGoogle Scholar
Christensen, L. J., Peirce, E., Hatman, L. P., Hoffman, W. M., & Carrier, J. (2007). Ethics, CSR and sustainability in the Financial Times top 50 global business schools: Baseline data and future research directions. Journal of Business Ethics, 73, 347–368.Google Scholar
Connolly, M. (2003). The end of the MBA as we know it? Academy of Management Learning and Education, 2(4), 365–367.Google Scholar
Clayton, M. (2003). Speed-selecting a college. Christian Science Monitor. Accessed 04 23, 2011, from http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/1007/pi13s02-lehl.htmlGoogle Scholar
Financial Times. (2010). Global MBA rankings. Accessed 04 27, 2010, from http://rankings.ft.com/businessschoolrankings/global-mba-rankingsGoogle Scholar
Graduate Management Admission Council [GMAC]. (2008). Application trends survey. GMAC. Accessed 02 23, 2011, from http://www.gmac.com/NR/rdonlyres/9E0E543A-F26A-432E-94B0-1DE913CC7EC2/0/2008ATS_Asia_FTMBA.pdfGoogle Scholar
Graduate Management Admission Council. (2009). Application trends survey. GMAC. Accessed April 28, 2010, from http://www.GMAC.com/Google Scholar
Graduate Management Admission Council. (2010). Application trends survey. GMAC. Accessed 02 23, 2011, from http://www.gmac.com/gmac/ResearchandTrends/SurveyReports/ApplicationTrendsSurvey/default.htm/Google Scholar
Hoffman, M., & Moore, J. M. (1982). Results of a business ethics curriculum survey conducted by the center of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 1(1), 81–83.Google Scholar
MacDonald, E. (2011). Education proves nice little earner. Canberra Times. Accessed 02 23, 2011, from http://www.canberratimes.com.au/news/local/news/general/education-proves-nice-little-earner/2076174.aspxGoogle Scholar
Mintzberg, H. (2004). Managers not MBAs: A hard look at the soft practice of managing and management development. London: FT/Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J., & Fong, C. Y. (2002). The end of business schools? Less success than meets the eye. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 1(1), 78–85.Google Scholar
Poock, M. C., & Lefond, D. (2003). Characteristics of effective graduate school websites: implications for the recruitment of graduate students. College and University, 78(3), 15–19.Google Scholar
Schoenfeldt, L. F., McDonald, D., & Youngblood, S. A. (1991). The teaching of business ethics: A survey of AACSB member schools. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(3), 237–241.Google Scholar
Shore, B., & Briggs, W. (2007). Competitive analysis of MIS in the MBA core: Are trends putting pressure on the MIS course? Journal of Information Systems Education, 18(1), 63–68.Google Scholar
Thompson, R. (2008). Harvard Business School discusses future of the MBA. HBS Working Knowledge. Accessed 02 21, 2011, from http://hbswk.edu/item/6053.htmlGoogle Scholar
Vernon, P. E. (1934). The attitude of the subject in personality testing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 18, 165–177.Google Scholar