Examining the Use of Lecture Capture Technology: Implications for Teaching and Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2016.1.8Abstract
This study sought to provide a better understanding of how lecture capture technology is used by students and how its use is related to student satisfaction, attendance, and academic performance. Using a mixed method design with both quantitative and qualitative methods to collect data, instruments included a student questionnaire, interviews and focus groups, lecture capture usage statistics, and grades. Results showed that 63% of students were satisfied with lecture capture and 75% of students indicated that it had facilitated their learning. Students primarily used the recordings to learn what they had missed while in class (79%) or because they were absent (72%). 70% of students reported having watched at least 50% of the recorded material (27% watched all the material), and only 8% of students did not view any recordings. Student satisfaction had a significant positive relationship with the number of lectures viewed. In regards to attendance, the self-reported data from students indicated that 61% of students did not miss classes (none or just one class). Students with the greatest number of missed classes viewed the recordings more frequently. As for student achievement, 68% of students indicated that lecture capture helped them to achieve better grades. Students with lower course marks accessed the recordings more frequently than those with higher marks. Instructor perceptions were that lecture capture predominately helped average to below average students achieve slightly better marks, but had less of an impact on the grades for particularly low and high achieving students.
Cette étude avait pour but de fournir une meilleure compréhension de la manière dont la capture de cours en vidéo est utilisée par les étudiants et comment son utilisation est reliée à la satisfaction des étudiants, à leur assiduité et à leurs résultats académiques. Grâce à un concept de méthodes mixtes comprenant des méthodes quantitatives et qualitatives pour recueillir les données, les instruments incluaient un questionnaire à remplir par les étudiants, des entrevues et des groupes de discussion, des statistiques sur l’emploi de la capture de cours, ainsi que des notes. Les résultats ont indiqué que 63 % des étudiants étaient satisfaits de la capture de cours et 75 % d’entre eux ont pensé que cette méthode avait favorisé leur apprentissage. Les étudiants ont principalement utilisé les enregistrements pour apprendre ce qu’ils avaient manqué quand ils étaient en classe (79 %) ou parce qu’ils étaient absents (72 %). Soixante-dix pour cent des étudiants ont indiqué qu’ils avaient regardé au moins 50 % des enregistrements (27 % avaient regardé toutes les vidéos) et seulement 8 % des étudiants n’avaient regardé aucune vidéo. La satisfaction des étudiants a eu une incidence positive importante en fonction du nombre de vidéos visionnées. En ce qui concerne l’assiduité, les données auto-déclarées par les étudiants ont indiqué que 61 % des étudiants n’avaient pas manqué de classes (aucune absence ou seulement une absence). Les étudiants qui avaient le plus grand nombre d’absences avaient regardé les vidéos plus fréquemment. En ce qui concerne les résultats des étudiants, 68 % d’entre eux ont indiqué que la capture de cours les avait aidés à obtenir de meilleures notes. Les étudiants qui avaient obtenu les notes de cours les plus basses avaient regardé les vidéos plus fréquemment que ceux qui avaient obtenu des notes plus élevées. Les instructeurs ont déclaré que la capture de cours en vidéo avait surtout aidé les étudiants de niveau moyen ou inférieur à la moyenne à obtenir des notes un peu meilleures, mais qu’elle avait eu un effet moins important sur les notes des étudiants très peu performants ou sur celles des étudiants très performants.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Contribution Policy
The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning ("Journal") is the official journal of The Society for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education ("Society"). The Journal publishes research and commentary on the scholarship of teaching and learning.
To submit an article (the "Article"):
- You must be the author, or the authorized agent of the author(s) and copyright holder (if different from the author(s));
- the author(s) must have approved the work for publication;
- the author(s) must have agreed to submit the article to the Journal;
- the author(s) must accept full responsibility for the content of the Article;
- the Article must be the Author(s) original work and must not contain any libelous or unlawful statements or infringe on the rights or privacy of others or contain material or instructions that might cause harm or injury
- the Article must not have been previously published, is not pending review elsewhere, and will not be submitted for review elsewhere pending the completion of the editorial decision process at the Journal.
By submitting the Article, you represent and warrant that the above are true.
Each article submitted will undergo the Journal's editorial decision process. The Journal is not under any obligation to publish the Article. We will send you notices at the email address associated with your account.
Authors, whose work is accepted for publication in the Journal, retain all copyright in their work. Prior to publication, authors will grant the Journal written permission in perpetuity, on a non-exclusive basis, to publish their work in written, electronic, and any other formats and to make it available on academic databases, indexes, and directories. Authors may publish their works, which were initially published in the Journal, in other contexts, so long as any subsequent publications note the prior publication of the work in the Journal. Any subsequent publication of the article by the author will not affect the publishing of the work by the Journal.
An author contributing an article to the Journal may reference the work of other authors in an article. This may require the contributing author to obtain the consent of such other authors. It is the sole responsibility of the contributing author to obtain any consent necessary.
In order for an author’s work to be published in the Journal, the author must enter into a formal license agreement with the Journal.
Submitted articles cannot have been previously published, nor be forthcoming in an archival journal or book (print or electronic). Please note: "publication" in a working-paper series does not constitute prior publication. In addition, by submitting material to The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, the author is stipulating that the material is not currently under review at another journal (electronic or print) and that he or she will not submit the material to another journal (electronic or print) until the completion of the editorial decision process at The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. If you have concerns about the submission terms for The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, please contact the editors.