skip to main content
research-article
Open Access

Children teach a care-receiving robot to promote their learning: field experiments in a classroom for vocabulary learning

Published:28 July 2012Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

In contrast to conventional teaching agents (including robots) that were designed to play the role of human teachers or caregivers, we propose the opposite scenario in which robots receive instruction or care from children. We hypothesize that by using this care-receiving robot, we may construct a new educational framework whose goal is to promote children's spontaneous learning by teaching through their teaching the robot. In this paper, we describe the introduction of a care-receiving robot into a classroom at an English language school for Japanese children (3--6 years of age) and then conduct an experiment to evaluate if the care-receiving robot can promote their learning using English verbs. The results suggest that the idea of a care-receiving robot is feasible and that the robot can help children learn new English verbs efficiently. In addition, we report on investigations into several forms of teaching performed by children, which were revealed through observations of the children, parent interviews, and other useful knowledge. These can be used to improve the design of care-receiving robots for educational purposes.

References

  1. Aronson, E. (2000). The Jigsaw Classroom. Retrieved March 21, 2012, from http://www.jigsaw.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Biswas, G., Leelawong, K., Schwartz, D., Vye, N., & Vanderbilt, T. T. A. G. at. (2005). Learning by teaching: A new agent paradigm for educational software. Applied Artificial Intelligence: An International Journal, 19(3--4), 363--392Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Brophy, S., Biswas, G., Katzlberger, T., Bransford, J., & Schwartz, D. (1999). Teachable agents: Combining insights from learning theory and computer science. In Artificial Intelligence in Education (p. 21--28). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Han, J., Jo, M., Jones, V., & Jo, J. H. (2008). Comparative study on the educational use of home robots for children. Journal of Information Processing Systems, 4(4), 159--168Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Han, J., Jo, M., Park, S., & Kim, S. (2005). The educational use of home robots for children. In Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2005) (pp. 378--383, ). Nashville, TN, USA: IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Kanda, T., Hirano, T., Eaton, D., & Ishiguro, H. (2004). Interactive robots as social partners and peer tutors for children: a field trial. Human-Computer Interaction, 19(1--2), 61--84. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Kanda, T., Sato, R., Saiwaki, N., & Ishiguro, H. (2007). A two-month field trial in an elementary school for long-term human-robot interaction. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 23(5), 962--971 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Kim, E. S., Leyzberg, D., Tsui, K. M., & Scassellati, B. (2009). How people talk when teaching a robot. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI 2009) (pp. 23--30, ). La Jolla, CA, USA: ACM/IEEE. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Lee, J.-E. R., Nass, C., Brave, S. B., Morishima, Y., Nakajima, H., & Yamada, R. (2007). The case for caring colearners: The effects of a computer-mediated colearner agent on trust and learning. Journal of Communication, 57(2), 183--204Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Lee, S., Noh, H., Lee, J., Lee, K., Lee, G. G., Sagong, S., et al. (2011). On the effectiveness of robot-assisted language learning. ReCALL, 23(1), 25--58 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Movellan, J. R., Eckhardt, M., Virnes, M., & Rodriguez, A. (2009). Sociable robot improves toddler vocabulary skills. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI 2009) (pp. 307--308, ). La Jolla, CA, USA: ACM/IEEE. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Movellan, J. R., Tanaka, F., Fortenberry, B., & Aisaka, K. (2005). The RUBI/QRIO project: origins, principles, and first steps. In Proceedings of 4th IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning (ICDL 2005) (pp. 80--86, ). Osaka, Japan: IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. NEC. (2005). Childcare Robot PaPeRo. Retrieved March 21, 2012, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PaPeRo.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Okada, M., Sakamoto, S., & Suzuki, N. (2000). Muu: artificial creatures as an embodied interface. In SIGGRAPH 2000, the Emerging Technologies: Point of Departure (p. 91). New Orleans, LA, USA: ACM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Robins, B., Dautenhahn, K., Boekhorst, R. T., & Billard, A. (2005). Robotic assistants in therapy and education of children with autism: can a small humanoid robot help encourage social interaction skills? Universal Access in the Information Society, 4(2), 105--120 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Roscoe, R., & Chi, M. (2007). Understanding tutor learning: Knowledge-building and knowledge-telling in peer tutors' explanations and questions. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 534--574Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Ruvolo, P., Whitehill, J., Virnes, M., & Movellan, J. R. (2008). Building a more effective teaching robot using apprenticeship learning. In Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning (ICDL 2008) (pp. 209--214, ). Monterey, CA, USA: IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Sharkey, N. E. (2008). The ethical frontiers of robotics. Science, 322, 1800--1801Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Sony. (1999). AIBO. Retrieved March 21, 2012, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AIBO.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Suay, H. B., & Chernova, S. (2011). A comparison of two algorithms for robot learning from demonstration. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC 2011) (pp. 2495--2500, ). Anchorage, AK, USA: IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Tanaka, F., Cicourel, A., & Movellan, J. R. (2007). Socialization between toddlers and robots at an early childhood education center. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. (PNAS), 104(46), 17954--17958Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Tanaka, F., Fortenberry, B., Aisaka, K., & Movellan, J. R. (2005). Developing dance interaction between QRIO and toddlers in a classroom environment: plans for the first steps. In Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2005) (pp. 223--228, ). Nashville, TN, USA: IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Tanaka, F., & Kimura, T. (2009). The use of robots in early education: a scenario based on ethical consideration. In Proceedings of the 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2009) (pp. 558--560, ). Toyama, Japan: IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Tanaka, F., & Kimura, T. (2010). Care-receiving robot as a tool of teachers in child education. Interaction Studies, 11(2), 263--268Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Tanaka, F., Movellan, J. R., Fortenberry, B., & Aisaka, K. (2006). Daily HRI evaluation at a classroom environment: reports from dance interaction experiments. In Proceedings of the 1st Annual Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI 2006) (pp. 3--9, ). Salt Lake City, UT, USA: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Thomaz, A. L., & Cakmak, M. (2009). Learning about objects with human teachers. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI 2009) (pp. 15--22, ). La Jolla, CA, USA: ACM/IEEE. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. You, Z.-J., Shen, C.-Y., Chang, C.-W., Liu, B.-J., & Chen, G.-D. (2006). A robot as a teaching assistant in an English class. In Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2006) (pp. 87--91). Kerkrade, The Netherlands: IEEE. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Yujin Robot. (2007). iRobiQ. Retrieved March 21, 2012, from http://www.irobibiz.com/english/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in

Full Access

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader