Conventional Realism and Political Inquiry Channeling Wittgenstein
by John G. Gunnell
University of Chicago Press, 2020
Cloth: 978-0-226-66127-8 | Electronic: 978-0-226-66130-8
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226661308.001.0001
ABOUT THIS BOOKAUTHOR BIOGRAPHYREVIEWSTABLE OF CONTENTS

ABOUT THIS BOOK

When social scientists and social theorists turn to the work of philosophers for intellectual and practical authority, they typically assume that truth, reality, and meaning are to be found outside rather than within our conventional discursive practices.

John G. Gunnell argues for conventional realism as a theory of social phenomena and an approach to the study of politics. Drawing on Wittgenstein’s critique of “mentalism” and traditional realism, Gunnell argues that everything we designate as “real” is rendered conventionally, which entails a rejection of the widely accepted distinction between what is natural and what is conventional. The terms “reality” and “world” have no meaning outside the contexts of specific claims and assumptions about what exists and how it behaves. And rather than a mysterious source and repository of prelinguistic meaning, the “mind” is simply our linguistic capacities. Taking readers through contemporary forms of mentalism and realism in both philosophy and American political science and theory, Gunnell also analyzes the philosophical challenges to these positions mounted by Wittgenstein and those who can be construed as his successors.
 

AUTHOR BIOGRAPHY

John G. Gunnell is distinguished professor emeritus at the University at Albany, SUNY. He is the author of Social Inquiry after Wittgenstein and Kuhn and Social Science and Political Theory, and his work has been collected in the edited volume, John G. Gunnell: History, Discourses, and Disciplines.
 

REVIEWS

"This book is...an exploration of the relationship between social science and philosophy, but, more specifically, ... focuses on the impact of representational philosophy on the discipline of political science as well as on social inquiry in general."
— Blog of the APA

"The reading of Wittgenstein’s writings is contentious, but close, detailed, and substantial."
— The Review of Politics

"This text will surely attract established and budding scholars of political science, political theory, and philosophy. . . . Highly recommended."
— Choice

“One of the most distinguished analysts of American political science provides a fresh, powerful, and coherent [book].”
— Perspectives on Politics

“Gunnell ultimately contributes to Wittgensteinian scholarship by reinforcing its significance to social sciences and will hopefully stimulate the emergence of new critical literature in the field of political studies.”
— Wittgenstein-Studien

"Gunnel ultimately contributes to Wittgensteinian scholarship by reinforcing its significance to social science and will hopefully stimulatethe emergence of new critical literature on the field of political studies."
— Buchbesprechungen

"Conventional Realism and Political Inquiry is a serious and important book. For those not up to speed with contemporary analytic philosophy, it provides generally excellent if necessarily abbreviated accounts (not summaries) and cogent critiques of major analytical thinkers. Gunnell forcefully advances an account of how philosophers and social scientists should think about their business."
— The Review of Metaphysics

TABLE OF CONTENTS


DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226661308.003.0001
[mentalism;orders of discourse;realism;theory of conventionality]
This chapter consists of an expanded overview of the general argument of the book and discusses the "orders of discourse" as an approach to analyzing the issues involved. The chapter is designed to guide the reader through the subsequent chapters. In order to make the discussion more concrete and inclusive, it includes a brief and selective account of forms of mentalism and realism in the history of American political science and political theory. Special attention is given to the concerns of political inquiry that led to a search for a foundation of epistemic authority that would support critical judgment. The chapter defends a theory of conventionality as an ontology of social phenomena and distinguishes conventional realism from linguistic idealism.
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...


DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226661308.003.0002
[concepts;concept-words;mind-first attitude;the political]
This chapter focuses on a distinct and pervasive instance of the problems associated with what the chapter designates as the "mind-first" attitude in both philosophy and political inquiry. It critically discusses the manner in which, in both philosophy and political inquiry, concepts have typically been conceived as mental objects, and, as part of the argument for conventional realism, it advances an alternative analysis of concepts as forms of linguistic usage. This chapter also examines the persistent but, what it claims is, the futile search for the theoretical universality of politics.
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...


DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226661308.003.0003
[International Relations;critical realism;philosophical realism;philosophy of science]
This chapter explores the problems that have characterized claims about realism in the study of politics. In order to focus the discussion, it analyzes a particular philosophical rendition that has been derived primarily from the philosophy of natural science and that has at various points surfaced in contemporary social science but recently has been advanced as a basis of theory in the study of international politics.
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...


DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226661308.003.0004
[Austin;language;mentalism;realism;Ryle;Wittgenstein]
This chapter explores the role of Ludwig Wittgenstein, Gilbert Ryle, and J.L. Austin in initiating a critique of mentalism and realism in representational philosophy and particularly its conception of mind and language and their relationship to the "world."
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...


DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226661308.003.0005
[Davidson;Dennett;McDowell;Putnam;Sellars]
This chapter discusses the contributions to, as well as some of the difficulties in, contemporary anti-representational philosophy. The focus is on the work of Wilfrid Sellars, Donald Davidson, Hilary Putnam, John McDowell, and Daniel Dennett. Although the work of these individuals has challenged some of the principal assumptions of representational philosophy, there have been problems in fully escaping its premises.
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...


DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226661308.003.0006
[presentation;representation;social inquiry;Tractatus;Wittgenstein]
This chapter defends a distinction between the concepts of presentation and representation, which is important both to an argument for conventional realism and for understanding the difference between natural and social inquiry. While social inquiry is basically a representational and interpretive activity, natural science is presentational, even though each shares a form of the other. When speaking of representation in this chapter, it should not be confused with as representational philosophy. The difference between representation and presentation is explored through an interpretation of Wittgenstein's Tractatus and by an analysis of the persistence of this distinction in his later work.
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...


DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226661308.003.0007
[conventions;conventional realism;Searle;Taylor;Wittgenstein]
This chapter is devoted to a fuller account of conventional realism and of what Wittgenstein said about conventions. It begins with a detailed analysis of how the philosophers and social theorists John Searle and Charles Taylor, who had been deeply involved in the defense of mentalism and realism, have recently acknowledged some of the problems with these positions and embraced some of the criticisms. They have, however, proceeded by trying to solve the problems attributed to mentalism and realism rather than rejecting the framework in which the problems have arisen.
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...


DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226661308.003.0008
[Diamond;Lukes;realism;relativism;Wittgenstein]
This chapter begins with a brief case study of the work of Steven Lukes as an example of the attempt of social and political theorists to deal with what they believe to be the problem of relativism. The principal content of the chapter, however, is a critical discussion of an argument by the philosopher Cora Diamond. Although she had once described and defended what she believed to be a "realistic spirit" in Wittgenstein's work, which she interpreted as going against the grain of traditional realism, she nevertheless later argued that it was possible to elicit from that work a philosophical realist basis for what she referred to as "criticizing from outside."
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...


DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226661308.003.0009
[Arendt;democracy;Kant;metaphysics;Nietzsche]
Rather than summarizing the previous chapters, the Conclusion discusses what might be the normative democratic implication of conventional realism and how it relates to what Hannah Arendt and others have spoken of as modern problem of "thinking without bannisters" after the passing of traditional metaphysics.
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...