Reckoning with Matter Calculating Machines, Innovation, and Thinking about Thinking from Pascal to Babbage
by Matthew L. Jones
University of Chicago Press, 2016
Cloth: 978-0-226-41146-0 | Electronic: 978-0-226-41163-7
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226411637.001.0001
ABOUT THIS BOOKAUTHOR BIOGRAPHYREVIEWSTABLE OF CONTENTS

ABOUT THIS BOOK

From Blaise Pascal in the 1600s to Charles Babbage in the first half of the nineteenth century, inventors struggled to create the first calculating machines. All failed—but that does not mean we cannot learn from the trail of ideas, correspondence, machines, and arguments they left behind.
 
In Reckoning with Matter, Matthew L. Jones draws on the remarkably extensive and well-preserved records of the quest to explore the concrete processes involved in imagining, elaborating, testing, and building calculating machines. He explores the writings of philosophers, engineers, and craftspeople, showing how they thought about technical novelty, their distinctive areas of expertise, and ways they could coordinate their efforts. In doing so, Jones argues that the conceptions of creativity and making they exhibited are often more incisive—and more honest—than those that dominate our current legal, political, and aesthetic culture.
 

AUTHOR BIOGRAPHY

Matthew L. Jones is the James R. Barker Professor of Contemporary Civilization in the Department of History at Columbia University and the author of The Good Life in the Scientific Revolution, also published by the University of Chicago Press.
 

REVIEWS

Reckoning with Matter provides a groundbreaking view into the archaeology of the thinking machine. Jones deftly takes us through the tricky materiality, tense negotiations, conceptual reconfigurations, and mechanical constraints faced by Pascal, Leibniz, the irascible Babbage, and many others in bringing their blueprints of calculating machines into reality. Before a machine could be made to do what every schoolchild now learns—how to carry a digit from one column of addition to another—the roles between philosophers, artisans, and mechanics had to be redefined, parts had to be standardized, and an entire cultural logic which prized emulation and gradual, collective improvement had to be replaced by the cult of the individual inventor. Going back over two and a half centuries before Turing, the meaning of thought, creativity, and the limits of the human were already at stake in the protracted efforts to build a machine that adds and subtracts. This fascinating journey through the material and mental workshops of a panoply of protocomputers and the politics of getting them built is much more than a formidable history of the early–modern roots of the digital age: it’s a boldly innovative, sophisticated, and eminently emulable example of how to make sense of the interwoven histories of science, labor, property, and technology.”
— John Tresch, University of Pennsylvania

Reckoning with Matter is a unique contribution to the history of calculating machines, their designers, the craftsmen who created them, and the interplay between the various groups. Jones not only details the inner workings of some of the machines but also provides a good look at some of the lesser–known creators such as Stanhope, Hahn, Müller, and others. With an extensive use of wonderful primary sources, Jones produces an insight that is rarely seen in the literature on calculating machines. Reckoning with Matter will fascinate.”
— Michael R. Williams, emeritus, University of Calgary

“Jones offers a sharp new argument about the sources of creativity in science and technology. This history of early-modern calculating engines—carefully gleaned from the cryptic notes of savants like Leibniz and the sketches of their artisanal collaborators—shows how novelty was discovered ‘in the making’ and not through the imposition of thought on matter. The descriptions are vivid and offer fascinating insights into the ways such machines did (and didn't!) work. In the process, the book tracks the fitful route by which ‘originality’ came to be the basis of intellectual property. Clever, detailed, and assembled with an originality all its own, Reckoning with Matter will certainly find an eager audience.”
— Ken Alder, Northwestern University

"Innovative in its approach and its form, Reckoning with Matter offers a thoughtful and beautifully written history of technology that offers an important perspective on a division between two poles of writing the history of technology. Readers will not only enjoy a compelling account of machine calculation through the nineteenth century, but will also find the story of a frog that tears out the eyes of a fish, a man who designed machines for making breakfast, and discussions of the significance of credit and intellectual property, modern programming, sketching, imitation, and debates over the nature of thinking. Highly recommended!"
— New Books Network

"Rather than being yet another history of calculating machines, this book rises much higher by its scholarly examination, explanation, and interpretation of that history from the perspectives of computational mathematics, philosophy, logic, mechanical engineering capabilities, artisan skills, intellectual property, and the creative process itself. Starting from the primary difficulty of carrying tens on a mechanical device, the author provides an invigorating journey through the inventive process of calculating machines from 1600 to 1830, while introducing readers to the creations—ideas, justification, machines, and failures—of Pascal, Morland, Leibniz, Hooke, Babbage, Clement, and Stanhope. In each case, the author carefully details why the proposed models or dreams could not be realized as physical models, especially as marketable tools. The last chapter weighs the significance of 18th-century calculating machines on mathematics, as well as the processes of thinking and creation. The excellent chapter notes, reference list, and index complement the book. In summary, this book is exceptional and succeeds at its proposed task; more so, it offers both an approach and standard that more historians of technology should emulate—critically interweaving theory, practice, and results. Essential."
— Choice

“Matthew Jones tells the surprisingly long story of how calculation came to be mechanized, and uses this meandering tale of try, try, try again to make a deep point about the history of technology….The duo “inventors and artisans” is key to Jones’s argument. As he demonstrates in fascinating detail, almost all of these machines, including Charles Babbage’s Difference and Analytical Engines, faltered when they came to realizing a paper design in metal, wood, ivory, and other materials. Only those inventors who worked closely with artisans—whose improvisations often altered the original designs in significant ways—came anywhere near to achieving success.... The moral of this part of Jones’s story is that matter matters—and so does skill, hand and mind working in tandem.”
— Lorraine Daston, Critical Inquiry

“Jones anchors his inquiry firmly in the material world by retelling the story of the failed efforts to create calculating machines from Blaise Pascal in the 1640s to Charles Babbage in the early nineteenth century. Yet, as Jones’ account brings to bear, the laborious and generally unsuccessful instantiation of these designs were possibly more revealing in themselves than had they succeeded. Jones sets out to challenge our deepest assumptions about the creative process otherwise too often held to oscillate between ‘the collective, deterministic account of inventive activity and the individualistic, heroic, creative account’. Instead, he offers an account which cuts through these bifurcations and seeks to relocate technological design and production in its social, cultural and political context…. [U]ndeniably a most useful contribution to the field.”
— Global Intellectual History

“[A] deep, far-reaching, and thoroughly enjoyable journey through the varied and colorful landscapes of early modem Europe. He introduces us to sites, niches, and nooks in which artisans, philosophers, noblemen, monarchs, agents, bishops, and lawyers lived, worked, studied, governed, traded, negotiated, complained, corresponded, and argued with each other. . . . His material and analyses are so rich and original that one is tempted to give the field that his book circumscribes its own name. . . . Matt Jones’s erudition and trustworthiness, and his unusual ability to communicate with his readers and guide them through very demanding material, through both very close and very varied readings, as well as through bold claims, are always a pleasure and gratifying to be part of. He is a role model for all historians in these regards.”
— Journal of Modern History

"A fine study."
— Isis

TABLE OF CONTENTS

- Matthew L. Jones
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226411637.003.0001
[calculating machines;seventeenth century;eighteenth century;nineteenth century;Blaise Pascal;Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz;Charles Babbage;artisanal knowlwedge;tacit knowledge;intellectual property]
Understanding early modern calculating machines, the introduction explains, demands combining histories of labor, of mechanical contrivances, of intellectual history, and of philosophical reflection on thinking itself. Through the optic of technical artifacts, this books peers into diverse forms of technical life—social arrangements of practitioners, legal conceptions of the ownership of work and of ideas, and philosophical conceptions of knowledge and of skill. (pages 1 - 12)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

- Matthew L. Jones
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226411637.003.0002
[calculating machines;seventeenth century;Blaise Pascal;Samuel Morland;artisanal knowledge;labor history;tacit knowledge;thinking matter]
Focusing upon the calculating machines of Blaise Pascal and Sir Samuel Morland from the seventeenth century, this chapter studies the skills necessary in calculation and those necessary for designing and building calculating machines. The chapter connects discussion of the major technical challenges involved in producing calculating machines with evidence about the nature of the contributions of the artisans involved in producing those machines. (pages 13 - 43)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...


DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226411637.003.0003
[calculating machines;seventeenth century;Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz;Robert Hooke;Ollivier;labor history;tacit knowledge;thinking matter]
This chapter investigates Leibniz’s relationship to skilled labor in the conception and creation of his calculating machines. It shows Robert Hooke and Leibniz working to organize and coordinate the skills and knowledge of others. These cases reveal no stable, strict hierarchy between inventor and artisan, creator and implementer, between intellectual and manual labor. Despite a lifetime of effort and a small fortune, Leibniz never produced a machine deemed functional; the challenge of making machine inflected his philosophical reflections on the value of practical knowledge.
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...


DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226411637.003.0004
[calculating machines;seventeenth century;Blaise Pascal;Samuel Morland;Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz;intellectual property;patents;innovation;government patronage]
Contributing to the history of intellectual property, this chapter studies the calculating machines of Pascal, Morland and Leibniz within early modern systems for protecting and encouraging manufactures and, indirectly, invention. Each of these inventors sought to make the most advanced, natural philosophical and artisanal knowledge of the day pay off in practical applications for state and market alike. The legal protections afforded “philosophical” machines were parasitic on legal devices tasked to support artisanal, not intellective, activities. The chapter documents how these makers obtained something like ownership in ideas before the development of intellectual property.
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...


DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226411637.003.0005
[calculating machines;eighteenth century;Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz;collective invention;technology transfer;industrial espionage;emulation;Phillip Matthäus Hahn;Johann Helfrich Müller;Phillipe Vayringe]
The history of calculating machines in the eighteenth century is a story of copying—and improving—mechanisms and processes, often known with only the sketchiest of detail. These machines emerged through the efforts of artisans, engineers, and natural philosophers struggling to provide tangible proof that they were technical experts who could produce import substitutions, naturalize foreign manufactures and become ornaments to their states capable of enhancing reputation and treasuries alike. Within the incentive systems and structures of the eighteenth century, ignorance about the failed productions of the “universal genius” Leibniz served to legitimize inventive activity. The category of “emulation” offered a vision of aesthetic and technical progress made possible by pursuing the right forms of imitation and eschewing servile copying. Emulation offered a rich account of knowledge production as the novel drawing together of existing knowledge and processes.
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...


DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226411637.003.0006
[calculating machines;eighteenth century;Charles Mahon, 3rd Earl Stanhope;artisanal knowledge;tacit knowledge;technology transfer;collective invention;emulation;Geneva]
Using a rich store of documents, this chapter tracks the creation of a series of calculating machines by the English nobleman Charles Stanhope. Stanhope’s materialized design practice emerged from late eighteenth-century ways of forming materials, of coordinating different practitioners, of representing forms and matter—all linked to political economies of innovation devised to encourage the dense intertwining of design and making. A close examination of the collective process of devising and creating these machines illuminates a distinctive late eighteenth-century moment in the coordination among practitioners and ways of designing and implementing. This chapter chronicles the abandonment of a vision of how philosophers and elite artisans might coordinate and collaborate better to make new things and improve older ones.
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...


DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226411637.003.0007
[calculating machines;eighteenth century;nineteenth century;Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz;Charles Babbage;Alan Turing;philosophy of mathematics;originality;genius;collective invention]
Philosophers in the eighteenth century did not see machines capable of arithmetic as threatening the distinctiveness of human reasoning. Despite famous claims by Hobbes and Leibniz, calculation was not generally thought to capture much of human reasoning and its creative potential. From the seventeenth to the nineteenth century, calculating machines provided grounds for reflecting upon the originality thought to be distinctive to human beings. Makers of calculating machines who opined on their philosophical significance saw themselves as contributing less toward an atheist materialism than toward a refined conception of human beings, the nature of the material world, and their distance from the creator.
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...