Skip to main content
Log in

The High Growth in New Metal-Based Manufacturing and Business Service Firms in Finland

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined the effects of the factors involved in the start-up situation and the first seven years' development on the subsequent high growth of firms. The criterion of success used in this study was high growth in business during the first seven years. The subjects were Finnish metal products manufacturing firms and business service firms established in 1990. The results indicated, firstly, that it is the internal networks of firms that bring about competitive advantage, innovations and efficiency. In these entrepreneurial team-driven firms a group of people participate in the strategic management of the firm. It was also found that co-operation between firms and changes in external personal networks contributed to a high rate of growth. The empirical results showed that new firms had equal chances for growth irrespective of their locality. On the other hand, growth was affected by changes in a new firm's competitive situation and by changes in strategic factors. The results also clearly indicated that high growth firms were characterised by rising productivity of labour at the same time as they were generating new jobs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almus, M. and E. A. Nerlinger, 1999, ‘Growth of New Technology-Based Firms: Which Factors Matter?' Small Business Economics 13, 141-154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, H. and J. Taylor, 1985, Regional Economics and Policy, Oxford: Philip Allen Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, J., T. Gray, J. Johnson, J. Proctor, M. Rafiquzzamon, and D. Sabourin, 1997, Failing Concerns: Business Bankruptcy in Canada, Ottawa: Ministry of Industry, Statistics Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birley, S., 1985, ‘The Role of Networks in the Entrepreneurial Process’, Journal of Business Venturing 1, 107-117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bygrave, W. D. and C. W. Hofer, 1991, ‘Theorizing About Entrepreneurship’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 16(2), 13-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cachon, J. C., 1990, A Longitudinal Investigation of Entrepreneurial Teams, Part One: Who is Involved and What Makes Them Succeed’, in N. C. Churchill, W. D. Bygrave, J. A. Hornaday, D. F. Muzyka, K. H. Vesper and W. E. Jr. Wetzel (eds.), Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Wellesley, MA: Center for Entrepreneurial Studies, Babson College, pp. 100-102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calton, J. M., 1993, ‘What is at Stake in the Stakeholder Model?’, in D. C. Ludwig (ed.), Business and Society in a Changing World Order, Lewiston: The Edwin Mellen Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carland, J. W., F. Boulton and J. A. Carland, 1984, ‘Differentiating Entrepreneurs for Small Business Owners: A Conceptualization’, Academy of Management Review 9(2), 354-359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A., 1993, Business and Society, Business Ethics, and Stakeholder Management, Dallas: South Western Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A., 1995, ‘Stakeholder Thinking in Three Models of Management Morality: A Perspective with Strategic Implications’, in J. Näsi (ed.), Understanding Stakeholder Thinking, Jyväskylä, Finland: LSR Publications, pp. 47-74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chrisman, J. J., A. Bauerschmidt, and C. W. Hofer, 1998, ‘The Determinants of New Venture Performance: An Extended Model’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 23(1), 5-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A. C. and W. C. Dunkelberg, 1987, ‘Entrepreneurial Research: Old Questions, New Answers and Methodological Issues’, American Journal of Small Business 11(3), 11-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A. C. and F. Gascon, 1992, ‘Entrepreneurs, Processes of Founding, and New-firm Performance’, in D. Sexton and J. Kasarda (eds.), The State of the Art of Entrepreneurship, Boston: PWS-Kent, pp. 301-340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A. C., F. J. Gimeno-Gascon and C. Y. Woo, 1994, ‘Initial Human and Financial Capital Predictors of New Venture Performance’, Journal of Business Venturing 9, 371-395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran, J., R. Jarvis, R. A. Blackburn and S. Black, 1993, ‘Networks and Small Firms: Constructs, Methodological Strategies and Some Findings’, International Small Business Journal 11(2), 13-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, T. K. and Bing-Sheng Teng 1997, ‘Time and Entrepreneurial Risk Behavior’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 22(2), 69-88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donckels, R. and E. Fröhlich, 1991, ‘Are Family Businesses Really Different? European Experiences from STRATOS’, Family Business Review 4(2), 149-160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubini, P. and H. Aldrich, 1991, ‘Personal and Extended Networks are Central to the Entrepreneurial Process’, Journal of Business Venturing 6, 305-313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ensley, M. D., J. W. Carland, J. C. Carland, J. M. Näsi, S. Näsi and M. Banks, 1998, ‘Entrepreneurial Teams in High Growth Ventures: A Cross-cultural Comparison’, International Journal of Entrepreneurship 2, 13-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ensley, M. D. and M. C. Banks, 1992, ‘Raising Questions About Entrepreneurial Teams’, in M. Schnake (ed.), The Proceedings of the 1992 Southern Management Association Meeting, 438-440.

  • Evans, D. S. and L. S. Leighton, 1990, ‘Small Business Formation by Unemployed and Employed Workers’, Small Business Economics 2(4), 319-330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E., 1984, Strategic Management-A Stakeholder Approach, Boston: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E., 1995, ‘Stakeholder Thinking: The State of the Art’, in J. Näsi (ed.), Stakeholder Thinking, Jyväskylä: LSR Publications, pp. 35-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, E., A. R. Reuber, M. Hababou, W. Johnson and S. Lee, 1997, ‘The Role of Socially Constructed Temporal Perspectives in the Emergence of Rapid-growth Firms’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 22(2) (Winter), 13-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, W. B., 1985, ‘A Conceptual Framework for Describing New Venture Formation’, Academy of Management Review 10(4), 696-706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibb, A. and L. Davies, 1990, ‘In Pursuit of Frameworks for the Development of Growth Models for the Small Business’, International Small Business Journal 9(1), 15-31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilad, B. and P. Levine, 1986, ‘A Behaviour Model of Entrepreneurial Supply’, Journal of Small Business Management 24(October), 45-51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaksen, A., 1996, ‘Towards Increased Regional Specialization? The Quantitative Importance of New Industrial Spaces in Norway, 1970-1990’, Norsk Geogarfisk Tidsskrift 50(1), 113-123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johannisson, B., 1990, ‘Building an Entrepreneurial Career in a Mixed Economy: Need for Social and Business Ties in Personal Networks’. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, 12-15 August.

  • Johannisson, B., 1985, ‘Management Technology for Entrepreneurship and Change’. Paper presented at the seminar 'Entrepreneur 85' at the Institute of Finnish Entrepreneurs, Dipoli Conference Center, Helsinki, Finland, November 11-12.

  • Johannisson, B., 1998, ‘Personal Networks in Emerging Knowledge-based Firms: Spatial and Functional Patterns’, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 10(4), 297-312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kettunen, P., 1985, Yrittäjäkirja, Suomen Yrittäjäin Keskusliitto ry.

  • Krueger, N. F., 1993, ‘The Impact of Prior Entrepreneurial Exposure on Perceptions of New Venture Feasibility and Desirability’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 18(1), 5-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, N. F. and D. V. Brazeal, 1994, ‘Entrepreneurial Potential and Potential Entrepreneur’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 18(3), 91-104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, N. F. and A. L. Carsrud, 1993, ‘Entrepreneurial Intentions: Applying the Theory of Planned Behaviour’, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 5, 315-330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lechler, T. and H. G. Gemuenden, 1999, Social Interaction: A Determinant of Entrepreneurial Team Venture Success, London, U.K.: European Council For Small Business, November 25-26. 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehti, M., 1990, The Formation of the Resource Allocation Strategy of the Firm and the Underlying Performance Related Mechanism.An Empirical Study of the Finnish Consumer Goods Trade, Helsinki: The Helsinki School of Economics and Business Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littunen, H., 2000, ‘Networks and Local Environmental Characteristics in the Survival of New Firms’, Small Business Economics 15, 59-71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littunen, H., 1992, The Success of Newly-established Firms: Implementation of the Study and Review of Start-up Situations, University of Jyväskylä, School of Business and Economics, Publications of Centre for Economic Research 124 (Finnish).

  • Littunen, H., 1991, Yritysten sijaintitekijät ja hyvä toimintaympäristö (Factors in the Location of Firms and a Good Environment), Publications of Centre for Economic Research 109 (Finnish).

  • Littunen, H., E. Storhammar and T. Nenonen, 1998, ‘The Survival of Firms Over the Critical First 3 Years and the Local Environment’, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 10(3), 189-202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, M. B. and I. C. MacMillan, 1988, ‘Entrepreneurship: Past Research and Future Challenges’, Journal of Management 14, 139-161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H., 1987, ‘The Strategy Concept I: Five ps for Strategy’, in G. Carrol and D. Vogel (eds.), Organizational Approaches to Strategy, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Ballinger Publishing Company, pp. 7-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mole, K., 2000, ‘Gambling for Growth or Setting for Survival: The Dilemma of the Small Business Adviser’, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 7(4), 305-314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, R., 1976, Creative Management of Firms, Lund, Sweden: Aldhus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Näsi, J., 1995, ‘What is Stakeholder Thinking? A Snapshot of a Social Theory of Firms’, in J. Näsi (ed.), Understanding Stakeholder Thinking, Jyväskylä: LSR Publications, pp. 19-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahkinen, E. and R. Lehtonen, 1989, Otanta-asetelmat ja tilastollinen analyysi (The Sampling Techniques and Statistical Analysis), Helsinki: Gaudeamus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pikkarainen, M., 1993, Aluetalouksien haasteet Suomessa 1990-luvulla (The Challenges of the Local Economies in Finland in the 1990s), Helsinki: Suomen Kuntaliitto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., 1980, Competitive Strategy, New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., 1985, Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, D., 1993, ‘Understanding the Entrepreneur: Entrepreneurial Attributes, Experience and Skills’, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 5, 345-357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, P. D., 1992, ‘Predicting New Firm Births: Interactions of Organizational and Human Populations’, in D. L. Sexton and J. D. Kasarda (eds.), The State of the Art of Entrepreneurship, PWS-Kent Publishing Company, pp. 268-297.

  • Reynolds, P. D., 1995, ‘Who Starts New Firms? Linear Additive versus Interaction Based Models’, in W. Bygrave, B. Bird, S. Birley, N. Churchill, M. Hay, R. Keeley and W. Wetzel (eds.), Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research 1995, Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Entrepreneruship Research Conference, Babson College, pp. 32-46.

  • Sandberg, W. R. and C. W. Hofer, 1987, ‘Improving New Venture Performance: The Role of Strategy, Industry Structure, and the Entrepreneur’, Journal of Business Venturing 2, 5-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapienza, H. J. and C. M. Grimm, 1997, ‘Founder Characteristics, Start-up Process, and Strategy/Structure Variables as Predictors of Shortline Railroad Performance’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 22(1), 5-24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapero, A. and L. Sokol, 1982, ‘The Social Dimensions of Entrepreneurship’, in C. Kent, L. Sexton and K. Vesper (eds.), Encylopedia of Entrepreneurship, Prentice-Hall, pp. 72-90.

  • Smallbone, D., R. Leigh and D. North, 1995, ‘The Characteristics and Strategies of High Growth SMEs’, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research 1(3), 44-62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smallbone, D., D. North and R. Leigh, 1993, ‘The Growth and Survival of Mature Manufacturing SMEs in the 1980s: An Urban-rural Comparison’, in J. Curran and D. Storey (eds.), Small Firms in Urban and Rural Areas, London and New York, pp. 79-131.

  • Spilling, O., 1996, ‘Regional Variation of New Firm Formations: The Norwegian Case’, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 8, 217-243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storey, D., 1982, Entrepreneurship and New Firm, London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storey, D., 1994, Understanding the Small Business Sector, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storey, D. and P. Wynarczyk, 1996, ‘The Survival and Non Survival of Micro Firms in the U.K.’, Review of Industrial Organization 11, 211-229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tervo, H. and H. Niittykangas, 1994, ‘Development in the Growth, Location and Turbulence of Business Services in Finland’, Papers in Regional Science 73(1), 73-95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmons, J. A., 1976, ‘Characteristics and Role Demands of Entrepreneurship’, American Journal of Small Business 3, 5-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vesper, K., 1992, ‘New-Venture Ideas: Do Not Overlook the Experience Factor’, in W. Sahlman and H. Stevenson (eds.), The Entrepreneurial Venture, Boston Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Publications, pp. 73-80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vesper, K., 1990, New Venture Strategies, Revised Edition, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vyakarnam, Shailendra, R.C. Jacobs and J. Handelberg, 1997, ‘Formation and Development of Entrepreneurial Teams in Rapid Growth Businesses’, Working Paper.

  • Zhao, L. and J. Aram, 1995, ‘Networking and Growth of Young Technology-intensive Ventures in China’, Journal of Business Venturing 10, 349-370.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Littunen, H., Tohmo, T. The High Growth in New Metal-Based Manufacturing and Business Service Firms in Finland. Small Business Economics 21, 187–200 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025014427294

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025014427294

Keywords

Navigation