Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen
The article elaborates the background thinking and path for Open Innovation 2.0 conceptual innovation model. It is based on virtual enterprises, Holonic enterprises and fractal enterprises theory, combined with MIT Living Lab concept developed by Bill Mitchell (Me++: the cyborg self and the networked city. MIT Press; 2003). Combining this with the internet/connectivity revolution the need to have faster pace and more successful innovation rate led to the thinking of the quadruple helix, including the citizens as active agents in the innovation process, not only as verificators as they were used to be in the previous triple helix thinking.
Based on the work of New Club of Paris (Lin and Edvinsson. National intellectual capital: a comparison of 40 countries. Springer; 2011) the structural intellectual capital (IC) is a key for national prosperity. Open innovation integrating the crowd into the innovation process seamlessly seems to increase the structural IC. Hence, integrating all these components: quadruple helix, non-linear innovation, fractal and dynamic organizations into innovation processes in real world with real market creation with the users who become co-creators seem to be the key for future success.
The new open innovation 2.0 paradigm seems to be serving the innovation needs very well in time—if we dare to take it on board.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Bergvall-Kåreborn B, Ståhlbröst A (2009) Living Lab: an open and citizen-centric approach for Innovation. Int J Innov Reg Dev 1(4):356–358 CrossRef
Chesbrough HW (2003) Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press, Boston, MA
Edquist C (2014) Striving towards a holistic innovation policy in European countries – but linearity still prevails! STI Policy Rev 5(2), Lund University, Lund. https://charlesedquist.files.wordpress.com/2014/11/step-2014-v5-no2_01.pdf
ENoLL – European Network of Living Labs (2015) http://www.openlivinglabs.eu/. Accessed 26 Aug 2015
Leitão Paulo JP (2004) An agile and adaptive holonic architecture for manufacturing control. PhD Thesis, University of Porto
Lin C, Edvinsson L (2011) National intellectual capital: a comparison of 40 countries. Springer, New York CrossRef
Lucassen I, Klievink AJ, Tavasszy LA (2014) A living lab framework: facilitating the adoption of innovations in international information infrastructures. In: Proceedings of transport research arena 2014, Paris, France, p 5
Mitchell WJ (2003) Me++: the cyborg self and the networked city. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Niitamo VP, Kulkki S, Eriksson M, Hribernik KA (2006) State-of-the-art and good practice in the field of living labs. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on concurrent enterprising: innovative products and services through collaborative networks (Italy: Milan), pp 26–28
Tharumarajah A, Wells AJ, Nemes L (1996) Comparison of emerging manufacturing concepts. CSIRO manufacturing science & technology, Preston, Victoria, Australia. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 9(3):217–226. www.fractal.org/Fractal-Research-and-Products/Fractalfactory.pdf
van der Walt JS, Buitendag AAK, Zaaiman JJ, van Vuuren JCJ (2009) Community living lab as a collaborative innovation environment. Issues Inform Sci Inf Technol 6:430
Von Hippel E (2005) Democratizing innovation. MIT Press, Boston
- Living Labs and Open Innovation in European Context
in-adhesives, MKVS, Neuer Inhalt/© Zühlke, Technisches Interface Design/© scyther5 | Getty Images | iStock