nach oben

Small Business Economics

Erschienen in:

27.01.2020

Local institutional heterogeneity & firm dynamism: Decomposing the metropolitan economic freedom index

verfasst von: Daniel L. Bennett

Erschienen in: Small Business Economics | Ausgabe 1/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

A nascent body of research suggests that economic freedom is positively associated with entrepreneurial activity. Most of this literature is based on cross-countries analyses, although there is significant regional heterogeneity in entrepreneurial activity and the institutional and policy context within countries. The literature also largely overlooks the potential for the entrepreneurial inducing effects of economic freedom to drive less efficient firms out of the market. Additionally, economic freedom is a multi-dimensional construct comprised of numerous underlying aspects of the institutional and policy environment, but most studies have employed a composite economic freedom measure to assess its impact on entrepreneurial activity. I contribute to these gaps in the literature by decomposing the recently developed Metropolitan Economic Freedom Index into its underlying institutional indicators to explore their potential impact on the firm entry and firm exit rates for a sample of nearly 300 US cities over the period 1972–2012.

Vorheriger Artikel High-growth aspiration entrepreneurship and exit: the contingent role of market-supporting institutions

Nächster Artikel Small firms and patenting revisited

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Appendix Table A3 reports the between and within standard deviations of the MEFI and its underlying area sub-indices and component variables. There exists significant variation in economic freedom both between and within MSAs.

Some of these studies used the Economic Freedom of the World Index (Gwartney et al. 2018) and others the Index of Economic Freedom (Heritage Foundation 2019).

There is mixed cross-country evidence, however, on the relationships between economic freedom and informal entrepreneurship (cf., Dau and Cuervo-Cazurra 2014; Saunoris and Sajny 2017) and necessity-motivated entrepreneurship (cf., Angulo-Guerrero et al. 2017; Nikolaev et al. 2018). My measures of entrepreneurship more closely reflect formal and opportunity-motivated entrepreneurship for which the evidence is more consistent, as described above.

One limitation of the current study is that that newly developed MEFI dataset, which provides wide local coverage over a long period of time, does not capture all of the components of economic freedom that may vary across regions and exert an influence on the entrepreneurial ecosystem. Notably absent from the MEFI are measures of legal and regulatory institutions (Braunerhjelm et al. 2015).

Cullen and Gordon (2007) argue that a reduction in personal tax rates can discourage entrepreneurial risk taking for risk-adverse individuals because it implies less risk-sharing with the government. They also suggest that the potential tax savings from going into business as a means to reclassify earnings from personal to corporate income is reduced when personal income tax rates fall.

As an example, the firm entry rate assigned to 1997 is the average annual number of firms created over the period 1997–2001 relative to the total number of firms in 1997. Note that the BDS data series ends in 2014, so the numerator for the measures mapped to 2012 represents the average values over the 3 years spanning 2012–2014.

I ran the Hausman (1978) specification test to determine whether a fixed effects (FE) or random effects (RE) estimator is more appropriate for each dynamism indicator using the most complete model (see model 4 and 8 in Table 2). Under the null hypothesis, both the FE and RE estimators are assumed consistent and the RE estimator is more efficient. The Wu-Hausman test statistic, which has a χ² distribution, is used to test the null hypothesis. If the null is rejected (i.e., p value ≤0.05), then the FE estimator is preferred because it is assumed consistent and the test suggests that the RE estimator is inconsistent (Wooldridge 2010). For all firm dynamism indicators, the p value of the test statistics is 0.000, suggesting that the null be rejected. I omit these results for space. The Hausman test, despite being widely used in applied research, has been criticized for its inability to account for higher-level processes (Bell and Jones 2015). I therefore report analogous results using the RE estimator in Appendix Table A9.

Acs, Z. J., & Mueller, P. (2007). Employment effects of business dynamics: mice, gazelles and elephants. Small Business Economics, 30(1), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-007-9052-3.CrossRef

Acs, Z. J., Stam, E., Audretsch, D. B., & O’Connor, A. (2017). The lineages of the entrepreneurial ecosystem approach. Small Business Economics, 49(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9864-8.CrossRef

Acs, Z. J., Estrin, S., Mickiewicz, T., & Szerb, L. (2018). Entrepreneurship, institutional economics, and economic growth: an ecosystem perspective. Small Business Economics, 51(2), 501–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0013-9.CrossRef

Angulo-Guerrero, M. J., Pérez-Moreno, S., & Abad-Guerrero, I. M. (2017). How economic freedom affects opportunity and necessity entrepreneurship in the OECD countries. Journal of Business Research, 73, 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.11.017.CrossRef

Armanios, D. E., Lanahan, L., & Yu, D. (2019). Varieties of local government experimentation: U.S. state-led technology-based economic development policies, 2000–2015. Academy of Management Discoveries, amd.2018.0014. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2018.0014.

Audretsch, D. B., & Belitski, M. (2017). Entrepreneurial ecosystems in cities: establishing the framework conditions. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(5), 1030–1051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9473-8.CrossRef

Baliamoune-Lutz, M., & Garello, P. (2014). Tax structure and entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 42(1), 165–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9469-9.CrossRef

Barnatchez, K., & Lester, R. (2017). The relationship between economic freedom and economic dynamism. Contemporary Economic Policy, 35, 358–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/coep.12194.CrossRef

Bartelsman, E., Haltiwanger, J., & Scarpetta, S. (2009). Measuring and analyzing cross-country differences in firm dynamics. In T. Dunne, J. B. Jensen, & M. J. Roberts (Eds.), Producer dynamics: new evidence from micro data (pp. 15–76). https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226172576.001.0001.CrossRef

Bartik, T. J. (1985). Business location decisions in the United States: estimates of the effects of unionization, taxes, and other characteristics of states. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 3(1), 14–22. https://doi.org/10.2307/1391685.CrossRef

Bartik, T. J. (1989). Small business start-ups in the United States: estimates of the effects of characteristics of states. Southern Economic Journal, 55, 1004–1018. https://doi.org/10.2307/1059479.CrossRef

Baumol, W. J. (1990). Entrepreneurship: productive, unproductive, and destructive. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 893–921.CrossRef

Belitski, M., Chowdhury, F., & Desai, S. (2016). Taxes, corruption, and entry. Small Business Economics, 47(1), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9724-y.CrossRef

Bell, A., & Jones, K. (2015). Explaining fixed effects: random effects modeling of time-series cross-sectional and panel data. Political Science Research and Methods, 3(1), 133–153. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2014.7.CrossRef

Bennett, D. L. (2019a). Infrastructure investments and entrepreneurial dynamism in the U.S. Journal of Business Venturing, 34(5), 28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.10.005.CrossRef

Bennett, D. L. (2019b). Local economic freedom and creative destruction in America. Small Business Economics forthcoming.

Bennett, D.L. (2019c). Local economic freedom and creative destruction in America. Mendeley data, v1. https://doi.org/10.17632/c3t7yc2syn.1.

Bennett, D. L., & Nikolaev, B. (2017). On the ambiguous economic freedom–inequality relationship. Empirical Economics, 53, 717–754. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-016-1131-3.CrossRef

Bennett, D. L., & Nikolaev, B. (2019). Economic freedom, public policy, and entrepreneurship. In J. Gwartney, R. Lawson, J. Hall, & R. Murphy (Eds.), Economic freedom of the world (2019th ed., pp. 199–224). Vancouver: Fraser Institute.

Bennett, D. L., Faria, H. J., Gwartney, J. D., & Morales, D. R. (2017). Economic institutions and comparative economic development: a post-colonial perspective. World Development, 96, 503–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.03.032.CrossRef

Bjørnskov, C., & Foss, N. J. (2008). Economic freedom and entrepreneurial activity: some cross-country evidence. Public Choice, 134, 307–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-007-9229-y.CrossRef

Bjørnskov, C., & Foss, N. J. (2012). How institutions of liberty promote entrepreneurship and growth. In Economic freedom of the world: 2012 annual report (pp. 247–270). Fraser Institute.

Bjornskov, C., & Foss, N. J. (2016). Institutions, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: what do we know and what do we still need to know? Academy of Management Perspectives, 30, 292–315. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2015.0135.CrossRef

Boudreaux, C. J., & Nikolaev, B. (2018). Capital is not enough: opportunity entrepreneurship and formal institutions. Small Business Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0068-7.

Bradley, S. W., & Klein, P. (2016). Institutions, economic freedom, and entrepreneurship: the contribution of management scholarship. Academy of Management Perspectives, 30, 211–221. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0137.CrossRef

Braunerhjelm, P., Desai, S., & Eklund, J. E. (2015). Regulation, firm dynamics and entrepreneurship. European Journal of Law and Economics, 40(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-015-9498-8.CrossRef

Brown, R., & Mason, C. (2017). Looking inside the spiky bits: a critical review and conceptualisation of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Small Business Economics, 49(1), 11–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9865-7.CrossRef

Bruce, D. J. (2000). Effects of the United States tax system on transitions into self-employment. Labour Economics, 7(5), 545–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-5371(00)00013-0.CrossRef

Bruce, D., & Deskins, J. (2012). Can state tax policies be used to promote entrepreneurial activity? Small Business Economics, 38(4), 375–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-010-9262-y.CrossRef

Bruns, K., Bosma, N., Sanders, M., & Schramm, M. (2017). Searching for the existence of entrepreneurial ecosystems: a regional cross-section growth regression approach. Small Business Economics, 49(1), 31–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9866-6.CrossRef

Bylund, P. L., & McCaffrey, M. (2017). A theory of entrepreneurship and institutional uncertainty. Journal of Business Venturing, 32, 461–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.05.006.CrossRef

Campbell, N., & Rogers, T. M. (2007). Economic freedom and net business formation. Cato Journal, 27(1), 23–36.

Campbell, N., Heriot, K. C., Jauregui, A., & Mitchell, D. T. (2012). Which state policies lead to U.S. firm exits? Analysis with the economic freedom index. Journal of Small Business Management, 50, 87–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2011.00345.x.CrossRef

Chen, J.-H., & Williams, M. (1999). The determinants of business failures in the US low-technology and high-technology industries. Applied Economics, 31(12), 1551–1563. https://doi.org/10.1080/000368499323076.CrossRef

Colombelli, A., Krafft, J., & Vivarelli, M. (2016). To be born is not enough: the key role of innovative start-ups. Small Business Economics, 47(2), 277–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9716-y.CrossRef

Coomes, P. A., Fernandez, J., & Gohmann, S. F. (2013). The rate of proprietorship among metropolitan areas: the impact of the local economic environment and capital resources. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 37(4), 745–770. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00511.x.CrossRef

Cullen, J. B., & Gordon, R. H. (2007). Taxes and entrepreneurial risk-taking: theory and evidence for the U.S. Journal of Public Economics, 91(7–8), 1479–1505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2006.12.001.CrossRef

Dau, L. A., & Cuervo-Cazurra, A. (2014). To formalize or not to formalize: entrepreneurship and pro-market institutions. Journal of Business Venturing, 29, 668–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.05.002.CrossRef

Davidson, P., Recker, J., & von Briel, F. (2018). External enablement of new venture creation: a Frameworkamp.2017.Pdf. Academy of Management Perspectives. Retrieved from https://journals.aom.org/doi/pdf/10.5465/amp.2017.0163

Davidsson, P. (1995). Culture, structure and regional levels of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 7(1), 41–62.CrossRef

Davidsson, P. (2015). Entrepreneurial opportunities and the entrepreneurship nexus: a re-conceptualization. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(5), 674–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2015.01.002.CrossRef

Davidsson, P., Recker, J., & Von Briel, F. (2018). Characteristics, roles and mechanisms of external enablers in new venture creation processes: a framework. Academy of Management Perspectives, forthcoming. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2017.0163.

Davis, S. J., & Haltiwanger, J. (1992). Gross job creation, gross job destruction, and employment reallocation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, 819–863 https://doi.org/10.2307/2118365.

Decker, R., Haltiwanger, J., Jarmin, R., & Miranda, J. (2014). The role of entrepreneurship in US job creation and economic dynamism. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28, 3–24.CrossRef

Decker, R., Haltiwanger, J., Jarmin, R., & Miranda, J. (2016a). Declining business dynamism: implications for productivity? (no. Hutchins center working paper #23). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

Decker, R., Haltiwanger, J., Jarmin, R., & Miranda, J. (2016b). Declining business dynamism: what we know and the way forward. American Economic Review, 106, 203–207. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20161050.CrossRef

Decker, R., Haltiwanger, J., Jarmin, R., & Miranda, J. (2018). Changes in business dynamism: volatility of vs. responsiveness to shocks? Retrieved from http://papers.nber.org/tmp/74821-w24236.pdf

Denis, D. J. (2004). Entrepreneurial finance: an overview of the issues and evidence. Journal of Corporate Finance, 10(2), 301–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1199(03)00059-2.CrossRef

Ehrenberg, R. G., & Smith, R. S. (2017). Modern labor economics: theory and public policy (13th ed.). Retrieved from https://doi-org.ezproxy.baylor.edu/10.4324/9781315101798

EIG. (2017). Dynamism in retreat: consequences for regions, markets, and workers. Washington, DC: Economic Innovation Group.

Faria, H. J., Montesinos-Yufa, H. M., Morales, D. R., & Navarro, C. E. (2016). Unbundling the roles of human capital and institutions in economic development. European Journal of Political Economy, 45, 108–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2016.08.001.CrossRef

Feldman, M. P. (2001). The entrepreneurial event revisited: firm formation in a regional context. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10, 861–891. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/10.4.861.CrossRef

Feldstein, M. (1996). The missing piece in policy analysis: social security reform. The American Economic Review, 86(2), 1–14.

Fotopoulos, G., & Storey, D. J. (2018). Public policies to enhance regional entrepreneurship: another programme failing to deliver? Small Business Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0021-9.

Fritsch, M., & Mueller, P. (2007). The effect of new business formation on regional development over time: the case of Germany. Small Business Economics, 30(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-007-9067-9.CrossRef

Fritsch, M., & Wyrwich, M. (2018). Regional knowledge, entrepreneurial culture, and innovative start-ups over time and space―an empirical investigation. Small Business Economics, 51(2), 337–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0016-6.CrossRef

Garrett, T. A., & Wall, H. J. (2006). Creating a policy environment for entrepreneurs. Cato Journal, 26(3), 525–552.

Gentry, W. M., & Hubbard, R. G. (2000). Tax policy and entrepreneurial entry. The American Economic Review, 90(2), 283–287.CrossRef

Gentry, W. M., & Hubbard, R. G. (2005). “Success taxes,” entrepreneurial entry, and innovation. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 5, 87–108. https://doi.org/10.1086/ipe.5.25056172.

Georgellis, Y., & Wall, H. J. (2006). Entrepreneurship and the policy environment. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 88(2), 95–111.

Gimeno, J., Folta, T. B., Cooper, A. C., & Woo, C. Y. (1997). Survival of the fittest? Entrepreneurial human capital and the persistence of underperforming firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(4), 750–783. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393656.CrossRef

Gohmann, S. F. (2012). Institutions, latent entrepreneurship, and self-employment: an international comparison. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(2), 295–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00406.x.CrossRef

Gohmann, S. F., Hobbs, B. K., & McCrickard, M. (2008). Economic freedom and service industry growth in the United States. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32, 855–874. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00259.x.CrossRef

Gruber, J. (1997). The consumption smoothing benefits of unemployment insurance. The American Economic Review, 87(1), 192–205.

Gwartney, J., & Lawson, R. (2003). The concept and measurement of economic freedom. European Journal of Political Economy, 19, 405–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-2680(03)00007-7.CrossRef

Gwartney, J., Lawson, R., Hall, J., & Murphy, R. (2018). Economic freedom of the world: 2018 annual report. Retrieved from http://www.deslibris.ca/ID/10097993

Hall, J. C., & Lawson, R. A. (2014). Economic freedom of the world: an accounting of the literature. Contemporary Economic Policy, 32, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/coep.12010.CrossRef

Haltiwanger, J. (2012). Job creation and firm dynamics in the United States. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 12, 17–38. https://doi.org/10.1086/663154.CrossRef

Haltiwanger, J., Jarmin, R. S., & Miranda, J. (2013). Who creates jobs? Small versus large versus young. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 92, 347.CrossRef

Hathaway, I., & Litan, R. E. (2014). Declining business dynamism in the United States: a look at states and metros. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46, 1251–1271. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913827.CrossRef

Henrekson, M. (2005). Entrepreneurship: a weak link in the welfare state? Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(3), 437–467. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dth060.CrossRef

Henrekson, M., & Johansson, D. (2010). Gazelles as job creators: a survey and interpretation of the evidence. Small Business Economics, 35(2), 227–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-009-9172-z.CrossRef

Heritage Foundation. (2019). 2019 Index of economic freedom. Retrieved from //www.heritage.org/index/book/chapter-2.

Holtz-Eakin, D., Joulfaian, D., & Rosen, H. S. (1994). Sticking it out: entrepreneurial survival and liquidity constraints. Journal of Political Economy, 102(1), 53–75.CrossRef

Johnson, P., & Parker, S. (1994). The interrelationships between births and deaths. Small Business Economics, 6, 283–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01108395.CrossRef

Kanniainen, V., & Vesala, T. (2005). Entrepreneurship and labor market institutions. Economic Modelling, 22(5), 828–847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2005.05.002.CrossRef

Kirzner, I. M. (1973). Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Kreft, S. F., & Sobel, R. S. (2005). Public policy, entrepreneurship, and economic freedom. Cato Journal, 25(3), 595–616.

Lewis, G. B., & Frank, S. A. (2002). Who wants to work for the government? Public Administration Review, 62(4), 395–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00193.CrossRef

Lindh, T., & Ohlsson, H. (1996). Self-employment and windfall gains: evidence from the Swedish lottery. The Economic Journal, 106(439), 1515–1526. https://doi.org/10.2307/2235198.CrossRef

Mason, C., & Brown, R. (2013). Creating good public policy to support high-growth firms. Small Business Economics, 40(2), 211–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-011-9369-9.CrossRef

McMullen, J. S., Bagby, D. R., & Palich, L. E. (2008). Economic freedom and the motivation to engage in entrepreneurial action. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32, 875–895. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00260.x.CrossRef

Murphy, R. H., & O’Reilly, C. (2018). Applying panel vector autoregression to institutions, human capital, and output. Empirical Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-018-1562-0.

Nikolaev, B., Boudreaux, C. J., & Palich, L. (2018). Cross-country determinants of early-stage necessity and opportunity-motivated entrepreneurship: accounting for model uncertainty. Journal of Small Business Management, 56(S1), 243–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12400.CrossRef

North, D. C. (1991). Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.5.1.97.CrossRef

Nyström, K. (2008). The institutions of economic freedom and entrepreneurship: evidence from panel data. Public Choice, 136, 269–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-008-9295-9.CrossRef

Park, S. H., Li, S., & Tse, D. K. (2006). Market liberalization and firm performance during China’s economic transition. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(1), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400178.CrossRef

Phan, P. H. (2006). Dynamism as a necessary property of entrepreneurial systems. Journal of Business Venturing, 21, 149–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.04.001.CrossRef

Robson, M. T., & Wren, C. (1999). Marginal and average tax rates and the incentive for self-employment. Southern Economic Journal, 65(4), 757. https://doi.org/10.2307/1061274.CrossRef

Rogers, W. (1994). Regression standard errors in clustered samples. Stata Technical Bulletin, 3.

Ruggles, S., Flood, S., Goeken, R., Grover, J., Meyer, E., Pacas, J., & Sobek, M. (2018). IPUMS USA: Version 8.0 [dataset]. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.18128/D010.V8.0

Saunoris, J. W., & Sajny, A. (2017). Entrepreneurship and economic freedom: cross-country evidence from formal and informal sectors. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 29(3–4), 292–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2016.1267806.CrossRef

Schäfer, D., Talavera, O., & Weir, C. (2011). Entrepreneurship, windfall gains and financial constraints: evidence from Germany. Economic Modelling, 28(5), 2174–2180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2011.05.010.CrossRef

Schramm, C.J. (2004). The Entrepreneurial Imperative: How America's Economic Miracle Will Reshape the World (and Change Your Life). New York: Harper Collins.

Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York: Harper.

Shane, S. (2009). Why encouraging more people to become entrepreneurs is bad public policy. Small Business Economics, 33, 141–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-009-9215-5.CrossRef

Sinn, H.-W. (1997). The selection principle and market failure in systems competition. Journal of Public Economics, 66(2), 247–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(97)00043-1.CrossRef

Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations (Edwin Cannan, Ed.). Library of economics and liberty.

Sobel, R. S. (2008). Testing Baumol: institutional quality and the productivity of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 23, 641–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.01.004.CrossRef

Sobel, R. S., Clark, J. R., & Lee, D. R. (2007). Freedom, barriers to entry, entrepreneurship, and economic progress. The Review of Austrian Economics, 20(4), 221–236.CrossRef

Stansel, D. (2019). Economic freedom in U.S. metropolitan areas. Journal of Regional Analysis & Policy, 49(1), 40–48.

Stansel, D., & Tuszynski, M. P. (2018). Sub-national economic freedom: a review and analysis of the literature. Journal of Regional Analysis & Policy, 48(1), 61–71.

Stenholm, P., Acs, Z. J., & Wuebker, R. (2013). Exploring country-level institutional arrangements on the rate and type of entrepreneurial activity. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(1), 176–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.11.002.CrossRef

Taylor, M. P. (2001). Self–employment and windfall gains in Britain: evidence from panel data. Economica, 68(272), 539–565. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0335.00261.CrossRef

Terjesen, S., Hessels, J., & Li, D. (2016). Comparative international entrepreneurship: a review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 42(1), 299–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313486259.CrossRef

Tran, H. T. (2018). Institutional quality and market selection in the transition to market economy. Journal of Business Venturing, forthcoming. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.07.001.

Von Mises, L. (1990). In B. B. Greaves (Ed.), Economic freedom and interventionism: an anthology of articles and essays. Irvington-on-Hudson: Foundation for Economic Education.

White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48, 817–838.CrossRef

Wood, M. S., Bylund, P., & Bradley, S. (2016). The influence of tax and regulatory policies on entrepreneurs’ opportunity evaluation decisions. Management Decision, 54(5), 1160–1182. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2015-0446.CrossRef

Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press.

Titel: Local institutional heterogeneity & firm dynamism: Decomposing the metropolitan economic freedom index
verfasst von: Daniel L. Bennett
Publikationsdatum: 27.01.2020
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Small Business Economics / Ausgabe 1/2021
Print ISSN: 0921-898X
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0913
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-020-00322-2

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2021

Business angel exits: a theory of planned behaviour perspective

Are large firms born or made? Evidence from developing countries

Management turnover, ownership change, and post-bankruptcy failure of small businesses

SME insolvency, bankruptcy, and survival: an examination of retrenchment strategies

Public SME grants and firm performance in European Union: A systematic review of empirical evidence

Operating leverage and profitability of SMEs: agri-food industry in Europe