Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Introduction Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2014 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

14. Low-Complexity Video Streaming for Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

verfasst von : Scott Pudlewski, Tommaso Melodia

Erschienen in: The Art of Wireless Sensor Networks

Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In recent years, there has been intense research and considerable progress in solving numerous wireless sensor networking challenges. However, the key problem of enabling real-time quality-aware multimedia transmission over wireless sensor networks is largely unexplored. The large amount of data generated by most multimedia applications (compared to traditional scalar sensor networks), along with the higher QoS requirements make it difficult to meet the low energy use requirements of practical sensor networks. We explore the use of compressed sensing (aka “compressive sampling”) to reduce the energy required to encode and transmit high quality video in a severely resource-constrained environment. In this chapter, we will examine some of the major challenges of wireless multimedia sensor network (WMSN) implementation. Specifically, we examine what it would take to develop a WMSN that has similar performance (and restrictions) as a traditional scalar wireless sensor network (WSN). We then examine how we can use the new paradigm of compressed sensing (CS) to solve many of these problems.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel A Communication Framework for Networked Autonomous Underwater Vehicles
Nächstes Kapitel Body Sensor Networks for Activity and Gesture Recognition
Fußnoten
1
For practical systems, \(C\) is a small constant between 5 and 10 [16].
 
2
The SSIM index [48] is preferred to the more widespread peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR), which has been recently shown to be inconsistent with human eye perception [48, 49].
 
Literatur
1.
I. Akyildiz, T. Melodia, K. Chowdhury, Wireless multimedia sensor networks: applications and testbeds. Proc. IEEE 96(10), 1588–1605 (2008)
2.
S. Pudlewski, T. Melodia, A distortion-minimizing rate controller for wireless multimedia sensor networks. Comput. Commun. (Elsevier) 33(12), 1380–1390 (2010)CrossRef
3.
I.F. Akyildiz, T. Melodia, K.R. Chowdhury, A survey on wireless multimedia sensor networks. Comput. Netw. (Elsevier) 51(4), 921–960 (2007)CrossRef
4.
S. Soro, W. Heinzelman, A survey of visual sensor networks. Adv. Multimedia 2009, Article ID 640386 (2009)
5.
A. Kansal, S. Nath, J. Liu, F. Zhao, SENSE-WEB: an infrastructure for shared sensing. IEEE MultiMedia 14(4), 8–13 (2007)CrossRef
6.
A.T. Campbell, N.D. Lane, E. Miluzzo, R. Peterson, H. Lu, X. Zheng, M. Musolesi, K. Fodor, S.B. Eisenman, G.S. Ahn, The rise of people-centric sensing. IEEE Internet Comput 12(4), 12–21 (2008)
7.
Advanced Video Coding for Generic Audiovisual Services. ITU-T Recommendation H.264 (2005)
8.
T. Wiegand, G.J. Sullivan, G. Bjntegaard, A. Luthra, Overview of the H.264/AVC video coding standard. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Video Technol. 13(7), 560–576 (2003)
9.
J. Ostermann, J. Bormans, P. List, D. Marpe, M. Narroschke, F. Pereira, T. Stockhammar, T. Wedi, Video coding with H.264/AVC: tools, performance, and complexity. IEEE Circ. Syst. Mag. 4(1), 7–28 (2004)CrossRef
10.
T.Wiegand, G.J. Sullivan, J. Reichel, H. Schwarz, M. Wien, Joint Draft 11 of SVC Amendment. Doc. JVT-X201 (2007)
11.
12.
J. Hagenauer, Rate-compatible punctured convolutional codes (RCPC codes) and their applications. IEEE Trans. Commun. 36(4), 389–400 (1988)CrossRef
13.
E.J. Candes, Compressive sampling. in Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians (Madrid, 2006)
14.
15.
E. Candes, J. Romberg, T. Tao, Robust uncertainty principles: exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 52(2), 489–509 (2006)CrossRefMATHMathSciNet
16.
E.J. Candes, J. Romberg, T. Tao, Stable signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate measurements. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 59(8), 1207–1223 (2006)CrossRefMATHMathSciNet
17.
E. Candes, T. Tao, Near-optimal signal recovery from random projections and universal encoding strategies? IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 52(12), 5406–5425 (2006)CrossRefMathSciNet
18.
K. Gao, S.N. Batalama, D.A. Pados, B.W. Suter, Compressed sensing using generalized polygon samplers. in Proceedings of Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (Pacific Grove, 2010), pp. 1–5
19.
K. Gao, S.N. Batalama, D.A. Pados, Compressive sampling with generalized polygons. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 59(10), 4759–4766 (2011)CrossRefMathSciNet
20.
M. Wakin, J. Laska, M. Duarte, D. Baron, S. Sarvotham, D. Takhar, K. Kelly, R. Baraniuk. An architecture for compressive imaging. in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) (2006), pp. 1273–1276
21.
D. Takhar, J. Laska, M. Wakin, M. Duarte, D. Baron, S. Sarvotham, K. Kelly, R. Baraniuk, A new compressive imaging camera architecture using optical-domain compression. in Proceedings of SPIE Conference on Computational Imaging IV (San Jose, 2006), pp. 43–52
22.
23.
Digital compression and coding of continuous-tone still images—requirements and guidelines. ITU-T Recommendation T.81 (1992)
24.
N. Ahmed, T. Natarajan, K.R. Rao, Discrete cosine transform. IEEE Trans. Comput. C-23(1), 90–93 (1974)
25.
D. Huffman, A method for the construction of minimum-redundancy codes. Proc. IRE 40(9), 1098–1101 (1952)CrossRef
26.
S. Pudlewski, T. Melodia, On the performance of compressive video streaming for wireless multimedia sensor networks. in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Communications(ICC) (Cape Town, 2010)
27.
K. Stuhlmuller, N. Farber, M. Link, B. Girod, Analysis of video transmission over lossy channels. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 18(6), 1012–1032 (2000)CrossRef
28.
29.
Specification of the bluetooth system—version 1.1b, specification volume 1 & 2. Bluetooth SIG (2001)
30.
Ieee std 802.11b-1999/cor 1–2001. (2001)
31.
32.
A. Graps, An introduction to wavelets. IEEE Comput. Sci. Eng. 2(2), 50–61 (1995)CrossRef
33.
A. Bruckstein, D. Donoho, M. Elad, From sparse solutions of systems of equations to sparse modeling of signals and images. SIAM Rev. 51(1), 34–81 (2007)CrossRefMathSciNet
34.
J. Romberg, Imaging via compressive sampling. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 25(2), 14–20 (2008)CrossRef
35.
S. Boyd, L. Vandenberghe, Convex Optimization (Cambridge University Press, New York, 2004)
36.
I.E. Nesterov, A. Nemirovskii, Interior-Point Polynomial Algorithms in Convex Programming (SIAM, Philadelphia, 1994)CrossRefMATH
37.
38.
M.A.T. Figueiredo, R.D. Nowak, S.J. Wright, Gradient projection for sparse reconstruction: application to compressed sensing and other inverse problems. IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process. 1(4), 586–598 (2007)CrossRef
39.
S. Pudlewski, T. Melodia, A. Prasanna, Compressed-sensing-enabled video streaming for wireless multimedia sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput. 99, 1 (2011)
40.
JPEG2000 Requirements and Profiles. ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG1 N1271 (1999)
41.
W. Sweldens, The lifting scheme: a new philosophy in biorthogonal wavelet constructions. in Proceedings of the SPIE Wavelet Applications in Signal and Image Processing III, Vol. 2569, ed. by A.F. Laine, M. Unser (1995), pp. 68–79
42.
L. Gan, T. Do, T.D. Tran, Fast compressive imaging using scrambled block hadamard ensemble. in Proceedings of European Signal Processing Conference (EUSICPO) (Lausanne, 2008)
43.
M. Duarte, M. Davenport, D. Takhar, J. Laska, T. Sun, K. Kelly, R. Baraniuk, Single-pixel imaging via compressive sampling. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 25(2), 83–91 (2008)CrossRef
44.
45.
46.
J. Sturm, Using SeDuMi 1.02, a MATLAB toolbox for optimization over symmetric cones. Optim. Methods Softw. 11, 625–653 (1999)CrossRefMathSciNet
47.
D.L. Donoho, Y. Tsaig, I. Drori, J.-L. Starck, Sparse solution of underdetermined linear equations by stagewise orthogonal matching pursuit (Stanford Technical report, 2006)
48.
Z. Wang, A. Bovik, H. Sheikh, E. Simoncelli, Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 13(4), 600–612 (2004)CrossRef
49.
S. Chikkerur, V. Sundaram, M. Reisslein, L.J. Karam, Objective video quality assessment methods: a classification, review, and performance comparison. IEEE Trans. Broadcast. 57(2), 165–182 (2011)CrossRef
50.
51.
S. Low, D. Lapsley, Optimization flow control I basic algorithm and convergence. IEEE ACM Trans. Netw. 7(6), 861–874 (1999)CrossRef
52.
R. Tibshirani, Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J. Roy. Stat. Soci. Ser. B (Methodol.) 58(1), 267–288 (1996)
53.
J. Tropp, Greed is good: algorithmic results for sparse approximation. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 50(10), 2231–2242 (2004)CrossRefMathSciNet
54.
M. Asif, J. Romberg, Dynamic updating for \(ell_{1}\) minimization. IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process. 4(2), 421–434 (2010)CrossRef
55.
56.
T. Do, Y. Chen, D. Nguyen, N. Nguyen, L. Gan, T. Tran, Distributed compressed video sensing. in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) (2009), pp. 1393–1396
57.
V. Stankovic, L. Stankovic, S. Cheng, Compressive video sampling. in Proceedings of the European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO) (Lausanne, 2008), pp. 2–6
58.
A. Wani, N. Rahnavard, Compressive sampling for energy efficient and loss resilient camera sensor networks. in Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Military Communication (MILCOM) (Baltimore, 2011)
59.
S. Pudlewski and T. Melodia, “A Rate-Energy-Distortion Analysis for Compressed-Sensing-Enabled Wireless Video Streaming on Multimedia Sensors”, in Proc. of IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), Houston, TX, December 2011
Metadaten
Titel
Low-Complexity Video Streaming for Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks
verfasst von
Scott Pudlewski
Tommaso Melodia
Copyright-Jahr
2014
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Buch
The Art of Wireless Sensor Networks

Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40065-0

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-642-40066-7

Copyright-Jahr: 2014

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40066-7_14

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise