Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Analysis of Surgeons’ Muscle Activity During the Use of a Handheld Robotic Instrument in Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Low-Fidelity Simulation Versus Live Human Arms for Intravenous Cannulation Training: A Qualitative Assessment

verfasst von : Gary L. Boykin Sr.

Erschienen in: Advances in Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In the military, as well as in civilian medical settings, the question of whether to use simulation versus live tissue remains in debate. The purpose of this paper is to examine qualitative data provided by students (n = 260) attending the Army’s Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) program who completed peripheral intravenous cannulation (PIVC) training using either a Simulated Human Arm (SHA) (n = 135) or a Live Human Arm (LHA) (n = 124). Students provided subjective responses in a written format pertaining to their PIVC training method. Data patterns were assessed using Spradley’s semantic relationship approach. Results reveal that both those using a SHA and a LHA reported feeling confident following training, however the reasons for their confidence differed. Those using a SHA felt confident due to the opportunity to repeatedly practice on a simulated arm, while those learning on a LHA felt assured knowing they had performed PIVC successfully on a live human during LPN training.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Methods to Characterize Operating Room Variables in Robotic Surgery to Enhance Patient Safety
Nächstes Kapitel Improving the User Experience of Medical Devices with Comparative Usability Testing
Literatur
1.
2.
Rotem, H.: The best and the worst: students’ experience of clinical education. Aust. J. Adv. Nurs. 11, 26–33 (1994)
3.
Jones, R., Simmons, A., Boykin, G., Stamper, D., Thompson, J.: Measuring intravenous cannulation skills of practical nursing students using rubber mannequin intravenous training arm. Mil. Med. 179(11), 1361–1367 (2014)CrossRef
4.
Gelenbe, E., Wu, F.: Large scale simulation for human evacuation and rescue. Comput. Math. Appl. 64(12), 3869–3880 (2012)CrossRef
5.
Seropian, M., Brown, K., Samuelson Gavilanes, J., Drigger, B.: Simulation: not just a manikin. J. Nurs. Educ. 43(4), 164–169 (2004)
6.
Armstrong, B., Crouch, R., Read, C., Palfrey, R.: Training nurses in trauma management. Emerg. Nurse 21(4), 14–18 (2013)CrossRef
7.
Good, M.: Patient simulation for training basic and advanced clinical skills. Med. Educ. 37, 14–21 (2003)
8.
Shane, M., Pettitt, B., Morgenthal, C., Smith, C.: Should surgical novices trade their retractors for joysticks? Videogame experience decreases the time needed to acquire surgical skills. Surg. Endosc. 22(5), 1294–1297 (2008)CrossRef
9.
Lateef, F.: Simulation-based learning: just like the real thing. J. Emerg. Trauma Shock 3(4), 348–352 (2010)CrossRef
10.
Motola, I., Devine, L., Chung, E., Sullivan, J., Issenberg, S.: Simulation in healthcare education: a best evidence practical guide. AMEE guide No 82. Med. Teach. 35(10), e1511–e1530 (2013)CrossRef
11.
Okuda, Y., Bryson, E., DeMaria, S., Jacobson, L., Shen, B., Levine, A., Quinones, J.: The utility of simulation in medical education: what is the evidence? Mt Sinai J. Med. 76(4), 330–343 (2009)CrossRef
12.
Partin, J., Payne, T., Slemmons, M.: Student’s perceptions of the learning experiences using high-fidelity simulation to teach concepts relative to obstetrics. Teach. Technol. 32(3), 186–188 (2011)
13.
Engum, S., Jeffries, P., Fisher, L.: Intravenous catheter training system: computer-based education versus traditional learning methods. Am. J. Surg. 186(1), 67–74 (2003)CrossRef
14.
Munshi, F., Hani, L., Alyousef, S.: Low-versus high fidelity simulation in teaching and assessing clinical skills. J. Taibah Univ. Med. Sci. 10(1), 12–15 (2015)
15.
Cannon-Bowers, J., Bowers, C., Stout, R., Ricci, K., Hildabrand, A.: Using cognitive task analysis to develop simulation-based training for medical tasks. Mil. Med. 178, 15–21 (2013)
16.
Sittner, B., Aebersold, M., Paige, J., Graham, L., Schram, A., Decker, S., Lioce, L.: INACSL standards of best practice for simulation: past, present and future. Nurs. Edu. Perspect. 36, 295–298 (2015)
17.
Loukas, C., Nikiteas, N., Kanakis, M., Georgiou, E.: Evaluating the effectiveness of virtual reality simulation in intravenous cannulation. J. Soc. Simul. Healthc. 6(4), 213–217 (2011)CrossRef
18.
Savage, E., Tenn, C., Vartanian, O., Blackler, K., Sullivan-Kwantes, W., Garrett, M., Blais, A., Jarmasz, J., Peg, H., Tein, H.: A comparison of live tissue training and high-fidelity patient simulator: a pilot study in battlefield trauma training. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 79(4), S157–S163 (2015)CrossRef
19.
de Giovanni, D., Roberts, T., Norman, G.: Relative effectiveness of high-versus low-fidelity simulation in learning heart sounds. Med. Educ. 43(7), 661–668 (2009)CrossRef
20.
21.
22.
Carr, P., Glynn, R., Dineen, B., Flaherty, G., Kropmans, T., Kerin, M.: Interns’ attitudes to IV cannulation: a KAP study. Br. J. Nurs. 20, 15–20 (2011)
23.
LeCompte, M.: Qualitative data. Theor. Pract. 39(3), 146–154 (2000)
Metadaten
Titel
Low-Fidelity Simulation Versus Live Human Arms for Intravenous Cannulation Training: A Qualitative Assessment
verfasst von
Gary L. Boykin Sr.
Copyright-Jahr
2017
Buch
Advances in Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41651-9

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-41652-6

Copyright-Jahr: 2017

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41652-6_22