Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Hydrogeology Journal 1/2004

01.02.2004 | Paper

Managing for sustainability in an arid climate: lessons learned from 20 years of groundwater management in Arizona, USA

verfasst von: Katharine L. Jacobs, James M. Holway

Erschienen in: Hydrogeology Journal | Ausgabe 1/2004

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Substantial progress has been made within central Arizona in moving towards a more sustainable water future, particularly in transitioning the urban demand from a primarily nonrenewable groundwater-based supply1 to increasing dependence on the Colorado River, Salt River and effluent. Management efforts include a wide range of regulatory and voluntary programs which have had mixed success. The Department of Water Resources has learned a number of key lessons throughout the years, and this paper attempts to establish the water management context and identify those lessons for the benefit of others who may want to evaluate alternative approaches to groundwater management. Themes to be discussed include evaluating water management approaches in a public policy context, the effectiveness of alternative management approaches and the relative merits of regulatory vs. nonregulatory efforts, and the importance of high-quality data in making management decisions.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
Groundwater use in many areas of Arizona greatly exceeds the natural replenishment of the aquifer, so although a portion of the groundwater use is renewable, the majority is not.
 
2
Additional information on the Department of Water Resources and its programs is available on the web site at: http://​www.​water.​az.​gov.
 
3
Within the State of Arizona, there are 20 Native American (or Indian) reservations of varying size.
 
4
Particularly Nevada, California and Mexico.
 
5
Additional information available on the Salt River Project web site at: http://​www.​srpnet.​com.
 
6
Additional information available on the Central Arizona Project and the Central Arizona Water Conservation District, which operates the canal, at: http://​www.​cap-az.​com.
 
7
Under the Colorado Compact and subsequent international treaties, 7.5 MAF are allocated to the four Upper Basin states of Colorado, Utah, Wyoming and New Mexico, 7.5 MAF to the three Lower Basin states of Arizona (2.8 MAF), Nevada (0.3 MAF) and California (4.4 MAF), and 1.5 MAF to Mexico.
 
8
See The Supreme Court of the State of Arizona (2000).
 
9
The limitations on groundwater transfers resulted from efforts by cities within the AMAs to buy “water ranches” in rural Arizona during the 1980s. The rural areas were concerned that water transfers would limit their economic future, and the legislature passed the Groundwater Transportation Act in 1991. This Act, and subsequent legislation in 1993, prohibits any transfer of groundwater across groundwater basin boundaries that is not expressly grandfathered within the legislation.
 
10
Additional information on these programs as well as copies of AMA management plans and rules are available through the agency web site at: http://​www.​water.​az.​gov.
 
11
A very limited market has developed in Type II Non-Irrigation Grandfathered Rights, which can be severed from the land.
 
12
Industrial users, for GMA purposes, are nonagricultural entities that have their own groundwater rights and do not receive service from municipal providers.
 
13
A limited market also exists for acquiring recharge credits.
 
14
A description of the Arizona Water Banking Authority is found on pages 17–18. Additional information is available on the AWBA web site at: http://​www.​water.​az.​gov/​AWBA. Further information on the Central Arizona Groundwater Replenishment District, and the Central Arizona Water Conservation District, of which it is a part, is available through their website at: http://​www.​cap-az.​com.
 
15
The Department of Water Resources also has the authority to develop and publish substantive policies, in accordance with the State of Arizona Administrative Procedures, as necessary for additional guidance on regulatory program details not covered by statutes, rules or management plans.
 
16
One contributing factor to a strong interest in recharge in the Tucson AMA is that initial direct potable deliveries of CAP water resulted in major technical and political problems, including brown water, bursting pipes and a resulting initiative that prohibited direct delivery of CAP water unless it was recharged and recovered first.
 
17
Portions of this section were excerpted from the Governor’s Water Management Commission Interim Report (2001).
 
18
In the Phoenix AMA, the ability of the Salt River Project to conjunctively manage and deliver approximately 1 million acre-feet of surface water, groundwater, and, more recently, CAP water, has shaped water management in that AMA.
 
19
Certain major infrastructure projects in the west, such as the Central Arizona Project, are federally owned and operated by either regional districts or the federal government. These projects are the result of federal “distributive policies” which use low levels of coercion but have a direct impact on individuals. These types of government investments are also very expensive. In fact, recognition by the federal government of the need for major investments in dam building in the early 1900s for flood control and water supply initiated one of the most significant expansions of the role of the United States federal government.
 
20
Such a high percentage of federal public lands is common in only a few western states. In most of the states the vast majority of land is privately owned.
 
21
Residential landscape water use comprises nearly 40% of total water use in the city of Phoenix.
 
22
The legality of the GPCD program is currently being challenged in court over a number of questions including whether GPCD targets can apply to all sources of water, whether nonresidential uses can be limited, and whether the state should directly regulate water users instead of requiring water providers to reduce use by its customers.
 
23
This has occurred due to several factors including (1) improvements in irrigation efficiency, (2) low crop prices and high costs resulting in lower levels of production than the 1975–1979 historic period, (3) the allocation of water based on the maximum rather than average acres in production during the five-year period, (4) lands going out of production, and (5) the addition of flexibility credits which allowed limited marketing of unused allocations to individual farmers who did use more water than their allocations.
 
24
Farmers in the BMP program are required to choose from a list of physical improvements and management practices in four separate categories. The BMP program does still limit irrigation to historically irrigated lands.
 
25
This is important because conservation requirements generally are not applied to effluent and AWS rules require use of nongroundwater supplies.
 
26
Arizona makes recommendations to the U.S. Interior Secretary on the allocation of CAP supplies.
 
27
Nonregulatory approaches could include the less coercive and indirect influence “constituent policy” programs such as education and technical assistance or the more directly targeted “distributive policy” programs such as grants and other financial incentives.
 
28
The Commission’s final report is available on CD through the ADWR website, http://​www.​water.​az.​gov
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Arizona Department of Water Resources (1994) Arizona water resources assessment. Arizona Department of Water Resources, Phoenix, Arizona Arizona Department of Water Resources (1994) Arizona water resources assessment. Arizona Department of Water Resources, Phoenix, Arizona
Zurück zum Zitat Brundtland Commission (1987) Our common future. World Commission on Environment and Development, New York, Oxford University Press, Oxford Brundtland Commission (1987) Our common future. World Commission on Environment and Development, New York, Oxford University Press, Oxford
Zurück zum Zitat Connall D Jr.(1982) A history of the Arizona Groundwater Management Act Arizo State Law J (2)313–343 Connall D Jr.(1982) A history of the Arizona Groundwater Management Act Arizo State Law J (2)313–343
Zurück zum Zitat Glennon RJ (2002) Water follies: groundwater pumping and the fate of America’s fresh waters Island Press, Washington DC Glennon RJ (2002) Water follies: groundwater pumping and the fate of America’s fresh waters Island Press, Washington DC
Zurück zum Zitat Glennon RJ, Maddock T III (1977) The concept of capture: the hydrology and law of stream/aquifer interactions. Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Foundation, Westminster, Colorado, pp 89 Glennon RJ, Maddock T III (1977) The concept of capture: the hydrology and law of stream/aquifer interactions. Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Foundation, Westminster, Colorado, pp 89
Zurück zum Zitat Governor’s Water Management Commission (2001) Interim Report: Meeting the challenge, transition to renewable supplies, Arizona Department of Water Resources, Phoenix Governor’s Water Management Commission (2001) Interim Report: Meeting the challenge, transition to renewable supplies, Arizona Department of Water Resources, Phoenix
Zurück zum Zitat Grant D (1987) The complexities of managing hydrologically connected surface water and groundwater under the appropriation doctrine. Land Water Law Rev 22:63–64 Grant D (1987) The complexities of managing hydrologically connected surface water and groundwater under the appropriation doctrine. Land Water Law Rev 22:63–64
Zurück zum Zitat Leshy JD, Belanger J (1988) Arizona law where ground and surface water meet. Ariz State Law J 20:657–748 Leshy JD, Belanger J (1988) Arizona law where ground and surface water meet. Ariz State Law J 20:657–748
Zurück zum Zitat Lowi TJ (1972) Four systems of policy politics and choice. Public Admin Rev 32:298–310 Lowi TJ (1972) Four systems of policy politics and choice. Public Admin Rev 32:298–310
Zurück zum Zitat Tellman B (1994) My well vs. your surface water rights: how western states manage interconnected groundwater and surface water. Issue Paper No. 15, University of Arizona Water Resources Research Center, Tucson, Arizona Tellman B (1994) My well vs. your surface water rights: how western states manage interconnected groundwater and surface water. Issue Paper No. 15, University of Arizona Water Resources Research Center, Tucson, Arizona
Zurück zum Zitat The Supreme Court of the State of Arizona (2000) The general adjudication of all rights to use water in the Gila River system and source. Case No. 188 Ariz. 330, 9P.3d 1069, Maricopa County Superior Court Clerk’s Office, Phoenix, Arizona The Supreme Court of the State of Arizona (2000) The general adjudication of all rights to use water in the Gila River system and source. Case No. 188 Ariz. 330, 9P.3d 1069, Maricopa County Superior Court Clerk’s Office, Phoenix, Arizona
Zurück zum Zitat Western Regional Climate Center (2002) Comparative data. Western Regional Climate Center, Reno, Nevada Western Regional Climate Center (2002) Comparative data. Western Regional Climate Center, Reno, Nevada
Metadaten
Titel
Managing for sustainability in an arid climate: lessons learned from 20 years of groundwater management in Arizona, USA
verfasst von
Katharine L. Jacobs
James M. Holway
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2004
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Hydrogeology Journal / Ausgabe 1/2004
Print ISSN: 1431-2174
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-0157
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-003-0308-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2004

Hydrogeology Journal 1/2004 Zur Ausgabe