Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics 1/2016

14.01.2015

Managing Institutional Complexity: A Longitudinal Study of Legitimacy Strategies at a Sportswear Brand Company

verfasst von: Dorothee Baumann-Pauly, Andreas Georg Scherer, Guido Palazzo

Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics | Ausgabe 1/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Multinational corporations are operating in complex business environments. They are confronted with contradictory institutional demands that often represent mutually incompatible expectations of various audiences. Managing these demands poses new organizational challenges for the corporation. Conducting an empirical case study at the sportswear manufacturer Puma, we explore how multinational corporations respond to institutional complexity and what legitimacy strategies they employ to maintain their license to operate. We draw on the literature on institutional theory, contingency theory, and organizational paradoxes. The results of our qualitative longitudinal study show that managing corporate legitimacy is a dynamic process in which corporations adapt organizational capacities, structures, and procedures.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Adler, P. S., Goldoftas, B., & Levine, D. I. (1999). Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organization Science, 10, 43–68.CrossRef Adler, P. S., Goldoftas, B., & Levine, D. I. (1999). Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organization Science, 10, 43–68.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ashforth, B. E., & Gibbs, B. W. (1990). The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, 1, 177–194.CrossRef Ashforth, B. E., & Gibbs, B. W. (1990). The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, 1, 177–194.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Baumann, D. (2003). The role of the multinational corporation in global governance. Master thesis, University of Konstanz. Baumann, D. (2003). The role of the multinational corporation in global governance. Master thesis, University of Konstanz.
Zurück zum Zitat Bednarek, R. S. (2011). Strategizing for legitimacy in pluralistic contexts: New Zealand’s science sector. PhD thesis, Victoria University, Wellington. Bednarek, R. S. (2011). Strategizing for legitimacy in pluralistic contexts: New Zealand’s science sector. PhD thesis, Victoria University, Wellington.
Zurück zum Zitat Belova, O., King, I., & Sliwa, M. (2008). Introduction: Polyphony and organization studies. Mikhail Bakhtin and beyond. Organization Studies, 29, 493–500.CrossRef Belova, O., King, I., & Sliwa, M. (2008). Introduction: Polyphony and organization studies. Mikhail Bakhtin and beyond. Organization Studies, 29, 493–500.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise its the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise its the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
Zurück zum Zitat Berrone, P., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2009). Environmental performance and executive compensation: An integrated agency-institutional perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 103–126.CrossRef Berrone, P., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2009). Environmental performance and executive compensation: An integrated agency-institutional perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 103–126.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bhattacharjee, A., & Merk, J. (2011). Route map to an Asia floor wage. 10 steps brands and retailers can take toward implementing a minimum living wage. Retrieved from http://www.cleanclothes.org. Accessed 6 Jan 2015 Bhattacharjee, A., & Merk, J. (2011). Route map to an Asia floor wage. 10 steps brands and retailers can take toward implementing a minimum living wage. Retrieved from http://​www.​cleanclothes.​org. Accessed 6 Jan 2015
Zurück zum Zitat Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1998). Competing on the edge: Strategy as structured chaos. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1998). Competing on the edge: Strategy as structured chaos. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Chandler, A. D., & Mazlish, B. (Eds.). (2005). Leviathans: Multinational corporations and the new global history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Chandler, A. D., & Mazlish, B. (Eds.). (2005). Leviathans: Multinational corporations and the new global history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Child, J., & Rodrigues, S. B. (2011). How organizations engage with external complexity: A political action perspective. Organization Studies, 32, 803–824.CrossRef Child, J., & Rodrigues, S. B. (2011). How organizations engage with external complexity: A political action perspective. Organization Studies, 32, 803–824.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Deephouse, D. L., & Suchman, M. C. (2008). Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 49–77). London: Sage.CrossRef Deephouse, D. L., & Suchman, M. C. (2008). Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 49–77). London: Sage.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Delmas, M. A., & Toffel, M. W. (2008). Organizational responses to environmental demands: Opening the black box. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 1027–1055.CrossRef Delmas, M. A., & Toffel, M. W. (2008). Organizational responses to environmental demands: Opening the black box. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 1027–1055.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat DeSanctis, G., & Monge, P. (1999). Introduction to the special issue: Communication processes for virtual organizations. Organization Science, 10, 693–703.CrossRef DeSanctis, G., & Monge, P. (1999). Introduction to the special issue: Communication processes for virtual organizations. Organization Science, 10, 693–703.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat DiMaggio, P. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In L. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and culture (pp. 3–22). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company. DiMaggio, P. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In L. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and culture (pp. 3–22). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company.
Zurück zum Zitat DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.CrossRef DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Donaldson, L. (2001). The contingency theory of organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRef Donaldson, L. (2001). The contingency theory of organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532–550. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532–550.
Zurück zum Zitat Etzion, D., & Ferraro, F. (2010). The role of analogy in the institutionalization of sustainability reporting. Organization Science, 21, 1092–1107.CrossRef Etzion, D., & Ferraro, F. (2010). The role of analogy in the institutionalization of sustainability reporting. Organization Science, 21, 1092–1107.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new instittuonalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232–263). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new instittuonalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232–263). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 209–226.CrossRef Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 209–226.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Graetz, F., & Smith, A. C. T. (2008). The role of dualities in arbitrating continuity and change in forms of organizing. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10, 265–280.CrossRef Graetz, F., & Smith, A. C. T. (2008). The role of dualities in arbitrating continuity and change in forms of organizing. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10, 265–280.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Greenwood, R., Diaz, A. M., Li, S. X., & Lorente, J. C. (2010). The multiplicity of institutional logics and the heterogeneity of organizational responses. Organization Science, 21, 521–539.CrossRef Greenwood, R., Diaz, A. M., Li, S. X., & Lorente, J. C. (2010). The multiplicity of institutional logics and the heterogeneity of organizational responses. Organization Science, 21, 521–539.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Greenwood, R., & Hinings, C. R. (1996). Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. Acadeamy of Management Review, 21, 1022–1054. Greenwood, R., & Hinings, C. R. (1996). Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. Acadeamy of Management Review, 21, 1022–1054.
Zurück zum Zitat Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K., & Suddaby, R. (2008). Introduction. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 1–46). London: Sage.CrossRef Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K., & Suddaby, R. (2008). Introduction. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 1–46). London: Sage.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micoletta, E. R., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational response. Academy of Management Annals, 5, 317–371.CrossRef Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micoletta, E. R., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational response. Academy of Management Annals, 5, 317–371.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Habermas, J. (1990). Moral consciousness and communicative action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Habermas, J. (1990). Moral consciousness and communicative action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Hargadon, D., & Douglas, Y. (2001). When inventions meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 476–501.CrossRef Hargadon, D., & Douglas, Y. (2001). When inventions meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 476–501.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Harreld, B. J., O’Reilly, C. A, I. I. I., & Tushman, M. L. (2007). Dynamic capabilities at IBM: Driving strategy into action. California Management Review, 49(4), 21–43.CrossRef Harreld, B. J., O’Reilly, C. A, I. I. I., & Tushman, M. L. (2007). Dynamic capabilities at IBM: Driving strategy into action. California Management Review, 49(4), 21–43.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hasse, R., & Krücken, G. (2008). Systems theory, societal contexts, and organizational heterogeneity. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 539–559). London: Sage.CrossRef Hasse, R., & Krücken, G. (2008). Systems theory, societal contexts, and organizational heterogeneity. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 539–559). London: Sage.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hoffmann, M. (2011). Managing corporate legitimacy. A case study of Puma. Master thesis, University of Lausanne. Hoffmann, M. (2011). Managing corporate legitimacy. A case study of Puma. Master thesis, University of Lausanne.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoffrage, U., Hertwig, R., & Gigerenzer, G. (2000). Hindsight bias: A by-product of knowledge updating? Journal of Experimental Psychology, 26(3), 566–581. Hoffrage, U., Hertwig, R., & Gigerenzer, G. (2000). Hindsight bias: A by-product of knowledge updating? Journal of Experimental Psychology, 26(3), 566–581.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaul, I., Conceição, P., le Goulven, K., & Mendoza, R. U. (Eds.). (2003). Providing global public goods. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Kaul, I., Conceição, P., le Goulven, K., & Mendoza, R. U. (Eds.). (2003). Providing global public goods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Kobrin, S. J. (2001). Sovereignty@bay: Globalization, multinational enterprise, and the international political system. In A. M. Rugman & T. L. Brewer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of international business (pp. 181–205). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Kobrin, S. J. (2001). Sovereignty@bay: Globalization, multinational enterprise, and the international political system. In A. M. Rugman & T. L. Brewer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of international business (pp. 181–205). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kolk, A., & van Tulder, R. (2001). Multinationality and corporate ethics: Codes of conduct in the sporting goods industry. Journal of International Business Studies, 32, 267–283.CrossRef Kolk, A., & van Tulder, R. (2001). Multinationality and corporate ethics: Codes of conduct in the sporting goods industry. Journal of International Business Studies, 32, 267–283.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kornberger, M., Clegg, S. R., & Carter, C. (2006). Rethinking polyphonic organization: Managing as discursive practice. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 22, 3–30.CrossRef Kornberger, M., Clegg, S. R., & Carter, C. (2006). Rethinking polyphonic organization: Managing as discursive practice. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 22, 3–30.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kostova, T., & Zaheer, S. (1999). Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multi-national enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 24, 64–81. Kostova, T., & Zaheer, S. (1999). Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multi-national enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 24, 64–81.
Zurück zum Zitat Kraatz, M., & Block, E. (2008). Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 243–275). London: Sage.CrossRef Kraatz, M., & Block, E. (2008). Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 243–275). London: Sage.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lamin, A., & Zaheer, S. (2012). Wall street vs. main street: Firm strategies for defending legitimacy and their impact on different stakeholders. Organization Science, 23, 47–66.CrossRef Lamin, A., & Zaheer, S. (2012). Wall street vs. main street: Firm strategies for defending legitimacy and their impact on different stakeholders. Organization Science, 23, 47–66.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lawrence, P., & Lorsch, J. (1967). Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12, 1–30. Lawrence, P., & Lorsch, J. (1967). Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12, 1–30.
Zurück zum Zitat Levy, D. L. (2005). Offshoring in the new global political economy. Journal of Management Studies, 42, 685–693.CrossRef Levy, D. L. (2005). Offshoring in the new global political economy. Journal of Management Studies, 42, 685–693.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lim, S.-J., & Phillips, J. (2008). Embedding CSR values: The global footware industry’s evolving governance structure. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 143–156.CrossRef Lim, S.-J., & Phillips, J. (2008). Embedding CSR values: The global footware industry’s evolving governance structure. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 143–156.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Locke, R. (2002). The promise and perils of globalization. The case of Nike. MIT working paper IPC 02-007. Locke, R. (2002). The promise and perils of globalization. The case of Nike. MIT working paper IPC 02-007.
Zurück zum Zitat Locke, R. M., Amengual, M., & Mangla, A. (2009). Virtue out of necessity? Compliance, commitment, and the improvement of labor conditions in global supply chains. Politics & Society, 37, 319–351.CrossRef Locke, R. M., Amengual, M., & Mangla, A. (2009). Virtue out of necessity? Compliance, commitment, and the improvement of labor conditions in global supply chains. Politics & Society, 37, 319–351.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Locke, R. M., Qin, F., & Brause, A. (2007). Does monitoring improve labor standards? Lessons from Nike. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 61, 3–31.CrossRef Locke, R. M., Qin, F., & Brause, A. (2007). Does monitoring improve labor standards? Lessons from Nike. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 61, 3–31.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Merry, S. E. (1988). Legal pluralism. Law & Society Review, 22, 869–896.CrossRef Merry, S. E. (1988). Legal pluralism. Law & Society Review, 22, 869–896.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Miller, D., & Williams, P. (2009). What price a living wage? Implementation issues in the quest for decent wages in the global apparel sector. Global Social Policy, 9, 99–125.CrossRef Miller, D., & Williams, P. (2009). What price a living wage? Implementation issues in the quest for decent wages in the global apparel sector. Global Social Policy, 9, 99–125.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat O’Reilly, C. A, I. I. I., & Tushman, M. L. (2011). Organizational ambidexterity in action: How managers explore and exploit. California Management Review, 53(4), 5–22.CrossRef O’Reilly, C. A, I. I. I., & Tushman, M. L. (2011). Organizational ambidexterity in action: How managers explore and exploit. California Management Review, 53(4), 5–22.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185–206. O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185–206.
Zurück zum Zitat Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16, 145–179.CrossRef Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16, 145–179.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Oliver, C. (1996). The institutional embeddedness of economic activity. Advances in Strategic Management, 13, 163–186. Oliver, C. (1996). The institutional embeddedness of economic activity. Advances in Strategic Management, 13, 163–186.
Zurück zum Zitat Pache, A.-C., & Santos, F. (2010). When worlds collide. The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Academy of Management Review, 35, 455–476.CrossRef Pache, A.-C., & Santos, F. (2010). When worlds collide. The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Academy of Management Review, 35, 455–476.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Palazzo, G., & Scherer, A. G. (2006). Corporate legitimacy as deliberation: A communicative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 66, 71–88.CrossRef Palazzo, G., & Scherer, A. G. (2006). Corporate legitimacy as deliberation: A communicative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 66, 71–88.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
Zurück zum Zitat Pflitsch, G. (2009). Möglichkeiten und Grenzen von Stakeholderdialogen im Bereich Corporate Social Responsibility untersucht am Beispiel der “Banzer Gespräche” der PUMA AG. MA thesis, University of Münster. Pflitsch, G. (2009). Möglichkeiten und Grenzen von Stakeholderdialogen im Bereich Corporate Social Responsibility untersucht am Beispiel der “Banzer Gespräche” der PUMA AG. MA thesis, University of Münster.
Zurück zum Zitat Phillips, N., & Malhotra, N. (2008). Taking social construction seriously: Extending the discursive approach in institutional theory. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 702–720). London: Sage.CrossRef Phillips, N., & Malhotra, N. (2008). Taking social construction seriously: Extending the discursive approach in institutional theory. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 702–720). London: Sage.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 34, 375–409.CrossRef Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 34, 375–409.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., & Tushman, M. L. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science, 20, 685–695.CrossRef Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., & Tushman, M. L. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science, 20, 685–695.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Reay, T., & Hinings, C. R. (2009). Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics. Organization Studies, 30, 629–652.CrossRef Reay, T., & Hinings, C. R. (2009). Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics. Organization Studies, 30, 629–652.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Roloff, J. (2008). A life cycle model of multi-stakeholder networks. Business Ethics: A European Review, 17, 311–325.CrossRef Roloff, J. (2008). A life cycle model of multi-stakeholder networks. Business Ethics: A European Review, 17, 311–325.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sanchez, R., & Mahoney, J. T. (1996). Modularity, flexiblity, and knowledge management in product and organization design. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 63–76.CrossRef Sanchez, R., & Mahoney, J. T. (1996). Modularity, flexiblity, and knowledge management in product and organization design. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 63–76.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world—A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48, 899–931.CrossRef Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world—A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48, 899–931.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Seidl, D. (2013). Managing legitimacy in complex and heterogeneous environments: Sustainable development in a globalized world. Journal of Management Studies, 50, 259–284.CrossRef Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Seidl, D. (2013). Managing legitimacy in complex and heterogeneous environments: Sustainable development in a globalized world. Journal of Management Studies, 50, 259–284.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schreyögg, G., & Sydow, J. (2010). Organizing for fluidity? Dilemmas of new organizational forms. Organization Science, 21, 1251–1262.CrossRef Schreyögg, G., & Sydow, J. (2010). Organizing for fluidity? Dilemmas of new organizational forms. Organization Science, 21, 1251–1262.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and organizations (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and organizations (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Siggelkow, N., & Rivkin, J. W. (2005). Speed and search: Designing organizations for turbulence and complexity. Organization Science, 16, 101–122.CrossRef Siggelkow, N., & Rivkin, J. W. (2005). Speed and search: Designing organizations for turbulence and complexity. Organization Science, 16, 101–122.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36, 381–403. Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36, 381–403.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith, W. K., & Tushman, M. L. (2005). Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science, 16, 522–536.CrossRef Smith, W. K., & Tushman, M. L. (2005). Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science, 16, 522–536.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Starkey, K., Barnatt, C., & Tempest, S. (2000). Beyond networks and hierarchies: Latent organizations in the U.K. television industry. Organization Science, 11, 299–305.CrossRef Starkey, K., Barnatt, C., & Tempest, S. (2000). Beyond networks and hierarchies: Latent organizations in the U.K. television industry. Organization Science, 11, 299–305.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Suchman, M. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Mangement Review, 20, 571–610. Suchman, M. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Mangement Review, 20, 571–610.
Zurück zum Zitat Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action. New York: Mc Graw-Hill Company. Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action. New York: Mc Graw-Hill Company.
Zurück zum Zitat Thornton, P. H. (2004). Markets from culture: Institutional logics and organizational decisions in higher education publishing. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Thornton, P. H. (2004). Markets from culture: Institutional logics and organizational decisions in higher education publishing. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Maanen, J., & Barley, S. (1984). Occupational cummunities: Culture and control in organizations. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 287–365). Greenwich, CT: JAI. Van Maanen, J., & Barley, S. (1984). Occupational cummunities: Culture and control in organizations. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 287–365). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Zurück zum Zitat Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research-design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research-design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Zadek, S. (2004). The path to corporate responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 82(December), 125–132. Zadek, S. (2004). The path to corporate responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 82(December), 125–132.
Metadaten
Titel
Managing Institutional Complexity: A Longitudinal Study of Legitimacy Strategies at a Sportswear Brand Company
verfasst von
Dorothee Baumann-Pauly
Andreas Georg Scherer
Guido Palazzo
Publikationsdatum
14.01.2015
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Journal of Business Ethics / Ausgabe 1/2016
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2532-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2016

Journal of Business Ethics 1/2016 Zur Ausgabe