Skip to main content
Erschienen in: NanoEthics 1/2022

02.06.2021 | Original Research Paper

Manufacturing Life, What Life? Ethical Debates Around Biobanks and Social Robots

verfasst von: Núria Vallès-Peris, Violeta Argudo-Portal, Miquel Domènech

Erschienen in: NanoEthics | Ausgabe 1/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In this paper, we explore how the definition of life takes on an essential character in the ethical debates around health technologies, with life thus being manufactured in the tensions and conflicts around the use of such artefacts and devices. We introduce concepts from science and technology studies (STS) to approach bioethics, overcoming the dualistic conception that separates the natural and the technological and questioning the dominant rationality that divides life into dualities. Drawing on two research projects in which we have been involved in recent years, one regarding biobanks and the other regarding social care robots, we explore how the ethical discussions about biobanks and robots imply particular notions of life. We argue that the contemporary epistemic category of life is a manufactured life in which various rationalities coexist: one rationality based on a separation between the technological and the human, focused on pragmatism and functionalities that tend towards a dualized notion of life divided into qualified and non-qualified life, and another rationality based on a non-essentialist ontology, focused on the mediating role of health technologies, that entails a distributed life appearing as a precarious effect of a network. Each of these rationalities allows the emergence of different issues and ethical concerns, thus enriching the bioethical debate.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
The report Taking European Knowledge Society Seriously (2007) explores the “politics of ethics” in the European Union. This report indicates how, until the mid-2000s, ethics and legislation in science and technology were coupled to such an extent that the differentiation between ethical reasoning and lawmaking was blurred.
 
2
What constitutes a product of nature is a question that has been asked throughout the history of intellectual property [85]. Historical accounts provide relevant insights regarding the understanding of isolated biological materials and the product of nature doctrine. The Supreme Court decision in Ex Parte Latimer and Parke-Davis v. Mulford gathers together valuable content exploring discussions on gene patentability and biotechnology in general.
 
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Loeb J (1904) The recent development of biology. Science 20(519):777–786 Loeb J (1904) The recent development of biology. Science 20(519):777–786
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Braidotti R (2013) Lo posthumano. Gedisa, Barcelona Braidotti R (2013) Lo posthumano. Gedisa, Barcelona
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Roosth S (2013) Biobricks and crocheted coral: Dispatches from the life sciences in the age of fabrication. Sci Context 26:153–171CrossRef Roosth S (2013) Biobricks and crocheted coral: Dispatches from the life sciences in the age of fabrication. Sci Context 26:153–171CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Agamben G (2004) El uso de los cuerpos. Homo Sacer, IV, 2. Pre-Textos, Valencia Agamben G (2004) El uso de los cuerpos. Homo Sacer, IV, 2. Pre-Textos, Valencia
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Van De Poel I, Verbeek PP (2006) Ethics and engineering design. Sci Technol Hum Values 31:223–236CrossRef Van De Poel I, Verbeek PP (2006) Ethics and engineering design. Sci Technol Hum Values 31:223–236CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Pinch TJ, Bijker WE (1984) The social construction of facts and artefacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Soc Stud Sci 14:399–441CrossRef Pinch TJ, Bijker WE (1984) The social construction of facts and artefacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Soc Stud Sci 14:399–441CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Frith L (2012) Symbiotic empirical ethics: A practical methodology. Bioethics 26:198–206CrossRef Frith L (2012) Symbiotic empirical ethics: A practical methodology. Bioethics 26:198–206CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Arampatzis A, Papagiouvanni I, Anestakis D, Tsolaki M (2016) A classification and comparative study of European biobanks: An analysis of biobanking activity and its contribution to scientific progress. Arch Med 8:1–10 Arampatzis A, Papagiouvanni I, Anestakis D, Tsolaki M (2016) A classification and comparative study of European biobanks: An analysis of biobanking activity and its contribution to scientific progress. Arch Med 8:1–10
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Argudo-Portal V, Domènech M (2020) Publicaciones sobre los aspectos éticos, legales y sociales de los biobancos entre 2011–2018. Una revisión panorámica. Rev Esp Salud Pública 94:e1–e18 Argudo-Portal V, Domènech M (2020) Publicaciones sobre los aspectos éticos, legales y sociales de los biobancos entre 2011–2018. Una revisión panorámica. Rev Esp Salud Pública 94:e1–e18
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Argudo-Portal V, Domènech M (2020) The reconfiguration of biobanks in Europe under the BBMRI-ERIC framework: Towards global sharing nodes? Life Sci Soc Policy 16:1–15CrossRef Argudo-Portal V, Domènech M (2020) The reconfiguration of biobanks in Europe under the BBMRI-ERIC framework: Towards global sharing nodes? Life Sci Soc Policy 16:1–15CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Vallès-Peris N, Domènech M (2021) Two turtles: Children and autonomy in participatory technological design. In Delicado A, Crettaz von Roten F, Prpić K (eds) Communicating science and technology in society. Springer Cham, pp 179–195. Vallès-Peris N, Domènech M (2021) Two turtles: Children and autonomy in participatory technological design. In Delicado A, Crettaz von Roten F, Prpić K (eds) Communicating science and technology in society. Springer Cham, pp 179–195.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Wynsberghe A (2015) Healthcare robots. Ethics, design and implementation. Routledge, London and New York Van Wynsberghe A (2015) Healthcare robots. Ethics, design and implementation. Routledge, London and New York
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Vallès-Peris N, Domènech M (2020) Roboticists’ imaginaries of robots for care: The radical imaginary as a tool for an ethical discussion. Eng Stud 12:157–176CrossRef Vallès-Peris N, Domènech M (2020) Roboticists’ imaginaries of robots for care: The radical imaginary as a tool for an ethical discussion. Eng Stud 12:157–176CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Vallès-Peris N, Angulo C, Domènech M (2018) Children’s imaginaries of human-robot interaction in healthcare. Int J Environ Res Public Health 15:970–988CrossRef Vallès-Peris N, Angulo C, Domènech M (2018) Children’s imaginaries of human-robot interaction in healthcare. Int J Environ Res Public Health 15:970–988CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoeyer K (2008) The ethics of research biobanking: A critical review of the literature. Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev 25:429–452CrossRef Hoeyer K (2008) The ethics of research biobanking: A critical review of the literature. Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev 25:429–452CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Hilgartner S, Prainsack B, Hurlbut JB (2017) Ethics as governance in genomics and beyond. In: The handbook of science and technology studies, pp 823–851 Hilgartner S, Prainsack B, Hurlbut JB (2017) Ethics as governance in genomics and beyond. In: The handbook of science and technology studies, pp 823–851
17.
Zurück zum Zitat OECD (2009) OECD guidelines on human biobanks and genetic research databases. Paris OECD (2009) OECD guidelines on human biobanks and genetic research databases. Paris
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Rose N (2007) The politics of life itself. Biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford Rose N (2007) The politics of life itself. Biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Myskja BK, Nydal R, Myhr AI (2014) We have never been ELSI researchers – there is no need for a post-ELSI shift. Life Sci Soc Policy 10:1–17CrossRef Myskja BK, Nydal R, Myhr AI (2014) We have never been ELSI researchers – there is no need for a post-ELSI shift. Life Sci Soc Policy 10:1–17CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Balmer AS, Calvert J, Marris C et al (2015) Taking roles in interdisciplinary collaborations: Reflections on working in post-ELSI spaces. Sci Technol Stud 28:3–25CrossRef Balmer AS, Calvert J, Marris C et al (2015) Taking roles in interdisciplinary collaborations: Reflections on working in post-ELSI spaces. Sci Technol Stud 28:3–25CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Budimir D, Polašek O, Marušić A et al (2011) Ethical aspects of human biobanks: A systematic review. Croat Med J 52:262–279CrossRef Budimir D, Polašek O, Marušić A et al (2011) Ethical aspects of human biobanks: A systematic review. Croat Med J 52:262–279CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaye J, BriceñoMoraia L, Curren L et al (2016) Consent for biobanking: The legal frameworks of countries in the BioSHaRE-EU Project. Biopreserv Biobank 14:195–200CrossRef Kaye J, BriceñoMoraia L, Curren L et al (2016) Consent for biobanking: The legal frameworks of countries in the BioSHaRE-EU Project. Biopreserv Biobank 14:195–200CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Bossert S, Kahrass H, Heinemeyer U et al (2017) Participatory improvement of a template for informed consent documents in biobank research - study results and methodological reflections. BMC Med Ethics 18:1–12CrossRef Bossert S, Kahrass H, Heinemeyer U et al (2017) Participatory improvement of a template for informed consent documents in biobank research - study results and methodological reflections. BMC Med Ethics 18:1–12CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Helgesson G (2012) Indefense of broad consent. Cambridge Q Healthc Ethics 21:40–50CrossRef Helgesson G (2012) Indefense of broad consent. Cambridge Q Healthc Ethics 21:40–50CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Hofmann B, Solbak JHH, Holm S (2009) Consent to biobank research: One size fits all? In: Solbakk JH, Holm S, Hofmann B (eds) The ethics of research biobanking. Springer US, Boston, MA, pp 3-23 Hofmann B, Solbak JHH, Holm S (2009) Consent to biobank research: One size fits all? In: Solbakk JH, Holm S, Hofmann B (eds) The ethics of research biobanking. Springer US, Boston, MA, pp 3-23
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Caulfield T, Burningham S, Joly Y et al (2014) A review of the key issues associated with the commercialization of biobanks. J Law Biosci 1:94–110CrossRef Caulfield T, Burningham S, Joly Y et al (2014) A review of the key issues associated with the commercialization of biobanks. J Law Biosci 1:94–110CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Tutton R (2010) Biobanking: Social, political and ethical aspects. Encyclopedia of life sciences. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, UK, pp 1–7 Tutton R (2010) Biobanking: Social, political and ethical aspects. Encyclopedia of life sciences. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, UK, pp 1–7
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Verlinden M, Nys H, Ectors N, Huys I (2016) Qualitative study on custodianship of human biological material and data stored in biobanks. BMC Med Ethics 17:1–10CrossRef Verlinden M, Nys H, Ectors N, Huys I (2016) Qualitative study on custodianship of human biological material and data stored in biobanks. BMC Med Ethics 17:1–10CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Hawkins N (2015) Intellectual property and biobanks. In: Mascalzoni D (ed) Ethics, law, and governance of biobanking : National, European and international approaches. Springer, London, pp 39–52CrossRef Hawkins N (2015) Intellectual property and biobanks. In: Mascalzoni D (ed) Ethics, law, and governance of biobanking : National, European and international approaches. Springer, London, pp 39–52CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Hayden C (2007) Taking as giving: Bioscience, exchange, and the politics of benefit-sharing. Soc Stud Sci 37:729–758CrossRef Hayden C (2007) Taking as giving: Bioscience, exchange, and the politics of benefit-sharing. Soc Stud Sci 37:729–758CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Nicol D, Critchley C (2012) Benefit sharing and biobanking in Australia. Public Underst Sci 21(5):534-555 Nicol D, Critchley C (2012) Benefit sharing and biobanking in Australia. Public Underst Sci 21(5):534-555
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Goldenberg A, Brothers K (2018) Misplaced trust: Building research relationships in the age of biorepository networks. Am J Bioeth 18:21–23CrossRef Goldenberg A, Brothers K (2018) Misplaced trust: Building research relationships in the age of biorepository networks. Am J Bioeth 18:21–23CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Chalmers D, Nicol D, Kaye J et al (2016) Has the biobank bubble burst? Withstanding the challenges for sustainable biobanking in the digital era. BMC Med Ethics 17:39CrossRef Chalmers D, Nicol D, Kaye J et al (2016) Has the biobank bubble burst? Withstanding the challenges for sustainable biobanking in the digital era. BMC Med Ethics 17:39CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Prainsack B (2019) Data donation: How to resist the iLevia. In: Krutzinna J, Floridi (eds) The ethics of medical data donation. Springer, Cham, pp 9-22 Prainsack B (2019) Data donation: How to resist the iLevia. In: Krutzinna J, Floridi (eds) The ethics of medical data donation. Springer, Cham, pp 9-22
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Radin J (2013) Latent life: Concepts and practices of human tissue preservation in the International Biological Program. Soc Stud Sci 43:484–508CrossRef Radin J (2013) Latent life: Concepts and practices of human tissue preservation in the International Biological Program. Soc Stud Sci 43:484–508CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat International Society for Biological and Environmental Repositories (2018) Best practices: Recommendations for repositories International Society for Biological and Environmental Repositories (2018) Best practices: Recommendations for repositories
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Pavone V, Goven J (2017) Bioeconomies: Life, technology, and capital in the 21st century. Palgrave Macmillan, LondonCrossRef Pavone V, Goven J (2017) Bioeconomies: Life, technology, and capital in the 21st century. Palgrave Macmillan, LondonCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Waldby C (2009) Singapore Biopolis: Bare life in the city-state. East Asian Sci Technol Soc 3:367–383CrossRef Waldby C (2009) Singapore Biopolis: Bare life in the city-state. East Asian Sci Technol Soc 3:367–383CrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Tupasela A (2017) Populations as brands in medical research: Placing genes on the global genetic atlas. BioSocieties 12:47–65CrossRef Tupasela A (2017) Populations as brands in medical research: Placing genes on the global genetic atlas. BioSocieties 12:47–65CrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Mitchell R, Waldby C (2010) National biobanks: Clinical labor, risk production, and the creation of biovalue. Sci Technol Hum Values 35:330–355CrossRef Mitchell R, Waldby C (2010) National biobanks: Clinical labor, risk production, and the creation of biovalue. Sci Technol Hum Values 35:330–355CrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Sharp LA (2000) The commodification of the body and its parts. Annu Rev Anthr 29:287–328CrossRef Sharp LA (2000) The commodification of the body and its parts. Annu Rev Anthr 29:287–328CrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Landecker H (2007) Culturing life: How cells became technologies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MACrossRef Landecker H (2007) Culturing life: How cells became technologies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MACrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoeyer K (2017) Suspense: Reflections on the cryopolitics of the body. In: Radin J, Kowal E (eds) Cryopolitics: Frozen life in a melting world. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 205–2014 Hoeyer K (2017) Suspense: Reflections on the cryopolitics of the body. In: Radin J, Kowal E (eds) Cryopolitics: Frozen life in a melting world. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 205–2014
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Svendsen MN (2011) Articulating potentiality: Notes on the delineation of the blank figure in human embryonic stem cell research. Cult Anthropol 26:414–437CrossRef Svendsen MN (2011) Articulating potentiality: Notes on the delineation of the blank figure in human embryonic stem cell research. Cult Anthropol 26:414–437CrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoeyer K (2013) Exchanging human bodily material: Rethinking bodies and markets. Springer, LondonCrossRef Hoeyer K (2013) Exchanging human bodily material: Rethinking bodies and markets. Springer, LondonCrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Bowker G (2005) Memory practices in the sciences. The MIT Press, Cambridge Bowker G (2005) Memory practices in the sciences. The MIT Press, Cambridge
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Puig de la Bellacasa M (2011) Matters of care in technoscience: Assembling neglected things. Soc Stud Sci 41:85–106CrossRef Puig de la Bellacasa M (2011) Matters of care in technoscience: Assembling neglected things. Soc Stud Sci 41:85–106CrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Stahl BC, Coeckelbergh M (2016) Ethics of healthcare robotics: Towards responsible research and innovation. Rob Auton Syst 86:152–161CrossRef Stahl BC, Coeckelbergh M (2016) Ethics of healthcare robotics: Towards responsible research and innovation. Rob Auton Syst 86:152–161CrossRef
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Nordmann A, Rip A (2009) Mind the gap revisited. Nat Nanotechnol 4:273–274CrossRef Nordmann A, Rip A (2009) Mind the gap revisited. Nat Nanotechnol 4:273–274CrossRef
50.
Zurück zum Zitat van der Plas A, Smits M, Wehrmann C (2010) Beyond speculative robot ethics: A vision assessment study on the future of the robotic caretaker. Account Res 17:299–315CrossRef van der Plas A, Smits M, Wehrmann C (2010) Beyond speculative robot ethics: A vision assessment study on the future of the robotic caretaker. Account Res 17:299–315CrossRef
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Grunwald A (2010) From speculative nanoethics to explorative philosophy of nanotechnology. Nano Ethics 4:91–101 Grunwald A (2010) From speculative nanoethics to explorative philosophy of nanotechnology. Nano Ethics 4:91–101
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Leigh Anderson S, Anderson M (2015) Towards a principle-based healthcare agent. In: Van Rysewyk SP, Pontier M (eds) Machine Medical Ethics. pp 67–78 Leigh Anderson S, Anderson M (2015) Towards a principle-based healthcare agent. In: Van Rysewyk SP, Pontier M (eds) Machine Medical Ethics. pp 67–78
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Veruggio G (2005) The birth of roboethics. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Workshop on Roboethics. pp 1–4 Veruggio G (2005) The birth of roboethics. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Workshop on Roboethics. pp 1–4
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Sharkey A, Sharkey N (2011) Children, the elderly, and interactive robots: Anthropomorphism and deception in robot care and companionship. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 18:32–38CrossRef Sharkey A, Sharkey N (2011) Children, the elderly, and interactive robots: Anthropomorphism and deception in robot care and companionship. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 18:32–38CrossRef
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Sparrow R, Sparrow L (2006) In the hands of machines? The future of aged care. Minds Mach 16:141–161CrossRef Sparrow R, Sparrow L (2006) In the hands of machines? The future of aged care. Minds Mach 16:141–161CrossRef
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Coeckelbergh M, Pop C, Simut R et al (2016) A survey of expectations about the role of robots in robot-assisted therapy for children with ASD: Ethical acceptability, trust, sociability, appearance, and attachment. Sci Eng Ethics 22:47–65CrossRef Coeckelbergh M, Pop C, Simut R et al (2016) A survey of expectations about the role of robots in robot-assisted therapy for children with ASD: Ethical acceptability, trust, sociability, appearance, and attachment. Sci Eng Ethics 22:47–65CrossRef
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Feil-Seifer BD, Matari MJ (2011) Socially assistive robotics. ethical issues related to technology. Robot Autom Mag 18:24–31CrossRef Feil-Seifer BD, Matari MJ (2011) Socially assistive robotics. ethical issues related to technology. Robot Autom Mag 18:24–31CrossRef
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Iosa M, Morone G, Cherubini A, Paolucci S (2016) The three laws of neurorobotics: A review on what neurorehabilitation robots should do for patients and clinicians. J Med Biol Eng 36:1–11CrossRef Iosa M, Morone G, Cherubini A, Paolucci S (2016) The three laws of neurorobotics: A review on what neurorehabilitation robots should do for patients and clinicians. J Med Biol Eng 36:1–11CrossRef
59.
Zurück zum Zitat van Wynsberghe A (2013) Designing robots for care: Care centered value-sensitive design. Sci Eng Ethics 19:407–433CrossRef van Wynsberghe A (2013) Designing robots for care: Care centered value-sensitive design. Sci Eng Ethics 19:407–433CrossRef
60.
Zurück zum Zitat Coeckelbergh M (2009) Personal robots, appearance, and human good: A methodological reflection on roboethics. Int J Soc Robot 1:217–221CrossRef Coeckelbergh M (2009) Personal robots, appearance, and human good: A methodological reflection on roboethics. Int J Soc Robot 1:217–221CrossRef
61.
Zurück zum Zitat Coeckelbergh M (2015) Artificial agents, good care, and modernity. Theor Med Bioeth 36:265–277CrossRef Coeckelbergh M (2015) Artificial agents, good care, and modernity. Theor Med Bioeth 36:265–277CrossRef
62.
Zurück zum Zitat Borenstein J, Pearson Y (2010) Robot caregivers: Harbingers of expanded freedom for all? Ethics Inf Technol 12:277–288CrossRef Borenstein J, Pearson Y (2010) Robot caregivers: Harbingers of expanded freedom for all? Ethics Inf Technol 12:277–288CrossRef
63.
Zurück zum Zitat Commission E (2018) Statement on artificial intelligence, robotics and ‘autonomous’ systems. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg Commission E (2018) Statement on artificial intelligence, robotics and ‘autonomous’ systems. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg
64.
Zurück zum Zitat Fisher B, Tronto J (1990) Toward a feminist theory of caring. In: Abel EK, Nelson MK (eds) Circles of care: Work and identity in women’s lives. SUNY Press, Albany, pp 35–62 Fisher B, Tronto J (1990) Toward a feminist theory of caring. In: Abel EK, Nelson MK (eds) Circles of care: Work and identity in women’s lives. SUNY Press, Albany, pp 35–62
65.
Zurück zum Zitat van Wynsberghe A, Li S (2019) A paradigm shift for robot ethics: From HRI to human–robot–system interaction (HRSI). Medicolegal Bioeth 9:11–21CrossRef van Wynsberghe A, Li S (2019) A paradigm shift for robot ethics: From HRI to human–robot–system interaction (HRSI). Medicolegal Bioeth 9:11–21CrossRef
66.
Zurück zum Zitat Belpaeme T, Baxter P, De GJ et al (2013) Child-robot interaction: Perspectives and challenges. Lecture notes in artificial intelligence. Springer, Berlin, pp 452–459 Belpaeme T, Baxter P, De GJ et al (2013) Child-robot interaction: Perspectives and challenges. Lecture notes in artificial intelligence. Springer, Berlin, pp 452–459
67.
Zurück zum Zitat Arnold T, Scheutz M (2017) The tactile ethics of soft robotics: Designing wisely for human-robot interaction. Soft Robot 4:81–87CrossRef Arnold T, Scheutz M (2017) The tactile ethics of soft robotics: Designing wisely for human-robot interaction. Soft Robot 4:81–87CrossRef
68.
Zurück zum Zitat Riek LD, Howard D (2014) A code of ethics for the human-robot interaction profession. We Robot Conf 1–10 Riek LD, Howard D (2014) A code of ethics for the human-robot interaction profession. We Robot Conf 1–10
69.
Zurück zum Zitat Bijker WE (2009) How is technology made?-That is the question! Cambridge J Econ 34:63–76CrossRef Bijker WE (2009) How is technology made?-That is the question! Cambridge J Econ 34:63–76CrossRef
70.
Zurück zum Zitat Bishop J, Jotterand F (2006) Bioethics as biopolitics. J Med Philos 31:205–212CrossRef Bishop J, Jotterand F (2006) Bioethics as biopolitics. J Med Philos 31:205–212CrossRef
71.
Zurück zum Zitat Childress J, Beauchamp T (2001) Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford University Press, New York Childress J, Beauchamp T (2001) Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford University Press, New York
72.
Zurück zum Zitat Mol A (2008) The logic of care. Health and the problem of patient choice. Routledge, London and New YorkCrossRef Mol A (2008) The logic of care. Health and the problem of patient choice. Routledge, London and New YorkCrossRef
73.
Zurück zum Zitat Rán M, PeixotoJúnior CA (2007) Vulnerability and bare life: Bioethics and biopolitics today. Rev Saude Publica 41:849–857 Rán M, PeixotoJúnior CA (2007) Vulnerability and bare life: Bioethics and biopolitics today. Rev Saude Publica 41:849–857
74.
Zurück zum Zitat Trotter G (2006) Bioethics and deliberative democracy: Five warnings from Hobbes. J Med Philos 31:235–250CrossRef Trotter G (2006) Bioethics and deliberative democracy: Five warnings from Hobbes. J Med Philos 31:235–250CrossRef
75.
Zurück zum Zitat Garrafa V, Porto D (2003) Intervention bioethics: A proposal for peripheral countries in a context of power and injustice. Bioethics 17:399–416CrossRef Garrafa V, Porto D (2003) Intervention bioethics: A proposal for peripheral countries in a context of power and injustice. Bioethics 17:399–416CrossRef
76.
Zurück zum Zitat Feenberg A (2017) Technosystem. The social life of reason. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA and LondonCrossRef Feenberg A (2017) Technosystem. The social life of reason. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA and LondonCrossRef
77.
Zurück zum Zitat Verbeek P-P (2009) Let’s make things better: A reply to my readers. Hum Stud 32:251–261CrossRef Verbeek P-P (2009) Let’s make things better: A reply to my readers. Hum Stud 32:251–261CrossRef
78.
Zurück zum Zitat Latour B (1992) Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In: Bijker WE, Law J (eds) Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 225–258 Latour B (1992) Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In: Bijker WE, Law J (eds) Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 225–258
79.
Zurück zum Zitat Feenberg A (1999) Questioning technology. Routledge, London and New York Feenberg A (1999) Questioning technology. Routledge, London and New York
80.
Zurück zum Zitat European Parliamentary Research Service (2019) EU guidelines on ethics in artificial intelligence: Context and implementation. 13 European Parliamentary Research Service (2019) EU guidelines on ethics in artificial intelligence: Context and implementation. 13
81.
Zurück zum Zitat Latour B (1999) La esperanza de Pandora: Ensayos sobre la realidad de los estudios de la ciencia. Gedisa, Barcelona Latour B (1999) La esperanza de Pandora: Ensayos sobre la realidad de los estudios de la ciencia. Gedisa, Barcelona
82.
Zurück zum Zitat Serres M, Latour B (1995) Conversations on science, culture, and time. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MICrossRef Serres M, Latour B (1995) Conversations on science, culture, and time. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MICrossRef
83.
Zurück zum Zitat Tirado F, Domènech M (2005) Asociaciones heterogéneas y actantes: El giro postsocial de la Teoría del Actor-Red. AIBR Rev Antropol Iberoam 1–26 Tirado F, Domènech M (2005) Asociaciones heterogéneas y actantes: El giro postsocial de la Teoría del Actor-Red. AIBR Rev Antropol Iberoam 1–26
84.
Zurück zum Zitat Serres M (1982) The parasite. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore Serres M (1982) The parasite. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
85.
Zurück zum Zitat Kevles DJ (2015) Inventions, yes; nature, no: The products-of-nature doctrine from the American colonies to the U.S courts. Perspect Sci 23:13–34CrossRef Kevles DJ (2015) Inventions, yes; nature, no: The products-of-nature doctrine from the American colonies to the U.S courts. Perspect Sci 23:13–34CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Manufacturing Life, What Life? Ethical Debates Around Biobanks and Social Robots
verfasst von
Núria Vallès-Peris
Violeta Argudo-Portal
Miquel Domènech
Publikationsdatum
02.06.2021
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
NanoEthics / Ausgabe 1/2022
Print ISSN: 1871-4757
Elektronische ISSN: 1871-4765
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-021-00390-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2022

NanoEthics 1/2022 Zur Ausgabe