nach oben

The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment

Erschienen in:

01.04.2015 | LIFE CYCLE SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT

Mapping the scientific research on life cycle assessment: a bibliometric analysis

verfasst von: Qian Hou, Guozhu Mao, Lin Zhao, Huibin Du, Jian Zuo

Erschienen in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment | Ausgabe 4/2015

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Purpose

A bibliometric analysis of life cycle assessment (LCA)-related research literature is reported in this study. Based on databases of Science Citation Index (SCI), Social Science Citation Index (SSCI), Conference Proceedings Citation Index—Science (CPCI-S), and Conference Proceedings Citation Index—Social Science & Humanities (CPCI-SSH), this study aims to evaluate the research trends of LCA-related research literature from 1998 to 2013 by using bibliometric techniques.

Methods

The documents were analyzed according to their type, language(s), subject(s), journal(s), citation analysis of articles, authors’ address information, and keyword distribution, etc. H-index and impact factor (IF) were applied to characterize the LCA publications. Furthermore, co-word analysis and social network analysis (SNA) were employed to evaluate the interactions in this research field. The findings showed that the pace of publishing in this field increased exponentially over past 16 years.

Results and discussion

A total of 6616 records were obtained from the four databases. Journal articles are the most frequently used document type representing 74.33 % (4918) of the records, and English is the dominant language with 5914 records (97.53 %). The most common subject category is environmental sciences, and the most productive journal is International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. The USA, focusing on “energy,” “industrial ecology,” and “greenhouse gas emissions,” is the most productive country in the research field of LCA. Technology University of Denmark is the most productive institute all over the world over the past 16 years. According to the ranking of keywords, “greenhouse gas,” “energy”, and “biofuel” are the hotspots of LCA research. The main purpose of LCA is sustainability assessment whereas climate change is one of the most outstanding environmental issues.

Conclusions

By identifying global hotspots in the LCA research, this study provides a useful reference to researchers for the future research directions.

Vorheriger Artikel Assessing the variability of the bioavailable fraction of zinc at the global scale using geochemical modeling and soil archetypes

Nächster Artikel 20 years of life cycle assessment (LCA) in the forestry sector: state of the art and a methodical proposal for the LCA of forest production

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Adisa A (1999) Life cycle assessment and its application to process selection, design and optimization. Chem Eng J 73:1–21CrossRef

Adler PR, Del Grosso SJ, Parton WJ (2007) Life-cycle assessment of net greenhouse-gas flux for bioenergy cropping systems. Ecol Appl 17(3):675–691CrossRef

Azapagic A, Clift R (1999) The application of life cycle assessment to process optimization. Comput Chem Eng 23(10):1509–1526CrossRef

Baumann H (2002) Int J LCA could have received better acknowledgement. Int J Life Cycle Assess 7(1):2–3

Bettencourt LMA, Kaur J (2011) Evolution and structure of sustainability science. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108(49):19540–19545CrossRef

Boner K, Chen C, Boyack K (2003) Visualizing knowledge domains. Annu Rev Inf Sci Technol 37:179–255CrossRef

Callon M, Courtial JP, Laville F (1991) Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: the case of polymer chemistry. Scientometrics 22(1):155–205CrossRef

Chen HB, Yang Y, Yang Y et al (2014) A bibliometric investigation of life cycle assessment research in the web of science databases. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(10):1674–1685CrossRef

Chiu WT, Ho YS (2007) Bibliometric analysis of tsunami research. Scientometrics 73(1):3–17

Cobo MJ, Lopez-Herrera AG, Herrera-Viedma E et al (2011) An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: a practical application to the fuzzy sets theory field. J Inf 5:146–166CrossRef

Craig D, Alison K, Haroun C et al (2010) A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests. For Ecol Manag 259:660–684CrossRef

Crutzen PJ, Mosier AR, Smith KA et al (2008) N2O release from agro-biofuel production negates global warming reduction by replacing fossil fuels. Atmos Chem Phys 8(2):389–395CrossRef

David A, Haruna G, Heinz S et al (2013) Life cycle environmental impacts of carbonated soft drinks. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:77–92CrossRef

De Souza CG, Barbastefano RG (2011) Knowledge diffusion and collaboration networks on life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(6):561–568CrossRef

Demirbas A (2011) Competitive liquid biofuels from biomass. Appl Energy 88(1):17–28CrossRef

Espinosa N, Hosel M, Angmo D et al (2012) Solar cells with one-day energy payback for the factories of the future. Energy Environ Sci 5(1):5117–5132CrossRef

Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA (2008) Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J 22(2):338–342CrossRef

Gelfand I, Sahajpal R, Zhang XS et al (2013) Sustainable bioenergy production from marginal lands in the US Midwest. Nature 493(7433):514–517CrossRef

Goran F, Michael ZH, Tomas E et al (2009) Recent developments in life cycle assessment. J Environ Manag 91:1–21CrossRef

Haas G, Wetterich F, Kopke U (2001) Comparing intensive, extensified and organic grassland farming in southern Germany by process life cycle assessment. Agric Ecosystems Environ 83(1–2):43–53CrossRef

Hellweg S, Mila L (2014) Emerging approaches, challenges and opportunities in life cycle assessment. Nature 344(6188):1109–1113

Hendrickson C, Horvath A, Joshi S et al (1998) Economic input-output models for environmental life-cycle assessment. Environ Sci Technol 32(7):184A–191ACrossRef

Hirsch JE (2005) An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102(46):16569–16572CrossRef

Hui ZF, Yuh SH, Yu MS et al (2010) A bibliometric analysis of solid waste research during the period 1993–2008. Waste Manag 30:2410–2417CrossRef

Huijbregts MAJ, Thissen U, Guinee JB et al (2000) Priority assessment of toxic substances in life cycle assessment. Part I: calculation of toxicity potentials for 181 substances with the nested multi-media fate, exposure and effects model USES-LCA. Chemosphere 41(4):541–573CrossRef

ISO (1998) AS/NZS ISO 14040. Environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework. ISO, Homebush

ISO (1999) AS/NZS ISO 14041. Environmental management—life cycle assessment—goal and scope definition and inventory analysis. ISO, Homebush

ISO (2000a) ISO 14042:2000(E) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—life cycle impact assessment. ISO Central Secretariat. ISO, Geneva

ISO (2000b) ISO 14043:2000(E) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—life cycle interpretation. ISO Central Secretariat. ISO, Geneva

Joshi SV, Drzal LT, Mohanty AK et al (2004) Are natural fiber composites environmentally superior to glass fiber reinforced composites? Compos Part A Appl S 35(3):371–376CrossRef

Kim S, Dale BE (2005) Life cycle assessment of various cropping systems utilized for producing biofuels: bioethanol and biodiesel. Biomass Bioenergy 29(6):426–439CrossRef

Lardon L, Helias A, Sialve B et al (2009) Life-cycle assessment of biodiesel production from microalgae. Environ Sci Technol 43(17):6475–6481CrossRef

Martin C, Morgavi DP, Doreau M (2010) Methane mitigation in ruminants: from microbe to the farm scale. Anim 4(3):351–365CrossRef

Meho LI, Yang K (2007) Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of Science versus Scopus and Google Scholar. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 58(13):2015–2125CrossRef

Ming HW, Te CY, Yuh SH (2010) A bibliometric analysis of the performance of water research. Scientometrics 84:813–820CrossRef

Moss RH, Edmonds JA, Hibbard KA et al (2010) The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature 463(7282):747–756CrossRef

Nilsson M, Eckerberg K (2007) Environmental policy integration in practice. Shaping institutions for learning, Earthscan

Noyons ECM, Moed HF, Luwel M (1999) Combining mapping and citation analysis for evaluative bibliometric purposes: a bibliometric study. J Am Soc Inf Sci 50(2):115–131CrossRef

Oscar O, Francesc C, Guido S (2009) Sustainability in the construction industry: a review of recent developments based on LCA. Constr Build Mater 23:28–39CrossRef

Pehnt M (2006) Dynamic life cycle assessment (LCA) of renewable energy technologies. Renew Energy 31(1):55–71CrossRef

Rebitzer G, Ekvall T, Frischknecht R et al (2004) Life cycle assessment part 1: framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications. Environ Int 30:701–720CrossRef

Robert HC (2008) Validation of a hybrid life-cycle inventory analysis method. J Environ Manage 88:496–506CrossRef

Robert KH, Schmidt BB, Larderel JA et al (2002) Strategic sustainable development—selection, design and synergies of applied tools. J Clean Prod 10(3):197–214CrossRef

Sebastien H, Vincent R, Manuele M et al (2009) Life cycle assessment of two baby food packaging alternatives: glass jars vs. plastic pots. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14:95–106CrossRef

Serenella S, Francesca F, Alessandra Z (2013a) Life cycle sustainability assessment in the context of sustainability science progress (part 2). Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1686–1697CrossRef

Serenella S, Francesca F, Alessandra Z (2013b) Progress in sustainability science: lessons learnt from current methodologies for sustainability assessment: part 1. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1653–1672CrossRef

Serrat O (2009) Social network analysis. Asian Development Bank, Manila

Tsay MY (2008) A bibliometric analysis of hydrogen energy literature, 1965–2005. Scientometrics 75(3):421–438CrossRef

Van RAFJ (2005) For your citations only? Hot topics in bibliometric analysis. Meas Interdisc Res Perspect 3(1):50–62CrossRef

Vink ETH, Rabago KR, Glassner DA et al (2003) Applications of life cycle assessment to NatureWorks (TM) polylactide (PLA) production. Polym Degrad Stab 80(3):403–419CrossRef

Von BH, Curran MA (2007) A review of assessments conducted on bio-ethanol as a transportation fuel from a net energy, greenhouse gas, and environmental life cycle perspective. J Clean Prod 15(7):607–619CrossRef

Zuo J, Zhao ZY (2014) Green building research–current status and future agenda: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 30:271–281CrossRef

Titel: Mapping the scientific research on life cycle assessment: a bibliometric analysis
verfasst von: Qian Hou
Guozhu Mao
Lin Zhao
Huibin Du
Jian Zuo
Publikationsdatum: 01.04.2015
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment / Ausgabe 4/2015
Print ISSN: 0948-3349
Elektronische ISSN: 1614-7502
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0846-2

Springer Professional

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results and discussion

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2015

A new data architecture for advancing life cycle assessment

The potential contribution to climate change mitigation from temporary carbon storage in biomaterials

Erratum to: Assessing the variability of the bioavailable fraction of zinc at the global scale using geochemical modeling and soil archetypes

Global land use impacts on biomass production—a spatial-differentiated resource-related life cycle impact assessment method

Scenario analysis of life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of Darjeeling tea

Life cycle inventory of a flash geothermal combined heat and power plant located in Iceland