nach oben

Erschienen in:

2020 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

8. MAR Project Implementation and Regulatory Issues

verfasst von : Robert G. Maliva

Erschienen in: Anthropogenic Aquifer Recharge

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

MAR planning and implementation start with identification of project goals and success criteria. A feasibility assessment is then performed to determine whether MAR is technically and economically feasible in the proposed project areas. Feasibility assessments involve both a review of existing data and regulatory requirements and constraints (desktop assessment) and field testing. For projects determined to be technically and economically feasible, the next steps are system design and obtaining required regulatory approvals. Subsequent project phases are the construction and operational testing of a pilot or full-scale system. Project planning, design, and implementation should incorporate flexibility to allow for adaptive management. Project performance should be objectively evaluated against specific success critera established at the start of a project.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Contaminant Attenuation and Natural Aquifer Treatment

Nächstes Kapitel MAR Hydrogeological and Hydrochemistry Evaluation Techniques

American Society of Civil Engineers. (2001). Standard guidelines for artificial recharge of ground water, Report EWRI/ASCE 34-01. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers.

Belton, V., & Stewart, T. J. (2002). Multiple criteria decision analysis: An integrated approach. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Boardman, A., Greenberg, D., Vining, A., & Weimer, D. (1996). Cost-benefit analysis: Concepts and practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Bouwer, H. (1999). Artificial recharge of groundwater: Systems, design, and management. In Mays, L. E. (Ed.) Hydraulic design handook (p. 24.1–24.44). New York: McGraw Hill.

Bouwer, H. (2002). Artificial recharge of groundwater: Hydrogeology and engineering. Hydrogeology Journal, 10(1), 121–142.CrossRef

Brown, C. J. (2005). Planning decision framework for brackish water aquifer, storage and recovery (ASR) projects: Ph.D. thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville.

Business Dictionary (n.d.). Planning. http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/planning.html. Accessed June, 18, 2017.

CH2M Hill. (1997). Water supply needs and sources assessment, alternative water supply strategies investigation. A tool for assessing the feasibility of aquifer storage recovery. Special Publication SJ97-SP4. Palatka: St. Johns River Water Management.

Chemonics International Inc. (2004). International survey of decision support systems for integrated water management. Report prepared for U.S. Agency for International Development.

Chowdhury, A., Jha, M. K., & Chowdary, V. M. (2010). Delineation of groundwater recharge zones and identification of artificial recharge sites in West Medinipur district, West Bengal, using RS, GIS and MCDM techniques. Environmental Earth Sciences, 59(6), 1209–1222.CrossRef

Close, C., Conroy, A., Shannon, J., & Williams, D. (2001). Recharge feasibility assessment for the City of Phoenix North Gateway Water Reclamation Plant. In Proceedings Tenth Biennial Symposium. Artificial Recharge of Groundwater, Tucson, AZ, June 2001, pp. 51–60.

Colby, B. G. (1989). Estimating the value of water in alternative uses. Natural Resources Journal, 29, 511–527.

Cowdin, S. W., & Peters, H. J. (1988). The economics of ground water recharge projects. In Johnson, A. I. & D. J. Finlayson (Eds.) Artificial recharge of groundwater. Proceedings of the international symposium on artificial recharge of groundwater, August 23–27, 1988, Anaheim, California (pp. 14–22). New York: American Society of Civil Engineers.

Cross, M., Lyons., E., Harbour, T., & Cullom, C. (2001). Reconnaissance investigations for sitings of underground storage facilities in western Arizona. In Proceedings Tenth Biennial Symposium. Artificial Recharge of Groundwater, Tucson, AZ, June 2001, pp. 41–50.

Dillon, P., & Molloy, R. (2006). Developing aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) opportunities in Melbourne, technical guidance for ASR. Canberra: CSIRO Land Water.

Freeman III., A. M. (1993). The measurement of environmental and resource values. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

Ghayoumian, J., Mohseni Saravi, M., Feiznia, S., Nouri, B., & Malekian, A. (2007). Application of GIS techniques to determine areas most suitable for artificial groundwater recharge in a coastal aquifer in southern Iran. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 30, 364–374.CrossRef

Gibbons, D. C. (1986). The economic value of water. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future.

Jordan, D. (2006). Understanding decision support systems: A tool for analyzing complex systems. Southwest Hydrology, 5(4), 16–34.

Layard, R., & Glaister, S. (1994). Cost-benefit analysis (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Loucks, D. P., & Gladwell, J. S. (1999). Sustainability criteria for water resources systems. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Mahmoud, S. H., Alazba, A. A., & Amin, M. T. (2014). Identification of potential sites for groundwater recharge using a GIS-based decision support system in Jazan region-Saudi Arabia. Water Resources Management, 28(10), 3319–3340.CrossRef

Maliva, R. G. (2014). Economics of managed aquifer recharge. Water, 6(5), 1251–1279.CrossRef

Maliva, R. G., & Missimer, T. M. (2010). Aquifer storage and recovery and managed aquifer recharge using wells: Planning, hydrogeology, design, and operation. Houston: Schlumberger Corporation.

Maliva, R. G., & Missimer, T. M. (2012). Arid lands water evaluation and management. Berlin: Springer.CrossRef

National Research Council. (2008). Prospects for managed underground storage of recoverable water. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

NRMMC-EPHC–NHMRC. (2009). Australian guidelines for water recycling: Managing health and environmental risks. Phase 2: Managed aquifer recharge natural resource. Management Ministerial Council, Environment Protection and Heritage Council and National Health and Medical Research Council.

Page, D., Dillon, P., Vanderzalm, J., Toze, S., Sidhu, J., Barry, K., et al. (2010). Risk assessment for aquifer storage transfer and recovery with urban stormwater for producing water for a potable quality. Journal of Environmental Quality, 39(6), 2029–2039.CrossRef

Pearce, D., Atkinson, G., & Mourato, S. (2006). Cost-benefit analysis and the environment: Recent developments. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.

Pedrero, F., Alarcón, J. J., Abellán, M., & Perez-Cutillas, P. (2016). Optimization of the use of reclaimed water through groundwater recharge, using a geographic information system. Desalination and Water Treatment, 57(11), 4864–4877.CrossRef

Purkey, D. R., & Huber-Lee, A. (2006). A DSS for long-term water utility planning. Southwest Hydrology, 5(4), 18–31.

Pyne, R. D. G. (2005). Aquifer storage recovery, a guide to groundwater recharge through wells. Gainesville, FL: ASR Systems.

Rahman, M. A., Rusteberg, B., Gogu, R. C., Ferreira, J. L., & Sauter, M. (2012). A new spatial multi-criteria decision support tool for site selection for implementation of managed aquifer recharge. Journal of Environmental Management, 99, 61–75.CrossRef

Reisner, M. (1999). Cadillac desert: The American West and its disappearing water (2nd ed.). New York: Penguin.

Russo, T., Fisher, A. T., & Lockwood, B. S. (2015). Assessment of managed aquifer recharge site suitability using a GIS and modeling. Groundwater, 53(3), 389–400.CrossRef

Stewart, T. J., & Scott, L. (1995). A scenario-based framework for multicriteria decision analysis in water resources planning. Water Resources Research, 31(11), 2835–2843.CrossRef

Todd, D. K. (1965). Economics of ground water recharge. Journal of The Hydraulic Division, Proceeding of The American Society of Civil Engineers, 91, 249–270.

Titel: MAR Project Implementation and Regulatory Issues
verfasst von: Robert G. Maliva
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Anthropogenic Aquifer Recharge
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11083-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-11084-0

Copyright-Jahr: 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11084-0_8

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"