Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
The Future of Home Service: Integration of User Behavior and Scenario Planning in the Domestic Plumbing Service Design Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2021 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

46. MCDM-Based Decision Support System for Product Design and Development

verfasst von : Prabhat Kumar, Ayan Tiwari

Erschienen in: Design for Tomorrow—Volume 2

Verlag: Springer Singapore

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The process of product design and development (PDD) consists of various sequential stages. Each stage requires a complex evaluation and the right decision to attain a successful product. Decision making in these product design stages often is involved with multiple criteria and it is important to use multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) to assist design practitioners for more appropriate decisions. Nowadays, various MCDM methods are available and applied in various areas. The objective of this paper is to identify the types of decision-making problems that may creep during different design stages and possible MCDM methods that might be applicable to solve them. This paper presents comparative analysis and gives information about some of the most popular MCDM methods with the design decision applications as per the available literature. This knowledge can help enterprises make better decisions in a particular design stage to ensure the success of their PDD.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Capturing Knowledge Transfer Using Zachman Framework in Bio-inspired Design Process
Nächstes Kapitel Mindmaps-Based Tool for Planning and Structuring Design Research Papers
Literatur
1.
Kumar, P., Tandon, P.: A paradigm for customer-driven product design approach using extended axiomatic design. J. Intell. Manuf. 30(2), 589–603 (2019)CrossRef
2.
Kumar, P., Tandon, P.: Bionic knowledge and information reuse methodology for uncertainty minimization in product design. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 57(2), 287–309 (2018)CrossRef
3.
4.
Mardani, A., Jusoh, A., Nor, K., Khalifah, Z., Zakwan, N., Valipour, A.: Multiple criteria decision-making techniques and their applications–a review of the literature from 2000 to 2014. Econ. Res. Ekonomska Istraživanja 28(1), 516–571 (2015)CrossRef
5.
Wang, C.H.: Incorporating customer satisfaction into the decision-making process of product configuration: a fuzzy Kano perspective. Int. J. Prod. Res. 51(22), 6651–6662 (2013)CrossRef
6.
Saaty, T.L.: A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J. Math. Psychol. 15(3), 234–281 (1977)MathSciNetCrossRef
7.
Saaty, T. L., Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications Pittsburgh (1996)
8.
Roy, B.: Classement etchoixenprésence de points de vue multiples (la méthode ELECTRE). La Revue d'Informatiqueet de RechercheOpérationelle (RIRO) 8, 57–75 (1968)
9.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Ferguson, R.: Optimal estimation of executive compensation by linear programming. Manage. Sci. 1, 138–151 (1955)MathSciNetCrossRef
10.
Churchman, C.W., Ackoff, R.L., Arnoff, E.L.: Introduction to Operations Research. Wiley, New York (1957)MATH
11.
Brans, J.P., Vincke, P.: A preference ranking organization method: the PROMETHEE method for MCDM. Manage. Sci. 31(6), 647–656 (1985)
12.
Hwang, C.-L., Lai, Y.-J., Liu, T.-Y.: A new approach for multiple objective decision making. Comput. Oper. Res. 20(8), 889–899 (1993)
13.
Afshari, A., Mojahed, M., Yusuff, R.M.: Simple additive weighting approach to personnel selection problem. Int. J. Innov. Manage. Technol. 1(5), 511–515 (December 2010)
14.
15.
Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z.: Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in economics: an overview. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 17(2), 397–427 (2011)
16.
Renzi, C., Leali, F., Di Angelo, L.: A review on decision-making methods in engineering design for the automotive industry. J. Eng. Des. 28(2), 118–143 (2017)CrossRef
17.
Mayyas, A., Shen, Q., Mayyas, A., Abdelhamid, M., Shan, D., Qattawi, A., Omar, M.: Using quality function deployment and analytical hierarchy process for material selection of body-in-white. Mater. Des. 32(5), 2771–2782 (2011)CrossRef
18.
Peng, A.-H., Xiao, X.-M.: Material selection using PROMETHEE combined with analytic network process under hybrid environment. Mater. Des. 47, 643–652 (2013)CrossRef
19.
Zhou, L., Zheng, P., Xu, X., Zhou, W.: A novel AHP-TOPSIS integrated method for case-based retrieval in mechanical product design. Int. J. Prod. Dev. 22(3), 212–229 (2017)CrossRef
20.
Kumar, P., Tandon, P.: Uncertainty and decision making in product design: a fuzzy approach. In DS79: Proceedings of The Third International Conference on Design Creativity, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore (2015)
21.
Darko, A., Chan, A.P.C., Ameyaw, E.E., Owusu, E.K., Pärn, E., Edwards, D.J.: Review of application of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in construction. Int. J. Constr. Manage. 19(5), 436–452 (2019)
22.
Kumar, P., Tandon, P.: Improvised concept development process in design through product ingredients. In International Conference on Research into Design, pp. 453–463. Springer, Singapore (2017, January)
23.
Guitouni, A., Martel, J.M.: Tentative guidelines to help choosing an appropriate MCDA method. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 109, 501–521 (1998)CrossRef
24.
Roy, B., Słowinski, R.: Questions guiding the choice of a multicriteria decision aiding method. EURO J. Dec. Proces. 1, 69–97 (2013)CrossRef
25.
Rehman, S., Khan, S.A.: Multi-criteria wind turbine selection using weighted sum approach. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 8(6), 128–132 (2017)
26.
Xiao, Z., Jianhua, Y., Xin, S.: Multi-criteria decision model for imperfect maintenance using multi-attribute utility theory. Int. J. Perform. Eng. 14(12), 3014–3024 (2019)
27.
Razi, P.Z., Ramli, N.I., Ali, M.I., Ramadhansyah, P.J.: Selection of method in construction industry by using analytical hierarchy process (AHP). In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Vol. 712, No. 1, p. 012015. IOP Publishing (2020, January)
28.
Kumar, R., Singh, K., Jain, S.K.: A combined AHP and TOPSIS approach for prioritizing the attributes for successful implementation of agile manufacturing. Int. J. Product. Perfor. Manage. (2020)
29.
Kheybari, S., Rezaie, F.M., Farazmand, H.: Analytic network process: an overview of applications. Appl. Math. Comput. 367, 124780 (2020)MathSciNetMATH
30.
Rogers, M.: Using electre III to aid the choice of housing construction process within structural engineering. Constr. Manage. Econ. 18(3), 333–342 (2000)CrossRef
31.
Govindan, K., Jepsen, M.B.: ELECTRE: a comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 250(1), 1–29 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRef
32.
dos Santos Rubem, A.P., de Mello, J.C.C.S., Meza, L.A.: A goal programming approach to solve the multiple criteria DEA model. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 260(1), 134–139 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRef
33.
Munoz, D.A., Nembhard, H.B., Camargo, K.: A goal programming approach to address the proposal selection problem: a case study of a clinical and translational science institute. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 25(1), 405–423 (2018)MathSciNetCrossRef
34.
Vinodh, S., Girubha, R.J.: PROMETHEE based sustainable concept selection. Appl. Math. Model. 36(11), 5301–5308 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRef
35.
Ulrich, K.T., Eppinger, S.D.: PDD. McCraw-Hill. Inc., New York (1995)
36.
Pahl, G., Beitz, W.: Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach, 2nd, rev Springer, New York (1996)CrossRef
37.
Anderson, D.M., Pine, J.: Agile Product Development for Mass Customization: How to Develop and Deliver Products for Mass Customization. Irwin Professional Publishing, Chicago, USA (1996)
38.
Montagna, F.: Decision-aiding tools in innovative product development contexts. Res. Eng. Design 22(2), 63–86 (2011)CrossRef
39.
Certa, A., et al.: ELECTRE TRI-based approach to the failure modes classification on the basis of risk parameters: an alternative to the risk priority number. Comput. Industr. Eng. 108, 100–110 (2017)
Metadaten
Titel
MCDM-Based Decision Support System for Product Design and Development
verfasst von
Prabhat Kumar
Ayan Tiwari
Copyright-Jahr
2021
Verlag
Springer Singapore
Buch
Design for Tomorrow—Volume 2

Print ISBN: 978-981-16-0118-7

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-16-0119-4

Copyright-Jahr: 2021

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0119-4_46

Premium Partner

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen. 

    Zur Marktübersicht
    Bildnachweise