nach oben

Learning Environments Research

Erschienen in:

08.07.2019 | Original Paper

Measuring learners’ perceptions of a team-taught learning environment: development and validation of the Learners’ Team Teaching Perceptions Questionnaire (LTTPQ)

verfasst von: Mathea Simons, Stephen Coetzee, Marlies Baeten, Astrid Schmulian

Erschienen in: Learning Environments Research | Ausgabe 1/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Team teaching is a teaching model in which teachers work collaboratively in the preparation, teaching and evaluation of a course. Literature suggests that team teaching potentially provides rich and varied lessons, increased support and learning gains. However, team teaching possibly also could cause some confusion. To support the implementation of team teaching, stakeholders (teachers and policy makers) require an instrument that offers insights to support their decision making. The present study describes the development and validation of an easy-to-use questionnaire to explore learners’ perceptions of team teaching. The questionnaire was developed and validated in four stages: an extensive literature review (1) resulted in a preliminary version of the questionnaire (2) containing advantages and disadvantages for learners of team teaching. Next, a pilot study (3) was conducted, followed by a validation study (4) based on confirmatory factor analysis in two different learning environments of secondary education (Belgium, n = 229 pupils) and higher education (South Africa, n = 350 students). The final questionnaire comprises 16 items and four factors and appears to be valid, internally consistent and reliable.

Vorheriger Artikel What you do is less important than how you do it: the effects of learning environment on student outcomes

Nächster Artikel Measuring Halliwick Foundation course students' perceptions of case-based learning, assessment and transfer of learning

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Akerson, A., & Montgomery, M. S. (2017). Peer-to-peer co-teaching: Idea to implementation. SRATE Journal,26(2), 1–8.

Austin, V. L. (2001). Teachers’ beliefs about co-teaching. Remedial and Special Education,22(4), 2045–2255.CrossRef

Badiali, B., & Titus, N. (2010). Co-teaching: Enhancing students learning through mentor-intern partnerships. School–University Partnerships,4(2), 74–80.

Baeten, M., & Simons, M. (2014). Student teachers’ team teaching: Models, effects and conditions for implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education,41, 92–110.CrossRef

Baeten, M., & Simons, M. (2016). Student teachers’ team teaching : How do learners in the classroom experience team-taught lessons by student teachers? Journal of Education for Teaching,42(1), 93–105.CrossRef

Birrell, J., & Bullough, R. (2005). Teaching with a peer: A follow-up study of the first year of teaching. Action in Teacher Education,27(1), 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2005.10463375.CrossRef

Bollen, K. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.CrossRef

Bronson, C. E., & Dentith, A. M. (2014). Partner teaching: A promising model. Education,134(4), 504–520.

Bullough, R., Young, J., Birrell, J., Clark, D., Egan, M., Erickson, L., et al. (2003). Teaching with a peer: A comparison of two models of student teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education,19, 57–73.CrossRef

Bullough, R. V., Young, J., Erickson, L., Birrell, J. R., Clark, D. C., Egan, M. W., et al. (2002). Rethinking field experiences: Partnership teaching vs. single-placement teaching. The Journal of Teacher Education,53(1), 68–80.CrossRef

Carless, D. (2016). Collaborative EFL teaching in primary schools. ELT Journal,60(4), 328–335.CrossRef

Carpenter, D., Crawford, L., & Walden, R. (2007). Testing the efficacy of team teaching. Learning Environments Research,10, 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-007-9019-y.CrossRef

Chanmugan, A., & Gerlach, B. (2013). A co-teaching model for developing future educators’ teaching effectiveness. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education,25(1), 110–117.

Cook, L., & Friend, M. (1995). Co-teaching: Guidelines for creating effective practices. Focus on Exceptional Children,28(3), 1–16.

Dee, A. (2012). Collaborative clinical practice: An alternate field experience. Issues in Teacher Education,21(2), 147–163.

Deneire, A., Gijbels, D., Vanhoof, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2012). (Wanneer) draagt het beoordelen van leerkrachten bij tot jobtevredenheid? Lessen uit het TALIS-onderzoek. Leerrijk.be, 1–13.

Deneire, A., Vanhoof, J., Faddar, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2013). Denken, handelen en professionele ontwikkeling van Vlaamse leraren en schoolleiders. Eerste resultaten van de Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS). Vlaamse Overheid.

Dugan, K., & Letterman, M. (2008). Student appraisals of collaborative teaching. College Teaching,56(1), 11–15.CrossRef

Entwistle, N. J. (1991). Approaches to learning and perceptions of the learning environment. Introduction to the special issue. Higher Education,22, 201–204.CrossRef

Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). London: Sage.

Gardiner, W. (2010). Mentoring two student teachers: Mentors’ perceptions of peer placements. Teaching Education,21(3), 233–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210903342102.CrossRef

Gardiner, W., & Robinson, K. (2011). Peer field placements with preservice teachers: Negotiating the challenges of professional collaboration. The Professional Educator,35(2).

George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Goodnough, K., Osmond, P., Dibbon, D., Glassman, M., & Stevens, K. (2009). Exploring a triad model of student teaching: Pre-service teacher and cooperating teacher perceptions. Teaching and Teacher Education,25, 285–296.CrossRef

Graue, E., Hatch, K., Rao, K., & Oen, D. (2007). The wisdom of class-size reduction. American Educational Research Journal,44(3), 670–700.CrossRef

Graziano, K., & Navarette, L. (2012). Co-teaching in a teacher education classroom: Collaboration, comprise, and creativity. Issues in Teacher Education,21(1), 109–126.

Helms, M., Alvis, J., & Willis, M. (2005). Planning and implementing shared teaching: An MBA team-teaching case study. Journal of Education for Business,8, 29–34.CrossRef

Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods,6(1), 53–60.

Kamens, M. (2007). Learning about co-teaching: A collaborative student teaching experience for preservice teachers. Teacher Education and Special Education,30(3), 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/088840640703000304.CrossRef

Keefe, E. B., Moore, V., & Duff, F. (2004). The four “knows” of collaborative teaching. Teaching Exceptional Children,36(5), 36–42.CrossRef

Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (2014). The inclusive classroom: Strategies for effective instruction (5th ed.). Cranbury, NJ: Pearson Education.

Millis, B. J. (2012). Why faculty should adopt cooperative learning approaches. In B. Millis (Ed.), Cooperative learning in higher education: Across the disciplines, across the academy. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing LLC.

Murata, R. (2002). What does team teaching mean? A case study of interdisciplinary teaming. The Journal of Educational Research,96(2), 67–77.CrossRef

Musanti, S., & Pence, L. (2010). Collaboration and teacher development: Unpacking resistance, constructing knowledge and navigating identities. Teacher Education Quarterly,37(1), 73–89.

Nevin, A., Thousand, J., & Villa, R. (2009). Collaborative teaching for teacher educators: What does the research say? Teaching and Teacher Education,25, 569–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.02.009.CrossRef

Nokes, J., Bullough, R., Egan, W., Birrell, J., & Hansen, J. (2008). The paired-placement of student teachers: An alternative to traditional placements in secondary schools. Teaching and Teacher Education,24, 2168–2177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.05.001.CrossRef

Pajares, F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research,62, 307–332.CrossRef

Smith, J. (2002). The development of tandem teaching placements. Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning,10(3), 253–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/1361126022000022507.CrossRef

Smith, J. (2004). Developing paired teaching placements. Educational Action Research,12(1), 99–125.CrossRef

Solis, M., Vaughn, S., Swanson, E., & Mcculley, L. (2012). Collaborative models of instruction: The empirical foundations of inclusion and co-teaching. Psychology in the Schools,49(5), 498–510.CrossRef

Sorensen, P. (2004). Learning to teach collaboratively: The use of subject pairs in the school practicum. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy. Available at: http://www.umanitoba.ca/publications/cjeap/pdf%20files/sorensen.pdf.

Struyf, E., Adriaensens, S., & Verschueren, K. (2012). De meerwaarde van zorgverantwoordelijken in het schoolteam. Leerrijk.be. 1–8.

Thousand, J., Villa, N., & Nevin, A. (2006). The many faces of collaborative planning and teaching. Theory into Practice,45(3), 239–248.CrossRef

Tobin, K., Roth, W., & Zimmermann, A. (2001). Learning to teach science in urban schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,38(8), 941–964.CrossRef

Topping, K. J. (2005). Trends in peer learning. Educational Psychology,25(6), 631–645.CrossRef

Vanblaere, B., & Devos, G. (2016). Exploring the link between experienced teachers’ learning outcomes and individual and professional learning community characteristics. School Effectiveness and School Improvement,27(2), 205–227.CrossRef

Welch, M. (2002). Descriptive analysis of team teaching in two elementary classrooms: A formative experimental approach. Remedial and Special Education,21(6), 366–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193250002100606.CrossRef

Zeegers, P. (2001). Approaches to learning in science: A longitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Psychology,71, 115–132.CrossRef

Titel: Measuring learners’ perceptions of a team-taught learning environment: development and validation of the Learners’ Team Teaching Perceptions Questionnaire (LTTPQ)
verfasst von: Mathea Simons
Stephen Coetzee
Marlies Baeten
Astrid Schmulian
Publikationsdatum: 08.07.2019
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Learning Environments Research / Ausgabe 1/2020
Print ISSN: 1387-1579
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1855
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-019-09290-1

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2020

A dynamic systems analysis of classrooms: teacher experience and student motivation

What about the tertiary climate? Reflecting on five decades of class climate research

Myint Swe Khine (Ed.): Emerging trends in learning analytics: leveraging the power of education data (Contemporary approaches to research in learning innovations, volume 12)

Differential effectiveness of alternative middle-school science sequences for students of different ethnicities

Effects of friendship and relationship dimensions of classroom environment on general and academic self-concept

Associations between school climate and student life satisfaction: resilience and bullying as mediating factors