Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Media Convergence Meets Deconvergence Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

5. Media Convergence and the Network Society: Media Logic(s), Polymedia and the Transition of the Public Sphere

verfasst von : Caja Thimm

Erschienen in: Media Convergence and Deconvergence

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In this chapter it is argued that the phenomena which used to be described as convergence have started to reach a level of complexity which can no longer be embraced by the convergence concepts alone. For one, convergence as a term implies a transition process, which for many new social media platforms does not seem to be applicable anymore: they are already polymediated by nature. Consequently, the chapter links the idea of media convergence to a concept, which specifically focuses on the role of technology and its embeddedness in interpersonal and institutional contexts: the concept of “media logic.” To offer an applicable approach for media logic, which opens up the field for empirical research, the concept of “media grammar” is introduced. To demonstrate how media logic and the connected concept of media grammar play out in society, the notion of the digital public sphere is discussed.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Blurred Lines, Distinct Forces: The Evolving Practices of Italian TV Audiences in a Convergent Scenario
Nächstes Kapitel Deconstructing Audiences in Converging Media Environments
Literatur
Altheide, D. L. (2013). Media logic, social control, and fear. Communication Theory, 23(3), 223–238.CrossRef
Altheide, D., & Snow, R. (1979). Media logic. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Altheide, D. L., & Snow, R. P. (1992). Media logic and culture: reply to oakes. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 5(3), 465–472.CrossRef
Arango-Forero, G., Roncallo-Dow, S., & Uribe-Jongbloed, E. (2016). Rethinking convergence: A new world to describe an old idea. In A. Lugmayr & C. Dal Zotto (Eds.), Media Convergence Handbook (Vol. 1, pp. 17–26)., Journalism, Broadcast and Social Media Aspects of Convergence New York: Springer.CrossRef
Bächle, T. C., & Thimm, C. (Eds.) (2014). Mobile Medien—Mobiles Leben. Neue Technologien, Mobilität und die mediatisierte Gesellschaft. Münster: Lit.
Baym, N. (2010). Personal connections in the digital age. Chichester: Polity Press.
Bohman, J. (2004). Expanding dialogue: The internet, the public sphere, and prospects for transnational democracy. The Sociological Review, 52(1), 131–155.CrossRef
Breese, E. B. (2011). Mapping the variety of public spheres. Communication Theory, 21(2), 130–149.CrossRef
Bruns, A. (2008). Blogs, Wikipedia, second life and beyond: From production to produsage. New York: Peter Lang.
Castells, M. (2005). The network society: From knowledge to policy. In M. Castells & G. Cardoso (Eds.), The Network Society: From Knowledge to Policy (pp. 3–21). Washington, D.C.: John Hopkins University.
Castells, M. (2008). The new public sphere: global civil society, Communication networks, and global governance(s). Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 78–93.CrossRef
Chayko, M. (2008). Portable communities. The social dynamics of online and mobile connectedness. Albany: State University of New York.
Couldry, N. (2014). Media logic revisited. In A. Hepp & F. Krotz (Eds.), Mediatized worlds: Culture and society in a media age. London: Palgrave.
Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2013). Conceptualizing mediatization: Contexts, traditions. Arguments. Communication Theory, 23(3), 191–202.CrossRef
Dahlberg, L. (2007). The internet, deliberative democracy, and power: Radicalizing the public sphere. International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics, 3(1), 47–64.CrossRef
Dahlgren, P. (2009). Media and political engagement: citizens, communication, and democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Downey, J., & Fenton, N. (2003). New media, counter publicity and the public sphere. New Media & Society, 5(2), 185–202.CrossRef
Einspänner-Pflock, J., Anastasiadis, M., & Thimm, C. (2015). Ad hoc mini-publics on Twitter: Citizen participation or political communication? Examples from the German National Election 2013. In A. Frame & G. Brachotte (Eds.), Forms and Functions of Political Participation in a Digital World (pp. 52–59). London: Routledge.
Einspänner-Pflock, J., Dang-Anh, M., & Thimm, C. (Eds.) (2014). Digitale Gesellschaft—Partizipationskulturen im Netz. Berlin: Lit.
Goodin, R. E., & Dryzek, J. S. (2006). Deliberative impacts: The macro-political uptake of mini-publics. Politics and Society, 34(2), 219–244.CrossRef
Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hasebrink, U., & Popp, J. (2006). Media repertoires as a result of selective media use. A conceptual approach to the analysis of patterns of exposure. Communications, 31(3), 369–387.CrossRef
Hepp, A. (2011). Medienkultur. Die Kultur mediatisierter Welten. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.CrossRef
Hjarvard, S. (2008). The mediatization of society. Nordicom review, 29(2), 105–134.
Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.
Katzenbach, C. (2012). Technologies as institutions: Rethinking the role of technology in media governance constellations. In N. Just & M. Puppis (Eds.), Trends in communication policy research: New theories, methods and subjects, intellect (pp. 117–138). Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Klinger, U., & Svensson, J. (2014). The emergence of network media logic in political communication: A theoretical approach. New Media Society, 17(8), 1241–1257.CrossRef
Krotz, F. (2007). The meta-process of mediatization as a conceptual frame. Global Media and Communication, 3(3), 256–260.CrossRef
Lundby, K. (Ed.). (2009). Mediatization: concept. Changes, Consequences, New York: Lang.
Lunt, P., & Livingstone, S. (2013). Media studies’ fascination with the concept of the public sphere: Critical reflections and emerging debates. Media, Culture and Society, 35(1), 87–96.CrossRef
Madianou, M., & Miller, D. (2013). Polymedia: Towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 16(2), 169–187.CrossRef
Montpetit, M.-J. (2016). The 2nd Convergence: A technology viewpoint. In A. Lugmayr & C. Dal Zotto (Eds.), Media convergence handbook, Vol. 1: Journalism, broadcast and social media aspects of convergence (pp. 29–58). New York: Springer.
Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J., & McLean, R. (2007). Digital citizenship: The internet, society, and participation. Boston: MIT Press.
Napoli, P. M. (2014). Automated media: An institutional theory perspective on algorithmic media production and consumption. Communication Theory, 24(3), 340–360.CrossRef
Papacharissi, Z., & de Fatima Oliveira, M. (2012). Affective news and networked publics: The rhytms of news storytelling on #Egypt. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 266–282.CrossRef
Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the internet is hiding from you. New York: The Penguin Press.
Rheingold, H. (2000). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sacco, V. (2016). How does social media shape media convergence? The case of journalists covering war and conflict. In A. Lugmayr, C. Dal Zotto, (Eds.), Media convergence handbook, Vol. 1.: Journalism, broadcast and social media aspects of convergence. New York: Springer (pp. 363–87). Berlin: Springer.
Star, A., & Keller, Bill. (2011). Open secrets: WikiLeaks, war and American diplomacy. New York: The New York Times Company.
Steiner, C. (2012). Automate this. How algorithms came to rule our world. New York: Penguin Books.
Strömböck, J. (2008). Four phases of mediatization: an analysis of the mediatization of politics. International Journal of Press/Politics, 2008(13), 26–228.
Surowiecki, J. (2005). The wisdom of crowds. New York: Anchor Books.
Thimm, C. (2004). Mediale Ubiquität und soziale Kommunikation. In U. Thiedecke (Ed.), Soziologie des cyperspace. Medien, strukturen und semantiken (pp. 51–69). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
Thimm, C. (2015). The mediatization of politics and the digital public sphere: Participatory dynamics in mini-publics. In A. Frame & G. Brachotte (Eds.), Forms and Functions of Political Participation in a Digital World (pp. 167–183). London: Routledge.
Thimm, C. (2017, forthcoming): Media technology and media logic(s)—Introducing Media Grammar. In C. Thimm, M. Anastasiadis, & J. Einspänner (Eds.), Media logic(s) revisited: Modelling the interplay between media institutions, media technology and societal change. Basingstoke: Palgave MacMillan.
Thimm, C., Anastasiadis, M. & Einspänner-Pflock, J. (Eds.) (2017, forthcoming). Media logics revisited. Basingstoke: Palgave Macmillan.
Thimm, C., Dang-Anh, M., & Einspänner, J. (2011). Diskurssystem Twitter: Semiotische und handlungstheoretische Perspektiven. In M. Anastasiadis & C. Thimm (Eds.), Social Media: Theorie und Praxis digitaler Sozialität (pp. 265–286). Frankfurt/New York: Lang.
Thimm, C., Dang-Anh, M., & Einspänner, J. (2014). Mediatized politics—structures and strategies of discursive participation and online deliberation on Twitter. In F. Krotz & A. Hepp (Eds.), Mediatized worlds: Culture and society in a media age (pp. 253–269). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillian.CrossRef
Thimm, C., Einspänner, J. & Dang-Anh, M. (2012). Politische deliberation online. Twitter als Element des politischen Diskurses. In A. Hepp & F. Krotz. (Eds.), Mediatisierte Welten: Beschreibungsansätze und Forschungsfelder (pp. 283–307). Wiesbaden: VS.
Tufekci, Z., & Wilson, C. (2012). Social media and the decision to participate in political protest: Observations from tahrir square. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 363–379.CrossRef
Uricchio, W. (2011). The algorithmic turn: Photosynth, augmented reality and the changing implications of the image. Visual Studies, 26(1), 25–35.CrossRef
Van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Van Dijk, J., & Poell, T. (2013). Understanding social media logic. Media and Communication, 1(1), 2–14.CrossRef
Villi, M., Matikainen, J., & Khaldarova, I. (2016). Recommend, tweet, share: User-distributed content (UCD) and the convergence of news and social networks. In A. Lugmayr & C. Dal Zotto (Eds.), Media convergence handbook (Vol. 1, pp. 289–306)., Journalism, Broadcast and Social Media Aspects of Convergence New York: Springer.CrossRef
Webster, J., & Ksiazek, T. (2012). The dynamics of audience fragmentation: Public attention in an age of digital media. Journal of Communication, 62(1), 39–56.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Media Convergence and the Network Society: Media Logic(s), Polymedia and the Transition of the Public Sphere
verfasst von
Caja Thimm
Copyright-Jahr
2017
Buch
Media Convergence and Deconvergence

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-51288-4

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-51289-1

Copyright-Jahr: 2017

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51289-1_5