nach oben

Erschienen in:

19.03.2015

Mental Models and Ethical Decision Making: The Mediating Role of Sensemaking

verfasst von: Zhanna Bagdasarov, James F. Johnson, Alexandra E. MacDougall, Logan M. Steele, Shane Connelly, Michael D. Mumford

Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics | Ausgabe 1/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The relationship between mental models and ethical decision making (EDM), along with the mechanisms through which mental models affect EDM, are not well understood. Using the sensemaking approach to EDM, we empirically tested the relationship of mental models (or knowledge representations about an ethical situation) to EDM. Participants were asked to depict their mental models in response to an ethics case to reveal their understanding of the ethical dilemma, and then provide a response, along with a rationale, to a different ethical problem. Findings indicated that complexity of respondents’ mental models was related to EDM, and that this relationship was mediated by sensemaking processes (i.e., cause and constraint criticality, and forecast quality). The implications of these findings for improving integrity training in organizations, as well as ultimately understanding the role of mental models in EDM, are discussed.

Vorheriger Artikel Effective Elements to Establish an Ethical Infrastructure: An Exploratory Study of SMEs in the Madrid Region

Nächster Artikel Behavioral Ethics: A Critique and a Proposal

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Antes, A. L., Brown, R. P., Murphy, S. T., Waples, E. P., Mumford, M. D., Connelly, S., & Devenport, L. D. (2007). Personality and ethical decision-making in research: The role of perceptions of self and others. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 2(4), 15–34.CrossRef

Bagdasarov, Z., Harkrider, L. N., Johnson, J. F., MacDougall, A. E., Devenport, L. D., Connelly, S.,… & Thiel, C. E. (2012). An investigation of case-based instructional strategies on learning, retention, and ethical decision-making. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 7(4), 79–86.

Bagdasarov, Z., Thiel, C. E., Johnson, J. F., Connelly, S., Harkrider, L. N., Devenport, L. D., & Mumford, M. D. (2013). Case-based ethics instruction: The influence of contextual and individual factors in case content on ethical decision-making. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(3), 1305–1322. doi:10.1007/s11948-012-9414-3.CrossRef

Barrett, J. D., Peterson, D. R., Hester, K. S., Robledo, I. C., Day, E. A., Hougen, D. P., & Mumford, M. D. (2013). Thinking about applications: Effects on mental models and creative problem-solving. Creativity Research Journal, 25(2), 199–212. doi:10.1080/10400419.2013.783758.CrossRef

Basu, K., & Palazzo, G. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: A process model of sensemaking. Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 122–136.CrossRef

Brock, M. E., Vert, A., Kligyte, V., Waples, E. P., Sevier, S. T., & Mumford, M. D. (2008). Mental models: An alternative evaluation of a sensemaking approach to ethics instruction. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14(4), 449–472. doi:10.1007/z11948-008-9076-3.CrossRef

Carley, K., & Palmquist, M. (1992). Extracting, representing, and analyzing mental models. Social Forces, 70(3), 601–636.CrossRef

Caughron, J. J., Antes, A. L., Stenmark, C. K., Thiel, C. E., Wang, X., & Mumford, M. D. (2011). Sensemaking strategies for ethical decision making. Ethics and Behavior, 21(5), 351–366.CrossRef

Chermack, T. J. (2003). Mental models in decision making and implications for human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 5(4), 408–422. doi:10.1177/1523422303257373.CrossRef

Craft, J. L. (2013). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 2004–2011. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(2), 221–259. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1518-9.CrossRef

Devenport, L. D. (2005). Big Pharma. Norman: University of Oklahoma.

Doerner, D., & Schaub, H. (1994). Errors in planning and decision making and the nature of human information processing. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 43, 433–453.CrossRef

Drazin, R., Glynn, M. A., & Kazanjian, R. K. (1999). Multilevel theorizing about creativity in organizations: A sensemaking perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 286–307.

Ethics Resource Center (2013). National business ethics survey (NBES) of the U.S. workforce. Arlington, VA: Ethics Resource Center.

Ford, R. C., & Richardson, W. D. (1994). Ethical decision making: A review of the empirical literature. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(3), 205–221.CrossRef

Gino, F., & Ariely, D. (2012). The dark side of creativity: original thinkers can be more dishonest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(3), 445–459. doi:10.1037/a0026406.CrossRef

Gino, F., & Wiltermuth, S. S. (2014). Evil genius? How dishonesty can lead to greater creativity. Psychological Science, 25, 973–981. doi:10.1177/0956797614520714.CrossRef

Goldvarg, E., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2001). Naive causality: A mental model theory of causal meaning and reasoning. Cognitive Science, 25, 565–610.CrossRef

Harkrider, L. N., MacDougall, A. E., Bagdasarov, Z., Johnson, J. F., Thiel, C. E., Mumford, M. D., et al. (2013). Structuring case-based ethics trainings: How comparing cases and structured prompts influence training effectiveness. Ethics and Behavior, 23(3), 179–198. doi:10.1080/10508422.2013.774865.CrossRef

Harkrider, L. N., Thiel, C. E., Bagdasarov, Z., Mumford, M. D., Johnson, J. F., Connelly, S., & Devenport, L. D. (2012). Improving case-based ethics training with codes of conduct and forecasting content. Ethics and Behavior, 22(4), 258–280. doi:10.1080/10508422.2012.661311.CrossRef

Hester, K. S., Robledo, I. C., Barrett, J. D., Peterson, D. R., Hougen, D. P., Day, E. A., & Mumford, M. D. (2012). Causal analysis to enhance creative problem-solving: Performance and effects on mental models. Creativity Research Journal, 24(2), 115–133. doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.677249.CrossRef

Hogarth, R. M., & Makridakis, S. (1981). Forecasting and planning: An evaluation. Management Science, 27, 115–138.CrossRef

Johnson, J. F., Bagdasarov, Z., Harkrider, L. N., MacDougall, A. E., Connelly, S., Devenport, L. D., & Mumford, M. D. (2013). The effects of note-taking and review on sensemaking and ethical decision-making. Ethics and Behavior, 23(4), 299–323. doi:10.1080/10508422.2013.774275.CrossRef

Johnson, J. F., Thiel, C. E., Bagdasarov, Z., Connelly, S., Harkrider, L., Devenport, L. D., et al. (2012). Case-based ethics education: The impact of cause complexity and outcome favorability on ethicality. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 7(3), 63–77.CrossRef

Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Kligyte, V., Marcy, R. T., Waples, E. P., Sevier, S. T., Godfrey, E. S., Mumford, M. D., & Hougen, D. F. (2008). Application of a sensemaking approach to ethics training in the physical sciences and engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14(2), 251–278. doi:10.1007/s11948-007-9048-z.CrossRef

Loe, T. W., Ferrell, L., & Mansfield, P. (2000). A review of empirical studies assessing ethical decision making in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 25(3), 185–204.CrossRef

MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 593–614.CrossRef

MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(1), 99–128.CrossRef

Maitlis, S., & Sonenshein, S. (2010). Sensemaking in crisis and change: Inspiration and insights from Weick (1988). Journal of Management Studies, 47(3), 551–580. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00908.x.CrossRef

Mumford, M. D., Connelly, S., Brown, R. P., Murphy, S. T., Hill, J. H., Antes, A. L., et al. (2008). Sensemaking approach to ethics training for scientists: Preliminary evidence of training effectiveness. Ethics and Behavior, 18, 315–339. doi:10.1080/10508420802487815.CrossRef

Mumford, M. D., Devenport, L. D., Brown, R. P., Connelly, M. S., Murphy, S. T., Hill, J. H., & Antes, A. L. (2006). Validation of ethical decision-making measures: Evidence for a new set of measures. Ethics and Behavior, 16(4), 319–345. doi:10.1207/s15327019eb1604_4.CrossRef

Mumford, M. D., Feldman, J. M., Hein, M. B., & Nago, D. J. (2001a). Tradeoffs between ideas and structure: Individual versus group performance in creative-problem solving. Journal of Creative Behavior, 35(1), 1–23.CrossRef

Mumford, M. D., Hester, K. S., Robledo, I. C., Peterson, D. R., Day, E. A., Hougen, D. F., & Barrett, J. D. (2012). Mental models and creative problem-solving: The relationship of objective and subjective model attributes. Creativity Research Journal, 24(4), 311–330. doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.730008.CrossRef

Mumford, M. D., Schultz, R., & Van Doorn, J. A. (2001b). Performance in planning: Processes, requirements, and errors. Review of General Psychology, 5, 213–240.CrossRef

Mumford, M. D., Waples, E. P., Antes, A. L., Brown, R. P., Connelly, S., Murphy, S. T., & Devenport, L. D. (2010). Creativity and ethics: The relationship of creative and ethical problem-solving. Creativity Research Journal, 22(1), 74–89. doi:10.1080/10400410903579619.CrossRef

O’Fallon, M. J., & Butterfield, K. D. (2005). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996–2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(4), 375–413.CrossRef

Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), 717–731.CrossRef

Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.CrossRef

Riley, S. & Gabora, L. (2012). Evidence that threatening situations enhance creativity. In: Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2234–2239). Held August 1–4, Sapporo Japan. Houston, TX: Cognitive Science Society.

Rouse, W. B., & Morris, N. M. (1986). On looking into the black box: Prospects and limits in the search for mental models. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 349–363.CrossRef

Sonenshein, S. (2007). The role of construction, intuition, and justification in responding to ethical issues at work: The sensemaking-intuition model. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1022–1040.CrossRef

Stenmark, C. K., Antes, A. L., Thiel, C. E., Caughron, J. J., Wang, X., & Mumford, M. D. (2011). Consequences identification in forecasting and ethical decision-making. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 6(1), 25–32. doi:10.1525/jer.2011.6.1.25.CrossRef

Stenmark, C. K., Antes, A. L., Wang, X., Caughron, J. J., Thiel, C. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2010). Strategies in forecasting outcomes in ethical decision-making: Identifying and analyzing the causes of the problem. Ethics and Behavior, 20(2), 110–127. doi:10.1080/10508421003595935.CrossRef

Swanson, R. A. (1994). Analysis for improving performance: Tools for diagnosing organizations and documenting workplace expertise. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Smith-Crowe, K. (2008). Ethical decision making: Where we’ve been and where we’re going. The Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 545–607.CrossRef

Thiel, C. E., Bagdasarov, Z., Harkrider, L., Johnson, J. F., & Mumford, M. D. (2012). Leader ethical decision-making in organizations: Strategies for sensemaking. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(1), 49–64. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1299-1.CrossRef

Thiel, C. E., Connelly, S., Harkrider, L., Devenport, L. D., Bagdasarov, Z., Johnson, J. F., & Mumford, M. D. (2013). Case-based knowledge and ethics education: Improving learning and transfer through emotionally rich cases. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(1), 265–286. doi:10.1007/s11948-011-9318-7.CrossRef

Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management, 32(6), 951–990.CrossRef

Waples, E. P., & Antes, A. L. (2011). Sensemaking: A fresh framework for ethics education in management. In C. Wankel & A. Stachowicz-Stanusch (Eds.), Management education for integrity: Ethically educating tomorrow’s business leaders (pp. 15–47). Bingley, UK: Emerald.

Weick, K. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Werhane, P. H. (2002). Moral imagination and systems thinking. Journal of Business Ethics, 38, 33–42.CrossRef

Westbrook, L. (2006). Mental models: A theoretical overview and preliminary study. Journal of Information Science, 32(6), 563–579.CrossRef

Woehr, D. J., & Huffcutt, A. I. (1994). Rater training for performance appraisal: A quantitative review. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67(3), 189–205.CrossRef

Titel: Mental Models and Ethical Decision Making: The Mediating Role of Sensemaking
verfasst von: Zhanna Bagdasarov
James F. Johnson
Alexandra E. MacDougall
Logan M. Steele
Shane Connelly
Michael D. Mumford
Publikationsdatum: 19.03.2015
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics / Ausgabe 1/2016
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2620-6

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2016

Virtue Ethics and the Practice–Institution Schema: An Ethical Case of Excellent Business Practices

A Systematic Literature Review on Islamic Values Applied in Quality Management Context

Challenging the ‘Million Zeros’: The Importance of Imagination for Business Ethics Education

Online Education: Values Dilemma in Business and the Search for Empathic Engagement

Ethics Education and Accounting Students’ Level of Moral Development: Experimental Design in Tunisian Audit Context

Humility in Business: A Contextual Approach