nach oben

Electrical Engineering

14.02.2025 | Original Paper

Method for identifying false data injection attacks in power grid based on improved CNN-LSTM

verfasst von: Jie Cao, Qiming Wang, Zhaoyang Qu, Chin-Ling Chen, Yunchang Dong

Erschienen in: Electrical Engineering

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

In contemporary power systems, the interaction between informational and physical dimensions significantly increases vulnerability to network attacks, particularly false data injection attacks (FDIAs). These attacks are characterized by their stealth and potential for severe disruption, posing a threat to the stability and security of power grid operations. The complexity and high dimensionality of operational data in power systems further exacerbate computational challenges, leading to reduced accuracy in traditional attack detection models. To address these issues, this paper introduces an improved CNN-LSTM approach for FDIA detection in power grids. It incorporates an attention mechanism in the autoencoder structure for refined feature extraction and utilizes a sparrow search algorithm for optimizing model parameters. Evaluational results show over 95% accuracy rate, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed method in diverse power grid scenarios.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Gai K, Xu K, Lu Z et al (2019) Fusion of cognitive wireless networks and edge computing. IEEE Wirel Commun 26(3):69–75. https://doi.org/10.1109/MWC.2019.1800407CrossRefMATH

Ting Y, Lu ZH, Yajian ZH et al (2021) Fusion control method for cyber-physical power system based on information entropy calculation model. Autom Elect Power Syst 45(12):10. https://doi.org/10.7500/AEPS20201013009CrossRefMATH

Sahin D, Gungor et al (2011) Smart grid technologies: communication technologies and standards. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 7(4):529–539. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2011.2166794CrossRefMATH

Giraldo J, Sarkar E, Cardenas A et al (2017) Security and privacy in cyber-physical systems: a survey of surveys. IEEE Design Test 34(4):7–17. https://doi.org/10.1109/MDAT.2017.2709310CrossRefMATH

Kaveh D, Zhaoyu W, Jianhui W et al (2018) A survey on state estimation techniques and challenges in smart distribution systems. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 10(2):2312–2322. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2018.2870600CrossRefMATH

Li J (2020) Vulnerabilities mapping based on OWASP-SANS: a survey for static. Appl Secur Test (SAST). https://doi.org/10.33166/AETIC.2020.03.001CrossRef

Yue M, Hong T, Wang J (2019) Descriptive analytics based anomaly detection for cybersecure load forecasting. IEEE 10(6):5964–5974. https://doi.org/10.1109/PESGM40551.2019.8974079CrossRefMATH

Liang G, Weller SR, Zhao J, Luo F, Dong ZY (2017) The 2015 Ukraine blackout: Implications for false data injection attacks. IEEE Trans Power Syst 32(4):3317–3318. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2016.2631891CrossRefMATH

Li J (2020) Vulnerabilities mapping based on OWASP-SANS: a survey for static application security testing (SAST). Ann Emerg Technol Comput (AEsTiC) 4(3):1–8. https://doi.org/10.33166/AETIC.2020.03.001CrossRef

10.

Zheng R Gu J (2019) Anomaly detection for power system forecasting under data corruption based on variational auto-encoder. In: International conference on renewable power generation, pp 206–6. https://doi.org/10.1049/cp.2019.0461

11.

Liang G, Zhao J, Luo F et al (2016) A review of false data injection attacks against modern power systems. IEEE Trans Smart Grid. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsg.2015.2495133CrossRefMATH

12.

Liu S, Mashayekh S, Kundur D et al (2013) A framework for modeling cyber-physical switching attacks in smart grid. IEEE Trans Emerg Top Comput 1(2):273–285CrossRefMATH

13.

Margossian H, Sayed MA, Fawaz W et al (2019) Partial grid false data injection attacks against state estimation. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 110:623–629CrossRef

14.

Hug G, Giampapa JA (2012) Vulnerability assessment of AC state estimation with respect to false data injection cyber-attacks. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 3(3):1362–1370CrossRefMATH

15.

Ashrafuzzaman M, Das S, Chakhchoukh Y et al (2020) Detecting stealthy false data injection attacks in the smart grid using ensemble-based machine learning–science direct. Comput Secur 97:101994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2020.101994CrossRef

16.

Xiong S, Li B, Zhu S (2023) DCGNN: a single-stage 3D object detection network based on density clustering and graph neural network. Complex Intell Syst 9(3):3399–3408CrossRefMATH

17.

Guan Y, Ge X (2017) Distributed attack detection and secure estimation of networked cyber-physical systems against false data injection attacks and jamming attacks. IEEE Trans Signal Inf Process Over Netw 4(1):48–59. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSIPN.2017.2749959MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

18.

Xu B, Guo F, Wen C, et al. (2021) Detecting false data injection attacks in smart grids with modeling errors: a deep transfer learning based approach. 2104.06307. 2104.06307v3

19.

Hink RCB, Beaver JM, Buckner MA et al. (2014) Machine learning for power system disturbance and cyber-attack discrimination. In: 7th international symposium on resilient control systems (ISRCS), IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISRCS.2014.6900095

20.

Singh NK, Mahajan V (2023) Analysis and evaluation of cyber-attack impact on critical power system infrastructure. Smart Sci 09(3):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/23080477.2020.1861502CrossRefMATH

21.

Musleh AS, Chen G, Dong ZY (2020) A survey on the detection algorithms for false data injection attacks in smart grids. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 11(3):2218–2234. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2019.2949998CrossRefMATH

22.

Li B, Xiao G, Lu R et al (2019) On feasibility and limitations of detecting false data injection attacks on power grid state estimation using D-FACTS devices. IEEE Trans Industr Inf 16(2):854–864. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2019.2922215CrossRefMATH

23.

Pal S, Sikdar B, Chow J (2017) Classification and detection of PMU data manipulation attacks using transmission line parameters. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 9(5):5057–5066. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2017.2679122CrossRefMATH

24.

Drayer E, Routtenberg T (2018) Detection of false data injection attacks in power systems with graph fourier transform. In: 2018 IEEE global conference on signal and information processing (GlobalSIP). IEEE, pp 890–894. https://doi.org/10.1109/GlobalSIP.2018.8646454

25.

Chaojun G, Jirutitijaroen P, Motani M (2015) Detecting false data injection attacks in AC state estimation. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 6(5):2476–2483. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2015.2388545CrossRefMATH

26.

He Y, Mendis GJ, Wei J (2017) Real-time detection of false data injection attacks in smart grid: a deep learning-based intelligent mechanism. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 8(5):2505–2516. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2017.2703842CrossRefMATH

27.

Xue D, Jing X, Liu H (2019) Detection of false data injection attacks in smart grid utilizing ELM-based OCON framework. IEEE Access 7:31762–31773. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2902910CrossRef

28.

Wang Y, Shi W, Jin Q et al. (2019) an accurate false data detection in smart grid based on residual recurrent neural network and adaptive threshold. In: 2019 IEEE international conference on energy internet (ICEI).IEEE, pp 499–504. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEI.2019.00094

29.

Jorjani M, Seifi H, Yazdian-Varjani A (2020) a graph theory-based approach to detect false data injection attacks in power system AC state estimation. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 17(4):2465–2475. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2020.2999571CrossRefMATH

30.

Zhao Y, Jia X, An D et al. (2020) LSTM-based false data injection attack detection in smart grids. In: 2020 35th Youth Academic Annual conference of chinese association of automation (YAC), pp 638–644. https://doi.org/10.1109/YAC51587.2020.9337674

31.

Niu X, Li J, Sun J, et al. (2019) Dynamic detection of false data injection attack in smart grid using deep learning. In: IEEE power and energy society innovative smart grid technologies conference. IEEE, pp 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISGT.2019.8791598

32.

Li Z, Xie Y, Ma R, Wei Z (2024) Optimizing CNN-LSTM for the localization of false data injection attacks in power systems. Appl Sci 14:6865. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14166865CrossRefMATH

33.

Wu Y, Wang Q, Guo N et al (2023) Efficient multi-source self-attention data fusion for fdia detection in smart grid. Symmetry 15(5):1019CrossRefMATH

34.

Malhi A, Gao RX (2003) PCA-based feature selection scheme for machine defect classification. IEEE IEEE Trans Instrum Meas. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2004.834070CrossRefMATH

35.

Cao LJ, Chua KS, Chong WK et al (2003) A comparison of PCA, KPCA and ICA for dimensionality reduction in support vector machine. Neurocomputing 55(1–2):321–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-2312(03)00433-8CrossRefMATH

36.

Kuang F, Xu W, Zhang S (2014) A novel hybrid KPCA and SVM with GA model for intrusion detection. Appl Soft Comput 18(C):178–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.01.028CrossRefMATH

37.

Yin J, Yan X (2021) Stacked sparse autoencoder monitoring model based on fault-related variable selection. Soft Comput 25(5):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-05384-8CrossRefMATH

38.

Feiniu Y, Lin ZH, Jinting X et al (2019) Theorise and applications of auto-encoder neural networks: a literature survey. Chin J Comput 42(01):203–230. https://doi.org/10.11897/SP.J.1016.2019.00203CrossRef

39.

Hinton GE, Salakhutdinov RR (2006) Reducing the dimensiona lity of data with neural networks. Science 313(28):504–507. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1127647MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

40.

Ahmed M, Pathan ASK (2020) False data injection attack (FDIA): an overview and new metrics for fair evaluation of its countermeasure. Complex Adapt Syst Model 8:1–14CrossRefMATH

41.

Berahmand K, Daneshfar F, Salehi ES et al (2024) Autoencoders and their applications in machine learning: a survey. Artif Intell Rev 57(2):28CrossRefMATH

42.

Pinaya WHL, Vieira S, Garcia-Dias R et al (2020) Autoencoders. Machine learning. Academic Press, Cambridge, pp 193–208CrossRefMATH

43.

Vaswani A (2017) Attention is all you need. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst

44.

Sharif Razavian A, Azizpour H, Sullivan J, et al. (2014) CNN features off-the-shelf: an astounding baseline for recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops, pp 806–813

45.

Yu Y, Si X, Hu C et al (2019) A review of recurrent neural networks: LSTM cells and network architectures. Neural Comput 31(7):1235–1270MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

46.

Baldi P (2012) Autoencoders, unsupervised learning, and deep architectures. In: Proceedings of ICML workshop on unsupervised and transfer learning. JMLR Workshop and Conference Proceedings, pp 37–49

47.

Nowdeh SA, Davoudkhani IF, Moghaddam MJH et al (2019) Fuzzy multi-objective placement of renewable energy sources in distribution system with objective of loss reduction and reliability improvement using a novel hybrid method. Appl Soft Comput 77:761–779CrossRef

48.

Jahannoush M, Nowdeh SA (2020) Optimal designing and management of a stand-alone hybrid energy system using meta-heuristic improved sine–cosine algorithm for Recreational Center, case study for Iran country. Appl Soft Comput 96:106611CrossRef

49.

Alanazi A, Alanazi M, Nowdeh SA et al (2022) An optimal sizing framework for autonomous photovoltaic/hydrokinetic/hydrogen energy system considering cost, reliability and forced outage rate using horse herd optimization. Energy Rep 8:7154–7175CrossRefMATH

50.

Xue J, Shen B (2020) A novel swarm intelligence optimization approach: sparrow search algorithm. Syst Sci Control Eng 8(1):22–34CrossRefMATH

51.

Datasets: https://sites.google.com/a/uah.edu/tommy-morris-uah/ics-data-sets

Titel: Method for identifying false data injection attacks in power grid based on improved CNN-LSTM
verfasst von: Jie Cao
Qiming Wang
Zhaoyang Qu
Chin-Ling Chen
Yunchang Dong
Publikationsdatum: 14.02.2025
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Electrical Engineering
Print ISSN: 0948-7921
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0487
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-025-02974-3

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"