nach oben

Erschienen in:

2020 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

3. Methodology to Align Lean and Value-Based Management

verfasst von : Gerd Kaufmann

Erschienen in: Aligning Lean and Value-based Management

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This chapter outlines the research design of the current study. It starts by describing the all-embracing “research masterplan”, which contains the creation of a conceptual value driver model based on existing literature (see Chap. 4) and its validation and refinement through primary data (see Chap. 5). Moreover, this chapter details the study’s underlying methodological framework, which reflects the author’s research philosophy of critical realism, as well as related methodological choices and strategies.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Theoretical Background of Lean and Value-Based Management

Nächstes Kapitel Examining Prior Research of Lean Management

“Transferability” is a term used in qualitative research that equals generalisability or external validity within quantitative studies (Bryman & Bell, 2015).

Allan, G. (2003). A critique of using grounded theory as a research method. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 2(1), 1–10. Retrieved from http://www.ejbrm.com/issue/download.html?idArticle=126

Babbie, R. (2016). The basics of social research (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.

Bernard, H. R. (2011). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (5th ed.). Lanham, MD: AltaMira.

Bhaskar, R. (1975). A realist theory of science. Leeds: Leeds Books.

Bhaskar, R. (1998). Philosophy and scientific realism. In M. S. Archer (Ed.), Critical realism: Essential readings (pp. 16–47). London: Routledge.

Bhaskar, R. (2010). Reclaiming reality: A critical introduction to contemporary philosophy. London: Routledge.CrossRef

Boyce, C., & Neale, P. (2006). Conducting in-depth interviews: A guide for designing and conducting in-depth interviews for evaluation input. Watertown, MA: Pathfinder International.

Brace, I. (2008). Questionnaire design: How to plan, structure and write survey material for effective market research (2nd ed.). London: Kogan Page Publishers.

Brown, B. J., & Baker, S. (2007). Philosophies of research into higher education. London: Bloomsbury.

Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2015). Business research methods (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Collis, J., & Hussey, R. (2014). Business research: A practical guide for undergraduate & postgraduate students (4th ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRef

Coughlan, P., & Coghlan, D. (2002). Action research for operations management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22(2), 220–240. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570210417515CrossRef

Cronin, P., Ryan, F., & Coughlan, M. (2008). Undertaking a literature review: A step-by-step approach. British Journal of Nursing, 17(1), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2008.17.1.28059CrossRef

Cruickshank, J. (2003). Critical realism: The difference it makes. London: Routledge.CrossRef

De Vaus, D. A. (2014). Surveys in social research (6th ed.). Routledge: Abingdon.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2013). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 1–42). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Dobson, P. (2002). Critical realism and information systems research: Why bother with philosophy? Information Research, 7(2), 1–13. Retrieved from http://www.informationr.net/ir/7-2/paper124.html

Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R., & Jackson, P. R. (2015). Management and business research (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.

Fernández, W. D. (2004). Using the Glaserian approach in grounded studies of emerging business practices. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 2(2), 83–94. Retrieved from http://www.ejbrm.com/issue/download.html?idArticle=137

Fetterman, D. M. (1998). Ethnography: Step by step (Applied social research methods series: Vol. 17) (2nd ed.). London: SAGE.

Fink, A. (2003). The survey handbook (2nd ed.). London: SAGE.CrossRef

Fletcher, A. J. (2016). Applying critical realism in qualitative research: Methodology meets method. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(2), 181–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2016.1144401CrossRef

Geertz, C. (2000). Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretive anthropology (3rd ed.). New York: Basic Books.

Glaser, B. G. (2010). The future of grounded theory. Grounded Theory Review, 9(2), 1–14.

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

Goulding, C. (2002). Grounded theory: A practical guide for management, business and market researchers. London: SAGE.CrossRef

Gray, D. E. (2004). Doing research in the real world. London: SAGE.

Greenwood, D. J. (1999). Action research: From practice to writing in an international action research development program (Vol. 8). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publication.

Jansen, H. (2010). The logic of qualitative survey research and its position in the field of social research methods. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 11(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-11.2.1450CrossRef

Jha, N. K. (2008). Research methodology. Chandigarh: Abhishek Publications.

Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research planner. Singapore: Springer.CrossRef

Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques (2nd ed.). New Delhi: New Age International.

Kumar, R. (2014). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.

Marais, H. (2012). A multi-methodological framework for the design and evaluation of complex research projects and reports in business and management studies. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 10(2), 64–76.

Mayan, M. J. (2009). Essentials of qualitative inquiry. London: Routledge.

Menard, S. (2002). Longitudinal research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.CrossRef

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.

Mkansi, M., & Acheampong, E. A. (2012). Research philosophy debates and classifications: Students’ dilemma. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 10(2), 132–140. Retrieved from http://www.ejbrm.com/issue/download.html?idArticle=285

Muecke, M. A. (1994). On the evaluation of ethnographies. In J. M. Morse & M. A. Muecke (Eds.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (pp. 187–209). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Nightingale, D. J., & Srinivasan, J. (2011). Beyond the lean revolution: Achieving successful and sustainable enterprise transformation. New York: American Management Association.

Okoli, C., & Schabram, K. (2010). A guide to conducting a systematic literature review of information systems research. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, 10(26), 1–49. Retrieved from http://sprouts.aisnet.org/10-26

Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2005). Taking the “Q” out of research: Teaching research methodology courses without the divide between quantitative and qualitative paradigms. Quality and Quantity, 39(3), 267–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-004-1670-0CrossRef

Ployhart, R. E., & Vandenberg, R. J. (2010). Longitudinal research: The theory, design, and analysis of change. Journal of Management, 36(1), 94–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309352110CrossRef

Pring, R. (2010). Philosophy of educational research. London: Bloomsbury.

Remenyi, D., & Williams, B. (1998). Doing research in business and management: An introduction to process and method. London: SAGE.

Robson, C. (2011). Real world research: A resource for users of social research methods in applied settings (3rd ed.). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

Rowlands, B. H. (2005). Grounded in practice: Using interpretive research to build theory. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methodology, 3(1), 81–92. Retrieved from http://www.ejbrm.com/volume3/issue1/p81

Rowley, J. (2014). Designing and using research questionnaires. Management Research Review, 37(3), 308–330. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-02-2013-0027CrossRef

Sachdeva, J. K. (2009). Business research methodology. Mumbai: Himalaya Publishing House.

Sandelowski, M. (2000). Focus on research methods: Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing & Health, 23(4), 334–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4<334::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-GCrossRef

Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2015). Research methods for business students (7th ed.). New York: Pearson.

Schwandt, T. A. (2001). Dictionary of qualitative inquiry (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Shento, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201CrossRef

Siegel, H. (2011). Epistemological relativism: Arguments pro and con. In S. D. Hales (Ed.), A companion to relativism (pp. 199–218). Chichester: Wiley.CrossRef

Somekh, B. (2006). Action research: A methodology for change and development. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Suddaby, R. (2006). From the editors: What grounded theory is not. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 633–642. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.22083020CrossRef

Trauth, E. M. (2001). Qualitative research in IS: Issues and trends. Hershey, PA: Idea Group.CrossRef

Van Maanen, J. (2011). Ethnography as work: Some rules of engagement. Journal of Management Studies, 48(1), 218–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00980.xCrossRef

Wall, S. (2015). Focused ethnography: A methodological adaption for social research in emerging contexts. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 16(1), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-16.1.2182CrossRef

Wallace, W. L. (1971). The logic of science in sociology. Chicago, IL: Aldine de Gruyter.

Walliman, N. S. R. (2011). Research methods: The basics. London: Routledge.

Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), xiii–xxiii. https://doi.org/10.2307/4132319CrossRef

Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.

Titel: Methodology to Align Lean and Value-Based Management
verfasst von: Gerd Kaufmann
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Aligning Lean and Value-based Management
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-38466-1

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-38467-8

Copyright-Jahr: 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38467-8_3