nach oben

Erschienen in:

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Metrics for Innovation and Entrepreneurial Networks

verfasst von : Luís Farinha, João J. Ferreira

Erschienen in: Industry 4.0

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This study aims to find a model to measure the regional dynamics of the Triple and Quadruple Helixes (Academia-Firms-Local Governments and Civil Society), based on innovativeness pillars. In accordance with this purpose, different strands of literature are identified according to their focus on specific regional competitiveness governance mechanisms. We put forward an overview of the state-of-the-art of research and is duly assessed in order to develop and propose a framework of analysis that enables an integrated approach in the context of collaborative dynamics. We conclude by presenting the Regional Helix Scoreboard (RHS) for the study of regional collaborative dynamics, which integrates and associates different backgrounds and identifies a number of key performance indicators for research challenges.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Family Business and Entrepreneurship: Competencies and Organizational Behavior

Nächstes Kapitel Determinants and Interdependence of Firm Entry, Exit and Mobility

Acs, Z., & Amorós, J. (2015). Entrepreneurship and development: The role of clusters. Small Business Economics, 39(3), 561–574.

Al-Ashaab, A., Flores, M., Doultsinou, A., & Magyar, A. (2011). A balanced scorecard for measuring the impact of industry–university collaboration. Production Planning and Control, 22(5–6), 554–570.CrossRef

Alfaro, J. J., Rodriguez-Rodriguez, R., Verdecho, M. J., & Ortiz, A. (2009). Business process interoperability and collaborative performance measurement. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 22(9), 877–889.CrossRef

Arranz, N., & Arroyabe, J. C. (2008). The choice of partners in R&D cooperation: An empirical analysis of Spanish firms. Technovation, 28(1–2), 88–100.CrossRef

Asheim, B. T., & Coenen, L. (2005). Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: Comparing Nordic clusters. Research Policy, 34(8), 1173–1190.CrossRef

Asheim, B. T., Ejermo, O., & Rickne, A. (2009). When is regional ‘Beautiful’? Implications for knowledge flows, entrepreneurship and innovation. Industry and Innovation, 16(1), 1–9.CrossRef

Asheim, B. T., Smith, H. L., & Oughton, C. (2011). Regional innovation systems: Theory, empirics and policy. Regional Studies, 45(7), 875–891.CrossRef

Audretsch, D. B., & Keilbach, M. (2004). Entrepreneurship and regional growth: An evolutionary interpretation. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14(5), 605–616.CrossRef

Audretsch, D. B., & Keilbach, M. (2005). Entrepreneurship capital and regional growth. The Annals of Regional Science, 39(3), 457–469.CrossRef

Audretsch, D. B., Link, A. N., & Peña, I. (2012). Academic entrepreneurship and economic competitiveness: Introduction to the special issue. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 21(5–6), 427–428.CrossRef

Audretsch, D. B., Belitski, M., & Desai, S. (2015). Entrepreneurship and economic development in cities. The Annals of Regional Science, 55(1), 33–60.CrossRef

Awazu, Y. (2006). Managing technology alliances: The case for knowledge management. International Journal of Information Management, 26(6), 484–493.CrossRef

Balkyte, A., & Tvaronavičiene, M. (2010). Perception of competitiveness in the context of sustainable development: Facets of sustainable competitiveness. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 11(2), 341–365.CrossRef

Bernasconi, A. (2005). University entrepreneurship in a developing country: The case of the P. Universidad Católica de Chile, 1985–2000. Higher Education, 50(2), 247–274.CrossRef

Budd, L., & Hirmis, A. (2004). Conceptual framework for regional competitiveness. Regional Studies, 38(9), 1015–1028.CrossRef

Budd, L., & Hirmisf, K. (2004, December). Conceptual framework for regional competitiveness. University Business, 3, 1015–1028.

Carayannis, E. G., Barth, T. D., & Campbell, D. F. (2012). The Quintuple Helix innovation model: Global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 2.CrossRef

Chytas, P., Glykas, M., & Valiris, G. (2011). A proactive balanced scorecard. International Journal of Information Management, 31(5), 460–468.CrossRef

Čučković, N., Jurlin, K., & Vučković, V. (2013). Measuring regional competitiveness: The case of Croatia. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 13(4), 503–523.CrossRef

D’Este, P., & Perkmann, M. (2010). Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(3), 316–339.CrossRef

Dror, S. (2008). The balanced scorecard versus quality award models as strategic frameworks. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 19(6), 583–593.CrossRef

EC. (2014a). European competitiveness report 2014: Helping firms grow. Belgium.

EC. (2014b). Innovation union scoreboard. Brussels.

Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Innovation in innovation: The triple helix of University—Industry—Government relations. Social Science Information, 42(3), 293–337.CrossRef

Etzkowitz, H. (2008). The triple helix: University–Industry–Government innovation in action (1st ed.). Oxon: Routledge.CrossRef

Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “Mode 2” to a triple helix of University—Industry—Government relations. Science and Technology, 109–123.

Etzkowitz, H., Mello, J. M. C., & Almeida, M. (2005). Towards ‘meta-innovation’ in Brazil: The evolution of the incubator and the emergence of a triple helix. Research Policy, 34(4), 411–424.CrossRef

Farinha, L., Ferreira, J., & Gouveia, J. B. (2014). Innovation and competitiveness: A high-tech cluster approach. The Romanian Review Precision Mechanics, Optics & Mechatronics, 45, 41–48.

Farinha, L., Ferreira, J., & Gouveia, B. (2016). Networks of innovation and competitiveness: A triple helix case study. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 7(1), 259–275.CrossRef

Gopalakrishnan, K., Yusuf, Y. Y., Musa, A., Abubakar, T., & Ambursa, H. M. (2012). Sustainable supply chain management: A case study of British Aerospace (BAe) systems. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 193–203.CrossRef

Grubic, T., & Fan, I.-S. (2010). Supply chain ontology: Review, analysis and synthesis. Computers in Industry, 61(8), 776–786.CrossRef

Herath, H. S. B., Bremser, W. G., & Birnberg, J. G. (2010). Joint selection of balanced scorecard targets and weights in a collaborative setting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 29(1), 45–59.CrossRef

Hira, A. (2013). Mapping out the triple helix: How institutional coordination for competitiveness is achieved in the global wine industry. Prometheus, 31(4), 271–303.CrossRef

Huggins, R., Izushi, H., Prokop, D., & Thompson, P. (2014). Regional competitiveness, economic growth and stages of development. Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci, časopis za ekonomsku teoriju i praksu, 32(2), 255–283.

Ioppolo, G., Saija, G., & Salomone, R. (2012). Developing a territory balanced scorecard approach to manage projects for local development: Two case studies. Land Use Policy, 29(3), 629–640.CrossRef

Jiang, Y., & Shen, J. (2010). Measuring the urban competitiveness of Chinese cities in 2000. Cities, 27(5), 307–314.CrossRef

Kanji, G. K., & Sá, P. M. (2002). Kanji’s business scorecard. Total Quality Management, 13(1), 13–27.CrossRef

Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001a). The strategy-focused organization: How balanced scorecard. Boston: Harvard Business School.

Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001b). Transforming the balanced scorecard from performance measurement to strategic management: Part I. Accounting Horizons, 15(1), 87–104.CrossRef

Kelley, D. J., Singer, S., Herrington, M. (2011). The global entrepreneurship monitor 2011 global report.

Kim, Y., Kim, W., & Yang, T. (2012). The effect of the triple helix system and habitat on regional entrepreneurship: Empirical evidence from the U.S. Research Policy, 41(1), 154–166.CrossRef

Kitson, M., Martin, R., & Tyler, P. (2004). Regional competitiveness: An elusive yet key concept? Regional Studies, 38(9), 991–999.CrossRef

Lazzarotti, V., Manzini, R., & Mari, L. (2011). A model for R&D performance measurement. International Journal of Production Economics, 134(1), 212–223.CrossRef

Lengyel, I., & Rechnitzer, J. (2013). Drivers of regional competitiveness in the Central European Countries. Transition Studies Review, 20(3), 421–435.CrossRef

Leydesdorff, L. (2012). The triple helix, quadruple helix, …, and an N-Tuple of helices: Explanatory models for analyzing the knowledge-based economy? Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 3(1), 25–35.CrossRef

Leydesdorff, L., & Fritsch, M. (2006). Measuring the knowledge base of regional innovation systems in Germany in terms of a triple helix dynamics. Research Policy, 35(10), 1538–1553.CrossRef

Leydesdorff, L., & Meyer, M. (2006). Triple helix indicators of knowledge-based innovation systems Introduction to the special issue. Research Policy, 35(10), 1441–1449.CrossRef

Leydesdorff, L., Dolfsma, W., & Vanderpanne, G. (2006). Measuring the knowledge base of an economy in terms of triple-helix relations among ‘technology, organization, and territory’. Research Policy, 35(2), 181–199.CrossRef

MacGregor, S. P., Marques-Gou, P., & Simon-Villar, A. (2010). Gauging readiness for the quadruple helix: A study of 16 European organizations. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1(3), 173–190.CrossRef

Mendes, P., Santos, A., Perna, F., & Ribau Teixeira, M. R. (2012). The balanced scorecard as an integrated model applied to the Portuguese public service: A case study in the waste sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 24, 20–29.CrossRef

Nissan, E., Galindo Martín, M.-Á., & Méndez Picazo, M.-T. (2011). Relationship between organizations, institutions, entrepreneurship and economic growth process. The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7(3), 311–324.CrossRef

Nordqvist, M., & Melin, L. (2010). Entrepreneurial families and family firms. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 22(3–4), 211–239.CrossRef

Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: A handbook for visonairies, game changers and challengers. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Ozman, M. (2009). Inter-firm networks and innovation: A survey of literature. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 18(1), 39–67.CrossRef

Perkmann, M., Neely, A., & Walsh, K. (2011). How should firms evaluate success in university-industry alliances? A performance measurement system. R&D Management, 41(2), 202–216.CrossRef

Philbin, S. (2008). Process model for university-industry research collaboration. European Journal of Innovation Management, 11(4), 488–521.CrossRef

Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2001). Innovation: Location matters. MIT Sloan Management Review, 42(4), 28–36.

Salvador, E. (2010). Are science parks and incubators good ‘brand names’ for spin-offs? The case study of Turin. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(2), 203–232.CrossRef

Semlinger, K. (2008). Cooperation and competition in network governance: Regional networks in a globalised economy. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 20(6), 547–560.CrossRef

Singhal, S., McGreal, S., & Berry, J. (2012, June). Application of a hierarchical model for city competitiveness in cities of India. Cities, 31, 114–122.CrossRef

Smith, H. L., & Bagchi-Sen, S. (2006). University–Industry interactions: The case of the UK biotech industry. Industry and Innovation, 13(4), 371–392.CrossRef

Smith, H. L., & Bagchi-Sen, S. (2012). The research university, entrepreneurship and regional development: Research propositions and current evidence. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 24(5–6), 383–404.CrossRef

Smith, H. L., Glasson, J., & Chadwick, A. (2005). The geography of talent: Entrepreneurship and local economic development in Oxfordshire. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 17(6), 449–478.CrossRef

Stanley, R., Lillis, K. A., Zuspan, S. J., Lichenstein, R., Ruddy, R. M., Gerardi, M. J., & Dean, J. M. (2010). Development and implementation of a performance measure tool in an academic pediatric research network. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 31(5), 429–437.CrossRef

Sternberg, R. (2012). Do EU regional policies favour regional entrepreneurship? Empirical evidence from Spain and Germany. European Planning Studies, 20(4), 583–608.CrossRef

Sundin, H., Granlund, M., & Brown, D. A. (2009). Balancing multiple competing objectives with a balanced scorecard. European Accounting Review, 19.

Taylor, J., & Baines, C. (2012). Performance management in UK universities: Implementing the balanced scorecard. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 34(2), 111–124.CrossRef

Theriou, N. G., Demitriades, E., & Chatzoglou, P. (2004). A proposed framework for integrating the balanced scorecard into the strategic management process. Operations Research, 4(2), 147–165.CrossRef

Tseng, M.-L. (2010). Implementation and performance evaluation using the fuzzy network balanced scorecard. Computers in Education, 55(1), 188–201.CrossRef

Turok, I. (2004). Cities, regions and competitiveness. Regional Studies, 38(9), 1069–1083.CrossRef

Van Looy, B., Landoni, P., Callaert, J., van Pottelsberghe, B., Sapsalis, E., & Debackere, K. (2011). Entrepreneurial effectiveness of European universities: An empirical assessment of antecedents and trade-offs. Research Policy, 40(4), 553–564.CrossRef

Verdecho, M.-J., Alfaro-Saiz, J.-J., & Rodriguez-Rodriguez, R. (2012a). Prioritization and management of inter-enterprise collaborative performance. Decision Support Systems, 53(1), 142–153.CrossRef

Verdecho, M.-L., Alfaro-Saiz, J.-J., Rodriguez-rodriguez, R., & Ortiz-bas, A. (2012b). A multi-criteria approach for managing inter-enterprise collaborative relationships. Omega, 40, 249–263.CrossRef

Verdecho, M.-J., Alfaro-Saiz, J.-J., Rodríguez-Rodríguez, R., & Ortiz-Bas, A. (2012c). The analytic network process for managing inter-enterprise collaboration: A case study in a collaborative enterprise network. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(1), 626–637.CrossRef

Viale, R., & Etzkowitz, H. (2010). The capitalization of knowledge: A tripla helix of University-Industry-Government (1st ed.). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRef

Wong, P. K., Ho, Y. P., & Autio, E. (2005). Entrepreneurship, innovation and economic growth: Evidence from GEM data. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 335–350.CrossRef

Wu, I.-L., & Chang, C.-H. (2012). Using the balanced scorecard in assessing the performance of e-SCM diffusion: A multi-stage perspective. Decision Support Systems, 52(2), 474–485.CrossRef

Titel: Metrics for Innovation and Entrepreneurial Networks
verfasst von: Luís Farinha
João J. Ferreira
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Industry 4.0
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49603-0

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-49604-7

Copyright-Jahr: 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49604-7_18

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"