nach oben

Artificial Life and Robotics

Erschienen in:

13.10.2020 | Original Article

Microbial associates and social behavior in ants

verfasst von: Alessio Sclocco, Serafino Teseo

Erschienen in: Artificial Life and Robotics | Ausgabe 4/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Current research in life sciences provides advances on how animal-associated microbes affect behavior and its underlying neurophysiology. However, studies in this field are often limited to individuals outside of their social context and neglect social dynamics. Contrarily, animals and humans develop and live in complex societies where they constantly adjust physiology and behavior to social interactions. To improve our understanding of how microbes and hosts interact and produce phenotypes at social and group levels, we need to broaden our experimental approaches to a group-level dimension. Here, we point out that eusocial insects, and ants in particular, are ideal models for this purpose. We first examine the most common types of microorganismal associations that ants engage in, and then briefly summarize what is known about the role of symbiotic microbes in ant social behavior. Finally, we propose future directions in the field, in the light of recent technical advances in behavior measuring techniques.

Vorheriger Artikel Visualization of dynamic structure in flocking behavior

Nächster Artikel An agent-based model for community formation process of vampire bats that survive by sharing food

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Bienenstock J, Kunze W, Forsythe P (2015) Microbiota and the gut-brain axis. Nutr Rev 73(Suppl 1):28–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuv019CrossRef

Carabotti M, Scirocco A, Maselli MA, Severi C (2015) The gut-brain axis: interactions between enteric microbiota, central and enteric nervous systems. Ann Gastroenterol 28:203–209

Tognini P (2017) Gut microbiota: a potential regulator of neurodevelopment. Front Cell Neurosci 11:25. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2017.00025CrossRef

Mayer EA, Knight R, Mazmanian SK et al (2014) Gut microbes and the brain: paradigm shift in neuroscience. J Neurosci 34:15490–15496. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3299-14.2014CrossRef

Mändar R (2013) Microbiota of male genital tract: impact on the health of man and his partner. Pharmacol Res 69:32–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2012.10.019CrossRef

van de Wijgert JHHM, Borgdorff H, Verhelst R et al (2014) The vaginal microbiota: what have we learned after a decade of molecular characterization? PLoS ONE 9:e105998. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105998CrossRef

Urbaniak C, Cummins J, Brackstone M et al (2014) Microbiota of human breast tissue. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:3007–3014. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00242-14CrossRef

Chen YE, Fischbach MA, Belkaid Y (2018) Skin microbiota–host interactions. Nature 553:427–436. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25177CrossRef

Linksvayer TA (2006) Direct, maternal, and sibsocial genetic effects on individual and colony traits in an ant. Evolution 60:2552–2561. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb01889.xCrossRef

10.

Teseo S, Châline N, Jaisson P, Kronauer DJC (2014) Epistasis between adults and larvae underlies caste fate and fitness in a clonal ant. Nat Commun 5:3363. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4363CrossRef

11.

Wu M, Walser J-C, Sun L, Kölliker M (2020) The genetic mechanism of selfishness and altruism in parent-offspring coadaptation. Sci Adv 6:eaaw0070. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaw0070CrossRef

12.

Mathuru AS, Libersat F, Vyas A, Teseo S (2020) Why behavioral neuroscience still needs diversity?: a curious case of a persistent need. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 116:130–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.06.021CrossRef

13.

Leitão-Gonçalves R, Carvalho-Santos Z, Francisco AP et al (2017) Commensal bacteria and essential amino acids control food choice behavior and reproduction. PLoS Biol 15:e2000862. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2000862CrossRef

14.

Arbuthnott D, Levin TC, Promislow DEL (2016) The impacts of Wolbachia and the microbiome on mate choice in Drosophila melanogaster. J Evol Biol 29:461–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12788CrossRef

15.

Morimoto J, Simpson JS, Ponton F (2017) Direct and trans-generational effects of male and female gut microbiota in Drosophila melanogaster. Biol Let 13:20160966. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2016.0966CrossRef

16.

Ringo J, Sharon G, Segal D (2011) Bacteria-induced sexual isolation in Drosophila. Fly (Austin) 5:310–315. https://doi.org/10.4161/fly.5.4.15835CrossRef

17.

Sharon G, Segal D, Ringo JM et al (2010) Commensal bacteria play a role in mating preference of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:20051–20056. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1009906107CrossRef

18.

Lizé A, McKay R, Lewis Z (2014) Kin recognition in Drosophila: the importance of ecology and gut microbiota. ISME J 8:469–477. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2013.157CrossRef

19.

Schretter CE, Vielmetter J, Bartos I et al (2018) A gut microbial factor modulates locomotor behaviour in Drosophila. Nature 563:402–406. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0634-9CrossRef

20.

Teseo S, Veerus L, Mery F (2016) Fighting experience affects fruit fly behavior in a mating context. Naturwissenschaften 103:38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-016-1368-xCrossRef

21.

Kennedy EA, King KY, Baldridge MT (2018) Mouse microbiota models: comparing germ-free mice and antibiotics treatment as tools for modifying gut bacteria. Front Physiol 9:1534. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.01534CrossRef

22.

Cheung SG, Goldenthal AR, Uhlemann A-C et al (2019) Systematic review of gut microbiota and major depression. Front Psychiatry 10:34. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00034CrossRef

23.

Viney M (2018) The gut microbiota of wild rodents: Challenges and opportunities. Lab Anim 53(3):252–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023677218787538CrossRef

24.

Teseo S, Kronauer DJC, Jaisson P, Châline N (2013) Enforcement of reproductive synchrony via policing in a clonal ant. Curr Biol 23:328–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.01.011CrossRef

25.

Greenwald EE, Baltiansky L, Feinerman O (2018) Individual crop loads provide local control for collective food intake in ant colonies. eLife 7:e31730. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.31730CrossRef

26.

Sapountzis P, Zhukova M, Hansen LH et al (2015) Acromyrmex leaf-cutting ants have simple gut microbiota with nitrogen-fixing potential. Appl Environ Microbiol 81:5527–5537. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00961-15CrossRef

27.

Chua K-O, Song S-L, Yong H-S et al (2018) Microbial community composition reveals spatial variation and distinctive core microbiome of the weaver ant Oecophylla smaragdina in Malaysia. Sci Rep 8:10777. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29159-2CrossRef

28.

Douglas AE (2015) Multiorganismal insects: diversity and function of resident microorganisms. Annu Rev Entomol 60:17–34. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-010814-020822CrossRef

29.

Sannino DR, Dobson AJ, Edwards K et al (2018) The Drosophila melanogaster gut microbiota provisions thiamine to its host. mBiol. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00155-18CrossRef

30.

Sapountzis P, Zhukova M, Shik JZ et al (2018) Reconstructing the functions of endosymbiotic Mollicutes in fungus-growing ants. eLife 7:e39209. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.39209CrossRef

31.

Baumann P, Moran NA, Baumann L (2006) Bacteriocyte-associated endosymbionts of insects. In: Dworkin M, Falkow S, Rosenberg E, et al. (eds) The The prokaryotes: volume 1: symbiotic associations, biotechnology, applied. microbiology Springer New York, New York, pp 403–438

32.

Wernegreen JJ (2015) Endosymbiont evolution: predictions from theory and surprises from genomes. Ann NY Acad Sci 1360:16–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12740CrossRef

33.

Reyes-Prieto M, Latorre A, Moya A (2014) Scanty microbes, the “symbionelle” concept. Environ Microbiol 16:335–338. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12220CrossRef

34.

Wernegreen JJ (2012) Strategies of genomic integration within insect-bacterial mutualisms. Biol Bull 223:112–122CrossRef

35.

Sinotte VM, Renelies-Hamilton J, Taylor BA et al (2020) Synergies between division of labor and gut microbiomes of social insects. Front Ecol Evol 7:503CrossRef

36.

Johansson H, Dhaygude K, Lindström S et al (2013) A Metatranscriptomic approach to the identification of microbiota associated with the ant Formica exsecta. PLoS ONE 8:e79777. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079777CrossRef

37.

Brown BP, Wernegreen JJ (2016) Deep divergence and rapid evolutionary rates in gut-associated Acetobacteraceae of ants. BMC Microbiol 16:140. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-016-0721-8CrossRef

38.

Koto A, Nobu MK, Miyazaki R (2020) Deep sequencing uncovers caste-associated diversity of symbionts in the social ant Camponotus japonicus. mBiol 11:e00408-20. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00408-20CrossRef

39.

Ramalho MO, Duplais C, Orivel J et al (2020) Development but not diet alters microbial communities in the Neotropical arboreal trap jaw ant Daceton armigerum: an exploratory study. Sci Rep 10:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64393-7CrossRef

40.

Hu Y, Sanders JG, Łukasik P et al (2018) Herbivorous turtle ants obtain essential nutrients from a conserved nitrogen-recycling gut microbiome. Nat Commun 9:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03357-yCrossRef

41.

Clarke G, Stilling RM, Kennedy PJ et al (2014) Minireview: gut microbiota: the neglected endocrine organ. Mol Endocrinol 28:1221–1238. https://doi.org/10.1210/me.2014-1108CrossRef

42.

Yano JM, Yu K, Donaldson GP et al (2015) Indigenous bacteria from the gut microbiota regulate host serotonin biosynthesis. Cell 161:264–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.02.047CrossRef

43.

Mazzoli R, Pessione E (2016) The neuro-endocrinological role of microbial glutamate and GABA signaling. Front Microbiol 7:1934. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01934CrossRef

44.

Ríos-Covián D, Ruas-Madiedo P, Margolles A et al (2016) Intestinal short chain fatty acids and their link with diet and human health. Front Microbiol 7:185. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00185CrossRef

45.

Byrne CS, Chambers ES, Alhabeeb H et al (2016) Increased colonic propionate reduces anticipatory reward responses in the human striatum to high-energy foods. Am J Clin Nutr 104:5–14. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.115.126706CrossRef

46.

Strandwitz P (2018) Neurotransmitter modulation by the gut microbiota. Brain Res 1693:128–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2018.03.015CrossRef

47.

de Bekker C, Ohm RA, Loreto RG et al (2015) Gene expression during zombie ant biting behavior reflects the complexity underlying fungal parasitic behavioral manipulation. BMC Genom 16:620. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-1812-xCrossRef

48.

Calcagnile M, Tredici SM, Talà A, Alifano P (2019) Bacterial semiochemicals and transkingdom interactions with insects and plants. Insects 10(12):441. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects10120441CrossRef

49.

Dosmann A, Bahet N, Gordon DM (2016) Experimental modulation of external microbiome affects nestmate recognition in harvester ants (Pogonomyrmex barbatus). PeerJ 4:e1566. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1566CrossRef

50.

Silva-Junior EA, Ruzzini AC, Paludo CR et al (2018) Pyrazines from bacteria and ants: convergent chemistry within an ecological niche. Sci Rep 8:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20953-6CrossRef

51.

Teseo S, van Zweden JS, Pontieri L et al (2019) The scent of symbiosis: gut bacteria may affect social interactions in leaf-cutting ants. Anim Behav 150:239–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2018.12.017CrossRef

52.

Arrese EL, Soulages JL (2010) Insect fat body: energy, metabolism, and regulation. Annu Rev Entomol 55:207–225. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-112408-085356CrossRef

53.

Russell JA, Moreau CS, Goldman-Huertas B et al (2009) Bacterial gut symbionts are tightly linked with the evolution of herbivory in ants. PNAS 106:21236–21241. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0907926106CrossRef

54.

Klein A, Schrader L, Gil R et al (2016) A novel intracellular mutualistic bacterium in the invasive ant Cardiocondyla obscurior. ISME J 10:376–388. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2015.119CrossRef

55.

Williams LE, Wernegreen JJ (2015) Genome evolution in an ancient bacteria-ant symbiosis: parallel gene loss among Blochmannia spanning the origin of the ant tribe Camponotini. PeerJ 3:e881. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.881CrossRef

56.

Stoll S, Feldhaar H, Gross R (2009) Transcriptional profiling of the endosymbiont Blochmannia floridanus during different developmental stages of its holometabolous ant host. Environ Microbiol 11:877–888. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01808.xCrossRef

57.

Fan Y, Thompson JW, Dubois LG et al (2013) Proteomic analysis of an unculturable bacterial endosymbiont (Blochmannia) reveals high abundance of chaperonins and biosynthetic enzymes. J Proteome Res 12:704–718. https://doi.org/10.1021/pr3007842CrossRef

58.

Sinotte VM, Freedman SN, Ugelvig LV, Seid MA (2018) Camponotus floridanus ants incur a trade-off between phenotypic development and pathogen susceptibility from their mutualistic endosymbiont blochmannia. Insects 9:e58. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects9020058CrossRef

59.

van Zweden JS, d’Ettorre P (2010) Nestmate recognition in social insects and the role of hydrocarbons. In: Blomquist GJ, Bagnères AG (eds) Insect hydrocarbons. Cambridge, pp 222–243

60.

Abel B, Lukas S, Julia P et al (2018) Stress and early experience underlie dominance status and division of labour in a clonal insect. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 285:20181468. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.1468CrossRef

61.

Itoh H, Jang S, Takeshita K et al (2019) Host–symbiont specificity determined by microbe–microbe competition in an insect gut. PNAS 116:22673–22682. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1912397116CrossRef

62.

Chatzispyrou IA, Held NM, Mouchiroud L et al (2015) Tetracycline antibiotics impair mitochondrial function and its experimental use confounds research. Cancer Res 75:4446–4449. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-1626CrossRef

63.

Moullan N, Mouchiroud L, Wang X et al (2015) Tetracyclines disturb mitochondrial function across eukaryotic models: a call for caution in biomedical research. Cell Rep 10(10):1681–1691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2015.02.034CrossRef

64.

Poulsen M, Bot ANM, Boomsma JJ (2003) The effect of metapleural gland secretion on the growth of a mutualistic bacterium on the cuticle of leaf-cutting ants. Naturwissenschaften 90:406–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-003-0450-3CrossRef

65.

Consuegra J, Grenier T, Baa-Puyoulet P et al (2020) Drosophila-associated bacteria differentially shape the nutritional requirements of their host during juvenile growth. PLoS Biol 18:e3000681. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000681CrossRef

66.

Csata E, Gautrais J, Bach A et al (2020) Ant foragers compensate for the nutritional deficiencies in the colony. Curr Biol 30:135–142.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.11.019CrossRef

67.

Feldhaar H, Straka J, Krischke M et al (2007) Nutritional upgrading for omnivorous carpenter ants by the endosymbiont Blochmannia. BMC Biol 5:48. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-5-48CrossRef

68.

Noldus LPJJ, Spink AJ, Tegelenbosch RAJ (2001) EthoVision: a versatile video tracking system for automation of behavioral experiments. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 33:398–414. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195394CrossRef

69.

Buresová O, Bolhuis JJ, Bures J (1986) Differential effects of cholinergic blockade on performance of rats in the water tank navigation task and in a radial water maze. Behav Neurosci 100:476–482. https://doi.org/10.1037//0735-7044.100.4.476CrossRef

70.

Spruijt B, Pitsikas N, Algeri S, Gispen WH (1990) Org2766 improves performance of rats with unilateral lesions in the fimbria fornix in a spatial learning task. Brain Res 527:192–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(90)91137-6CrossRef

71.

Martin BR, Prescott WR, Zhu M (1992) Quantitation of rodent catalepsy by a computer-imaging technique. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 43:381–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/0091-3057(92)90166-DCrossRef

72.

Spruijt BM, Gispen WH (1983) Prolonged animal observation by use of digitized video displays. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 19:765–769CrossRef

73.

Olivo RF, Thompson MC (1988) Monitoring animals’ movements using digitized video images. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 20:485–490. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202701CrossRef

74.

Noldus L, Spink AJ, Tegelenbosch RAJ (2002) Computerised video tracking, movement analysis and behaviour recognition in insects. Comput Electron Agric 35:201–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1699(02)00019-4CrossRef

75.

Mersch DP, Crespi A, Keller L (2013) Tracking individuals shows spatial fidelity is a key regulator of ant social organization. Science 340:1090–1093. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1234316CrossRef

76.

Heyman Y, Shental N, Brandis A et al (2017) Ants regulate colony spatial organization using multiple chemical road-signs. Nat Commun 8:ncomms15414. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15414CrossRef

77.

Greenwald E, Eckmann J-P, Feinerman O (2019) Colony entropy—Allocation of goods in ant colonies. PLoS Comput Biol 15:e1006925. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006925CrossRef

78.

Quque M, Bles O, Bénard A et al (2020) Hierarchical networks of food exchange in the black garden ant Lasius niger. Insect Sci. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7917.12792CrossRef

79.

Ulrich Y, Burns D, Libbrecht R, Kronauer DJC (2015) Ant larvae regulate worker foraging behavior and ovarian activity in a dose-dependent manner. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 70:1011–1018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-015-2046-2CrossRef

80.

Ulrich Y, Saragosti J, Tokita CK et al (2018) Fitness benefits and emergent division of labour at the onset of group living. Nature 560:635. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0422-6CrossRef

81.

Ulrich Y, Kawakatsu M, Tokita CK et al (2020) Emergent behavioral organization in heterogeneous groups of a social insect. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.05.963207CrossRef

82.

Gal A, Saragosti J, Kronauer DJC (2020) anTraX: high throughput video tracking of color-tagged insects. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.29.068478CrossRef

83.

Kabra M, Robie AA, Rivera-Alba M et al (2013) JAABA: interactive machine learning for automatic annotation of animal behavior. Nat Methods 10:64–67. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2281CrossRef

84.

Mathis A, Mamidanna P, Cury KM et al (2018) DeepLabCut: markerless pose estimation of user-defined body parts with deep learning. Nat Neurosci 21:1281–1289. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-018-0209-yCrossRef

85.

Gernat T, Rao VD, Middendorf M et al (2018) Automated monitoring of behavior reveals bursty interaction patterns and rapid spreading dynamics in honeybee social networks. PNAS 115:1433–1438. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1713568115CrossRef

Titel: Microbial associates and social behavior in ants
verfasst von: Alessio Sclocco
Serafino Teseo
Publikationsdatum: 13.10.2020
Verlag: Springer Japan
Erschienen in: Artificial Life and Robotics / Ausgabe 4/2020
Print ISSN: 1433-5298
Elektronische ISSN: 1614-7456
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-020-00645-z

Neuer Inhalt

Bildnachweise

Smart-Manufacturing Dashboard Banner/© AdobeStock_583269095, VDI-Icon, Profil Icon, inhalt2, Springer Professional Modul/© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, Nachhaltigkeitsaward Key Visual/© Cometis AG/Global ESG Monitor | Daniel Rupp | Generiert mit KI, Search Icon, Banner Hanser, Smart Factory Symbolbild/© TensorSpark | Generated with AI | Getty Images, Hacker-Angriff Cyber-Sicherheit Bank-IT/© FOTOKITA / Getty Images / iStock, Leads Kundenakquise/© Andrey Popov / stock.adobe.com, Zeitschrift Wissensmanagement Cover, PatentFit-Logo/© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, Sustainibility Finance/© Robert Kneschke / stock.adobe.com / Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, Zukunftswerkstatt Sales Excellence 2024/© AndreyPopov / Getty Images / iStock, 2023_Antrieb/© supervisuell

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2020

High-speed crawling-like locomotion robot using wobbling mass and reaction wheel

Evolving behaviour trees for supervisory control of robot swarms

Strict stealth walking gait generation for 3-link underactuated biped robots

Event-triggered and self-triggered formation control of a multi-agent system

Second-order agent-based models of emergent behaviour of Dictyostelium discoideum and their inspiration for swarm robotics

Tamper-resistant controller using neural network and time-varying quantization

Neuer Inhalt

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.