Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-09520-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
People with disabilities constitute one of the largest minority groups in Europe, and yet our knowledge about how they relate to the political system remains limited. In addition to facing practical barriers such as inaccessible campaign material and polling stations, they often have fewer resources that facilitate and promote confidence and engagement in politics. Moreover, experiences of discrimination and low numbers of politicians with disabilities can generate feelings of disempowerment. Using European Social Survey data from 30 countries from 2002 to 2015, this study shows that people with disabilities have lower levels of internal and external efficacy, political trust and interest, and electoral participation. The disparities in internal efficacy and political interest disappear when accounting for education, income, employment, and social contact. Meanwhile, significant gaps in external efficacy, political trust, and turnout remain to be explained. Perceptions of discrimination strengthen the internal efficacy and political interest of citizens with disabilities but further decrease their external efficacy, political trust, and turnout. The study sheds light on a frequently overlooked dimension of political inequality, provides insights on several contributing factors, and highlights where further research is needed.
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 191 kb)11109_2018_9520_MOESM1_ESM.docx
Adams, P., Hurd, M. D., McFadden, D., et al. (2003). Healthy, wealthy, and wise? Tests for direct causal paths between health and socioeconomic status. Journal of Econometrics, 112, 3–56.
Adda, J., Chandola, T., & Marmot, M. (2003). Socio-economic status and health: Causality and pathways. Journal of Econometrics, 112, 57–63.
Alexander, A. C. (2012). Change in women’s descriptive representation and the belief in women’s ability to govern: A virtuous cycle. Politics & Gender, 8(4), 437–464.
Almond, G., & Verba, S. (1963). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Anspach, R. (1979). From stigma to identity politics: Political activism among the physically disabled and former mental patients. Social Science and Medicine, 13(9), 765–773.
Atkeson, L. R. (2003). Not all cues are created equal: The conditional impact of female candidates on political engagement. Journal of Politics, 65(4), 1040–1061.
Atkeson, L. R., & Carrillo, N. (2007). More is better: The influence of collective female descriptive representation on external efficacy. Politics & Gender, 3(01), 79–101.
Banducci, S. A., Donovan, T., & Karp, J. A. (2004). Minority representation, empowerment, and participation. Journal of Politics, 66(2), 534–556.
Barker, D. (2016). Don’t forget the most under-represented group in our democracy: Disabled people. New Statesman. Retrieved September 26, 2017, from https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/staggers/2016/08/dont-forget-most-under-represented-group-our-democracy-disabled-people.
Barreto, M. A. (2007). ¡Si Se Puede! Latino Candidates and the mobilization of Latino Voters. American Political Science Review, 101(3), 425–441.
Bergh, J. (2007). Explaining the gender gap: A cross-national analysis of gender differences in voting. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 17(3), 235–261.
Bobo, L., & Gilliam, F. D., Jr. (1990). Race, socio-political participation, and black empowerment. American Political Science Review, 84(2), 377–393.
Booth, R. (2017). New intake brings number of disabled MPs in commons to five. The Guardian. Retrieved September 26, 2017, from https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/jun/11/new-intake-brings-number-of-disabled-mps-in-commons-to-five.
Brady, H. E., Verba, S., & Schlozman, K. L. (1995). Beyond SES: A resource model of political participation. American Political Science Review, 89(2), 271–294.
Bratton, K. A., & Ray, L. P. (2002). Descriptive representation, policy outcomes, and municipal day-care coverage in Norway. American Journal of Political Science, 46(2), 428–437.
Brehm, J., & Rahn, W. (1997). Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. American Journal of Political Science, 41(3), 999–1023.
Bühlmann, M., & Schädel, L. (2012). Representation matters: The impact of descriptive women’s representation on the political involvement of women. Representation, 48(1), 101–114.
Burns, N., Schlozman, K. L., & Verba, S. (2001). The private roots of public action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. New York: Wiley.
Catterberg, G., & Moreno, A. (2006). The individual bases of political trust: Trends in new and established democracies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18(1), 31–48.
Charlton, J. (1998). Nothing about us without us: Disability oppression and empowerment. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Clarke, H., Sanders, D., Stewart, M., & Whiteley, P. (2006). Taking the bloom off new labour’s rose: Party choice and voter turnout in Britain, 2005. Journal of Elections, Public Opinions, and Parties, 16(1), 3–36.
Converse, P. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. E. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp. 206–261). New York: Free Press.
Corrigan, P. W. (Ed.). (2014). The stigma of disease and disability: Understanding causes and overcoming injustices. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Cowley, P. (2013). Why not ask the audience? Understanding the public’s representational priorities. British Politics, 8(2), 138–163.
Cowley, P. (2014). Descriptive representation and political trust: A quasi-natural experiment utilising ignorance. Journal of Legislative Studies, 20(4), 573–587.
Craig, S. C., Niemi, R. G., & Silver, G. E. (1990). Political efficacy and trust: A report on the NES pilot study items. Political Behavior, 12(3), 289–314.
Dalton, R. (2004). Democratic challenges, democratic choices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Denny, K. J., & Doyle, O. M. (2007). “…Take up thy bed, and vote” measuring the relationship between voting behaviour and indicators of health. European Journal of Public Health, 17(4), 400–401.
European Commission. (2010). European Disability Strategy 2010– 2020. Retrieved September 21, 2017, from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:0636:FIN:en:PDF.
Eurostat. (2017). Disability statistics. Retrieved September 21, 2017, from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Disability_statistics.
Fenno, R. F., Jr. (1978). Home style: House members in their districts. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.
Fiedler, K., Schott, M., & Meiser, T. (2011). What mediation analysis can (not) do. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 1231–1236.
FRA—European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. (2014). The right to political participation for persons with disabilities: Human rights indicators. Retrieved September 10, 2017, from http://fra.europa.eu/en/publication/2014/right-political-participation-persons-disabilities-human-rights-indicators.
Gastil, J. (2000). The political beliefs and orientations of people with disabilities. Social Science Quarterly, 81, 588–603.
Gay, C. (2001). The effect of black congressional representation on political participation. American Political Science Review, 95(3), 589–602.
Gay, C. (2002). Spirals of trust? The effect of descriptive representation on the relationship between citizens and their government. American Journal of Political Science, 46(4), 717–732.
Guldvik, I., Askheim, O. P., & Johansen, V. (2013). Political citizenship and local political participation for disabled people. Citizenship Studies, 17(1), 76–91.
Hale, T. W. (2001). The lack of a disability measure in today’s current population survey. Monthly Labor Review, 124, 38–40.
Henderson, M. (2014). Issue publics, campaigns, and political knowledge. Political Behavior, 36(3), 631–657.
Hetherington, M. (2005). Why trust matters. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hooghe, M., Dassonneville, R., & Marien, S. (2015). The impact of education on the development of political trust. Political Studies, 63, 123–141.
Hooghe, M., Marien, S., & de Vroome, T. (2012). The cognitive basis of trust. The relation between education, cognitive ability, and generalized and political trust. Intelligence, 40, 604–613.
House of Commons. (2010). Speaker’s Conference (on Parliamentary Representation) Final Report. London, House of Commons, HC 239-1.
Karp, J., & Banducci, S. (2008). When politics is not just a man’s game: Women’s representation and political engagement. Electoral Studies, 27(1), 105–115.
Kittilson, M. C. (2008). Representing women: The adoption of family leave in comparative perspective. Journal of Politics, 70(2), 323–334.
Krosnick, J. A. (1990). Government policy and citizen passion: A study of issue publics in contemporary America. Political Behavior, 12(1), 59–92.
Kruse, D. (1998). Persons with disabilities: Demographic, income, and health care characteristics, 1993. Monthly Labor Review, 121(9), 13–22.
Kumlin, S. (2004). The personal and the political: How personal welfare state experiences affect political trust and ideology. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lawless, J. L. (2004). Politics of presence? Congresswomen and symbolic representation. Political Research Quarterly, 57(1), 81–99.
Leighley, J. E., & Vedlitz, A. (1999). Race, ethnicity, and political participation: Competing models and contrasting explanations. Journal of Politics, 61(4), 1092–1114.
Mansbridge, J. (1999). Should blacks represent blacks and women represent women? A contingent, “yes”. Journal of Politics, 61(3), 628–657.
Marien, S., & Hooghe, M. (2011). Does political trust matter? An empirical investigation into the relation between political trust and support for law compliance. European Journal of Political Research, 50, 267–291.
Mattila, M., & Papageorgiou, A. (2017). Disability, perceived discrimination and political participation. International Political Science Review, 38(5), 505–519.
Mattila, M., & Rapeli, L. (2017). Just sick of it? Health and political trust in Western Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 57(1), 116–134.
Mattila, M., Rapeli, L., Wass, H., et al. (2017). Health and political engagement. Oxford: Routledge.
Mattila, M., Söderlund, P., Wass, H., et al. (2013). Healthy voting: The effect of self-reported health on turnout in 30 countries. Electoral Studies, 32(4), 886–891.
McColl, M. A., Jarzynowska, A., & Shortt, S. E. D. (2010). Unmet health care needs of people with disabilities: Population level evidence. Disability & Society, 25(2), 205–218.
Miller, A. H. (1974). Political issues and trust in government: 1964–1970. American Political Science Review, 68(3), 951–972.
Miller, A. H., Gurin, P., Gurin, G., & Malanchuk, O. (1981). Group consciousness and political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 25(3), 494–511.
Miller, W. E., Miller, A. H., & Schneider, E. J. (1980). American national election studies data sourcebook, 1952–1978. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Miller, P., & Powell, S. (2016). Overcoming voting obstacles: The use of convenience voting by voters with disabilities. American Politics Research, 44(1), 28–55.
Mishler, W., & Rose, R. (2001). What are the origins of political trust? Testing institutional and cultural theories in post-communist societies. Comparative Political Studies, 34(1), 30–62.
Newton, K., & Norris, P. (2000). Confidence and public institutions: Faith, culture, and performance? In S. J. Pharr & R. D. Putnam (Eds.), Disaffected democracies: What’s troubling the trilateral countries?. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Ojeda, C. (2015). Depression and political participation. Social Science Quarterly, 95(5), 1226–1243.
Ojeda, C., & Pacheco, J. (2017). Health and voting in young adulthood. British Journal of Political Research. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123417000151.
Oliver, M. (1996). Understanding disability: From theory to practice. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Opokua, M. P., Mprah, W. K., & Saka, B. N. (2016). Participation of persons with disabilities in political activities in Cameroon. Disability and the Global South, 3(2), 980–999.
Pacheco, J., & Fletcher, J. (2015). Incorporating health into studies of political behavior: Evidence for turnout and partisanship. Political Research Quarterly, 68(1), 104–116.
Peters, Y., & Ensink, S. J. (2015). Differential responsiveness in Europe: the effects of preference difference and electoral participation. West European Politics, 38(3), 577–600.
Pharr, S. J., & Putnam, R. (Eds.). (2000). Disaffected democracies: What’s troubling the trilateral countries?. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Phillips, A. (1995). The politics of presence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pitkin, H. F. (1967). The concept of representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Rahn, W. M., & Rudolph, T. J. (2005). A tale of political trust in American cities. Public Opinion Quarterly, 69(4), 530–560.
Reher, S. (2014). The effect of congruence in policy priorities on electoral participation. Electoral Studies, 36, 158–172.
Reher, S. (2015). Explaining cross-national variation in the relationship between priority congruence and satisfaction with democracy. European Journal of Political Research, 54, 160–181.
Reher, S. (2018). Gender and opinion–policy congruence in Europe. European Political Science Review. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1755773918000140.
Reingold, B., & Harrell, J. (2010). The impact of descriptive representation on women’s political engagement: does party matter? Political Research Quarterly, 63(2), 280–294.
Rohmer, O., & Louvet, E. (2018). Implicit stereotyping against people with disability. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21(1), 127–140.
Rosenstone, S., & Hansen, J. (1993). Mobilization, participation and democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.
Sakellariou, D., & Rotarou, E. S. (2017). Access to healthcare for men and women with disabilities in the UK: Secondary analysis of cross-sectional data. British Medical Journal Open, 7(e016614), 1–9.
Schildkraut, D. J. (2005). The rise and fall of political engagement among Latinos: The role of identity and perceptions of discrimination. Political Behavior, 27(3), 285–312.
Schoeni, R. F., Martin, L. G., Andreski, P. M., et al. (2005). Persistent and growing socioeconomic disparities in disability among the elderly: 1982–2002. American Journal of Public Health, 95(11), 2065–2070.
Schur, L. (2003). Contending with the ‘Double Handicap’: Political activism among women with disabilities. Women and Politics, 15(2), 31–62.
Schur, L., & Adya, M. (2013). Sidelined or mainstreamed? Political participation and attitudes of people with disabilities in the United States. Social Science Quarterly, 94(3), 811–839.
Schur, L., & Kruse, D. (2000). What determines voter turnout? Lessons from citizens with disabilities. Social Science Quarterly, 81(2), 571–587.
Schur, L., Kruse, D., & Blanck, P. (2013). People with disabilities: Sidelined or mainstreamed?. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Schur, L., Shields, T., Kruse, D., & Schriner, K. (2002). Enabling democracy: Disability and voter turnout. Political Research Quarterly, 55(1), 167–190.
Schur, L., Shields, T., & Schriner, K. (2003). Can i make a difference? Efficacy, employment, and disability. Political Psychology, 24(1), 119–149.
Schur, L., Shields, T., & Schriner, K. (2005). Generational cohorts, group membership, and political participation by people with disabilities. Political Research Quarterly, 58(3), 487–496.
Schwindt-Bayer, L. A., & Mishler, W. (2005). An integrated model of women’s representation. Journal of Politics, 67(2), 407–428.
Shakespeare, T. W., & Watson, N. (1997). Defending the social model. Disability and Society, 12(2), 293–300.
Shields, T., Schriner, K. F., & Schriner, K. (1998). The disability voice in American politics. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 9(2), 33–52.
UN General Assembly. (2007). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: resolution/adopted by the General Assembly, 24 January 2007, A/RES/61/106.
Verba, S., & Nie, N. (1972). Participation in America: Social equality and political democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wass, H., Mattila, M., Rapeli, L., et al. (2017). Voting while ailing? The effect of voter facilitation instruments on health-related differences in turnout. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 27(4), 503–522.
Watson, N. (2002). Well, I know this is going to sound Very strange to you, but I don’t see myself as a disabled person: Identity and disability. Disability and Society, 17(5), 509–527.
Wolbrecht, C., & Campbell, D. E. (2007). Leading by example: Female members of parliament as political role models. American Journal of Political Science, 51(4), 921–939.
Wolfinger, R. E., & Rosenstone, S. J. (1980). Who votes?. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
World Health Organization (WHO). (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organization.
World Health Organization (WHO). (2011). World report on disability. Retrieved October 5, 2017, from http://www.who.int/disabilities/world_report/2011/en.
- Mind This Gap, Too: Political Orientations of People with Disabilities in Europe
- Springer US
Print ISSN: 0190-9320
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6687
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, digitale Transformation/© Maksym Yemelyanov | Fotolia