Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen
Design rationale can act as a creativity support tool. Recent findings from the field of creativity research present new opportunities that can guide the implementation and evaluation of design rationale’s ability to foster creative processes and outcomes. By encouraging the exploration of failure through use of analogy, design rationale can foster creative transfer and enable progress in new directions. Open source communities offer an opportunity to observe a form of intrinsically motivated ad hoc design rationale, exhibiting formal and informal information transfer links within forums and allowing access to common tools, expertise, and mentorship. A discussion of a spectrum of implementations of design rationale informs strategies to mitigate conflicts and advance inherent synergies between design rationale and creativity.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Amabile, T. M. (1983). Social psychology of creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 357–376. CrossRef
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder: Westview Press.
Amabile, T. M., & Kramer, S. J. (2003, October). The best (and worst) days in creative project teams: Some preliminary results. Paper presented at the Society of Experimental Social Psychology, Boston.
Amabile, T., & Mueller, J. (2002). Assessing creativity and its antecedents: An exploration of the componential theory of creativity. In C. Ford & N. Mahwah (Eds.), Handbook of organizational creativity. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Amabile, T. M., Hadley, C. N., & Kramer, S. J. (2002). Creativity under the gun. Harvard Business Review, 80(8), 52–61.
Atman, C. J., Adams, R. S., Cardella, M. E., Turns, J., Mosborg, S., & Saleem, J. (2007). Engineering design processes: A comparison of students and expert practicioners. Journal of Engineering Education, 96, 359–379.
Beschastnikh, I., Kriplean, T., & McDonald, D. (2008). Wikipedian self-governance in action: Motivating the policy lens. Second International Conference on Weblogs Social Media, Seattle.
Beschastnikh, I., McDonald, D. W., Zachry, M., Kriplean, T., & Borning, A. (2009, May). Promoting quality in Wikipedia through enculturation. Paper presented at the Support Amat Workshop at the ACM 2009 International Conference on Support Group Work, Sanibel Island.
Buchanan, B. (2001). Creativity at the metalevel: AAAI-2000 presidential address. AI Magazine, 22(3), 13–28. MathSciNet
Burleson, W. (2005). Developing creativity, motivation, and self-actualization with learning systems. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 63, 436–451. CrossRef
Burleson, W. (2007, May). Opportunities for ubiquitous design environments in a flat world. Paper presented at the Harvey Mudd Design Workshop, Claremont.
Burleson, W., & Pentland, S. (2008). NSF Award 0846148: SGER: Human-centered computing: Creativity in IT research organizations. Award notification retrieved August 24, 2011, from http://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward.do?AwardNumber=0846148
Burleson, W., & Selker, T. (2002). Introduction: Creativity and interface. Communications of the ACM, 45(10), 88–90. CrossRef
Buxton, B. (2007). Sketching the user experience. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
Carroll, J. (2010). The essential tension of creativity and rationale in software design. Human Technology: Interdisciplinary Journal of Human ICT Environment, 6(1), 4–10.
Cashman, P. M., & Stroll, D. (1989). Developing the management systems of the 1990s: The role of collaborative work. In M. H. Olson (Ed.), Technological support for group collaboration. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Certeau, M. D. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Computing Research Association. (2002). Grand research challenges in information systems. Retrieved August 6, 2011, from http://archive.cra.org/reports/gc.systems.pdf
Conklin, J. (2003). Dialog mapping: Reflections on an industrial strength case study. In P. Kirschner, S. J. B. Shum, & C. S. Carr (Eds.), Visualizing argumentation: Software tools for collaborative and education sense making. London: Springer.
Corbet, J., Kroah-Hartman, G., & McPherson, A. (2010). Linux kernel development: How fast it is going, who is doing it, what they are doing, and who is sponsoring it. The Linux Foundation, San Francisco. Retrieved August 24, 2011, from http://www.linuxfoundation.org/docs/lf_linux_kernel_development_2010.pdf
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Perennial.
DiBona, C., Ockman, S., & Stone, M. (1999). Open sources: Voices from the open source revolution. Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media. MATH
DiMicco, J. M., & Bender, W. (2007). Group reactions to visual feedback tools. In Y. de Kort, B. J. Fogg, W. Ijsselsteijn, B. Eggen, & C. Midden (Eds.), Proceedings of the second international conference on persuasive technology. Berlin: Springer.
Dow, S. P., Heddleston, K., & Klemmer, S. (2009). The efficacy of prototyping under time constraints. Creativity & cognition. In N. Bryan-Kinns, M. D. Gross, H. Johnson, J. Ox, & R. Wakkary (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th conference on creativity & cognition. New York: ACM Press.
Dow, S. P., Glassco, A., Kass, J., Schwarz, M., Schwartz, D. L., & Klemmer, S. R. (2010). Parallel prototyping leads to better design results, more divergence, and increased self-efficacy. ACM Transaction on Computational-Human Interaction, 17(4), 18:1–18:24. doi: 10.1145/1879831.1879836.
Dunbar, K. (1994). How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Farooq, U., Carroll, J. M., & Ganoe, C. H. (2007, November). Supporting creativity with awareness in distributed collaboration. Paper presented at the Intern ACM Conf Support Group Work, Sanibel Island.
Fischer, G., Lemke, A., McCall, R., & Morch, A. (1991). Making argumentation serve design. In T. H. Moran & J. Carroll (Eds.), Design rationale: Concepts, techniques, and use. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Gardner, H. (1994). Creating minds: An anatomy of creativity seen through the lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot, Graham, and Gandhi. New York: Basic Books.
Gero, J. S. (1996). Creativity, emergence and evolution in design: Concepts and framework. Knowledge-Based Systems, 9, 435–448. CrossRef
Gersick, C. J. G., & Hackman, J. R. (1990). Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47, 65–97. CrossRef
Goldenberg, J., Mazursky, D., & Solomon, S. (1999). Creative sparks. Science, 258, 1495–1496. CrossRef
Gruber, T. R., & Russell, D. M. (1996). Generative design rationale: Beyond the record and replay paradigm. In T. P. Moran & J. Carroll (Eds.), Design rationale: Concepts, techniques, and use. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Ishikawa, T., & Terano, T. (1996). Analogy by abstraction: Case retrieval and adaptation for inventive design expert systems. Expert Systems with Applications, 10, 351–356. CrossRef
Kapoor, A., Burleson, W., & Picard, R. (2007). Automatic prediction of frustration. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 65, 724–736. CrossRef
Kuznetsov, S., & Paulos, E. (2010, October). Rise of the expert amateur: DIY projects, communities, and cultures. Paper presented at the ACM NordiCHI Conf, Reykjavík.
Luther, K., Kelly, C., Ziegler, K., & Bruckman, A. (2010, November). Why it works (when it works): success factors in online creative collaboration. Paper presented at the Group 2010 conference, Sanibel.
MacLean, A., Young, R. M., Bellotti, V. M. E., & Moran, T. P. (1996). Questions, options, and criteria: Elements of design space analysis. In T. P. Moran & J. Carroll (Eds.), Design rationale: Concepts, techniques, and use. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Mitchell, W. J., Inouye, A. S., & Blumenthal, M. S. (2003). Beyond productivity: Information technology, innovation, and creativity. Committee on information technology and creativity, CSTB, National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academics Press.
Moran, T., & Carroll, J. (Eds.). (1996). Design rationale: Concepts, techniques, and use. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
National Science Foundation (NSF). (2009). Creative IT program solicitation. Retrieved August 1, 2011, from http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2009/nsf09572/nsf09572.pdf
O’Mahony, S., & Ferraro, F. (2007). The emergence of governance in an open source community. The Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1079–1106. CrossRef
Raymond, E. S. (2001). The cathedral and the bazaar: Musings on Linux and open source by an accidental revolutionary. Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media.
Rittel, H. (1972). On the planning crisis: Systems analysis of the ‘first and second generations’. Bedriftskonomen, 8, 390–396.
Robonerd. (2010, March 7–17). Do it yourself arduino or the DIY-duino. [On-line forum comments]. Retrieved August 24, 2011, from http://www.instructables.com/id/DIY-Arduino-or-The-DIY-Duino/
Shneiderman, B. (2003). Leonardo’s laptop: Human needs and the new computing technologies. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Shneiderman, B., Fischer, G., Czerwinski, M., Resnick, M., Myers, B., Candy, L., Edmonds, E., Elsenberg, M., Giaccardi, E., Hewett, T., Jennings, P., Kules, B., Nakakoji, K., Nunamaker, J., Pausch, R., Selker, T., Sylvan, E., & Terry, M. (2006). Creativity support tools: Report from a U.S. National Science Foundation sponsored workshop. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 20, 61–77. CrossRef
Shute, V., & Becker, B. (2010). Prelude: Assessment for the 21st century. In V. Shute & B. Becker (Eds.), Innovative assessment for the 21st century supporting educational needs. New York: Springer Science + Business Media LLC. CrossRef
Smith, S. M. (2003). The constraining effects of initial ideas. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stark, M. (2003, July 7). The organizational model for open source: Q&A with Siobhán O’Mahony. Retrieved August 6, 2011, from http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/3582.html
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (2007). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sutton, R., & Hargadon, A. (1996). Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness at a product design firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 685–718. CrossRef
Tjosvold, D. (1998). Cooperative and competitive goal approach to conflict: Accomplishments and challenges. Applied Psychology, 47, 285–313. CrossRef
von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
von Krogh, G., Spaeth, S., & Lakhani, K. R. (2003). Community, joining, and specialization in open source software innovation: A case study. Research Policy, 34, 1217–1242. CrossRef
Wageman, R. (1995). Interdependence and group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 145–180. CrossRef
Wakkary, R., & Maestri, L. (2007). The resourcefulness of everyday design. In: Proceedings of Creativity and Cognition 2007. New York: ACM Press.
Weber, S. (2004). The success of open source. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wegerif, R., McLaren, B. M., Chamrada, M., Scheuer, O., Mansour, N., Mikšátko, J., & Williams, M. (2010). Exploring creative thinking in graphically mediated synchronous dialogues. Computers in Education, 54, 613–621. CrossRef
Wentworth, R. (1978). Making do and getting by. Artscribe, 14, 21–23.
Werner, K., & Rittel, H. (1979). Issues as elements of information systems. (Working Paper No. 131). Original publication 1970. Studiengruppe für Systemforschung, Heidelberg.
West, M. A. (1996). Reflexity and work group effectiveness: A conceptual integration. In M. A. West (Ed.), Handbook of work-group psychology. Chichester: Wiley.
- Mining Creativity Research to Inform Design Rationale in Open Source Communities
- Springer London
- Chapter 17