nach oben

Erschienen in:

2023 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Mobile Application-Based Field Survey as a Possible Tool for Investigating Visitors’ Perception and Preferences of the Vegetation in Urban Parks

verfasst von : Péter Szilassi, Jürgen Breuste, Ronald A. Kolcsár, Gerhard Aigner

Erschienen in: Making Green Cities

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

In recent years, numerous studies have reported the importance of the human perception of the qualities of urban green spaces. While we can measure the value of most ecosystem services quantitatively, the real values of the individual vegetation are often determined by human perception. Creating and maintaining vegetation in a way that it meets the most needs, urban planners and decision-makers need to understand the differences between visitor preferences regarding various structural vegetation types (SVT). In the present study, we tested a mobile application-based survey method (Park Survey) as a possible tool for the assessment of human perception and preferences regarding park vegetation. The subjects of the investigation were university students in Salzburg, Austria. The results indicated participants’ general inclination of the forest vegetation type, while aesthetically groves and water areas were the most valued SVTs. Future evaluation of visitors' or other focus groups' attitudes towards urban vegetation utilization of Park Survey could prove as a highly effective surveying method.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Changes in Urban Green Infrastructure in Tabriz, Iran

Nächstes Kapitel Searching for the Perfect Balance in the Multifunctionality of Urban Green Parks

Antrop M (2005) Why landscapes of the past are important for the future? Landsc Urban Plan 70(1–2):21–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.002CrossRef

Appleton J (1996) The experience of landscape. Wiley, Chichester, United Kingdom

Bertram C, Rehdanz K (2015) The role of urban green space for human well-being. Ecol Econ 120:139–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.10.013CrossRef

Bonauioto M, Aiello A, Perugini M, Bonnes M, Ercolani AP (1999) Multidimensional percep-tion of residential environment quality and neighborhood attachment in the urban environment. J Environ Psychol 19:331–352. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1999.0138CrossRef

Brancalion PHS, Melo FPL, Tabarelli M, Rodrigues RR (2013) Restoration reserves as biodi-versity safeguards in human-modified landscapes. Natureza a Conservacao 11(2):186–190. https://doi.org/10.4322/natcon.2013.029CrossRef

Breuste J, Haase D, Elmquist T (2013) Urban landscapes and ecosystem services. In: Wratten S, Sandhu A, Cullen R, Costanza R (eds) Ecosystem services in agricultural and urban landscapes. Wiley, London, pp 83–104CrossRef

Brun M, Di Pietro F, Bonthoux S (2018) Residents’ perceptions and valuations of urban wastelands are influenced by vegetation structure. Urban For Urban Green 29:393–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.01.005CrossRef

Buijs A, Lawrence A (2013) Emotional conflicts in rational forestry: towards a research agenda for understanding emotions in environmental conflicts. For Policy Econ 33:104–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2012.09.002CrossRef

Campelo A, Aitken R, Thyne M, Gnoth J (2014) Sense of place: the importance for destination branding. J Travel Res 53(2):154–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287513496474CrossRef

Carp F, Carp A (1982) Perceived quality of neighborhoods: development of assessment scales and their relation to age and gender. J Environ Psychol 2:295–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(82)80029-7CrossRef

Council of Europe (2000) European landscape convention, european treaty series, no 176. Frorence, 20 X. 2000. p 7. https://rm.coe.int/1680080621. Accessed 9 July 2018

Crow T, Brown T, De Young R (2006) The Riverside and Berwyn experience: contrasts in landscape structure, perceptions of the urban landscape, and their effects on people. Landsc Urban Plan 75:282–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.04.002CrossRef

de Vries FT, Thébault E, Liiri M, Birkhofer K, Tsiafouli MA, Bjørnlund L, Jørgensen HB, Brady MV, Christensen S, de Ruiter PC, d’Hertefeldt T, Frouz J, Hedlund K, Hemerik L, Hol WHG, Hotes S, Mortimer SR, Setälä H, Sgardelis SP, Uteseny K, van der Putten WH, Wolters V, Bardget RD (2013) Soil food web properties explain ecosystem services across European land use systems. PNAS 110(35):14296–14301. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1305198110CrossRef

Dramstad WE, Sundli Tveit M, Fjellstad WJ, Fry GLA (2006) Relationships between visual landscape preferences and map-based indicators of landscape structure. Landsc Urban Plan 78(4):465–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.12.006CrossRef

Gobster PH, Westphal LM (2004) The human dimensions of urban greenways: planning for recreation and related experiences. Landsc Urban Plan 68:147–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00162-2CrossRef

Hami A, Tharaskar M (2018) Assessment of women’s familiarity perceptions and preferences in terms of plants origins in the urban parks of Tabriz, Iran. Urban For Urban Green 32:168–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.04.002CrossRef

Hansen AS (2016) Testing visitor produced pictures as a management strategy to study visitor experience qualities—a Swedish marine case study. J Outdoor Recreat Tour 14:52–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2016.05.001CrossRef

Haq SMA (2011) Urban green spaces and an integrative approach to sustainable environment. J Environ Prot 2:601–608. https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2011.25069CrossRef

Hashim NHM, Thani SKSO, Jamaludin MA, Yatim NO (2016) A perceptual study on the influence of vegetation design towards women’s safety in public park. Proc Soc Behav Sci 234(31):280–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.244CrossRef

Hofmann M, Westermann JE, Kowarik I, van der Meer E (2012) Perceptions of parks and urban derelict land by landscape planners and residents. Urban For Urban Green 11(3):303–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2012.04.001CrossRef

Hur M, Nasar JL, Chun B (2010) Neighborhood satisfaction, physical and perceived naturalness and openness. J Environ Psychol 30(1):52–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.05.005CrossRef

Jansson Å (2013) Reaching for a sustainable, resilient urban future using the lens of ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 86:285–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.06.013CrossRef

Jennings TE, Jean-Philippe SR, Willcox A, Zobel JM, Poudyal NC, Simpson T (2016) The influence of attitudes and perception of tree benefits on park management priorities. Landscape Urban Planning 153:122–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.05.021CrossRef

Kangas A, Rasinmäki J, Eyvindson K, Chambers P (2015) A mobile phone application for the collection of opinion data for forest planning purposes. Environ Manage 55(4):961–971. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0438-0CrossRef

Kolcsár RA, Szilassi P (2018) Assessing accessibility of urban green spaces based on isochrone maps and street resolution population data through the example of Zalaegerszeg, Hungary. Carpathian J Earth Environ Sci 13(1):31–36. https://doi.org/10.26471/cjees/2018/013/003

Kothencz G, Blaschke T (2017) Urban parks: visitors’ perceptions versus spatial indicators. Land Use Policy 64:233–244.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.02.012

Kothencz G, Kolcsár R, Cabrera-Barona P, Szilassi P (2017) Urban green space perception and its contribution to well‐being. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 7:1–14.https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14070766

Li X, Zhang C, Li W, Ricard R, Meng Q, Zhang W (2015) Assessing street-level urban greenery using google street view and a modified green view index. Urban For Urban Green 14(3):675–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.06.006CrossRef

Liu H, Hu Y, Li F, Yuan L (2018) Associations of multiple ecosystem services and disservices of urban park ecological infrastructure and the linkages with socioeconomic factors. J Clean Prod 174:868–879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.139CrossRef

Madge C (1997) Public parks and the geography of fear. Tijdschr Econ Soc Geogr 88(3):237–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.1997.tb01601.xCrossRef

Martín B, Ortega E, Otero I, Arce RM (2016) Landscape character assessment with GIS using map-based indicators and photographs in the relationship between landscape and roads. J Environ Manage 180(15):324–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.05.044CrossRef

MEAB—Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Board (2005) Millennium ecosystem assessment, ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC. https://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.356.aspx.pdf. Accessed 9 July 2018

Newell R, Canessa R (2018) From sense of place to visualization of place: examining people-place relationships for insight on developing geovisualizations. Helyon 4(2):e00547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00547CrossRef

Ode Å, Miller D (2011) Analysing the relationship between indicators of landscape complexity and preference. Environ Planning B Urban Analyt City Sci 38(1):24–40

Ode Å, Fry G, Tveit MS, Messager P, Miller D (2009) Indicators of perceived naturalness as drivers of landscape preference. J Environ Manage 90(1):375–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.10.013CrossRef

Priego C, Breuste JH, Rojas J (2008) Perception and value of nature in urban landscapes: a comparative analysis of cities in Germany, Chile and Spain. Landscape Online 7:1–22. https://doi.org/10.3097/LO.200807CrossRef

Qureshi S, Breuste JH, Jim CY (2013) Differential community and the perception of urban green spaces and their contents in the megacity of Karachi, Pakistan. Urban Ecosyst 16:853–870. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-012-0285-9CrossRef

Rötzer T, Chmielewski F-M (2001) Phenological maps of Europe. Climate Res 18(3):249–257CrossRef

Rupprecht CDD, Byme JA, Ueda H, Lo AY (2015) ‘It’s real, not fake like a park’: residents’ perception and use of informal urban green-space in Brisbane, Australia and Sapporo, Japan. Landsc Urban Plan 143:205–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.07.003CrossRef

Sang ÁO, Knez I, Gunnarsson B, Helblom M (2016) The effects of naturalness, gender, and age on how urban green space is perceived and used. Urban For Urban Green 18:268–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.06.008CrossRef

Sugimoto K (2013) Quantitative measurement of visitors’ reactions to the settings in urban parks: spatial and temporal analysis of photographs. Landsc Urban Plan 110:59–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.10.004CrossRef

Swanwick C, Dunnett N, Woolley H (2003) Nature, role and value of green space in towns and cities: an overview. Built Environ 29(2):94–106CrossRef

Tyrväinen L, Silvennoinen H, Kolehmainen O (2003) Ecological and aesthetic values in urban forest management. Urban For Urban Green 1:135–149CrossRef

van den Berg AE, Jorgenssen A, Wilson ER (2014) Evaluating restoration in urban green spaces: does setting type make a difference? Landsc Urban Plan 127:173–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.04.012CrossRef

Voigt A, Kabisch N, Wurster D, Haase D, Breuste J (2014) Structural diversity: a multi-dimensional approach to assess recreational services in urban parks. Ambio 43(4):480–491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0508-9CrossRef

Zwierzchowska I, Hof A, Cristian I-C, Müller C, Poniży L, Breuste J, Mizgajski A (2018) Multi-scale assessment of cultural ecosystem services of parks in central European cities. Urban For Urban Green 30:84–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.12.017CrossRef

Titel: Mobile Application-Based Field Survey as a Possible Tool for Investigating Visitors’ Perception and Preferences of the Vegetation in Urban Parks
verfasst von: Péter Szilassi
Jürgen Breuste
Ronald A. Kolcsár
Gerhard Aigner
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Making Green Cities
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-73088-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-73089-5

Copyright-Jahr: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73089-5_33

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"