Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
This article uses a peculiarity of French local elections to test the influence of mobilization factors and the cost of voting on electoral turnout. At local elections, half of the constituencies have to vote in a single election (regional elections), whereas the other half cast two ballots (a departmental election and a regional election). Since these two categories of constituencies are distributed randomly, this context provides the conditions of a natural randomized experiment. Comparison of the turnout rates in both types of constituencies allows us to assess in a particularly robust way the significant impacts of mobilization activities and of the cost of voting on turnout in the context of double ballots. We estimate the average impact of an additional election at the national level on turnout to be around four percentage points, but this impact is much higher at the local level.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Blais, A. (2000). To vote or not to vote? The merits and limits of rational choice theory. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Bowler, S., & Donovan, T. (2000). Demanding choices: Opinion, voting, and direct democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Carter, J. R. (1984). Early projections and voter turnout in the 1980 presidential election. Public Choice, 43, 195–202. CrossRef
Cox, G. W., & Munger, M. C. (1989). Closeness, expenditures, and turnout in the 1982 US House elections. The American Political Science Review, 83, 217–231. CrossRef
Dettrey, B. J., & Schwindt-Bayer, L. A. (2009). Voter turnout in presidential democracies. Comparative Political Studies, 42(10), 1317–1338. CrossRef
Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper.
Durden, G. C., & Gaynor, P. (1987). The rational behavior theory of voting participation: Evidence from the 1970 and 1982 elections. Public Choice, 53(1), 231–242. CrossRef
Fauvelle-Aymar, C., & François, A. (2006). The impact of closeness on turnout: An unambiguous empirical relation based on a study of a two-round ballot. Public Choice, 127(3–4), 461–484. CrossRef
Fauvelle-Aymar, C., & Lewis-Beck, M. S. (2008). TR versus PR: Effects of the French double ballot. Electoral Studies, 27(3), 400–406. CrossRef
Feddersen, T. (2004). Rational choice theory and the paradox of not voting. Journal of Economic Perspective, 38, 390–413.
Filer, J. E., & Kenny, L. W. (1980). Voter turnout and the benefits of voting. Public Choice, 35, 575–585. CrossRef
Gerber, A. S., & Green, D. P. (2000). The effects of canvassing, telephone calls, and direct mail on voter turnout: A field experiment. American Political Science Review, 94, 653–663. CrossRef
Geys, B. (2006). Explaining voter turnout: A review of aggregate-level research. Electoral Studies, 25(4), 637–663. CrossRef
Gillian, F. D, Jr. (1985). Influences on voter turnout for US House elections in non-presidential years. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 10(3), 339–351. CrossRef
McDermott, R. (2002). Experimental methods in political science. Annual Review of Political Science, 5(1), 31–61. CrossRef
Morton, R. B., & Kenneth, C. (2010). Experimental political science and the study of causality: From nature to the lab. Cambridge: CUP. CrossRef
Rallings, C., & Thrasher, M. (2005). Not all ’second-order’ contests are the same: Turnout and party choice at the concurrent 2004 local and European parliament elections in England. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 7(4), 584–597. CrossRef
Riker, W., & Ordeshook, P. (1968). A theory of the calculus of voting. American Political Science Review, 62(1), 25–42. CrossRef
Rubin, D. B. (1978). Bayesian inference for casual effects: The role of randomization. Annals of Statistics, 6, 34–58. CrossRef
Tollison, R. D., & Willett, T. D. (1973). Some simple economics of voting and not voting. Public Choice, 16, 59–71. CrossRef
Tollison, R., Crain, M., & Pautler, P. (1975). Information and voting: An empirical note. Public Choice, 24(1), 43–49. CrossRef
- Mobilization, cost of voting and turnout: a natural randomized experiment with double elections
- Springer US
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© BBL, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, Neuer Inhalt/© hww, digitale Transformation/© Maksym Yemelyanov | Fotolia