Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Toward the Rapid Design of Engineered Systems Through Deep Neural Networks Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2019 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Model-Based Abduction in Design

verfasst von : Lauri Koskela, Ehud Kroll

Erschienen in: Design Computing and Cognition '18

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In prior literature, design abduction has been conceived in sentential (propositional) terms. The aim in this presentation is to explore the significance of internal mental models and images, and their external projections, in design abduction. Seminal and current literature on model-based reasoning in cognitive psychology and philosophy of science are reviewed. A retrospective case study on the invention of the airplane by the Wright brothers reveals that most occurrences of design abduction were model based. Conclusions and reflections flowing from the findings are presented.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Voxel Synthesis for Generative Design
Nächstes Kapitel Ekphrasis as a Basis for a Framework for Creative Design Processes
Fußnoten
1
The concept of generativity, argued to be different from creativity, has recently been defined as the capacity to generate new propositions that are made of known building blocks but are still different from all previously known combinations of these building blocks [31]. Obviously, this refers to novelty. These authors add criteria, such as “impact of a new entity on the others,” which seems to be related to productiveness or effectiveness. Thus, the difference between generativity and creativity is not entirely clear. This issue is of significance as Hatchuel et al. [31] claim that generativity is an essential ontological property of design that provides it with a unique scientific identity.
 
2
The C-K theory may provide an interesting exception. Ullah et al. [39] argue that the process of generating innovative concepts, as described by the C-K theory, cannot be explained by classical abduction. They suggest that it is a motivation-driven process, and that motivation comprises two facets, compelling reason and epistemic challenge, which help conceive a new concept when faced with lack of knowledge.
 
3
Hatchuel et al. [31] present an opposite view, based on Gedenryd’s [44] (to us) erroneous interpretation of the method of analysis as intramental.
 
Literatur
1.
Koskela L, Paavola S, Kroll E (2018) The role of abduction in production of new ideas in design. In: Vermaas P, Vial S (eds) Advancements in philosophy of design. Springer
2.
Kroll E, Koskela L (2017) Studying design abduction in the context of novelty. In: DS 87-7 Proceeding of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 17), Vol 7: Design Theory and Research Methodology, Vancouver, Canada
3.
Johnson-Laird P (2010) Mental models and human reasoning. PNAS 107(43):18243–18250CrossRef
4.
Kapitan T (1990) In what way is abductive inference creative? Trans Charles S. Peirce Soc 26(4):499–512
5.
Magnani L (2004) Model-based and manipulative abduction in science. Found Sci 9:219–247CrossRef
6.
Magnani L, Bertolotti T (2017) Springer handbook of model-based science. Springer, SwitzerlandCrossRef
7.
Johnson-Laird PN (2001) Mental models and human reasoning. In: Language, brain, and cognitive development: essays in honor of Jacques Mehler. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 85–102
8.
Johnson-Laird PN (1998) Imagery, visualization, and thinking. In: Hochberg J (ed) Perception and cognition at the century’s end. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp 441–467CrossRef
9.
Johnson-Laird PN (2002) Peirce, logic diagrams, and the elementary operations of reasoning. Think Reason 8(1):69–95CrossRef
10.
11.
Tversky B, Kessell A (2014) Thinking in action. Pragmat Cogn 22(2):206–223CrossRef
12.
Tversky B (2015) The cognitive design of tools of thought. Rev Phil Psych 6(1):99–116CrossRef
13.
Hintikka J (1997) On creativity in reasoning. In: Andersson ÅE, Sahlin N-E (eds) The complexity of creativity. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 67–78CrossRef
14.
Pietarinen AV (2011) Existential graphs: What a diagrammatic logic of cognition might look like. Hist Philos Logic 32(3):265–281MathSciNetCrossRef
15.
Peirce CS (1909) MS 619: 8. Studies in meaning
16.
Peirce CS (1901) CP 2.778. Notes on ampliative reasoning. Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol 5. HUP, Cambridge, Mass, p 2
17.
Paavola S (2011) Diagrams, iconicity, and abductive discovery. Semiotica 186:297–314
18.
Peirce CS (1898) CP 7.498. In: Burks AW (ed) Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol 7. HUP, Cambridge, Mass
19.
Peirce CS (1893) Qualitative logic, CP 7.451–2. In: Burks AW (ed) Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol 7. HUP, Cambridge, Mass
20.
Peirce CS (1901) On the logic of drawing history from ancient documents especially from testimonies (logic of history), CP 7.218. In: Burks AW (ed) Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol 7. HUP, Cambridge, Mass
21.
Gärdenfors P (2004) Conceptual spaces: the geometry of thought. MIT Press
22.
Bruza P, Cole R, Song D, Bari Z (2006) Towards operational abduction from a cognitive perspective. Logic J IGPL 14(2):161–177MathSciNetCrossRef
23.
Magnani L (2013) Thinking through drawing: diagram constructions as epistemic mediators in geometrical discovery. Knowl Eng Rev 28(3):303–326CrossRef
24.
25.
Minnameier G (2004) Peirce-suit of truth–why inference to the best explanation and abduction ought not to be confused. Erkenntnis 60(1):75–105MathSciNetCrossRef
26.
27.
Campos D (2011) On the distinction between Peirce’s abduction and Lipton’s inference to the best explanation. Synthese 180:419–442CrossRef
28.
McAuliffe W (2015) How did abduction get confused with inference to the best explanation? Trans Charles S Peirce Soc 51:300–319CrossRef
29.
Peirce CS (1903) Harvard lectures on pragmatism: lecture VI, CP 5.171–172. In: Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol 5. HUP, Cambridge, Mass
30.
Runco MA, Jaeger GJ (2012) The standard definition of creativity. Creat Res J 24(1):92–96CrossRef
31.
Hatchuel A, Le Masson P, Reich Y, Subrahmanian E (2018) Design theory: a foundation of a new paradigm for design science and engineering. Res Eng Des 29(1):1–17CrossRef
32.
Stacey M, Lauche K (2005) Thinking and representing in design. In: Design process improvement. Springer, London, pp 198–229CrossRef
33.
Maier AM, Wynn DC, Howard TJ, Andreasen MM (2014) Perceiving design as modelling: a cybernetic systems perspective. In: An anthology of theories and models of design. Springer, London, pp 133–149CrossRef
34.
Cross N (2004) Expertise in design: an overview. Des Stud 25(5):427–441CrossRef
35.
Goldschmidt G (1991) The dialectics of sketching. Creat Res J 4:123–143CrossRef
36.
Pahl G, Beitz W, Feldhusen J, Grote K-H (2007) Engineering design: a systematic approach, 3rd edn. Springer, LondonCrossRef
37.
Gero JS, Kannengiesser U (2014) The function-behaviour-structure ontology of design. In: An anthology of theories and models of design. Springer, London, pp 263–283CrossRef
38.
Le Masson P, Weil B, Hatchuel A (2017) Design theory: methods and organization for innovation. Springer, SwitzerlandCrossRef
39.
Ullah AS, Rashid MM, Tamaki JI (2012) On some unique features of C-K theory of design. CIRP J Manufact Sci Technol 5(1):55–66CrossRef
40.
Kroll E, Condoor S, Jansson DG (2001) Innovative conceptual design: theory and application of parameter analysis. CUP, CambridgeCrossRef
41.
Kroll E, Le Masson P, Weil B (2014) Steepest-first exploration with learning-based path evaluation: uncovering the design strategy of parameter analysis with C-K theory. Res Eng Des 25:351–373CrossRef
42.
Kroll E, Farbman I (2016) Casting innovative aerospace design case studies in the parameter analysis framework to uncover the design process of experts. Des Sci 2
43.
Koskela L, Codinhoto R, Tzortzopoulos P, Kagioglou M (2014). The Aristotelian proto-theory of design. In: An anthology of theories and models of design. Springer, LondonCrossRef
44.
Gedenryd H (1998) How designers work–making sense of authentic cognitive activities. Lund University, vol 75
45.
Hintikka J, Remes U (1974) The method of analysis: its geometrical origin and its general significance. Reidel, DordrechtCrossRef
46.
Johnson-Laird PN (2006) How we reason. Oxford University Press, New York
47.
Peirce CS (1903) Harvard lectures on pragmatism: lecture VII, CP 5.181. In: Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol 5. HUP, Cambridge, Mass
48.
Kroll E (2013) Design theory and conceptual design: contrasting functional decomposition and morphology with parameter analysis. Res Eng Des 24:165–183CrossRef
49.
Schön DA (1983) The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Basic Books, New York
50.
March L (1976) The logic of design and the question of value. In: March L (ed) The architecture of form. CUP, Cambridge, pp 1–40
51.
Roozenburg NFM (1993) On the pattern of reasoning in innovative design. Des Stud 14:4–18CrossRef
52.
Dorst K (2011) The core of ‘design thinking’ and its application. Des Stud 32:521–532CrossRef
53.
Kroll E, Koskela L (2016) Explicating concepts in reasoning from function to form by two-step innovative abductions. AIEDAM 30:125–137CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Model-Based Abduction in Design
verfasst von
Lauri Koskela
Ehud Kroll
Copyright-Jahr
2019
Buch
Design Computing and Cognition '18

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05362-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-05363-5

Copyright-Jahr: 2019

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05363-5_14

Premium Partner

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen. 

    Zur Marktübersicht
    Bildnachweise