nach oben

Erschienen in:

2017 | Supplement | Buchkapitel

3. Models of Economic Growth, Institutional Differences and Socio-economic Costs of Development

verfasst von : Sangaralingam Ramesh

Erschienen in: China's Lessons for India: Volume I

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

In this chapter a distinction has been drawn between neoclassical growth theory and endogenous growth theory. The latter seems sufficient to describe how economic growth in China may occur. In this regard, endogenous growth theory allows for an explanation of the importance of human capital to economic growth through innovation. It has also been established that as part of the economic reforms, the Chinese government initiated specific reforms to horizontally integrate R&D related activities in two stages; and thus, facilitate the commercialisation of knowledge creation. Institutional development in China has been more flexible, consistent and robust in contrast to India; and this may help explain why China’s economic reforms have been more successful than those of India. However, China has incurred socioeconomic costs of development, especially those associated with its one-child policy and pollution.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel An Economic History of India

Nächstes Kapitel Modelling China’s Economic Growth

Acosta, M., Coronado, D., & Flores, E. (2011). University spillovers and new business location in high-technology sectors: Spanish evidence. Small Business Economics, 36(3), 365–376.CrossRef

Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., Braunerhjelm, P., & Carlsson, B. (2004). The missing link: The knowledge filter and endogenous growth (discussion paper). Stockholm: Center for Business and Policy Studies.

Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., Braunerhjelm, P., & Carlsson, B. (2012). Growth and entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 39(2), 289–300.CrossRef

Acs, Z. J., Braunerhjelm, P., Audretsch, D. B., & Carlsson, B. (2009a). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 32(1), 15–30.CrossRef

Acs, Z. J., Plummer, L. A., & Sutter, R. (2009b). Penetrating the knowledge filter in “rust belt” Economies. Annals of Regional Studies, 43(4), 989–1012.CrossRef

Acs, Z. J., & Sanders, M. (2013). Knowledge spillover entrepreneurship in an endogenous growth model. Small Business Economics, 41(4), 775–795.CrossRef

Aghion, P., & Jaravel, X. (2015). Knowledge spillovers, innovation and growth. The Economic Journal, 125, 533–573. doi:10.1111/ecoj.12199.CrossRef

Altenburg, T., Schmitz, H., & Stamm, A. (2007). Breakthrough? China’s and India’s transition from production to innovation. World Development, 36(2), 325–344.CrossRef

Araral, E., & Wu, X. (2016). Comparing water resource management in India and China: Policy design, institutional structure and governance. Water Policy, 18, 1–13.CrossRef

Arrow, K. J (1962, June). The economic implications of learning by doing. The Review of Economic Studies, 29(3), 155–173.

Asakawa, K., & Som, A. (2008). Internationalization of R&D in China and India: Conventional wisdom versus reality. Asia Pacific J Manage, 25, 375–394.CrossRef

Audretsch, D. B., & Stephan, P. E. (1999). Knowledge spillovers in biotechnology: Sources and incentives. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 9(1), 97–107.CrossRef

Audretsch, D. B., & Keilbach, M. (2008). Resolving the knowledge paradox: Knowledge-spillover entrepreneurship and economic growth. Research Policy, 37(10), 1697–1705.

Audretsch, D. B., Lehmann, E. E., & Warning, S. (2005). University spillovers and new firm location. Research Policy, 34(7), 1113–1122.

Audretsch, D. B., Hulsbeck, M., & Lehmann, E. E. (2012). Regional competitiveness, university spillovers and entrepreneurial activity. Small Business Economics, 39, 587–601.

Ayyagari, M., Demirguc-Kunt, A., & Maksimovic, V. (2010). Formal versus informal finance: Evidence from China. The Review of Financial Studies, 23(8), 3048–3097.CrossRef

Bascavusoglu, E. (2007). Innovation and knowledge spillovers in developing countries. Open Discussion Papers in Economics, Number 62, The Open University.

Bonaccorsi, A., Colombo, M. G., Guerini, M., & Rossi-Lamastra, C. (2013). University specialization and new firm creation across industries. Small Business Economics, 41(4), 837–863.CrossRef

Brandt, L., & Thun, E. (2016). Constructing a ladder for growth policy, markets and industrial upgrading in China. World Development, 80, 78–95.CrossRef

Braunerhjelm, P., Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., & Carlsson, B. (2010). The missing link: Knowledge diffusion and entrepreneurship in endogenous growth. Small Business Economics, 34(2), 105–125.CrossRef

Bruton, G., & Ahlstrom, D. (2003). An institutional view of China’s venture capital industry: Explaining differences of China from the West. Journal of Business Ventures, 18, 233–259.CrossRef

Bruton, G., Ahlstrom, D., & Obloj, K. (2008, January). Entrepreneurship in emerging economies: Where are we today and where should the research go in the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32, 1–14.

Chatterji, S., Kowal, P., Mathers, C., Naidoo, N., Verdes, E., Smith, J., et al. (2008). The health of aging populations in China and India. Health Affairs, 27(4), 1052–1063.CrossRef

Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989). Innovation and learning: Two faces of R&D. Economic Journal, 99(397), 569–596.CrossRef

Criaco, G., Minola, T., Migliorini, P., & Serarols-Tarre´s, C. (2013). To have and have not: Founders’ human capital and university start-up survival. The Journal of technology Transfer. doi:10.1007/s10961-013-9312-0.

Cumming, D., & Johan, S. (2010). The differential impact of the internet on spurring regional entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(5), 857–883.CrossRef

Demir, F. (2016). Effects of FDI flows on institutional development: Does it matter where the investors are from? World Development, 78, 341–359.CrossRef

Ding, C. (2007). Policy and praxis of land acquisition in China. Land Use Policy, 24, 1–13.CrossRef

Durnev, A., Li, K., Morck, R., & Yeung, B. (2004). Capital markets and capital allocation: Implications for economies in transition. Economics of Transition, 12, 593–634.CrossRef

Estrin, S., & Prevezer, M. (2011). The role of informal institutions in corporate governance: Brazil, Russia, India and China explained. Asia Pacific Journal Management, 28, 41–67.CrossRef

Fritsch, M., & Aamoucke, R. (2013). Regional public research, higher education, and innovative start-ups: An empirical investigation. Small Business Economics, 41(4), 865–885.CrossRef

Furman, J. L. et al. (2002). The determinants of national innovative capacity. Research Policy, 31, 899–933.

Ganapati, S., & Liu, L. (2008). The clean development mechanism in China and India: A comparative institutional analysis. Public Administration and Development, 28, 351–362.CrossRef

Ghio, N., Guerini, M., Lehmann, E., & Rossi-Lamastra, C. (2015). The emergence of the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics 44, 1–18.CrossRef

Gilley, B. (2008). Legitimacy and institutional change: The case of China. Comparative Political Studies, 41(3), 259–284.CrossRef

Gonzalez-Pernia, J. L., Pena-Legazkue, I., & Vendrell-Herrero, F. (2012). Innovation, entrepreneurial activity and competitiveness at a sub-national level. Small Business Economics, 39(3), 561–574.CrossRef

Guo, C., & Miller, J. K. (2010). Guanxi dynamics and entrepreneurial firm creation and development in China. Management and Organisation Review, 6(2), 267–291.CrossRef

Gupta, V., Guo, C., Canever, M., Yim, H., Sraw, G., & Liu, M. (2014). Institutional environment for entrepreneurship in rapidly emerging economies: The case of Brazil, China, India and Korea. International Entrepreneurship Management Journal, 10, 367–384.CrossRef

Jiang, J. (2003). FDI and technology transfer in China in conference on China’s new knowledge systems and their global interaction (J. Sigurdson, Ed.), VINNOVA.

Jones, C. I. (1995). R&D based models of economic growth. The Journal of Political Economy, 103(4), 759–784.

Kafouros, M., & Aliyev, M. (2016). Institutional development and firm profitability in transition economies. Journal of World Business, 51, 369–378.CrossRef

Kim, Y., Kim, W., & Yang, T. (2012). The effect of the triple helix system and habitat on regional entrepreneurship: Empirical evidence from the U.S. Research Policy, 41(1), 154–166.CrossRef

Knoben, J., Ponds, R., & Van Oort, F. (2011). Employment from new firm formation in the Netherlands: Agglomeration economies and the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 23(3–4), 135–157.CrossRef

Koo, J., & Cho, K.-R. (2011). New firm formation and industry clusters: A case of the drugs industry in the U.S. Growth and Change, 42(2), 179–199.CrossRef

Lai, Y., & Tang, B. (2016). Institutional barriers to redevelopment of urban villages in China: A transaction cost perspective. Land Use Policy, 58, 482–490.CrossRef

Lee, I. H., Hong, E., & Sun, L. (2013). Regional knowledge production and entrepreneurial firm creation: Spatial dynamic analyses. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 2106–2115.CrossRef

Li, X. (2016). Exploring the spatial heterogeneity of entrepreneurship in Chinese manufacturing industries. Journal Technology Transfer. doi:10.1007/s10961-016-9474-7.

Lin, J., & Nugent, J. (1995). Institutions and economic development. In J. Behrman, & T. N. Srinivasan (Eds.), Handbook of development economics (Vol III). Elsevier Science B.V.

Liu, H., & Jiang, Y. (2001). Technology transfer from higher education institutions to industry in China: Nature and implications. Technovation, 21, 175–188.CrossRef

Lo, C., & Tang, S. (2006). Institutional reform, economic changes, and local environmental management in China: The case of Guangdong Province. Environmental Politics, 15(62), 190–210.

Mandey, M., & Dong, X. (2009). Manufacturing productivity in China and India: The role of institutional changes. China Economic Review, 20, 754–766.CrossRef

Moore, M. (1984). Institutional development, the World Bank, and India’s new agricultural extension programme. The Journal of Development Studies, 20(4), 303–317.CrossRef

Nolan, P., & Sender, J. (1992). Death rates, life expectancy and China’s economic reforms: A critique of A.K. Sen. World Development, 20(9), 1279–1303.CrossRef

North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Nundy, M. (2016). Challenges to health service system in China: Institutional and financial reforms. In N. Islam. (Ed.), Public health challenges in contemporary China. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag GmbH.

Pal, S. (2008). Agricultural R&D policy and institutional reforms: Learning from the Experiences of India and China. Economic and Political Weekly, 43(26/27), 145, 147–155.

Pomfret, J. (2001, July 3). New deal For China’s capitalists: Businessmen join party but run their own show. The Washington Post.

Prodi, G., Frattini, F., & Nicolli, F. (2016). Regional innovation systems in China: A long-term perspective based on patent data at prefectural level, SEEDS Working Paper 01/2016, http://www.sustainability-seeds.org/.

Puffer, S., McCarthy, D., & Boisot, M. (2010). Entrepreneurship in Russia and China: The impact of formal institutional voids. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34, 441–467.

Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), part 2.

Saith, A. (2008). China and India: The institutional roots of differential performance. Development and Change, 39(5), 723–757.CrossRef

Shen, X., & Tsai, K. (2016). Institutional adaptability in China: Local developmental models under changing economic conditions. World Development, 87, 107–127.CrossRef

Solow, R. (1956, February). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65–94.

Stam, E. (2013). Knowledge and entrepreneurial employees: A country-level analysis. Small Business Economics, 41(4), 887–898.CrossRef

Tsai, K. (2004). Imperfect substitutes: The local political economy of informal finance and microfinance in rural China and India. World Development, 32(9), 1487–1507.CrossRef

Wong, P. K., Lee, L., & Der, Foo M. (2008). Occupational choice: The influence of product vs. process innovation. Small Business Economics, 30(3), 267–281.CrossRef

Wu, C. (2016). Where does the source of external knowledge come from? A case of the Shanghai ICT chip industrial cluster in China. Journal of Organisational Change Management, 29(2), 150–175.CrossRef

Wu, J., Wang, C., Hong, J., Piperopoulos, P., & Zhuo, S. (2016). Internalisation and innovation performance of emerging market enterprises: The role of host-country institutional development. Journal of World Business, 51, 251–263.CrossRef

Yaron, J., Benjamin, M. P., & Piprek, G. L. (1997). Rural finance: Issues, design and best practices. Environmentally and socially sustainable development studies and monograph series, Vol. 13, Washington DV: The World Bank.

Yip, W., & Hsiao, W. (2009). China’s health care reform: A tentative assessment. China Economic Review, 20, 613–619.CrossRef

Zhao, W., & Watanabe, C. (2008). A comparison of institutional systems affecting software advancement in China and India: The role of Outsourcing from Japan and the United States. Technology in Society, 30, 429–436.CrossRef

Titel: Models of Economic Growth, Institutional Differences and Socio-economic Costs of Development
verfasst von: Sangaralingam Ramesh
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: China's Lessons for India: Volume I
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-58111-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-58112-5

Copyright-Jahr: 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58112-5_3