Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
This study investigates the convergence of multiliteracies and scientific practices in a fifth grade classroom. As students’ lives become increasingly multimodal, diverse, and globalized, the traditional notions of literacy must be revisited (New London Group 1996). With the adoption of the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS Lead States 2013a) in many states, either in their entirety or in adapted forms, it becomes useful to explore the interconnectedness multiliteracies and scientific practices and the resulting implications for scientific literacy. The case study included a fifth grade classroom, including the students and teacher. In order to create a rich description of the cases involved, data were collected and triangulated through teacher interviews, student interviews and focus groups, and classroom observations. Findings reveal that as science activities were enriched with multiliteracies and scientific practices, students were engaged in developing skills and knowledge central to being scientifically literate. Furthermore, this study establishes that characteristics of scientific literacy, by its intent and purpose, are a form of multiliteracies in elementary classrooms. Therefore, the teaching and learning of science and its practices for scientific literacy are in turn reinforcing the development of broader multiliteracies.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Anastopoulou, S., Sharples, M., & Baber, C. (2011). An evolution of multimodal interactions with technology while learning science concepts. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(2), 266–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01017.x. CrossRef
Banjong, D. (2014). Same performance but different perception: female stereotypes in mathematics emerge in fifth grade. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 6(2), 258–268. https://doi.org/10.15345/iojes.2014.02.001. CrossRef
Blackwell, C., Lauricella, A., Wartella, E., Robb, M., & Schomburg, R. (2013). Adoption and use of technology in early education: the interplay of extrinsic barriers and teacher attitudes. Computers in Education, 69, 310–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.024. CrossRef
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc..
Coleman, J., & Goldston, J. (2011). What do you see? Science and Children, 49(1), 42–47.
Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2010). The second educational revolution: rethinking education in the age of technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00339.x. CrossRef
Gee, J. (1994). New alignments and old literacies: from fast capitalism to the canon Australian Reading Association. In B. Shortland-Jones, B. Bosich, & J. Rivalland (Eds.), Living literacy: conference papers, Australian Reading Association twentieth national conference. Australian Reading Association.
Gee, J. P. (2000). New people in new worlds: networks, the new capitalism and schools. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 43–68). New York: Routledge.
Gee, J. P. (2013). The anti-education era: creating smarter students through digital learning. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Glesne, C. (2006). Becoming qualitative researchers: an introduction. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc..
Goldston, J., Allison, E., Fowler, L., & Glaze, A. (2013). The dynamic earth: Recycling naturally. Science and Children, 50(8), 38–45.
Goldston, M. J., & Downey, L. (2013). Your science classroom: Becoming and Elementary/Middle school science teacher. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Greer, R., & Sweeney, T. (2012). Students’ voices about learning with technology. Journal of Social Sciences, 8(2), 294–303. CrossRef
Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2009). The meaning of scientific literacy. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 4(3), 275–288.
Hurd, P. (1970). Scientific enlightenment for an age of science. The Science Teacher, 37, 13–16.
Hurd, P. (1998). Scientific literacy: new minds for a changing world. Issues and Trends, 82(3), 407–416.
Knobel, M., & Lankshear, C. (2006). Discussing new literacies. Language Arts, 84(1), 78–86.
NGSS Lead States. (2013a). Next generation science standards. Retrieved from www.nextgenscience.org
NGSS Lead States. (2013b). Appendix F: Science and Engineering Practices in the NGSS. Retrieved from www.nextgenscience.org
NRC. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
NRC. (2007). Taking science to school: learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
NRC. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Rowsell, J., McLean, C., & Hamilton, M. (2012). Visual literacy as a classroom approach. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 55, 444–447. CrossRef
Scholastic Inc. (2014). Science court. Retrieved from www.tomsnyder.com
Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
The New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–93. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u. CrossRef
Weinstein, M. (2006). Slash writers and guinea pigs as models for a scientific multiliteracy. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(5), 607–623. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2006.00215.x. CrossRef
- Modern Scientific Literacy: A Case Study of Multiliteracies and Scientific Practices in a Fifth Grade Classroom
M. Jenice Goldston
- Springer Netherlands
in-adhesives, MKVS, Neuer Inhalt/© Zühlke, Technisches Interface Design/© scyther5 | Getty Images | iStock