Skip to main content
Erschienen in: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 5-6/2021

13.05.2021 | ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Modularity-based quality assessment of a disruptive reconfigurable manufacturing system-A hybrid meta-heuristic approach

verfasst von: Abdul Salam Khan, Lazhar Homri, Jean Yves Dantan, Ali Siadat

Erschienen in: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology | Ausgabe 5-6/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This study considers quality aspects in the process planning of a reconfigurable manufacturing system. The goal is to analyze how the variation in quality impacts the process planning, i.e., cost-based design and modular features. Besides this, the analysis helps in identifying the number of conforming and failed products delivered by a process plan. First, a multi-objective mixed integer non-linear programming model is proposed that contains the novel objectives of cost, quality decay, and modular efforts. Secondly, the model is implemented on an industrial case study by using an exact solution approach and a novel hybrid version of two popular meta-heuristics, namely non-sorting genetic algorithm and multi-objective particle swarm optimization. The hybrid heuristic helps strengthening the application of approaches by creating a balance in searching the solution space. The performance of different approaches is assessed by using two metrics and two termination criteria. The findings will help the decision-makers in assessing how quality-related issues impact the choice of a process plan and in understanding the trade-off among cost, quality, and modularity. Finally, conclusion and future research avenues are provided.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Koren Y, Heisel U, Jovane F, Moriwaki T, Pritschow G, Ulsoy G, Van Brussel H (1999) Reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Ann CIRP 48:2 Koren Y, Heisel U, Jovane F, Moriwaki T, Pritschow G, Ulsoy G, Van Brussel H (1999) Reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Ann CIRP 48:2
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Taguchi G, Clausing D (1990) Robust quality. Harv Bus Rev 68(1):65–75 Taguchi G, Clausing D (1990) Robust quality. Harv Bus Rev 68(1):65–75
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Elmaraghy WH, Nada OA, ElMaraghy HA (2008) Quality prediction for reconfigurable manufacturing systems via human error modelling. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 21(5):584–598CrossRef Elmaraghy WH, Nada OA, ElMaraghy HA (2008) Quality prediction for reconfigurable manufacturing systems via human error modelling. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 21(5):584–598CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Koren Y, Gu X, Guo W (2018a) Reconfigurable manufacturing systems: principles, design, and future trends. Front Mech Eng 13(2):121–136CrossRef Koren Y, Gu X, Guo W (2018a) Reconfigurable manufacturing systems: principles, design, and future trends. Front Mech Eng 13(2):121–136CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Koren Y, Gu X, Guo W (2018b) Choosing the system configuration for high-volume manufacturing. Int J Prod Res 56(1-2):476–490CrossRef Koren Y, Gu X, Guo W (2018b) Choosing the system configuration for high-volume manufacturing. Int J Prod Res 56(1-2):476–490CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Whitney DE (2004) Mechanical assemblies: their design, manufacture, and role in product development. Oxford university press, New York Whitney DE (2004) Mechanical assemblies: their design, manufacture, and role in product development. Oxford university press, New York
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Shaik AM, Rao VK, Rao CS (2015) Development of modular manufacturing systems—a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 76(5-8):789–802CrossRef Shaik AM, Rao VK, Rao CS (2015) Development of modular manufacturing systems—a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 76(5-8):789–802CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Stamatis DH (2003) Failure mode and effect analysis: FMEA from theory to execution. Quality Press Stamatis DH (2003) Failure mode and effect analysis: FMEA from theory to execution. Quality Press
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Mahto D, Kumar A (2008) Application of root cause analysis in improvement of product quality and productivity. J Indust Eng Manag (JIEM) 1(2):16–53 Mahto D, Kumar A (2008) Application of root cause analysis in improvement of product quality and productivity. J Indust Eng Manag (JIEM) 1(2):16–53
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Zheng LY, Liu Q, McMahon CA (2010) Integration of process FMEA with product and process design based on key characteristics. In: Proceedings of the 6th CIRP-sponsored international conference on digital enterprise technology. Springer, Berlin, pp 1673–1686CrossRef Zheng LY, Liu Q, McMahon CA (2010) Integration of process FMEA with product and process design based on key characteristics. In: Proceedings of the 6th CIRP-sponsored international conference on digital enterprise technology. Springer, Berlin, pp 1673–1686CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Srinivasan V (1999) On interpreting key characteristics. In Proceeding of the 1999 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences pp. 12-15 Srinivasan V (1999) On interpreting key characteristics. In Proceeding of the 1999 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences pp. 12-15
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Khorramshahgol R, Djavanshir GR (2008) The application of analytic hierarchy process to determine proportionality constant of the Taguchi quality loss function. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 55(2):340–348CrossRef Khorramshahgol R, Djavanshir GR (2008) The application of analytic hierarchy process to determine proportionality constant of the Taguchi quality loss function. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 55(2):340–348CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Loose JP, Zhou S, Ceglarek D (2008) Variation source identification in manufacturing processes based on relational measurements of key product characteristics. J Manuf Sci Eng 130(3) Loose JP, Zhou S, Ceglarek D (2008) Variation source identification in manufacturing processes based on relational measurements of key product characteristics. J Manuf Sci Eng 130(3)
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmitz B (1997) Practicing tolerance. CAE 16(9):12 Schmitz B (1997) Practicing tolerance. CAE 16(9):12
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Thornton AC (1999) A mathematical framework for the key characteristic process. Res Eng Des 11(3):145–157CrossRef Thornton AC (1999) A mathematical framework for the key characteristic process. Res Eng Des 11(3):145–157CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Thornton AC (2000) Quantitative selection of variation reduction plans. J Mech Des 122(2):185–193CrossRef Thornton AC (2000) Quantitative selection of variation reduction plans. J Mech Des 122(2):185–193CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Hsu LF, Tapiero CS (1989) Quality control of an unreliable flexible manufacturing system with scrapping and infinite buffer capacity. Int J Flex Manuf Syst 1(4):325–346CrossRef Hsu LF, Tapiero CS (1989) Quality control of an unreliable flexible manufacturing system with scrapping and infinite buffer capacity. Int J Flex Manuf Syst 1(4):325–346CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Karsak EE, Kuzgunkaya O (2002) A fuzzy multiple objective programming approach for the selection of a flexible manufacturing system. Int J Prod Econ 79(2):101–111CrossRef Karsak EE, Kuzgunkaya O (2002) A fuzzy multiple objective programming approach for the selection of a flexible manufacturing system. Int J Prod Econ 79(2):101–111CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Li J, Huang N (2007) Quality evaluation in flexible manufacturing systems: a Markovian approach. Math Probl Eng 2007(1):24MathSciNetMATH Li J, Huang N (2007) Quality evaluation in flexible manufacturing systems: a Markovian approach. Math Probl Eng 2007(1):24MathSciNetMATH
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Souier M, Dahane M, Maliki F (2019) An NSGA-II-based multi-objective approach for real-time routing selection in a flexible manufacturing system under uncertainty and reliability constraints. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 100(9-12):2813–2829CrossRef Souier M, Dahane M, Maliki F (2019) An NSGA-II-based multi-objective approach for real-time routing selection in a flexible manufacturing system under uncertainty and reliability constraints. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 100(9-12):2813–2829CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Mittal KK, Jain PK (2014) An overview of performance measures in reconfigurable manufacturing system. Proc Eng 69:1125–1129CrossRef Mittal KK, Jain PK (2014) An overview of performance measures in reconfigurable manufacturing system. Proc Eng 69:1125–1129CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Cochran D, Rudolf H (2003) Investment and resource allocation methodology to support manufacturing system Design Implementation. J Manuf Syst CIRP Cochran D, Rudolf H (2003) Investment and resource allocation methodology to support manufacturing system Design Implementation. J Manuf Syst CIRP
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Goyal KK, Jain PK, Jain M (2012) Optimal configuration selection for reconfigurable manufacturing system using NSGA II and TOPSIS. Int J Prod Res 50(15):4175–4191CrossRef Goyal KK, Jain PK, Jain M (2012) Optimal configuration selection for reconfigurable manufacturing system using NSGA II and TOPSIS. Int J Prod Res 50(15):4175–4191CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Moghaddam SK, Houshmand M, Saitou K, FatahiValilai O (2020) Configuration design of scalable reconfigurable manufacturing systems for part family. Int J Prod Res 58(10):2974–2996CrossRef Moghaddam SK, Houshmand M, Saitou K, FatahiValilai O (2020) Configuration design of scalable reconfigurable manufacturing systems for part family. Int J Prod Res 58(10):2974–2996CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Touzout FA, Benyoucef L (2019) Multi-objective multi-unit process plan generation in a reconfigurable manufacturing environment: a comparative study of three hybrid metaheuristics. Int J Prod Res 57(24):7520–7535CrossRef Touzout FA, Benyoucef L (2019) Multi-objective multi-unit process plan generation in a reconfigurable manufacturing environment: a comparative study of three hybrid metaheuristics. Int J Prod Res 57(24):7520–7535CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Deif AM, ElMaraghy W (2007) Investigating optimal capacity scalability scheduling in a reconfigurable manufacturing system. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 32(5-6):557–562CrossRef Deif AM, ElMaraghy W (2007) Investigating optimal capacity scalability scheduling in a reconfigurable manufacturing system. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 32(5-6):557–562CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Dou J, Dai X, Meng Z (2011) A GA-based approach for optimizing single-part flow-line configurations of RMS. J Intell Manuf 22(2):301–317CrossRef Dou J, Dai X, Meng Z (2011) A GA-based approach for optimizing single-part flow-line configurations of RMS. J Intell Manuf 22(2):301–317CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Chaube A, Benyoucef L, Tiwari MK (2012) An adapted NSGA-2 algorithm based dynamic process plan generation for a reconfigurable manufacturing system. J Intell Manuf 23(4):1141–1155CrossRef Chaube A, Benyoucef L, Tiwari MK (2012) An adapted NSGA-2 algorithm based dynamic process plan generation for a reconfigurable manufacturing system. J Intell Manuf 23(4):1141–1155CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Saxena LK, Jain PK (2012) A model and optimisation approach for reconfigurable manufacturing system configuration design. Int J Prod Res 50(12):3359–3381CrossRef Saxena LK, Jain PK (2012) A model and optimisation approach for reconfigurable manufacturing system configuration design. Int J Prod Res 50(12):3359–3381CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Haddou Benderbal H, Dahane M, Benyoucef L (2017) Flexibility-based multi-objective approach for machines selection in reconfigurable manufacturing system (RMS) design under unavailability constraints. Int J Prod Res 55(20):6033–6051CrossRef Haddou Benderbal H, Dahane M, Benyoucef L (2017) Flexibility-based multi-objective approach for machines selection in reconfigurable manufacturing system (RMS) design under unavailability constraints. Int J Prod Res 55(20):6033–6051CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Touzout FA, Benyoucef L (2019a) Multi-objective sustainable process plan generation in a reconfigurable manufacturing environment: exact and adapted evolutionary approaches. Int J Prod Res 57(8):2531–2547CrossRef Touzout FA, Benyoucef L (2019a) Multi-objective sustainable process plan generation in a reconfigurable manufacturing environment: exact and adapted evolutionary approaches. Int J Prod Res 57(8):2531–2547CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Dou J, Su C, Zhao X (2020b) Mixed integer programming models for concurrent configuration design and scheduling in a reconfigurable manufacturing system. Concurr Eng 28(1):32–46CrossRef Dou J, Su C, Zhao X (2020b) Mixed integer programming models for concurrent configuration design and scheduling in a reconfigurable manufacturing system. Concurr Eng 28(1):32–46CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Khezri A, Benderbal HH, Benyoucef L (2020) Towards a sustainable reconfigurable manufacturing system (SRMS): multi-objective based approaches for process plan generation problem. Int J Prod Res 1–26 Khezri A, Benderbal HH, Benyoucef L (2020) Towards a sustainable reconfigurable manufacturing system (SRMS): multi-objective based approaches for process plan generation problem. Int J Prod Res 1–26
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Taguchi G, Rafanelli AJ (1994) Taguchi on robust technology development: bringing quality engineering upstream Taguchi G, Rafanelli AJ (1994) Taguchi on robust technology development: bringing quality engineering upstream
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Bensmaine A, Dahane M, Benyoucef L (2013) A non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm based approach for optimal machines selection in reconfigurable manufacturing environment. Comput Ind Eng 66(3):519–524CrossRef Bensmaine A, Dahane M, Benyoucef L (2013) A non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm based approach for optimal machines selection in reconfigurable manufacturing environment. Comput Ind Eng 66(3):519–524CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Mohapatra P, Benyoucef L, Tiwari MK (2013) Integration of process planning and scheduling through adaptive setup planning: a multi-objective approach. Int J Prod Res 51(23-24):7190–7208CrossRef Mohapatra P, Benyoucef L, Tiwari MK (2013) Integration of process planning and scheduling through adaptive setup planning: a multi-objective approach. Int J Prod Res 51(23-24):7190–7208CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Hasan F, Jain PK, Kumar D (2014) Optimum configuration selection in reconfigurable manufacturing system involving multiple part families. Opsearch 51(2):297–311CrossRef Hasan F, Jain PK, Kumar D (2014) Optimum configuration selection in reconfigurable manufacturing system involving multiple part families. Opsearch 51(2):297–311CrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Dahane M, Benyoucef L (2016) An adapted NSGA-II algorithm for a reconfigurable manufacturing system (RMS) design under machines reliability constraints. In Metaheuristics for production systems (pp. 109-130). Springer, Cham Dahane M, Benyoucef L (2016) An adapted NSGA-II algorithm for a reconfigurable manufacturing system (RMS) design under machines reliability constraints. In Metaheuristics for production systems (pp. 109-130). Springer, Cham
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Ashraf M, Hasan F (2018) Configuration selection for a reconfigurable manufacturing flow line involving part production with operation constraints. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 98(5-8):2137–2156CrossRef Ashraf M, Hasan F (2018) Configuration selection for a reconfigurable manufacturing flow line involving part production with operation constraints. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 98(5-8):2137–2156CrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Benderbal HH, Dahane M, Benyoucef L (2018) Modularity assessment in reconfigurable manufacturing system (RMS) design: an archived multi-objective simulated annealing-based approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 94(1-4):729–749CrossRef Benderbal HH, Dahane M, Benyoucef L (2018) Modularity assessment in reconfigurable manufacturing system (RMS) design: an archived multi-objective simulated annealing-based approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 94(1-4):729–749CrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu M, An L, Zhang J, Chu F, Chu C (2019) Energy-oriented bi-objective optimization for a multi-module reconfigurable manufacturing system. Int J Prod Res 57(19):5974–5995CrossRef Liu M, An L, Zhang J, Chu F, Chu C (2019) Energy-oriented bi-objective optimization for a multi-module reconfigurable manufacturing system. Int J Prod Res 57(19):5974–5995CrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Pal Singh P, Madan J, Singh H (2020) Composite performance metric for product flow configuration selection of reconfigurable manufacturing system (RMS). Int J Prod Res 1–21 Pal Singh P, Madan J, Singh H (2020) Composite performance metric for product flow configuration selection of reconfigurable manufacturing system (RMS). Int J Prod Res 1–21
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Dou J, Li J, Xia D, Zhao X (2020a) A multi-objective particle swarm optimisation for integrated configuration design and scheduling in reconfigurable manufacturing system. Int J Prod Res 1–21 Dou J, Li J, Xia D, Zhao X (2020a) A multi-objective particle swarm optimisation for integrated configuration design and scheduling in reconfigurable manufacturing system. Int J Prod Res 1–21
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Prasad D, Jayswal SC (2019) Assessment of a reconfigurable manufacturing system. Benchmark Int J Prasad D, Jayswal SC (2019) Assessment of a reconfigurable manufacturing system. Benchmark Int J
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Cochran DS, Jafri MU, Chu AK, Bi Z (2016) Incorporating design improvement with effective evaluation using the manufacturing system design decomposition (MSDD). J Ind Inf Integr 2:65–74 Cochran DS, Jafri MU, Chu AK, Bi Z (2016) Incorporating design improvement with effective evaluation using the manufacturing system design decomposition (MSDD). J Ind Inf Integr 2:65–74
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Goyal KK, Jain PK (2016) Design of reconfigurable flow lines using MOPSO and maximum deviation theory. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 84(5-8):1587–1600 Goyal KK, Jain PK (2016) Design of reconfigurable flow lines using MOPSO and maximum deviation theory. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 84(5-8):1587–1600
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Eberhart R, Kennedy J (1995) A new optimizer using particle swarm theory. In MHS’95. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science IEEE pp. 39-43 Eberhart R, Kennedy J (1995) A new optimizer using particle swarm theory. In MHS’95. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science IEEE pp. 39-43
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Coello CA, Pulido GT, Lechuga MS (2004) Handling multiple objectives with particle swarm optimization. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 8(3):256–279CrossRef Coello CA, Pulido GT, Lechuga MS (2004) Handling multiple objectives with particle swarm optimization. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 8(3):256–279CrossRef
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Deb K (2001) Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. John Wiley & Sons Deb K (2001) Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. John Wiley & Sons
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang W, Koren Y (2012) Scalability planning for reconfigurable manufacturing systems. J Manuf Syst 31(2):83–91CrossRef Wang W, Koren Y (2012) Scalability planning for reconfigurable manufacturing systems. J Manuf Syst 31(2):83–91CrossRef
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Asghar E, uz Zaman UK, Baqai AA, Homri L (2018) Optimum machine capabilities for reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95(9):4397–4417CrossRef Asghar E, uz Zaman UK, Baqai AA, Homri L (2018) Optimum machine capabilities for reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95(9):4397–4417CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Modularity-based quality assessment of a disruptive reconfigurable manufacturing system-A hybrid meta-heuristic approach
verfasst von
Abdul Salam Khan
Lazhar Homri
Jean Yves Dantan
Ali Siadat
Publikationsdatum
13.05.2021
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology / Ausgabe 5-6/2021
Print ISSN: 0268-3768
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3015
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07229-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5-6/2021

The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 5-6/2021 Zur Ausgabe

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.