Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11109-017-9395-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Large partisan gaps in reports of factual beliefs have fueled concerns about citizens’ competence and ability to hold representatives accountable. In three separate studies, we reconsider the evidence for one prominent explanation of these gaps—motivated learning. We extend a recent study on motivated learning that asks respondents to deduce the conclusion supported by numerical data. We offer a random set of respondents a small financial incentive to accurately report what they have learned. We find that a portion of what is taken as motivated learning is instead motivated responding. That is, without incentives, some respondents give incorrect but congenial answers when they have correct but uncongenial information. Relatedly, respondents exhibit little bias in recalling the data. However, incentivizing people to faithfully report uncongenial facts increases bias in their judgments of the credibility of what they have learned. In all, our findings suggest that motivated learning is less common than what the literature suggests, but also that there is a whack-a-mole nature to bias, with reduction in bias in one place being offset by increase in another place.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Supplementary material 1 (pdf 553 KB)11109_2017_9395_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
Ahler, D., & Sood, G. (2016). The parties in our heads: Misperceptions about party composition and their consequences. Working paper.
Arceneaux, K., & Vander Wielen, R. J. (2013). The effects of need for cognition and need for affect on partisan evaluations. Political Psychology, 34(1), 23–42. CrossRef
Bartels, L. M. (2002). Beyond the running tally: Partisan bias in political perceptions. Political Behavior, 24(2), 117–150. CrossRef
Bechlivanidis, C., & Lagnado, D. A. (2013). Does the “why” tell us the “when”? Psychological Science, 24(8), 1563–1572. CrossRef
Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. J., & Lenz, G. S. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20(3), 351–368. CrossRef
Bisgaard, M. (2015). Bias will find a way: Economic perceptions, attributions of blame, and partisan-motivated reasoning during crisis. The Journal of Politics, 77(3), 849–860. CrossRef
Blais, A., Gidengil, E., Fournier, P., Nevitte, N., Everitt, J., & Kim, J. (2010). Political judgments, perceptions of facts, and partisan effects. Electoral Studies, 29(1), 1–12. CrossRef
Bolsen, T., Druckman, J. N., & Cook, F. L. (2014). The influence on partisan motivated reasoning on public opinion. Political Behavior, 36(2), 235–262. CrossRef
Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5. CrossRef
Bullock, J. G., Gerber, A. S., Hill, S. J., & Huber, G. A. (2015). Partisan bias in factual beliefs about politics. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 10(4), 519–578. CrossRef
Chaiken, S., & Maheswaran, D. (1994). Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3(66), 460–473. CrossRef
Chambers, J. R., Swan, L. K., & Heesacker, M. (2014). Better off than we know: Distorted perceptions of incomes and income inequality in america. Psychological Science, 25(2), 613–618. CrossRef
Chambers, J. R., Swan, L. K., & Heesacker, M. (2015). Perceptions of U.S. social mobility are divided (and distorted) along ideological lines. Psychological Science, 26(4), 413–423. CrossRef
Crawford, J. T., Kay, S. A., & Duke, K. E. (2015). Speaking out of both sides of their mouths: Biased political judgments within (and between) individuals. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(4), 422–430. CrossRef
Crawford, J. T., & Xhambazi, E. (2015). Predicting political biases against the Occupy Wall Street and Tea Party movements. Political Psychology, 36(1), 111–121. CrossRef
Dawson, E., Gilovich, T., & Regan, D. T. (2002a). Motivated reasoning and performance on the Wason selection task. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(10), 1379–1387. CrossRef
Dawson, E., Gilovich, T., & Regan, D. T. (2002b). Motivated reasoning and susceptibility to the “Cell A” bias. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Ditto, P. H., & Lopez, D. F. (1992). Motivated skepticism: Use of differential decision criteria for preferred and nonpreferred conclusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4(63), 568–584. CrossRef
Ditto, P. H., Scepansky, J. A., Munro, G. D., Apanovitch, A. M., & Lockhart, L. K. (1998). Motivated sensitivity to preference-inconsistent information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1(75), 53–69. CrossRef
Edwards, K., & Smith, E. E. (1996). A disconfirmation bias in the evaluation of arguments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 5. CrossRef
Gaines, B. J., Kuklinski, J. H., Quirk, P. J., Peyton, B., & Verkuilen, J. (2007). Same facts, different interpretations: Partisan motivation and opinion on Iraq. Journal of Politics, 69(4), 957–974. CrossRef
Gerber, A. S., & Huber, G. A. (2009). Partisanship and economic behavior: Do partisan differences in economic forecasts predict real economic behavior? American Political Science Review, 103(3), 407–426. CrossRef
Gilens, M. (2001). Political ignorance and collective policy preferences. American Political Science Review, 95(2), 379–396. CrossRef
Gilovich, T. D. (1991). How we know what isn’t so: The fallibility of human reason in everyday life. New York: The Free Press.
Hastorf, A. H., & Cantril, H. (1954). They saw a game: A case study. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 49(1), 129. CrossRef
Hochschild, J. L. (2001). Where you stand depends on what you see: Connections among values, perceptions of fact, and political prescriptions. In J. H. Kuklinski (Ed.), Citizens and politics: Perspectives from political psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 405–431. CrossRef
Iyengar, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2015). Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59(3), 690–707. CrossRef
Jacobson, G. (2010). Perception, memory, and partisan polarization on the Iraq War. Political Science Quarterly, 1(125), 31–56. CrossRef
Jerit, J., & Barabas, J. (2012). Partisan perceptual bias and the information environment. Journal of Politics, 74(3), 672–684. CrossRef
Kahan, D. M. (2013). Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection. Judgment and Decision Making, 8(4), 407–424.
Kahan, D. M., Peters, E., Dawson, E. C., & Slovic, P. (2017). Motivated numeracy and enlightened self-government. Behavioural Public Policy, Forthcoming. Yale Law School, Public Law Working Paper No. 307. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2319992.
Kahneman, D. (2013). The marvels and flaws of intuitive thinking. In J. Brockman (Ed.), Thinking: The new science of decision-making, problem-solving, and prediction. New York: Harper Collins.
Kim, S., Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2010). A computational model of the citizen as motivated reasoner: Modeling the dynamics of the 2000 presidential election. Political Behavior, 32(1), 1–28. CrossRef
Kruglanski, A. W., & Webster, D. M. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind: “Seizing” and “freezing”. Psychological Review, 103(2), 263–283. CrossRef
Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498. CrossRef
Lau, R. R., Sears, D. O., & Jessor, T. (1990). Fact or artifact revisited: Survey instrument effects and pocketbook politics. Political Behavior, 12(3), 217–242. CrossRef
Lebo, M. J., & Cassino, D. (2007). The aggregated consequences of motivated reasoning and the dynamics of partisan presidential approval. Political Psychology, 28(6), 719–746. CrossRef
Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(11), 2098–2109. CrossRef
Luskin, R. C., & Bullock, J. G. (2011). “Don’t know” means “don’t know”: DK responses and the public’s level of political knowledge. The Journal of Politics, 73(2), 547–557. CrossRef
Luskin, R. C., Sood, G., & Blank, J. (2013). The waters of Casablanca: Political misinformation (and knowledge and ignorance). Unpublished manuscript.
Lyons, J., & Jaeger, W. P. (2014). Who do voters blame for policy failure? Information and the partisan assignment of blame. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 114(3), 321–341. CrossRef
Mata, A., Garcia-Marques, L., Ferreira, M. B., & Mendonça, C. (2015a). Goal-driven reasoning overcomes cell D neglect in contingency judgements. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27(2), 238–249. CrossRef
Mata, A., Sherman, S. J., Ferreira, M. B., & Mendonça, C. (2015b). Strategic numeracy: Self-serving reasoning about health statistics. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 37(3), 165–173. CrossRef
Muirhead, R. (2013). The case for party loyalty. In S. Levinson, J. Parker, & P. Woodruff (Eds.), Loyalty. New York: New York University Press.
Mullinix, K. J., Leeper, T. J., Druckman, J. N., & Freese, J. (2015). The generalizability of survey experiments. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 2(2), 109–138. CrossRef
Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220. CrossRef
Nyhan, B. (2010). Why the “death panel” myth wouldn’t die: Misinformation in the health care reform debate. The Forum, 8(1), 5.
Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2010). When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior, 32(2), 303–330. CrossRef
Palmer, H. D., & Duch, R. M. (2001). Do surveys provide representative or whimsical assessments of the economy? Political Analysis, 9(1), 58–77. CrossRef
Paolacci, G., & Chandler, J. (2014). Inside the Turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a participant pool. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(3), 184–188. CrossRef
Prior, M. (2013). Media and political polarization. Annual Review of Political Science, 16, 101–127. CrossRef
Prior, M., & Lupia, A. (2008). Money, time, and political knowledge: Distinguishing quick recall and political learning skills. American Journal of Political Science, 52(1), 169–183. CrossRef
Prior, M., Sood, G., & Khanna, K. (2015). You cannot be serious: The impact of accuracy incentives on partisan bias in reports of economic perceptions. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 10(4), 489–518. CrossRef
Sears, D. O., & Lau, R. R. (1983). Apparently self-interested political preferences. American Journal of Political Science, 27(2), 223–252. CrossRef
Shani, D. (2006). Knowing your true colors: Can knowledge correct for partisan bias in Political perceptions? Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
Shapiro, R. Y., & Bloch-Elkon, Y. (2008). Do the facts speak for themselves? Partisan disagreement as a challenge to democratic competence. Critical Review, 20(1–2), 115–139. CrossRef
Stroud, N. J. (2010). Polarization and partisan selective exposure. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 556–576. CrossRef
Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–769. CrossRef
Thibodeau, P., Peebles, M. M., Grodner, D. J., & Durgin, F. H. (2015). The wished-for always wins until the winner was inevitable all along: Motivated reasoning and belief bias regulate emotion during elections. Political Psychology, 36(4), 431–448. CrossRef
Weller, J. A., Dieckmann, N. F., Tusler, M., Mertz, C. K., Burns, W. J., & Peters, E. (2012). Development and testing of an abbreviated numeracy scale: A Rasch analysis approach. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26(2), 198–212. CrossRef
Wilcox, N., & Wlezien, C. (1993). The contamination of responses to survey items: Economic perceptions and political judgments. Political Analysis, 5(1), 181–213. CrossRef
- Motivated Responding in Studies of Factual Learning
- Springer US
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© BBL, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, Neuer Inhalt/© hww, Best Practices zu agiler Qualität