Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Podcasts Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben

Tipp

Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen

Erschienen in:
A Primer of Incentivization in Construction Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2023 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

6. Multi-agent Incentivizing Mechanism for Integrated Project Delivery

verfasst von : Qiuwen Ma

Erschienen in: Construction Incentivization

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Abstract

Integrated project delivery (IPD) has been able to optimize the value for money for the owner by integrating diverse talents from the earliest design stage. The nucleus that contributed to the superior IPD performances is multi-agent risk/reward sharing incentive (RRSI). By overviewing the RRSI, four issues (i.e. setting target cost, incentives for non-cost performances, sharing ratios and caps of risk/reward) are important to IPD participants who involve RRSI. Moreover, a closer inspection of the multi-agent RRSI for IPD revealed that compared to any other procurement strategy, IPD has designed its RRSI with (1) a larger size of risk/reward pool, and (2) a greater amount of incentive pool. This explains why IPD empowers to achieve an effective multidisciplinary integration. However, not all the parties are inclined to join the RRSI, due to risk aversion or the concern of “inequity”. To increase the participants’ willingness to join the multi-agent RRSI, an optimum sharing model is proposed. With the application of concepts from cooperative game theory and prospect theory, the model can competently incorporate fairness in an optimum sharing of risk/reward. This chapter is helpful for the industry practitioners who are interested in the use of multi-agent RRSI in IPD projects.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Incentivizing Relationship Investment for Mega Project Management
Nächstes Kapitel Would Raising Psychological Well-Being Incentivize Construction Workers?
Literatur
Aashto Subcommittee on Construction. (2000). Constructability review best practices guides. Construction (August).
Ahmad, I., Azhar, N., & Chowdhury, A. (2019). Enhancement of IPD characteristics as impelled by information and communication technology. Journal of Management in Engineering, 35(1), 4018055. CrossRef
Ahmed, M. O., Abdul Nabi, M., El-adaway, I. H., Caranci, D., Eberle, J., Hawkins, Z., & Sparrow, R. (2021). Contractual guidelines for promoting integrated project delivery. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(11), 5021008. CrossRef
AIA National and AIA California Council. (2009). Experiences in collaboration—On the path to IPD. Washington, DC, pp. 1–17.
AIA National and AIA California Council. (2007). Integrated project delivery: A guide. AIA National and AIA California Council.
American Institute of Architects. (2008). AIA Document C195—2008, standard form single purpose entity agreement for integrated project delivery, exhibit D (Work Plan). AIA. Washington, DC, Sacramento, CA.
American Institute of Architects (AIA). (2009). AIA Document C191 TM —2009, Standard form multi-party agreement for integrated project delivery. AIA. Washington, DC.
American Institute of Architects. (AIA). California Council (2007) Integrated project delivery: A working definition. Sacramento, CA.
Ashcraft, H.W. (2011) “Negotiating an Integrated Project Delivery Agreement”. in Hanson Bridgett LLP. Hanson Bridgett LLP, 1–34
Asmar, M. E., Asce, A. M., Hanna, A. S., Ph, D., Asce, F., Loh, W., Ph, D., & Asce, A. M. (2016). Evaluating integrated project delivery using the project quarterback rating 3. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(1), 1–13. CrossRef
Azhar, N., Kang, Y., & Ahmad, I. (2015). Critical look into the relationship between information and communication technology and integrated project delivery in public sector construction. Journal of Management in Engineering, 31(5).
Boukendour, S., & Hughes, W. (2014). Collaborative incentive contracts: Stimulating competitive behaviour without competition. Construction Management and Economics, 32(3), 279–289. CrossRef
Cheng, R. (2016) MOTIVATION AND MEANS: How and why IPD and lean lead to success. <Research report>
Cheng, R., Dale, K., Aspenson, A., & Salmela, K. (2012). IPD case studies. AIA, AIA Minnesota, School of Architecture—University of Minnesota.
Cohen, J. (2010). Integrated project delivery: Case studies. In AIA National, AIA California Council, AGC California and McGraw-Hill.
ConsensusDocs LLC (2012). ConsensusDocs Guidebook. (April).
Dal Gallo, L., O’Leary, S. T., & Louridas, L .J. (2009). Comparison of integrated project delivery agreements.
Darrington, J. W., & Lichtig, W. A. (2010). Rethinking the ‘G ’ in GMP: Why estimated maximum price contracts make sense on collaborative projects. The Construction Lawyer, 30(2), 1–12.
Department of Treasury and Finance (2010) The Practitioners ’ Guide to Alliance Contracting. (October). Victoria
Durdyev, S., Hosseini, M. R., Martek, I., Ismail, S., & Arashpour, M. (2019). Barriers to the use of integrated project delivery (IPD): A quantified model for Malaysia. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27(1), 186–204. CrossRef
El-adaway, I., Abotaleb, I., & Eteifa, S. (2017). Framework for multiparty relational contracting. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 9(3), 4517018. CrossRef
El Asmar, M., Hanna, A. S., & Loh, W. (2013). Quantifying performance for the integrated project delivery system as compared to established delivery systems. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(11), 1–14. CrossRef
Elghaish, F., Abrishami, S., & Hosseini, M. R. (2020). (2020) Integrated project delivery with blockchain: An automated financial system. Automation in Construction, 114, 103182. CrossRef
Elghaish, F., Pour Rahimian, F., Brooks, T., Dawood, N., & Abrishami, S. (2023). Web-based management system to share risk/reward for IPD projects. In Blockchain of things and deep learning applications in construction. Springer, pp. 83–97.
Forbes, L. H., & Ahmed, S. M. (2010). Modern construction: Lean project delivery and integrated practices. CRC Press. CrossRef
Hall, D., & Scott, W. R. (2016). Early stages in the institutionalization of integrated project delivery.
Hall, D. M., & Bonanomi, M. M. (2021). Governing collaborative project delivery as a common-pool resource scenario. Project Management Journal, 52(3), 250–263. CrossRef
Han, J., Rapoport, A., & Fong, P. S. W. (2019). Incentive structures in multi-partner project teams. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27(1), 49–65. CrossRef
Hanna, A. S. (2016). Benchmark performance metrics for integrated project delivery. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(9), 04016040. CrossRef
Hosseinian, M., Farahpour, E., & Carmichael, D. G. (2020). Optimum outcome-sharing construction contracts with multiagent and multioutcome arrangements. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(7), 4020067. CrossRef
Hughes, D., Williams, T., & Ren, Z. (2012). Is incentivisation significant in ensuring successful partnered projects? Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 19(3), 306–319. CrossRef
Hunhevicz, J. J., Brasey, P. -A., Bonanomi, M. M. M., & Hall, D. (2020). Blockchain and smart contracts for integrated project delivery: Inspiration from the commons. EPOC 2020 Working Paper Proceedings.
Hunhevicz, J. J., & Hall, D. M. (2019). Managing mistrust in construction using DLT: A review of use-case categories for technical design decisions. In Proceedings of the European Conference for Computing in Construction. held 2019, pp. 100–109.
Ibrahim, M. W., Hanna, A., & Kievet, D. (2020). Quantitative comparison of project performance between project delivery systems. Journal of Management in Engineering, 36(6), 4020082. CrossRef
Kagioglou, M., & Tzortzopoulos, P. (2010). Improving healthcare through built environment infrastructure. Wiley. CrossRef
Kent, D. C., Asce, S. M., Becerik-gerber, B., & Asce, A. M. (2010). Understanding construction industry experience and attitudes toward integrated project delivery. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management (August), 815–825.
Lahdenperä, P. (2012). Making sense of the multi-party contractual arrangements of project partnering, project alliancing and integrated project delivery. Construction Management and Economics, 30(1), 57–79. CrossRef
Lahdenperä, P. (2010). Conceptualizing a two-stage target-cost arrangement for competitive cooperation. Construction Management and Economics, 28(7), 783–796. CrossRef
Laryea, S., & Watermeyer, R. (2016). Early contractor involvement in framework contracts. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, held 2016 at Boston, MA, USA, pp. 13–22.
Latham, M. (1994). Constructing the Team. HM Stationery Office London.
Lichtig, W. (2005a). Sutter health: Developing a contracting model to support lean project delivery. Lean Construction Journal, 2(1), 105–112.
Lichtig, W. (2005b). Integrated Form of Agreement for Integrated Lean Project Delivery Among Owner, Architect & CM/GC.
Ling, F. Y. Y., Teo, P. X., Li, S., Zhang, Z., & Ma, Q. (2020). Adoption of integrated project delivery practices for superior project performance. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 12(4), 5020014. CrossRef
Liu, J., & Cheah, C. Y. J. (2009). Real option application in PPP/PFI project negotiation. Construction Management and Economics, 27(4), 331–342. CrossRef
Liu, J., Gao, R., Cheah, C. Y. J., & Luo, J. (2016). Incentive mechanism for inhibiting investors’ opportunistic behavior in PPP projects. International Journal of Project Management, 34(7), 1102–1111. CrossRef
Liu, J., Yu, X., & Cheah, C. Y. J. (2014). Evaluation of restrictive competition in PPP projects using real option approach. International Journal of Project Management, 32(3), 473–481. CrossRef
Lostuvali, B., da Alves, T., & C.L., and Modrich, R.-U. (2014). Learning from the Cathedral hill hospital project during the design and preconstruction phases. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 10(3), 160–180. CrossRef
Love, P. E. D., Davis, P. R., Chevis, R., & Edwards, D. J. (2011). Risk/reward compensation model for civil engineering infrastructure alliance projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 137(2), 127–136. CrossRef
Ma, Q., Li, S., & Cheung, S. O. (2022a). Unveiling embedded risks in integrated project delivery. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 148(1), 4021180. CrossRef
Ma, Q., Shan, L., Teo, P. X., & Ling, F. Y. Y. (2022b). Barriers to adopting integrated project delivery practices. Engineering Construction and Architectural Management ahead-of-p (ahead-of-print).
Ma, Z., & Ma, J. (2017). Formulating the application functional requirements of a BIM-based collaboration platform to support IPD projects. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 21(6), 2011–2026. CrossRef
Matthews, O., & Howell, G. A. (2005). Integrated project delivery an example of relational contracting. Lean Construction Journal, 2(1), 46–61.
Mauck, R., Lichtig, W. A., Christian, D. R., & Darrington, J. (2009). Integrated project delivery: Different outcomes, different rules. In The 48th Annual Meeting of Invited Attorneys. held 2009. Victor O. Schinnerer & Company, Inc., pp 105–128.
Medda, F. (2007). A game theory approach for the allocation of risks in transport public private partnerships. International Journal of Project Management, 25(2007), 213–218. CrossRef
Melese, Y., Lumbreras, S., Ramos, A., Stikkelman, R., & Herder, P. (2017). Cooperation under uncertainty: Assessing the value of risk sharing and determining the optimal risk-sharing rule for agents with pre-existing business and diverging risk attitudes. International Journal of Project Management, 35(3), 530–540. CrossRef
Mosey, D. (2009). Chapter four: Early contractor involvement in design , pricing and risk management. In Early Contractor Involvement in Building Procurement: Contracts, Partnering and Project Management, pp 57–94.
Nwajei, U. O. K., Bølviken, T., & Hellström, M. M. (2022). Overcoming the principal-agent problem: The need for alignment of tools and methods in collaborative project delivery. International Journal of Project Management, 40(7), 750–762. CrossRef
O’Connor, P. J. (2009). Integrated project delivery: collaboration through new contract forms. Minneapolis.
Pishdad-Bozorgi, P. (2017). Case studies on the role of integrated project delivery (IPD) approach on the establishment and promotion of trust. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 13(2), 1–23. CrossRef
Pishdad-Bozorgi, P., & Srivastava, D. (2018). Assessment of integrated project delivery (IPD) risk and reward sharing strategies from the standpoint of collaboration: A game theory approach. In Construction Research Congress 2018. held 2018, pp 196–206.
Ross, J. (2013). Gainshare/Painshare regime—Guidance paper with sample model/drafting. Www. Pci-Aus. Com/Downloads/PCI_Gainshare-GuideModel_A_07Feb2011. Pdf (Accessed January 11, 2013).
Ross, J. (2003). Introduction to project alliancing. Project Control International Pty Limited.
Ross, J. (1999). Project alliancing in Australia. In Industry Summit on Relationship Contracting in Construction. held 1999 at Sydney, Australia, pp 1–24.
Rowlinson, S. (2017). Building information modelling, integrated project delivery and all that. Construction Innovation, 17(1), 45–49. CrossRef
Su, G., Hastak, M., Deng, X., & Khallaf, R. (2021). Risk sharing strategies for IPD projects: Interactional analysis of participants’ decision-making. Journal of Management in Engineering, 37(1), 4020101. CrossRef
Suijs, J., & Borm, P. (1999a). Stochastic cooperative games: Superadditivity, convexity, and certainty equivalents. Games and Economic Behavior, 27(2), 331–345. MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Suijs, J., Borm, P., De Waegenaere, A., & Tijs, S. (1999b). Cooperative games with stochastic payoffs. European Journal of Operational Research, 113(1), 193–205. MATHCrossRef
Suijs, J., De Waegenaere, A., & Borm, P. (1998). Stochastic cooperative games in insurance. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 22(3), 209–228.
Thomsen, C., Darrington, J., Dunne, D., & Lichtig, W. (2009). Managing integrated project delivery. In Construction Management Association of America (CMAA), McLean, VA.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 5(4), 297–323. MATH
Victorian Department of Treasury and Finance. (2006). Project Alliancing Practitioners Guide.
Walker, D., & Rowlinson, S. (2019). Routledge handbook of integrated project delivery. Routledge. CrossRef
Walker, D. H. T., Hampson, K., & Peters, R. (2002). Project alliancing versus project partnering: A case study of the Australian national museum project. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 7(2), 83–91. CrossRef
Whang, S.-W., Park, K. S., & Kim, S. (2019). Critical success factors for implementing integrated construction project delivery. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(10), 2432–3244. CrossRef
Zheng, L., Lu, W., Chen, K., Chau, K. W., & Niu, Y. (2017). Benefit sharing for BIM implementation: Tackling the moral hazard dilemma in inter-firm cooperation. International Journal of Project Management, 35(3), 393–405. CrossRef
Zhu, L., & Cheung, S. O. (2021). Equity gap in construction contracting: Identification and ramifications. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management.
Metadaten
Titel
Multi-agent Incentivizing Mechanism for Integrated Project Delivery
verfasst von
Qiuwen Ma
Copyright-Jahr
2023
Buch
Construction Incentivization

Print ISBN: 978-3-031-28958-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-031-28959-0

Copyright-Jahr: 2023

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28959-0_6