Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Granular Computing 3/2022

12.11.2021 | Original Paper

Multiple attribute group decision-making based on generalized aggregation operators under linguistic interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy environment

verfasst von: Rajkumar Verma, Nikunj Agarwal

Erschienen in: Granular Computing | Ausgabe 3/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The linguistic variables provide a powerful and efficient tool for describing qualitative information in many complex real-life decision situations. The notion of the linguistic interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy sets (LIVPFSs) has been introduced to more flexibly deal with the decision–information under a qualitative environment. It generalizes the existing theories, such as linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy sets (LPFSs) and linguistic interval-valval intuitionistic fuzzy sets (LIVIFSs). The paper’s main objective is to present a detailed study of operational laws and aggregation operators (AOs) for linguistic interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy numbers (LIVPFNs). This work uses Archimedean t-norm (ATN) and Archimedean t-conorm (ACN) to define new and generalized operational laws between LIVPFNs. The paper also proves many properties and special cases of them. Next, we define some new AOs for aggregating different LIVPFNs, such as the generalized Archimedean linguistic interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy weighted average (GALIVPFWA) operator, the generalized Archimedean linguistic interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy ordered weighted average (GALIVPFOWA) operator, and the generalized Archimedean linguistic interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy ordered weighted average weighted average (GALIVPFOWAOWA) operator. The properties and special cases of developed AOs are discussed in detail. We use the linguistic scale function (LSF) to accommodate the decision-makers’ different translation requirements during the aggregation process. It is worth noting that the developed AOs have a parameter in their formulations to consider the attitudinal character of the decision-makers. The work designs a new and flexible decision-making approach utilizing the proposed AOs to solve multiple attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) problems with LIVPF information. A real-life problem of robot selection is given to illustrate the effectiveness of the developed approach in complex real-life situations. Finally, we present the sensitivity analysis and the comparison of the characteristic to show the superiority over existing methods.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
  1. Ali Khan MS, Abdullah S, Ali A (2019) Multiattribute group decision-making based on Pythagorean fuzzy Einstein prioritized aggregation operators. Int J Intell Syst 34(5):1001–1033View Article
  2. Atanassov K (1986) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 20(1):87–96MATHView Article
  3. Chen SM (1997) Interval-valued fuzzy hypergraph and fuzzy partition. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern 27(4):725–733View Article
  4. Chen SM, Hsiao WH (2000) Bidirectional approximate reasoning for rule-based systems using interval-valued fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 113(2):185–203MathSciNetMATHView Article
  5. Chen SM, Lee LW (2011) Fuzzy interpolative reasoning for sparse fuzzy rule-based systems based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Expert Syst Appl 38(8):9947–9957MathSciNetView Article
  6. Chen SM, Hong JA (2014) Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on ranking interval type-2 fuzzy sets and the TOPSIS method. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst 44(12):1665–1673View Article
  7. Chen SM, Hsiao WH, Jong WT (1997) Bidirectional approximate reasoning based on interval-valued fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 91(3):339–353MathSciNetMATHView Article
  8. Chen SM, Chang YC, Pan JS (2013) Fuzzy rules interpolation for sparse fuzzy rule-based systems based on interval type-2 gaussian fuzzy sets and genetic algorithms. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 21(3):412–425View Article
  9. Chen Z, Liu P, Pei Z (2015) An approach to multiple attribute group decision making based on linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. Int J Comput Intell Syst 8(4):747–760View Article
  10. Fu X, Ouyang T, Yang Z, Liu S (2020) A product ranking method combining the features-opinion pairs mining and interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Appl Soft Comput 97:106803View Article
  11. Gao H, Lu M, Wei G, Wei Y (2018) Some novel Pythagorean fuzzy interaction aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. Fund Inf 159(4):385–428MathSciNetMATH
  12. Garg H (2018) Linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy sets and its applications in multiattribute decision-making process. Int J Intell Syst 33(6):1234–1263View Article
  13. Garg H (2020) Linguistic interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy sets and their application to multiple attribute group decision-making process. Cogn Comput 12(6):1313–1337View Article
  14. Garg H, Kumar K (2019) Linguistic interval-valued Atanassov intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their applications to group decision making problems. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 27(12):2302–2311View Article
  15. Herrera F, Martínez L (2001) A model based on linguistic 2-tuples for dealing with multigranular hierarchical linguistic contexts in multi-expert decision-making. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern 31(2):227–234View Article
  16. Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E (2000) Linguistic decision analysis: steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information. Fuzzy Sets Syst 115(1):67–82MathSciNetMATHView Article
  17. Klement EP, Mesiar R (2005) Logical, algebraic, analytic and probabilistic aspects of triangular norms. Elesvier, New YorkMATH
  18. Klir GJ, Yuan B (1995) Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic: theory and applications. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverMATH
  19. Liang D, Darko AP, Zeng J (2020) Interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy power average-based MULTIMOORA method for multi-criteria decision-making. J Exp Theor Artif Intell 32(5):845–874View Article
  20. Lin M, Huang C, Xu Z (2019) TOPSIS method based on correlation coefficient and entropy measure for linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy sets and its application to multiple attribute decision making. Complexity 2019:1–16MATH
  21. Liu Y, Jiang W (2020) A new distance measure of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its application in decision making. Soft Comput 24(9):6987–7003View Article
  22. Liu Y, Qin Y, Xu L, Liu HB, Liu J (2019) Multiattribute group decision-making approach with linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy information. IEEE Access 7:143412–143430View Article
  23. Mendel JM, John RI, Liu F (2006) Interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems made simple. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 14(6):808–821View Article
  24. Merigó JM (2012) OWA operators in the weighted average and their application in decision making. Control Cybern 41(3):605–643MathSciNetMATH
  25. Peng X (2019) New operations for interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy set. Sci Iran 26(2):1049–1076
  26. Peng X, Yang Y (2015) Some results for Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 30(11):1133–1160MathSciNetView Article
  27. Peng X, Yang Y (2016) Fundamental properties of interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy aggregation operators. Int J Intell Syst 31(5):444–487View Article
  28. Peng X, Li W (2019a) Algorithms for interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy sets in emergency decision making based on multiparametric similarity measures and WDBA. IEEE Access 7:7419–7441View Article
  29. Peng X, Selvachandran G (2019b) Pythagorean fuzzy set: state of the art and future directions. Artif Intell Rev 52(3):1873–1927View Article
  30. Rahman K, Abdullah S (2019) Generalized interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy aggregation operators and their application to group decision-making. Granular Comput 4(1):15–25MATHView Article
  31. Rahman K, Abdullah S, Ghani F (2019) Some new generalized interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy aggregation operators using Einstein t-norm and t-conorm. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 37(3):3721–3742View Article
  32. Rong Y, Pei Z, Liu Y (2020) Linguistic Pythagorean Einstein operators and their application to decision making. Information 11(1):46View Article
  33. Singh A, Kumar S (2020) A novel dice similarity measure for IFSs and its applications in pattern and face recognition. Expert Syst Appl 149:113245View Article
  34. Tan C (2011) A multi-criteria interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making with Choquet integral-based TOPSIS. Expert Syst Appl 38(4):3023–3033View Article
  35. Tang X, Wei G, Gao H (2019) Models for multiple attribute decision making with interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy Muirhead mean operators and their application to green suppliers selection. Informatica (Netherlands) 30(1):153–186MATHView Article
  36. Thao NX (2018) A new correlation coefficient of the intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its application. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 35(2):1959–1968View Article
  37. Thao NX (2019) A new correlation coefficient of the Pythagorean fuzzy sets and its applications. Soft Comput 24(13):9467–9478View Article
  38. Thao NX, Ali M, Smarandache F (2019) An intuitionistic fuzzy clustering algorithm based on a new correlation coefficient with application in medical diagnosis. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 36(1):189–198View Article
  39. Turksen IB (1986) Interval valued fuzzy sets based on normal forms. Fuzzy Sets Syst 20(2):191–210MathSciNetMATHView Article
  40. Verma R (2020) On intuitionistic fuzzy order-\(\alpha\) divergence and entropy measures with MABAC method for multiple attribute group decision-making. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 40(1):1191–1217View Article
  41. Verma R, Sharma B (2013a) Exponential entropy on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Kybernetika 49(1):114–127MathSciNetMATH
  42. Verma R, Sharma BD (2013b) Intuitionistic fuzzy Jensen-Rényi divergence: applications to multiple-attribute decision making. Informatica 37(4):399–409MathSciNet
  43. Verma R, Sharma B (2014a) On intuitionistic fuzzy entropy of order-α. Adv Fuzzy Syst 2014:1–8MathSciNetView Article
  44. Verma R, Sharma BD (2014b) A new measure of inaccuracy with its application to multi-criteria decision making under intuitionistic fuzzy environment. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 27(4):1811–1824MathSciNetMATHView Article
  45. Verma R, Sharma BD (2015a) Intuitionistic fuzzy Einstein prioritized weighted average operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making. Appl Math Inf Sci 9(6):3095–3107
  46. Verma R, Sharma BD (2015b) R-norm entropy on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 28(1):327–335MathSciNetMATHView Article
  47. Verma R, Merigó JM (2019) On generalized similarity measures for Pythagorean fuzzy sets and their applications to multiple attribute decision-making. Int J Intell Syst 34(10):2556–2583View Article
  48. Wang L, Li N (2019) Continuous interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy aggregation operators for multiple attribute group decision making. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 36(6):6245–6263View Article
  49. Wang JQ, Wu JT, Wang J, Zhang HY, Chen XH (2014) Interval-valued hesitant fuzzy linguistic sets and their applications in multi-criteria decision-making problems. Inf Sci 288(1):55–72MathSciNetMATHView Article
  50. Xiao F, Ding W (2019) Divergence measure of Pythagorean fuzzy sets and its application in medical diagnosis. Appl Soft Comput 79:254–267View Article
  51. Xu Z (2004) A method based on linguistic aggregation operators for group decision making with linguistic preference relations. Inf Sci 166(1–4):19–30MathSciNetMATHView Article
  52. Xu Z (2005) An overview of methods for determining OWA weights. Int J Intell Syst 20(8):843–865MATHView Article
  53. Xu Z (2007) Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 15(6):1179–1187View Article
  54. Xu Z (2011) Approaches to multiple attribute group decision making based on intuitionistic fuzzy power aggregation operators. Knowl-Based Syst 24(6):749–760View Article
  55. Xu Z, Yager RR (2006) Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Int J Gen Syst 35(4):417–433MathSciNetMATHView Article
  56. Yager RR (2014) Pythagorean membership grades in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 22(4):958–965View Article
  57. Yager RR, Abbasov AM (2013) Pythagorean membership grades, complex numbers, and decision making. Int J Intell Syst 28(5):436–452View Article
  58. Yang Y, Chen ZS, Chen YH, Chin KS (2018) Interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy frank power aggregation operators based on an isomorphic frank dual triple. Int J Comput Intell Syst 11(1):1091–1110View Article
  59. Yang Y, Chin K, Ding H, Lv H, Li Y (2019) Pythagorean fuzzy Bonferroni means based on T-norm and its dual T-conorm. Int J Intell Syst 34(6):1303–1336View Article
  60. Zadeh L (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338–353MATHView Article
  61. Zadeh LA (1975) The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-I. Inf Sci 8(3):43–80MathSciNetMATHView Article
  62. Zhang H (2014) Linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy sets and application in MAGDM. J Appl Math 2014: 1–11
  63. Zhang X (2016a) A novel approach based on similarity measure for Pythagorean fuzzy multiple criteria group decision making. Int J Intell Syst 31(6):593–611View Article
  64. Zhang X (2016b) Multicriteria Pythagorean fuzzy decision analysis: a hierarchical QUALIFLEX approach with the closeness index-based ranking methods. Inf Sci 330:104–124View Article
  65. Zhang X, Xu Z (2014) Extension of TOPSIS to multiple criteria decision making with Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 29(12):1061–1078View Article
Metadaten
Titel
Multiple attribute group decision-making based on generalized aggregation operators under linguistic interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy environment
verfasst von
Rajkumar Verma
Nikunj Agarwal
Publikationsdatum
12.11.2021
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Granular Computing / Ausgabe 3/2022
Print ISSN: 2364-4966
Elektronische ISSN: 2364-4974
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-021-00286-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2022

Granular Computing 3/2022 Zur Ausgabe