Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen
Traditional analysis and classification of musical instruments is often based on an account of the material characteristics of instruments as physical objects. In this sense, their material basis as a kind of purpose-built technology is the primary focus of concern. This chapter takes the position that musical instruments are better understood in terms of their place in a network of relationships—an “assemblage”—with other objects, practices, institutions and social discourses. Particular attention is applied to the violin, the electric guitar and the phonographic turntable as examples. The assemblage is variable, and the same instrument can be used differently and take on different meanings depending on its place within a particular assemblage; indeed, it is the assemblage that allows us to consider devices like turntables as musical instruments even though they were not designed for such purposes.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste (R. Nice, trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice (R. Nice, trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Born, G. (2005). On musical mediation: Ontology, technology and creativity. Twentieth-Century Music,2(1), 7–36. CrossRef
Born, G. (2011). Music and the materialization of identities. Journal of Material Culture,16(4), 376–388. CrossRef
Born, G., & Devine, K. (2016). Gender, creativity and education in digital musics and sound art. Contemporary Music Review,35(1), 1–20. CrossRef
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (translation and foreword by B. Massumi). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Deleuze, G., & Parnet, C. (1987/2002). Dialogues II (H. Tomlinson & B. Habberjam, trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.
Guattari, F. (1993). Machinic heterogenesis. In V. A. Conley (Ed.), Rethinking technologies (pp. 13–27). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Henriques, J. (2011). Auditory and technological culture: The fine-tuning of the dancehall sound system ‘Set’”. Journal of Sonic Studies, 1(1), October. http://journal.sonicstudies.org/vol01/nr01/a03
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nye, S. (2011). Headphone-Headset-Jetset: DJ culture, mobility and science fictions of listening. Dancecult: Journal of Electronic Dance Music, 3(1), 64–96.
Sachs, C. (1940). The history of musical instruments. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
Perlman, M. (2004). Golden ears and meter readers: The contest for epistemic authority in audiophilia. Social Studies of Science,34(5), 783–807. CrossRef
Reynolds, S. (1999). Generation ecstasy: Into the world of techno and rave culture. New York: Routledge.
Rodgers, T. (2010). Pink noises: Women on electronic music and sound. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. CrossRef
Schloss, J. G. (2004). Making beats: The art of sample-based hip-hop. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
The story of the guitar. (2008). Three-part documentary television series, BBC One, London, broadcast 05, 12, 19 October. Segments of the documentary are available online at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/musictv/guitars/
Théberge, P. (1997). Any sound you can imagine: Making music/consuming technology. Hanover, NH: Wesleyan University Press/University Press of New England.
U2. (1987). Where the streets have no name. The Joshua Tree, Island Records.
Waksman, S. (1999). Instruments of desire: The electric guitar and the shaping of musical experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wise, J. M. (1997). Living in a Deleuzian World. In Exploring technology and social space (pp. 57–82). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Musical Instruments as Assemblage
- Springer Singapore