Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Managing the Myths of Health Care Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

8. Myth #5: Health Care Is Rightly Left to the Private Sector, for the Sake of Efficiency

verfasst von : Oriana Ciani, Aleksandra Torbica, Francesca Lecci, Marco Morelli, Michael Drummond, Rosanna Tarricone, Maurizio de Cicco, Salvatore Russo, Luca Del Bene

Erschienen in: The Myths of Health Care

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The Henry Mintzberg’s myth #5 has been inspired by “conventional wisdom” according to which ownership of health care providers plays an important role in the efficiency in producing services. Moreover, Henry Mintzberg argues that health care is rightly controlled by the public sector, for the sake of equality (Mintzeberg 2012). Based on these two apparently contrasting arguments one can conclude that in the system where most of provision is public, there should be some trade-offs between equality and efficiency.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Myth #4: The Healthcare System Can Be Fixed by Treating It More as a Business
Nächstes Kapitel Myth #6: Health Care Is Rightly Controlled by the Public Sector, for the Sake of Equality
Literatur
Amatucci F (2002) Il Project Finance nelle Aziende Pubbliche. Egea, Milano
Amatucci F, Biondi Y (2002) Project Finance nel Settore Sanitario Italiano: Esperienze e Modalità di Applicazione. In: Anessi Pessina E, Cantù E (eds) L’aziendalizzazione della Sanità in Italia, Rapporto OASI 2001. Egea, Milano, pp 371–391
Amatucci F, Vecchi V (eds) (2009) Le Operazioni di Project Finance: stato dell’arte e indicazioni per il futuro. Egea, Milano
Andon P (2012) Accounting-related research in PPPs/PFIs: present contributions and future opportunities. Account Auditing Accountability J 25(5):876–924CrossRef
Ball R, Heafey M, King D (2000) Private finance initiative—a good deal for the public purse or a drain on future generations? Policy Politics 29(1):95–108CrossRef
Barbetta GP, Turati G, Zago AM (2007) Behavioral differences between public and private not-for-profit hospitals in the Italian National Health Service. Health Econ 16(1):75–96. doi:10.​1002/​hec.​1143CrossRef
Broadbent J, Laughlin R (2003) Public private partnerships: an introduction. Account Auditing Accountability J 16(3):332–341CrossRef
Broadbent J, Gill J, Laughlin R (2003) Evaluating the private finance initiative in the National Health Service in the UK. Account Auditing Accountability J 16(3):422–445CrossRef
Broadbent J, Gill J, Laughlin R (2008) Identifying and controlling risk: the problem of uncertainty in the private finance initiative in the UK’s National Health Service. Critical Perspect Accounting 19:40–78CrossRef
Chivaka R (2007) Strategic cost management: context and philosophy—part 1, Accountancy SA, June
Dallocchio M, Lecci F, Morelli M (2016) L’Istituto Europeo di Oncologia: evidenze empiriche. In: Dallocchio M et al (eds) Valore e misurazione delle performance. EGEA, Milano, pp 111–153
Demirag I, Khadaroo I (2008) Accountability and value for money in private finance initiative contracts. Financ Accountability Manage 24(4):455–478CrossRef
Demirag I, Khadaroo I (2011) Accountability and value for money: a theoretical framework for the relationship in public–private partnerships. J Manage Gov 15(2):271–296CrossRef
Demirag I, Dubnick M, Khadaroo I (2005) A framework for examining accountability and value for money (VFM) in the UK’s private finance initiative (PFI). In: Demirag I (ed) Corporate social responsibility, accountability and governance: global perspectives. Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield
Demirag I, Khadaroo I, Stapleton P, Stevenson C (2011) Risks and the financing of PPP: perspectives from the financiers. Br Accounting Rev 43(4):294–310CrossRef
Donaldson C, Gerard K (1993) Market failure in health care. In: Donaldson C, Gerard K (eds) Economics of health care financing: the visible hand. MacMillan, BasingstokeCrossRef
Drummond MF (2013) Twenty years of using economic evaluations for drug reimbursement decisions. What has been achieved? J Health Polit Policy Law 38(6):1081–1102CrossRef
Dunnigan M, Pollock A (2003) Downsizing of acute inpatient beds associated with private finance initiative: Scotland’s case study. Br Med J 326(7395):905CrossRef
Economic Commission for Europe (ECE) (2002) A review of public-private partnerships for infrastructure development in Europe. Working party on international legal and commercial practice fiftieth session 11–13 March 2002
Edwards P, Shaoul J (2003) Partnerships: for better, for worse? Account Auditing Accountability J 16(3):397–421CrossRef
Eggleston K, Shen YC, Lau J, Schmid CH, Chan J (2008) Hospital ownership and quality of care: what explains the different results in the literature? Health Econ 17(12):1345–1362. doi:10.​1002/​hec.​1333CrossRef
English L, Guthrie J (2003) Driving privately financed projects in Australia: what makes them tick? Account Auditing Accountability J 16(3):493–511CrossRef
English L, Skellern M (2005) Public–private partnerships and public sector management reform: a comparative perspective. Int J Public Policy 1(1):1–21CrossRef
English L, Guthrie J, Broadbent J, Laughlin R (2010) Performance audit of the operational stage of long-term partnerships for the private sector provision of public services. Australian Accounting Rev 20(1):64–75CrossRef
Finlombarda (2012) Finlombarda survey of project finance in health care sector. X Report. Maggioli, Rimini
Flinders M (2005) The politics of public-private partnerships. Br J Polit Int Relat 7(2):215–239CrossRef
Folland S, Rocco L (2014) The economics of social capital and health a conceptual and empirical roadmap. World Scientific, Washington, DCCrossRef
Francesconi A, Lecci F (2014) Innovazioni nei sistemi di controllo e governo dei costi: le risposte delle aziende sanitarie alla crisi economica. In: CERGAS Bocconi (eds) L’aziendalizzazione della sanità in Italia. Rapporto OASI 2014, EGEA, Milan, pp 555–580
Froud J (2003) The private finance initiative: risk, uncertainty and the state. Acc Organ Soc 28(6):567–589CrossRef
Gaffney D, Pollock AM (1999) Pump priming the PFI: why are privately financed hospital schemes being subsidised? Public Money Manage 17(3):11–16
Gaffney D, Pollock A, Price D, Shaoul J (1999) NHS capital expenditure and the private finance initiative—expansion or contraction? Br Med J 319:48–51CrossRef
Greve C, Graeme H (eds) (2013) Rethinking public-private partnerships. Routledge, London
Grimsey D, Lewis MK (2004) Public private partnerships. The worldwide revolution in infrastructure provision and project finance. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK
Grimshaw D, Vincent S, Willmott H (2002) Going privately: partnership and outsourcing in UK public services. Public Adm 80(3):475–502CrossRef
Hellowell M, Vecchi V (2012) An evaluation of the projected returns to investors on 10 PFI projects commissioned by the National Health Service. Financ Accountability Manage 28(1):77–100CrossRef
Hood C (1991) A public management for all seasons? Public Adm 69:3–19CrossRef
Jackson A, Lapsley I (2003) The diffusion of accounting practices in the new “managerial” public sector. Int J Public Sector Manag 16(5):359–372CrossRef
Kakabadse NK, Kakabadse AP, Summers N (2007) Effectiveness of private finance initiatives (PFI): study of private financing for the provision of capital assets for schools. Public Adm Dev 27(1):49–61CrossRef
Kaplan R, Porter M (2011) How to solve the cost crisis in health care. Harvard Business Rev 89(9):6–52, 54, 56–61 passim
Khadaroo I (2008) The actual evaluation of school PFI bids for value for money in the UK public sector. Criti Perspect Account 19(8):1321–1345CrossRef
Kouzmin A, Leivesley R, Kakabadse N (1997) From managerialism and economic rationalism: towards reinventing economic ideology and administrative diversity. Admin Theory Praxis 19(1):19–43
Lane JE (2000) New public management. Routledge, London
Lecci F, Longo F (2015) Humanitas research hospital. In: Minoja M (ed) Bene comune e comportamenti responsabili. EGEA, Milano, pp 175–195
Lega F (2009) Strategic, organisational and managerial issues related to innovation, entrepreneurship and intrapreneurship in the hospital context: remarks from the Italian experience. J Manage Mark Healthc 2(1):77–93
Lord BR (1996) Strategic management accounting: the emperor’s new clothes? Manage Account Res 7(3):347–366CrossRef
Martiniello L, Zaino A (2009) Analisi delle tecniche di valutazione per la scelta del modello di realizzazione dell’intervento: il metodo del Public Sector Comparator e l’analisi del valore. Settembre, Unità Tecnica Finanza di Progetto. http://​www.​utfp.​it/​doc_​eco.​htm. Accessed 20 Oct 2012
Mason A, Drummond MF, Ramsey S, Campbell J, Raisch D (2010) Comparison of anticancer drug coverage decisions in the United States and the United Kingdom: does the evidence support the rhetoric? J Clin Oncol 28(20):3234–3238CrossRef
Milcent C (2005) Hospital ownership, reimbursement systems and mortality rates. Health Econ 4(11):1151–1168CrossRef
Mintzeberg H (2012) Managing the myths of health care. World Hosp Health Serv 48(3):4–7
Morelli M, Lecci F (2014) Management control systems (MCS) change and the impact of top management characteristics. The case of healthcare organisations. J Manag Control 24(3):267–298CrossRef
Osborne S (ed) (2000) Public-private partnerships: theory and practice in international perspective. Routledge, London
Palmer S, Torgerson DJ (1999) Definitions of efficiency. BMJ 318(7191):1136CrossRef
Parker D, Hartley K (2003) Transaction costs, relational contracting and public-private partnerships: a case study of UK defence. J Purchasing Supply Manag 9(3):97–108CrossRef
Pollitt C, van Thiel S, Homburg V (eds) (2007) New public management in Europe: adaptations and alternatives. Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke
Pollock AM, Shaoul J, Rowland D, Player S (2001) Public services and the private sector: a response to the IPPR. A Catalyst Working Paper, London
Puig-Junoy J (1998) Technical efficiency in the clinical management of critically ill patients. Health Econ 7:263–277CrossRef
Reinhardt UE (2003) Costs of healthcare administration in the United States and Canada. N Engl J Med 349(25):2461–2464CrossRef
Roehrich JK, Lewis MA, George G (2014) Are public–private partnerships a healthy option? A systematic literature review. Soc Sci Med 113:110–119CrossRef
Sherman D (1984) Data envelopment analysis as a new managerial audit methodology—test and evaluation. Audit J Pract Theory 4:35–53
Sloan FA (2000) Not-for-profit ownership and hospital behavior. In: Culyer AJ, Newhouse JP (eds) Handbook of health economics, vol 1B. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1141–1174
Spackman M (2002) Public-private partnership: lessons from the British approach. Econ Syst 26:283–301CrossRef
Sullivan SD, Watkins J, Sweet B, Ramsey SD (2009) Health technology assessment in health-care decisions in the United States. Value in Health 12(Suppl 2):S39–S44CrossRef
Tiemann O, Schreyogg J (2009) Effects of ownership on hospital efficiency in Germany. BuR Bus Res 2(2):115–145CrossRef
Tiemann O, Schreyogg J (2012) Changes in hospital efficiency after privatization. Health Care Manag Sci 15(4):310–326CrossRef
Torbica A, Ciani O (2016) Myth #6 If left to the private sector it would be more efficient. Public vs. private provision of healthcare services. In: Adinolfi P, Borgonovi E (eds) What is right and what is wrong in healthcare management? Commenting on Henry Mintzberg’s myths. Springer, Berlin
Torbica A, Tarricone R, Drummond MF (2016) The impact of culture, values and institutional context on the methods and use of economic evaluation. Value Health 19(3):A292CrossRef
Vannozzi D, Fedeli G (2011) La distinta base applicata all’azienda. Mecosan 20(77):105–129
Vitaliano DF, Toren M (1996) Hospital cost and efficiency in a regime of stringent regulation. Eastern Econ J 22(2):161–175
Wilson GW, Jadlow JM (1982) Competition, profit incentives, and technical efficiency in the provision of nuclear medicine services. Bell J Econ 13(2):472–482CrossRef
Woolhandler S, Campbell T, Himmelstein DU (2003) Costs of healthcare administration in the United States and Canada. N Engl J Med 349:768–775CrossRef
Yescombe ER (2007) Public-private partnerships. Principles of policy and finance. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK
Zuckerman S, Hadley J, Iezzoni L (1994) Measuring hospital efficiency with frontier cost functions. J Health Econ 13:255–280CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Myth #5: Health Care Is Rightly Left to the Private Sector, for the Sake of Efficiency
verfasst von
Oriana Ciani
Aleksandra Torbica
Francesca Lecci
Marco Morelli
Michael Drummond
Rosanna Tarricone
Maurizio de Cicco
Salvatore Russo
Luca Del Bene
Copyright-Jahr
2018
Buch
The Myths of Health Care

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53599-9

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-53600-2

Copyright-Jahr: 2018

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53600-2_8