nach oben

TechTrends

Erschienen in:

26.04.2019 | Original Paper

National Policies and Educational Technology: a Synopsis of Trends and Perspectives from Five Countries

verfasst von: Jin Mao, Dirk Ifenthaler, Toru Fujimoto, Andrea Garavaglia, Pier Giuseppe Rossi

Erschienen in: TechTrends | Ausgabe 3/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

There have been continued efforts in exploring how educational technology impacts human learning and performance. Through a synopsis of the trends and perspectives on educational technology in five countries by using the STEEP (social, technological, economic, environmental and political) framework, the authors discuss the direct influence of national policies on educational technology implementation and research, the constraints of the local STEEP elements of culture on the adoption of and research on innovation and change, and the strategies and reforms that different countries have adopted to prepare the next generation for the constantly changing, globalized twenty-first century. Limitations and future research following this work are discussed.

Vorheriger Artikel Collaborative Studio Experiences between South Korean and American Pre-Service Teachers: a Case Study of Designing Culturally-Responsive Virtual Classroom Simulation

Nächster Artikel A Needs Analysis to Inform Global Humanitarian Capacity Building

Baartmann, L. K. J., Bastiaens, T. J., Kirschner, P. A., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2007). Evaluating assessment quality in competence-based education: A qualitative comparison of two frameworks. Educational Research Review, 2, 114–129.CrossRef

Banathy, B. H., & Jenlink, P. M. (2004). Systems inquiry and its application in education. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 37–57). New York: Macmillan Library Reference.

Bellin-Mularski, N., Mah, D.-K., & Ifenthaler, D. (2016). Pre-service teachers' perceptions of school development. In J. M. Spector, D. Ifenthaler, D. G. Sampson, & P. Isaias (Eds.), Competencies in teaching, learning and educational leadership in the digital age (pp. 57–76). New York: Springer.CrossRef

Cabinet Office of Japan. (2017) New economic policy package. Retrieved from http://www5.cao.go.jp/keizai1/package/20171208_package_en.pdf.

Chen, L., Li, L., Zou, D., & Wang, A. (2013). Reflections on education and technological development in China. Deloitte China Education Industry. Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/cn/en/pages/technology-media-and-telecommunications/articles/reflections-education-technological-development-china2013.html.

Cronje, J. C. (2016). The future of our field—A steep perspective. TechTrends, 60(1), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-015-0009-0.CrossRef

CRUI. (2015). MOOCs massive open on-line courses. Prospettive e Opportunità per l’Università italiana. Roma: Fondazione CRUI.

Delcker, J., & Ifenthaler, D. (2017). Computational thinking as an interdisciplinary approach to computer science school curricula: A German perspective. In P. J. Rich & C. Hodges (Eds.), Emerging research, practice, and policy on computational thinking (pp. 49–62). New York: Springer.CrossRef

Dolan, J. E. (2016). Splicing the divide: A review of research on the evolving digital divide among k–12 students. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(1), 16–37.CrossRef

EDUCAUSE. (2018). Twenty years: EDUCAUSE and higher education IT. Retrieved from https://er.educause.edu/~/media/files/articles/2018/7/er184100.pdf.

Egloffstein, M., & Ifenthaler, D. (2017). Employee perspectives on MOOCs for workplace learning. TechTrends, 61(1), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0127-3.CrossRef

Fishman, B., & Dede, C. (2016). Teaching and technology: New tools for new times. In D. H. Gitomer & C. A. Bell (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 1269–1334). American Educational Research Association. https://doi.org/10.3102/978-0-935302-48-6_21.

Fujimoto, T., Takahama, A., Ara, Y., Isshiki, Y., Nakaya, K., & Yamauchi, Y. (2018). Designing a MOOC as an online community to encourage international students to study abroad. Educational Media International. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2018.1547545.

Galley, K., & Mayrberger, K. (2018 i.E.). Tablets im Schulalltag: Potenziale und Herausforderungen bei der Integration von mobilen Endgeräten an beruflichen Gymnasien. Erste Ergebnisse des Projekts, tabletBS’. MedienPädagogik: Zeitschrift für Theorie und Praxis der Medienbildung.

Garavaglia, A. (2015). Dispositivos móveis na escola: redefinição de ambientes e métodos de aprendizagem no contexto italiano. PERSPECTIVA, 33(2), 573–588.CrossRef

Hohlfeld, T. N., Ritzhaupt, A. D., Dawson, K., & Wilson, M. L. (2017). An examination of seven years of technology integration in Florida schools: Through the lens of the levels of digital divide in schools. Computers & Education, 113, 135–161.CrossRef

Huang, R., Yu, L., & Yang, J. (2014). The evolution of university open courses in transforming learning: Experiences from mainland China. In D. G. Sampson, D. Ifenthaler, P. Isaias, & J. M. Spector (Eds.), Digital systems for open access to formal and informal learning (pp. 25–39). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

Huang, R., Liu, J., Jiao, Y., Li, J., Zeng, H., Zhuang, G., et al. (2017). The 2017 Research report on the internet education service industry. Beijing: The Smart Learning Institute.

Ifenthaler, D. (2017). Are higher education institutions prepared for learning analytics? TechTrends, 61(4), 366–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0154-0.CrossRef

Ifenthaler, D. (2018). How we learn at the digital workplace. In D. Ifenthaler (Ed.), Digital workplace learning. Bridging formal and informal learning with digital technologies (pp. 3–8). New York: Springer.

Ifenthaler, D., Bellin-Mularski, N., & Mah, D.-K. (Eds.). (2016). Foundations of digital badges and micro-credentials. New York: Springer.

Ifenthaler, D., Gibson, D. C., & Dobozy, E. (2018). Informing learning design through analytics: Applying network graph analysis. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(2), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3767.CrossRef

Johnson, L., Liu, D., Huang, R., Adams Becker, S., Gao, Y., Cummins, M., et al. (2016). 2016 NMC technology outlook for Chinese k-12 education: A horizon project regional report. Austin: The New Media Consortium.

Lai, F. Q. (2017). Chinese scholars’ perspectives regarding educational technology. In F.-Q. Lai & J. D. Lehman (Eds.), Learning and knowledge analytics in open education: Selected readings from the AECT-LKAOE 2015 summer international research symposium (pp. 205–221). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

Li, B., Zhang, J., Chen, H., Huang, W., & Wang, C. X. (2017). Education reform in the era of “internet plus”: The 21st global Chinese conference on computers in education. TechTrends, 61(6), 520–523.CrossRef

Mao, J. (2017). New technologies and old professional development: A reflection on emerging approaches. In W. W. K. Ma, C. K. A. Chan, K.-w. Tong, H. Fung, & C. W. R. Fong (Eds.), New ecology for education: Communication x learning (pp. 67–77). Singapore: Springer Nature Pte Ltd..CrossRef

McMurray, D. (2018). MEXT’s new course of study guidelines to rely on active learning. The Language Teacher, 42(3) Retrieved from: https://jalt-publications.org/articles/24329-mext%E2%80%99s-new-course-study-guidelines-rely-active-learning.

MEXT. (2013) The second basic plan for the promotion of education (Provisional translation) Retrieved from: http://www.mext.go.jp/en/policy/education/lawandplan/title01/detail01/1373796.htm.

MEXT. (2014) The Top Global University Project. Retrieved from: http://www.mext.go.jp/en/policy/education/highered/title02/detail02/1373875.htm.

MEXT. (2015) Improvement of the quality of teachers. Retrieved from: http://www.mext.go.jp/en/policy/education/elsec/title02/detail02/1373865.htm.

MEXT (Ministry of Education of Japan). (2011). The vision for ICT in education: toward the creation of a learning system and schools suitable for the 21st century. Retrieved from: http://www.mext.go.jp/component/a_menu/education/micro_detail/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2017/06/26/1305484_14_1.pdf.

OECD. (2016). Education in China: A snapshot. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/china/Education-in-China-a-snapshot.pdf.

OECD. (2018). Education at a glance 2018: OECD indicators. https://doi.org/10.1787/eag-2018-en.

Office of Educational Technology. (2017). Reimagining the role of technology in higher education: A supplement to the National Education Technology Plan. U.S. Department of Education, Washington, D.C.

Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., & Brush, T. (2018). Integrating technology into K-12 education. In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (4th ed., pp. 176–184). New York: Pearson.

Reeves, T. C., & Oh, E. G. (2017). The goals and methods of educational technology research over a quarter century (1989-2014). Educational Technology Research & Development, 65, 325–339.CrossRef

Reiser, R. A., & Dempsey, J. V. (2018). Trends and issues in instructional design and technology. Boston: Pearson.

Ren, Y. (2014). Foreword. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, M. J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (4th ed., pp. vii–vxi). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5.

Ritchie, H., & Roser, M. (2018). Technology adoption. Retrieved from https://ourworldindata.org/technology-adoption#internet-access-technology.

Rivoltella, P. C. (2013). Fare didattica con gli EAS. Episodi di Apprendimento Situato. Brescia: La Scuola.

Rivoltella, P. C. (2018). Un’idea di scuola. Brescia: Morcelliana.

Rivoltella, P. C., Garavaglia, A., Ferrari, S., & Ferri, P. (2012). Could technology encourage innovation in school? An overview of "Classi 2.0" project in Lombardia (Italy). REM Research on Education and Media, 4(2), 253–264.

Rossi, P. G. (2017). Dall’uso del digitale nella didattica alla didattica digitale. In P. Limone & D. Parmigiani (Eds.), Modelli pedagogici e pratiche didattiche per la formazione iniziale e in servizio degli insegnanti. Bari: Progedit.

Sheninger, E. C., & Murray, T. C. (2017). Learning transformed: 8 keys to designing tomorrow’s schools, today. Alexandria: ASCD.

Spector, J. M. (2016). Foundations of educational technology: Integrative approaches and interdisciplinary perspectives. New York: Routledge.

Spector, J. M. (2018). Future trends of designing learning in the global context. In T.-W. Chang, R. Huang, & Kinshuk (Eds.), Authentic learning through advances in technologies (pp. 205–216). Singapore: Springer.CrossRef

Spector, J. M., Johnson, T. E., & Young, P. A. (2014). An editorial on research and development in and with educational technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-014-9331-z.CrossRef

Watson, S. L., Watson. W., & Reigeluth, C. M. (2008). Systems design for change in education and training. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. van Merri˜enboer, & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge/Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

World Bank. (2017). Gross domestic product 2017. World Development Indicators. Retrieved from http://databank.worldbank.org/data/download/gdp.pdf.

Wozniak, K. (2018). STEEP analysis. Retrieved from https://ceopedia.org/index.php/STEEP_analysis.

Xinhua News Agency. (2018). “E-book bag:” Worry addition or burden reduction? Retrieved from http://www.xinhuanet.com/local/2018-09/23/c_129959440.htm.

Zheng, Y., & Yang, R. Y. (2017). The rise of MOOCs: The literature review of research progress and hot spots of MOOCs education in mainland China. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(9), 6165–6174. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01056a.CrossRef

Titel: National Policies and Educational Technology: a Synopsis of Trends and Perspectives from Five Countries
verfasst von: Jin Mao
Dirk Ifenthaler
Toru Fujimoto
Andrea Garavaglia
Pier Giuseppe Rossi
Publikationsdatum: 26.04.2019
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: TechTrends / Ausgabe 3/2019
Print ISSN: 8756-3894
Elektronische ISSN: 1559-7075
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00396-0

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2019

Using Interactive Virtual Reality Tools in an Advanced Chinese Language Class: a Case Study

Dr. Edgar Dale

Educational Technology Research with International Perspectives and Cultural Contexts

Reflection of Forming a Research Collaboration with an International University

Review of Conrad, D., & Openo, J. (2018). Assessment Strategies for Online Learning: Engagement and Authenticity. Edmonton, AB: Athabasca University Press

Editor’s Notes