Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
Anyone who has lived in, driven through or walked by a “bad” neighborhood has a sense of the attributes that render such places unique: graffiti, litter, public intoxication and much more. According to the well-known theory of “broken windows,” these readily observable corporeal characteristics signal neighborhood disorder and lead to increased criminal behavior. This article investigates the implications of disorder for political behavior, taking particular care to distinguish between the objective tangible conditions of disorder and residents’ subjective interpretations of those conditions. Utilizing exceptionally rich data, this analysis reveals that while certain aspects of objective “reality” are consequential, perceptions of such reality are a more powerful mechanism through which neighborhood disorder impacts local political engagement. For some political outcomes, a heightened sense of the problems associated with disorder is linearly associated with an increase in participation. For others, the pattern is parabolic: those who perceive so little disorder that they remain content or so much disorder that they become disaffected are substantially less likely to take action to make their communities better. Ultimately, holding objective contextual features constant, the lenses through which residents interpret things like “broken windows” are critical determinants of grassroots politics. This information, combined with broader understandings of what shapes perceptions of disorder, lays the foundation for structuring policy in ways that facilitate grassroots activism—a vital component of the American democratic process.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Akers, R. L., & Jensen, G. F. (2003). Social Learning Theory and the Explanation of Crime: A Guide for the New Century. Advances in Criminological Theory (Vol. 11). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Alex-Assensoh, Y. (1998). Neighborhoods, family and political behavior in urban America. New York: Gerald Publishing.
Alvarez, R. M., & Glasgow, G. (2000). Two-stage estimation of non-recursive choice models. Political Analysis, 8, 147–165. CrossRef
Anderson, M. R. (2009). Beyond membership: A sense of community and political behavior. Political Behavior, 31, 603–627. CrossRef
Aneshensel, C. S., & Sucoff, C. A. (1996). The neighborhood context of adolescent mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 37(4), 293–310. CrossRef
Bolan, M. (1997). The mobility experience and neighborhood attachment. Demography, 34, 225–237. CrossRef
Books, J., & Prysby, C. (1988). Studying contextual effects on political behavior: A research inventory and agenda. American Politics Quarterly, 16, 211–238. CrossRef
Brook, D. (2006). The cracks in broken windows. The Boston Globe. Available at: http://www.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2006/02/19/the_cracks_in_broken_windows/?page=full.
Brunswik, E. (1956). Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Burbank, M. J. (1995). How do contextual effects work? Developing a theoretical model. In Munroe Eagles (Ed.), Spatial and contextual models in political research (pp. 166–178). London: Taylor and Francis.
Casciano, R., & Massey, D. (2011). Neighborhood disorder and economic self-sufficiency. Working paper. Office of Population Research Princeton University.
Chavis, D. M., & Wandesman, A. (1990). Sense of community in the urban environment: A catalyst for participation and community development. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 55–81. CrossRef
Christie-Mizell, A., & Erickson, R. J. (2007). Mothers and mastery: The consequences of perceived neighborhood disorder. Social Psychology Quarterly, 70(4), 340–365. CrossRef
Churchman, A. (1987). Can resident participation in neighborhood rehabilitation programs succeed? Israel’s project renewal through a comparative perspective. In I. Altman & A. Wandersman (Eds.), Neighborhood and community environments (pp. 113–162). New York: Plenum Press. CrossRef
Cohen, C. J., & Dawson, M. C. (1993). Neighborhood poverty and African-American politics. American Political Science Review, 87, 286–302. CrossRef
Curtis, L. A. (1987). Policies to prevent crime: Neighborhood, family and employment strategies. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 494, 9–168. CrossRef
Dassopoulos, A., & Monnat, S. M. (2011). Do perceptions of social cohesion, social support, and social control mediate the effects of local community participation on neighborhood satisfaction? Environment and Behavior, 43(4), 546–565. CrossRef
Eagles, M. (1995). Class versus community? Social identities and political mobilization. In M. Eagles (Ed.), Spatial and Contextual Models in Political Research (pp. 211–233). London: Taylor and Francis.
Earls, F. J., Brooks-Gunn, J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Sampson, R. J. (1997). Project on human development in Chicago neighborhoods: Community survey, 1994–1995. ICPSR02766-v3. Boston, MA: Harvard Medical School [producer]. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
Earls, F. J., Raudenbush, S. W., Reiss, A. J. Jr., & Sampson, R. J. (2002). Project on human development in Chicago neighborhoods (PHDCN): Systematic social observation, 1995. ICPSR13578-v1. Boston, MA: Harvard Medical School [producer]. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].
Elo, I. T., Mykyta, L., Margolis, R., & Culhane, J. F. (2009). Perceptions of neighborhood disorder: The role of individual and neighborhood characteristics. Social Science Quarterly, 90, 1298–1320. CrossRef
Enders, C. K., & Tofighi, D. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A New look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12(2), 121–138. CrossRef
Epstein, P. D., Coates, P. M., Wray, L. D., & Swain, D. (2006). Results that matter: Improving communities by engaging citizens, measuring performance and getting things done. San Francisco, CA: Josey-Bass Publishers.
Florin, P. (1989). Nurturing the grassroots: Neighborhood volunteer organizations and America’s cities. New York: Citizens Committee for New York City.
Franzini, L., O’Brien, Caughy M, Murray Nettles, S., & O’Campo, P. (2008). Perceptions of disorder: Contributions of neighborhood characteristics to subjective perceptions of disorder. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28, 83–93. CrossRef
Gay, C. (2012). Moving to opportunity: The political effects of a housing mobility experiment. Urban Affairs Review, 48(2), 147–175. CrossRef
Hadley-Ives, E., Stiffman, A. R., Elze, D., Johnson, S. D., & Dore, P. (2000). Measuring neighborhood and school environments perceptual and aggregate approaches. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 3(1), 1–28.
Haney, T. J. (2007). “Broken windows” and self-esteem: Subjective understandings of neighborhood poverty and disorder. Social Science Research, 36, 968–994. CrossRef
Harcourt, B. E. (2001). Illusion of order: The false promise of broken windows policing. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Harcourt, B. E., & Ludwig, J. (2006). Broken windows: New evidence from New York City and a five-city social experiment. University of Chicago Law Review, 73, 271–320.
Hardy-Fanta, C. (1993). Latina politics, Latino politics: Gender, culture and political participation in Boston. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Hauser, R. M. (1974). Contextual analysis revisited. Sociological Methods and Research, 2, 365–375. CrossRef
Hill, T. D., Ross, C. E., & Angel, R. J. (2005). Neighborhood disorder, psychophysiological distress, and health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 46, 170–186. CrossRef
Huckfeldt, R. (1986). Politics in context: Assimilation and conflict in urban neighborhoods. New York: Agathon Press.
Huckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. (1993). Citizens, contexts, and politics. In A. W. Finifter (Ed.), Political science: The state of the discipline II (pp. 281–303). Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
Kamphuis, C. B. M., Mackenbach, J. P., Giskes, K., Huisman, M., Brug, J., & Van Lenthe, F. J. (2010). Why do poor people perceive poor neighbourhoods? The role of objective neighbourhood features and psychosocial factors. Health and Place, 16(4), 744–754. CrossRef
Kaplan, S., & Kaplan, R. (1982). Cognition and environment: Functioning in an uncertain world. New York: Praeger.
Kasl, S. V., & Harburg, E. (1972). Perceptions of the neighborhood and the desire to move out. Journal of the American Planning Association, 38, 318–324. CrossRef
Kelling, G., & Coles, C. (1996). Fixing broken windows: Restoring order and reducing crime in our communities. New York: Free Press.
Keshk, O. M. G. (2003). CDSIMEQ: A Program to implement two staged probit least squares. The Stata Journal, 3(2), 157–167.
Kornhauser, R. (1978). Social sources of delinquency. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kubrin, C. E. (2008). Making order of disorder: A call for conceptual clarity. Criminology and Public Policy, 7(2), 203–214. CrossRef
Kweon, B., Ellis, C. D., Lee, S., & Rogers, G. O. (2006). Large-scale environmental knowledge: Investigating the relationship between self-reported and objectively measured physical environments. Environment and Behavior, 38(1), 72–91. CrossRef
Lake, R., & Huckfeldt, R. (1998). Social networks, social capital, and political participation. Political Psychology, 19, 567–584. CrossRef
Latkin, C. A., & Curry, A. D. (2003). Prospective study of the impact of neighborhood disorder. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 44, 34–44. CrossRef
Lee, B. A., & Campbell, K. E. (1997). Common ground? Urban neighborhoods as survey respondents see them. Social Science Quarterly, 78, 922–936.
Levitt, S. D., & Dubner, S. J. (2005). Freakonomics: A rogue economist explores the hidden side of everything. New York: HarperCollins.
Lott, J. (2000). More guns, less crime. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Manzo, L. C., & Perkins, D. D. (2006). Finding common ground: The importance of place attachment to community participation and planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 20, 335–350. CrossRef
Marschall, M. J. (2004). Citizen participation and the neighborhood context: A new look at the coproduction of local public goods. Political Research Quarterly, 57(2), 231–244.
Meersman, S. C. (2005). Objective neighborhood properties and perceptions of neighborhood problems: Using a Geographic Information System (GIS) in neighborhood effects and ageing research. Ageing International, 30, 63–87. CrossRef
Oliver, E. J. (2000). City size and civic involvement in metropolitan America. American Political Science Review, 94, 361–373. CrossRef
Peterson, S. A. (1990). Political behavior: Patterns in everyday life. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Piven, F. F., & Cloward, R. A. (1977). Poor people’s movements: Why they succeed, how they fail. New York: Pantheon Books.
Pomerantz, J. R. (2003). Perception: Overview. In L. Nadel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of cognitive science (Vol. 3, pp. 527–537). London: Nature Publishing Group.
Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Quillian, L., & Pager, D. (2001). Black neighbors, higher crime? The role of racial stereotypes in evaluations of neighborhood crime. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 717–767. CrossRef
Rich, R. C. (1979). The roles of neighborhood organizations in urban service delivery. Journal of Urban Affairs, 1, 81–93. CrossRef
Roberts, S. (2011). Fewer broken windows, and a decline in crime. The New York Times. Available Online: http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/02/23/fewer-broken-windows-and-a-decline-in-crime/.
Rohe, W. M., & Basolo, Victoria. (1997). Long-term effects of homeownership on the self-perceptions and social interaction of low-income persons. Environment and Behavior, 29, 793–819. CrossRef
Rohe, W. M., & Stegman, M. A. (1994). The impact of home ownership on the social and political involvement of low-income people. Urban Affairs Review, 30(1), 152–172. CrossRef
Rosenstone, S. J., & Hansen, J. M. (1993). Mobilization, participation and democracy in America. London: Macmillan Press.
Ross, C. E. (2000). Neighborhood disadvantage and adult depression. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 41(2), 177–187. CrossRef
Ross, C. E., Mirowsky, J., & Pribesh, S. (2001). Powerlessness and the amplification of threat: Neighborhood disadvantage, disorder, and mistrust. American Sociological Review, 66, 568–591. CrossRef
Sampson, R. J., & Groves, W. B. (1989). Community structures and crime: Testing social-disorganization theory. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 774–802. CrossRef
Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. D., & Gannon-Rowley, T. (2002). Assessing ‘neighborhood effects’: Social processes and new direction in research. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 443–478. CrossRef
Sampson, R. J., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1999). Systematic social observation of public spaces: A new look at disorder in urban neighborhoods. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 603–651. CrossRef
Sampson, R. J., & Raudenbush, S. W. (2004). Seeing disorder: Neighborhood stigma and the social construction of ‘Broken Windows’. Social Psychology Quarterly, 67, 319–342. CrossRef
Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918–924. CrossRef
Santiago, A. M., Galster, G. C., Kaiser, A. A., Roman, A. H. S.-S., Grace, R. A., & Linn, A. T. W. (2010). Low-income homeownership: Does it necessarily mean sacrificing neighborhood quality to buy a home? Journal of Urban Affairs, 32, 171–198. CrossRef
Scott, J. C. (1990). Domination and the arts of resistance: Hidden transcripts. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Skogan, W. G. (2008). Broken windows: Why-and How -We Should Take Them Seriously. Criminology and Public Policy, 7(2), 195–201. CrossRef
Skogan, W. G. (2012). Disorder and Crime. In Brandon C. Welsh & David P. Farrington (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of crime prevention (pp. 173–188). New York: Oxford University Press.
Small, M. L. (2004). Villa victoria: The transformation of social capital in a Boston barrio. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossRef
Steenbergen, M. R., & Jones, B. S. (2002). Modeling multilevel data structures. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 218–237. CrossRef
Taylor, R. B. (2001). Breaking away from broken windows. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. (1995). Voice and equality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Veysey, B. M., & Messner, S. F. (1999). Further testing of social disorganization theory: An Elaboration of Sampson and Groves’s ‘‘Community Structure and Crime’’. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 36, 156–174. CrossRef
Wandersman, A., Jakubs, J. F., & Giamartino, G. A. (1981). Participation in block organizations. Journal of Community Action, 1, 40–48.
Weden, M. M., Carpiano, R. M., & Robert, S. A. (2008). Subjective and objective neighborhood characteristics and adult health. Social Science and Medicine, 66(6), 1256–1270. CrossRef
Wilson, J. Q., & Kelling, G. (1982). The police and neighborhood safety: Broken windows. The Atlantic Monthly, 127, 29–38.
- Neighborhood Disorder and Local Participation: Examining the Political Relevance of “Broken Windows”
- Springer US
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta