nach oben

Small Business Economics

Erschienen in:

07.03.2018

Neither absent nor too present: the effects of the engagement of parent universities on the performance of academic spin-offs

verfasst von: Marco Ferretti, Salvatore Ferri, Raffaele Fiorentino, Adele Parmentola, Alessandro Sapio

Erschienen in: Small Business Economics | Ausgabe 1/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

There is a lack of studies regarding the impact of parent-child relationships on the growth of academic spin-offs (ASOs). The aim of this paper is to investigate whether the presence of the parent university can affect a new venture’s ability to create value after the spin-off is founded. We analyze the engagement of parent universities by examining their different roles in ownership structures and on boards of directors, and we test theoretical hypotheses using a sample of 194 Italian ASOs. Overall, our findings suggest that “neither absent nor too present” is the strategy that the parent university should adopt to support the growth of its spin-offs. These findings contribute to extending the parent-child approach to studies of ASO performance. We provide suggestions for ownership and board composition decisions after spin-off to help universities configure ex ante appropriate actions for the growth of new ventures.

Vorheriger Artikel Where is my partner? The role of gender in the formation of entrepreneurial businesses

Nächster Artikel Entrepreneurship capital spillovers at the local level

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

For the goals of the current work, it is necessary to focus only on science and engineering. This choice does not limit the field of investigation in a significant manner, as researchers-entrepreneurs from disciplines other than science and engineering were found to account for only 1.6% of the total.

The data collection covered a relatively extended period due to the large amount of data necessary for the study and the difficulties associated with the data extraction procedure (the documents are often in PDF format) and with the codification of qualitative information.

Using 4-year growth rates as the dependent variable only yields one observation per spin-off. In that case, it would be possible to use only cross-sectional estimators, thus losing the information provided by temporal variation in the board and capital composition.

We have not performed QML estimates due to convergence issues associated with such small samples.

Unfortunately, we do not have survey-based data that could account for these differences in university strategies in a more nuanced way. Nonetheless, we thank an anonymous referee for pointing out this issue.

Table 6 only reports estimates of the turning point based on statistically significant linear and quadratic coefficients associated with the share of academics on the board of directors.

Abramo, G., D'Angelo, C. A., Ferretti, M., & Parmentola, A. (2012). An individual-level assessment of the relationship between spin-off activities and research performance in universities. R&D Management, 42(3), 225–242. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2012.00680.x.

Acs, Z. J., Braunerhjelm, P., Audretsch, D. B., & Carlsson, B. (2009). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 32(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-008-9157-3.

Agarwal, R., & Shahb, S. K. (2014). Knowledge sources of entrepreneurship: firm formation by academic, user and employee innovators. Research Policy, 43, 1109–1133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.04.012.

Agarwal, R., Echambadi, R., Franco, A. M., & Sarkar, M. B. (2004). Knowledge transfer through inheritance: spin-out generation, development, and survival. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), 501–522. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159599.

Andersson, M., Baltzopoulos, A., & Lööf, H. (2012). R&D strategies and entrepreneurial spawning. Research Policy, 41(1), 54–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.08.005.

Audretsch, D. B. (2014). From the entrepreneurial university to the university for the entrepreneurial society. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(3), 313–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-012-9288-1.

Autio, E., Sapienza, H. J., & Almeida, J. G. (2000). Effects of age at entry, knowledge intensity, and imitability on international growth. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 909–924. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556419.

Baltagi, B. (2008). Econometric analysis of panel data. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

Barba Navaretti, G., Castellani, D., & Pieri, F. (2014). Age and firm growth: evidence from three European countries. Small Business Economics, 43(4), 823–837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-014-9564-6.

Bathelt, H., Kogler, D. F., & Munro, A. K. (2010). A knowledge-based typology of university spin-offs in the context of regional economic development. Technovation, 30(9), 519–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2010.04.003.

Bell, A., & Jones, K. (2015). Explaining fixed effects: random effects modeling of time-series cross-sectional and panel data. Political Science Research and Methods, 3(1), 133–153. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2014.7.

Berbegal-Mirabent, J., Ribeiro-Soriano, D. E., & Sánchez García, J. L. (2015). Can a magic recipe foster university spin-off creation? Journal of Business Research, 68, 2272–2278. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2016/9-3/6.

Bigdeli, A. Z., Feng, L., & Shi, X. (2015). Sustainability and scalability of university spinouts: a business model perspective. R&D Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12167.

Bonardo, D., Paleari, S., & Vismara, S. (2010). Valuing university-based firms: the effects of academic affiliation on IPO performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(4), 755–776. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00369.x.

Capasso, M., Cefis, E., & Sapio, A. (2013). Reconciling quantile autoregressions of firm size and variance–size scaling. Small Business Economics, 41(3), 609–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-012-9445-9.

Carlsson, B., Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., & Braunerhjelm, P. (2009). Knowledge creation, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: a historical review. Industrial and Corporate Change, 18(6), 1193–1229. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtp043.

Chai, S., & Shihb, W. (2016). Bridging science and technology through academic–industry partnerships. Research Policy, 45, 148–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.07.007.

Chang, Y. C., Yang, P. Y., & Chen, M. H. (2009). The determinants of academic research commercial performance: towards an organizational ambidexterity perspective. Research Policy, 38, 936–946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.03.005.

Chatterji, A. K. (2009). Spawned with a silver spoon? Entrepreneurial performance and innovation in the medical device industry. Strategic Management Journal, 30(2), 185–206. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.729.

Chiesa, V., & Piccaluga, A. (2000). Exploitation and diffusion of public research: the case of academic spin-off companies in Italy. R&D Management, 30(4), 329–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00187.

Clarysse, B., Wright, M., & Van de Velde, E. (2011). Entrepreneurial origin, technological knowledge, and the growth of spin-off companies. Journal of Management Studies, 48(6), 1420–1442. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00991.x.

Coad, A., Segarra, A., & Teruel, M. (2013). Like milk or wine: does firm performance improve with age? Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 24, 173–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2012.07.002.

Colombelli, A., Krafft, J., & Vivarelli. (2016). To be born is not enough: the key role of innovative start-ups. Small Business Economics, 47(2), 277–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9716-y.

Colombo, M. G., & Piva, E. (2012). Strengths firms’ genetic characteristics and competence-enlarging strategies: a comparison between academic and non-academic high-tech start-ups. Research Policy, 41, 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.08.010.

Criaco, G., Minola, T., Migliorini, P., & Serarols-Tarrès, C. (2013). “To have and have not”: founders’ human capital and university start-up survival. Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(4), 567–593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-013-9312-0.

Dahlstrand, Å. L. (1997). Growth and inventiveness in technology-based spin-off firms. Research Policy, 26(3), 331–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00016-4.

Daley, L., Mehrotra, V., & Sivakumar, R. (1997). Corporate focus and value creation: evidence from spinoffs. Journal of Financial Economics, 45, 257–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(97)00018-4.

Dasgupta, P., & David, P. A. (1994). Toward a new economics of science. Research Policy, 23, 487–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(94)01002-1.

Debackere, K., & Veugelers, R. (2005). The role of academic technology transfer organizations in improving industry science links. Research Policy, 34(3), 321–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.12.003.

Degroof, J. J., & Roberts, E. B. (2004). Overcoming weak entrepreneurial infrastructures for academic spin-off ventures. Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(3–4), 327–352. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOTT.0000034126.23592.23.

Di Gregorio, D., & Shane, S. (2003). Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? Research Policy, 32, 209–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00097-5.

Dosi, G. (2007). Statistical regularities in the evolution on industries: a guide through some evidence and challenges for the theory. L’industria, 29(2), 153–186. https://doi.org/10.1430/27262.

Druilhe, C., & Garnsey, E. (2004). Do academic spin-outs differ and does it matter? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(3–4), 269–285. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOTT.0000034123.26133.97.

Epure, M., Prior, D., & Serarols, C. (2016). Assessing technology-based spin-offs from university support units. Regional Studies, 50(3), 411–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.921669.

Eriksson, T., & Kuhn, J. M. (2006). Firm spin-offs in Denmark 1981–2000—patterns of entry and exit. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 24(5), 1021–1040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2005.11.008.

Feldman, E. R., Amit, R., & Villalonga, B. (2016). Corporate divestitures and family control. Strategic Management Journal, 37, 429–446. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2329.

Fernández-Alles, M., Camelo-Ordaz, C., & Franco-Leal, N. (2015). Key resources and actors for the evolution of academic spin-offs. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(6), 976–1002. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-014-9387-2.

Ferriani, S., Garnsey, E., & Lorenzoni, G. (2012). Continuity and change in a spin-off venture: the process of reimprinting. Industrial and Corporate Change, 21(4), 1011–1048. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dts001.

Festel, G. (2013). Academic spin-offs, corporate spin-outs and company internal start-ups as technology transfer approach. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(4), 454–470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-012-9256-9.

Filatotchev, I., Toms, S., & Wright, M. (2006). The firm’s strategic dynamics and corporate governance life-cycle. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 2(4), 256–279. https://doi.org/10.1108/17439130610705481.

Fini, R., Grimaldi, R., Santoni, S., & Sobrero, M. (2011). Complements or substitutes? The role of universities and local context in supporting the creation of academic spin-offs. Research Policy, 40(8), 1113–1127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.013.

Fini, R., Fu, K., Mathisen, M. T., Rasmussen, E., & Wright, M. (2017). Institutional determinants of university spin-off quantity and quality: a longitudinal, multilevel, cross-country study. Small Business Economics, 48(2), 361–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9779-9.

Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1996). Strategic leadership: top executives and their effects on organizations. Minneapolis: West Publishing.

Finkelstein, S., & Mooney, A. C. (2003). Not the usual suspects: how to use board process to make boards better. The Academy of Management Executive, 17(2), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.5465/AME.2003.10025204.

Franco-Leal, N., Soetanto, D., & Camelo-Ordaz, C. (2016). Do they matter? The role of non-academics in the internationalization of academic spin-offs. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 14(3), 410–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-016-0184-x.

Galati, F., Bigliardi, B., Petroni, A., & Marolla, G. (2017). Which factors are perceived as obstacles for the growth of Italian academic spin-offs? Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 29(1), 84–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2016.1199853.

Gredel, D., Kramer, M., & Bend, B. (2012). Patent-based investment funds as innovation intermediaries for SMEs: in-depth analysis of reciprocal interactions, motives and fallacies. Technovation, 32(9), 536–549.

Hayter, C. S. (2016). A trajectory of early-stage spinoff success: the role of knowledge intermediaries within an entrepreneurial university ecosystem. Small Business Economics, 47(3), 633–656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9756-3.

Heirman, A., & Clarysse, B. (2007). Which tangible and intangible assets matter for innovation speed in start‐ups? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24(4), 303–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2007.00253.x.

Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Rreview, 28(3), 383–396. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2003.10196729.

Hsiao, C., Pesaran, M. H., & Tahmiscioglu, A. K. (2002). Maximum likelihood estimation of fixed effects dynamic panel data models covering short time periods. Journal of Econometrics, 109(1), 107–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00143-9.

Johansson, M., Jacob, M., & Hellström, T. (2005). The strength of strong ties: university spin-offs and the significance of historical relations. Journal of Technology Transfer, 30(3), 271–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-005-0930-z.

Knockaert, M., & Ucbasaran, D. (2013). The service role of outside boards in high tech start-ups: a resource dependency perspective. British Journal of Management, 24(1), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00787.x.

Kripfganz, S. (2016). Quasi-maximum likelihood estimation of linear dynamic short-T panel data models. Stata Journal, 16(4), 1013–1038.

Lechner, C., Dowling, M., & Wolpe, I. (2006). Firm networks and firm development: the role of the relational mix. Journal of Business Venturing, 21, 514–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.02.004.

Lehouxa, P., GDaudelinb, G., Williams-Jones, B., JDenis, J. L., & Longo, C. (2014). How do business model and health technology design influence each other? Insights from a longitudinal case study of three academic spin-offs. Research Policy, 43, 1025–1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.02.001.

Leitch, C. M., & Harrison, R. T. (2005). Maximising the potential of university spin-outs: the development of second-order commercialisation activities. R&D Management, 35(3), 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2005.00388.x.

Lockett, A., & Wright, M. (2005). Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies. Research Policy, 34(7), 1043–1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.006.

Lubik, S., Garnsey, E. W., & Minshall, T. (2013). Value creation from the innovation environment: partnership strategies in university spin‐outs. R&D Management, 43(2), 136–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12006.

Markman, G. D., Phan, P. H., Balkin, D. B., & Gianiodis, P. T. (2005). Entrepreneurship and university-based technology transfer. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(2), 241–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.12.003.

McAdam, M., & McAdam, R. (2008). High tech start-ups in University Science Park incubators: the relationship between the start-up’s lifecycle progression and use of the incubator’s resources. Technovation, 28(5), 277–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2007.07.012.

Meoli, M., & Vismara, S. (2016). University support and the creation of technology and non-technology academic spin-offs. Small Business Economics, 47(2), 345–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9721-1.

Moray, N., & Clarysse, B. (2005). Institutional change and resource endowments to science-based entrepreneurial firms. Research Policy, 34(7), 1010–1027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.016.

Mosey, S., Lockett, A., & Westhead, P. (2006). The importance of bridging networks for university technology transfer: a case study of the Medici fellowship scheme. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 18(1), 71–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320500520635.

Murray, F. (2004). The role of academic inventors in entrepreneurial firms: sharing the laboratory life. Research Policy, 3, 643–659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.013.

Mustar, P., Renault, M., Colombo, M. G., Piva, E., Fontes, M., Lockett, A., Wright, M., Clarysse, B., & Moray, N. (2006). Conceptualising the heterogeneity of research-based spin-offs: a multi-dimensional taxonomy. Research Policy, 35, 289–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.11.001.

Mustar, P., Wright, M., & Clarysse, B. (2008). University spin-off firms: lessons from ten years of experience in Europe. Science and Public Policy, 35(2), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234208X282862.

Navis, C., & Glynn, M. (2011). Legitimate distinctiveness and the entrepreneurial identity: influence of investor judgments of new venture plausibility. Academy of Management Review, 36(3), 479–499. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.0361.

Ndonzuau, F. N., Pirnay, F., & Surlemont, B. (2002). A stage model of academic spin-off creation. Technovation, 22(5), 281–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(01)00019-0.

Nosella, A., & Grimaldi, R. (2009). University-level mechanisms supporting the creation of new companies: an analysis of Italian academic spin-offs. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 21(6), 679–698. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320903052657.

O’Shea, R. P., Allen, T. J., Chevalier, A., & Roche, F. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. universities. Research Policy, 34(7), 994–1009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.011.

O’Shea, R. P., Chugh, H., & Allen, T. J. (2007). Determinants and consequences of university spinoff activity: a conceptual framework. Journal of Technology Transfer, 33, 653–666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-007-9060-0.

Oe, A., & Mitsuhoshi, H. (2013). Founders’ experiences for startups’ fast break-even. Journal of Business Research, 66, 2193–2201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.01.011.

Ortín-Ángel, P., & Vendrell-Herrero, F. (2014). University spin-offs vs. other NTBFs: total factor productivity differences at outset and evolution. Technovation, 34(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2013.09.006.

Ouimet, P., & Zarutskie, R. (2014). Who works for startups? The relation between firm age, employee age, and growth. Journal of Financial Economics, 112(3), 386–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfinance.2014.03.003.

Parhankangas, A., & Arenius, P. (2003). From a corporate venture to an independent company: a base for a taxonomy for corporate spin-off firms. Research Policy, 32, 463–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00018-5.

Rasmussen, E., & Borch, O. J. (2010). University capabilities in facilitating entrepreneurship: a longitudinal study of spin-off ventures at mid-range universities. Research Policy, 39(5), 602–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.02.002.

Rasmussen, E., & Wright, M. (2015). How can universities facilitate academic spin-offs? An entrepreneurial competency perspective. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(5), 782–799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-014-9386-3.

Rasmussen, E., Mosey, S., & Wright, M. (2014). The influence of university departments on the evolution of entrepreneurial competencies in spin-off ventures. Research Policy, 43(1), 92–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.06.007.

Roodman, D. (2009). A note on the theme of too many instruments. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 71(1), 135–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2008.00542.x.

Sapienza, H. J., Parhankangas, A., & Autio, E. (2004). Knowledge relatedness and post-spin-off growth. Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 809–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.06.002.

Scholten, V., Omta, O., Kemp, R., & Elfring, T. (2015). Bridging ties and the role of research and start-up experience on the early growth of Dutch academic spin-offs. Technovation, 45–46, 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2015.05.001.

Semadeni, M., & Cannella, A. A. (2011). Examining the performance effects of post spin‐off links to parent firms: should the apron strings be cut? Strategic Management Journal, 32(10), 1083–1098. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.928.

Seward, J. K., & Walsh, J. P. (1996). The governance and control of voluntary corporate spin-off. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199601)17.

Shane, S. (2004a). Academic entrepreneurship: university spin-offs and wealth creation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Shane, S. (2004b). Encouraging university entrepreneurship? The effect of the Bayh-Dole act on university patenting in the United States. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(1), 127–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00114-3.

Siegel, D. S., Veugelers, R., & Wright, M. (2007). Technology transfer offices and commercialization of university intellectual property: performance and policy implications. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23(4), 640–660. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grm036.

Slavtchev, V., & Göktepe-Hultén, D. (2015). Support for public research spin-offs by the parent organizations and the speed of commercialization. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(6), 1507–1525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9443-6.

Soetanto, D., & Jack, S. (2016). The impact of university-based incubation support on the innovation strategy of academic spin-offs. Technovation, 50-51, 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2015.11.001.

Soetanto, D., & van Geenhuizen, M. (2015). Getting the right balance: university networks’ influence on spin-offs’ attraction of funding for innovation. Technovation, 36-37, 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2014.10.008.

Sorrentino, M., & Williams, M. L. (1995). Relatedness and corporate venturing: does it really matter? Journal of Business Venturing, 10(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(94)00007-H.

Thornhill, S., & Amit, R. (2000). A dynamic perspective of internal fit in corporate venturing. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(1), 25–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(99)00040-3.

Treibich, T., Konrad, K., & Truffer, B. (2013). A dynamic view on interactions between academic spin-offs and their parent organizations. Technovation, 33(12), 450–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2013.06.012.

Vanaelst, I., Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Lockett, A., Moray, N., & S'Jegers, R. (2006). Entrepreneurial team development in academic spinouts: an examination of team heterogeneity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(2), 249–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00120.x.

Visintin, F., & Pittino, D. (2014). Founding team composition and early performance of university-based spin-off companies. Technovation, 34(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2013.09.004.

Vohora, A., Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2004). Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spinout companies. Research Policy, 33(1), 147–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00107-0.

Walter, A., Auer, M., & Ritter, T. (2006). The impact of network capabilities and entrepreneurial orientation on university spin-off performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(4), 541–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.02.005.

Walter, S. G., Heinrichs, S., & Walter, A. (2014). Parent hostility and spin‐out performance. Strategic Management Journal, 35(13), 2031–2042. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2201.

Wennberg, K., Wiklund, J., & Wright, M. (2011). The effectiveness of university knowledge spillovers: performance differences between university spinoffs and corporate spinoffs. Research Policy, 40(8), 1128–1143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.014.

Williams, R., Allison, P., & Benito, E. M. (2015). Linear dynamic panel-data estimation using maximum likelihood and structural equation modeling. In 2015 Stata conference (No. 11). Stata Users Group.

Woo, C. Y., Willard, G. E., & Daellenbach, U. S. (1992). Spinoff performance: a case of overstated expectations. Strategic Management Journal, 13(6), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250130604.

Wright, M., Lockett, A., Clarysse, B., & Bink, M. (2006). University spin-out companies and venture capital. Research Policy, 35, 481–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.01.005.

Zahra, S. A., Van de Velde, E., & Larraneta, B. (2007). Knowledge conversion capability and the performance of corporate and university spin-offs. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 569–608. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtm018.

Zhang, J. (2009). The performance of university spin-offs: an exploratory analysis using venture capital data. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 34(3), 255–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-008-9088-9.

Titel: Neither absent nor too present: the effects of the engagement of parent universities on the performance of academic spin-offs
verfasst von: Marco Ferretti
Salvatore Ferri
Raffaele Fiorentino
Adele Parmentola
Alessandro Sapio
Publikationsdatum: 07.03.2018
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Small Business Economics / Ausgabe 1/2019
Print ISSN: 0921-898X
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0913
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0022-8

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2019

Where is my partner? The role of gender in the formation of entrepreneurial businesses

Public R&D subsidies: collaborative versus individual place-based programs for SMEs

The financing of immigrant-owned firms in Canada

Small Business Economics Journal Editor of the year award

Entrepreneurship capital spillovers at the local level

Small business online loan crowdfunding: who gets funded and what determines the rate of interest?