Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Policy Sciences 2/2017

18.01.2017 | RESEARCH NOTES

Network-centric policy design

verfasst von: Araz Taeihagh

Erschienen in: Policy Sciences | Ausgabe 2/2017

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Two important challenges in policy design are better understanding of the design space and consideration of the temporal factors. Moreover, in recent years it has been demonstrated that understanding the complex interactions of policy measures can play an important role in policy design and analysis. In this paper, the advances made in conceptualization and application of networks to policy design in the past decade are highlighted. Specifically, the use of a network-centric policy design approach in better understanding the design space and temporal consequences of design choices are presented. Network-centric policy design approach has been used in classification, visualization, and analysis of the relations among policy measures as well as ranking of policy measures using their internal properties and interactions, and conducting sensitivity analysis using Monte Carlo simulations. Furthermore, through use of a decision support system, network-centric approach facilitates ranking, visualization, and selection of policies using different sets of criteria, and exploring the potential for compromise in policy formulation. The advantage of the network-centric approach is providing the ability to go beyond visualizations and analysis of policies and piecemeal use of network concepts as a tool for different policy design tasks to moving to a more integrated bottom–up approach to design. Furthermore, the computational advantages of the network-centric policy design in considering temporal factors such as policy sequencing and addressing issues such as layering, drift, policy failure, and delay are presented. Finally, some of the current challenges of network-centric design are discussed, and some potential avenues of exploration in policy design through use of computational methodologies, as well as possible integration with approaches from other disciplines, are highlighted.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
Substantive policy measures directly affect the production, consumption, and distribution of goods and services while procedural policy measures modify or alter the nature of policy processes used in the implementation (Howlett 2010).
 
2
Unlike in policy design, networks have been used extensively in policy studies for the examination of policy actors and communities (e.g. Rhodes and March 1992; Hermans and Cunningham 2013). These forms of network analysis (Freeman et al. 1991; Wasserman and Faust 1994) are an important tool for the systematic description and analysis of relational dimensions in politics and society (Schneider 2005). Moreover, with recent advancements in network science (Newman et al. 2006; Milo et al. 2002; Boccaletti et al. 2006) and with the innovative applications of networks in assessing issues such as policy capacity (Craft et al. 2013; Middlemist et al. 2013) the use of networks analysis is becoming even more popular. It must be pointed out that the use of a policy networks approach has not been free from critique. These critiques range from criticizing the policy networks approach for not paying attention to factors that motivate policy actors, to the charge that they are descriptive rather than explanatory, and metaphorical rather than theoretical (John 1998; McPherson and Raab 1988; Dowding 1995; Jenkins-Smith and Sabatier 1999; Peters 1998).
 
3
Multi-criteria Decision Analysis is a method used for comparing different alternatives using different criteria to help the decision maker towards a judicious choice through application of a set of techniques and procedures for structuring the decision-making process (Roy 1996).
 
4
The term expert in this paper refers to policy-makers, domain specialists, or analysts.
 
5
Givoni et al. (2010) and OPTIC (2010) used two types of relations preconditions, and synergies/facilitations (as an interchangeable single type); Givoni et al. (2013) and Justen et al. (2014) used three policy measures types of precondition, synergy/facilitation (interchangeable), contradiction/potential contradiction (interchangeable); Matt et al. (2013) used precondition, synergy, facilitation and potential contradiction; and Taeihagh et al. (2014); Taeihagh and Banares-alcantara (2014) and Champalle et al. (2015) have used five types of policy measure relations defined so as to capture the interactions between policy measures in different capacities such as building frameworks and methodologies, or for analyses or visualizations.
 
6
It is important to point out that the group decision-making literature mainly focuses on how alternatives are selected, rather than on how groups learn about and examine relationships between different alternatives. The method proposed requires discussion among group members. A method such as Delphi can be used to decide the relations among particular measures or to examine key properties for policy measures. However, discussion which seeks to understand and analyze the policy measure relations is important. Given the number of policy measures considered in relation to modern policy problems and the tendency to reach quick agreement on known solutions it might be useful to use support systems in order to manage the information. Using a facilitator might also be helpful. We believe studies examining various approaches, such as the ones highlighted for expert group decision-making in the classification of policy measures, need to be carried out in the future, in collaboration with psychologists.
 
7
Multiplex networks are sets of nodes that link to other nodes with more than one type of relation (Wasserman and Faust 1994).
 
8
The centrality of a node is a measure of its importance or influence in a network (Freeman 1979).
 
9
Givoni (2014) points out that, unlike in network theory and network analysis, when ranking the individual policy measures the interest in policy formulation is in the policy measures themselves and not the network. Therefore, using various indices commonly used in network analysis is not as valuable for the ranking of policy measures. The information provided from a network analysis of policy measures can be better used in order to understand the interactions and to design policy packages.
 
10
In two-mode networks two sets of node types (in this case, policy measures and policy packages) constitute the nodes of the network and a relation type (edge) that connects the two types of nodes. In Taeihagh et al. (2014) the two-mode network demonstrates the policy measures selected by each policy package. Furthermore, the characteristics of policy packages based on the number of policy measures they connect to (policy measures they have selected) can be illustrated by adjusting the size of this node type (e.g. if total cost is being represented the size of the package node will be bigger if it costs more).
 
11
Provision of access to information during discussions (rather than relying on memory) has been demonstrated to be beneficial in decision-making (Sawyer 1997; Sheffey et al. 1989).
 
12
Orphaned policy measures might even contradict the new goal and policy measures.
 
13
Even in the case of online surveys the speed at which a worker can carry out a micro-task is much faster than an online survey (Prpić et al. 2014c).
 
14
Expert crowdsourcing mainly through competition-based platforms and non-expert crowdsourcing through the use of virtual labour markets. Open collaboration platforms provide access to both expert and non-expert crowds but require a more sustained effort in attracting and maintaining crowds.
 
15
This is while recognising that decisions and policies to attain desirable futures are essentially questions of social values and political choices and that different stakeholders given their diverse set of objectives and values have different preferences to alternative solutions (Robinson et al. 2006; Stirling 2003).
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Aitamurto, T. (2012). Crowdsourcing for democracy: New era in policy-making. In Publications of the Committee for the Future, Parliament of Finland. 1/2012. Helsinki, Finland. Aitamurto, T. (2012). Crowdsourcing for democracy: New era in policy-making. In Publications of the Committee for the Future, Parliament of Finland. 1/2012. Helsinki, Finland.
Zurück zum Zitat Aldea, A., Bañares-Alcántara, R., & Skrzypczak, S. (2012). Managing information to support the decision making process. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 11(03), 1250016.CrossRef Aldea, A., Bañares-Alcántara, R., & Skrzypczak, S. (2012). Managing information to support the decision making process. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 11(03), 1250016.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Banister, D., Stead, D., Steen, P., Åkerman, J., Dreborg, K., Nijkamp, P., et al. (2000). European transport policy and sustainable mobility. London: Spon Press. Banister, D., Stead, D., Steen, P., Åkerman, J., Dreborg, K., Nijkamp, P., et al. (2000). European transport policy and sustainable mobility. London: Spon Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Bicquelet, A., & Weale, A. (2011). Coping with the cornucopia: Can text mining help handle the data deluge in public policy analysis? Policy & Internet, 3(4), 1–21.CrossRef Bicquelet, A., & Weale, A. (2011). Coping with the cornucopia: Can text mining help handle the data deluge in public policy analysis? Policy & Internet, 3(4), 1–21.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bobrow, D. B. (2006). Policy design: Ubiquitous, necessary and difficult. In B. G. Peters & J. Pierre (Eds.), Handbook of public policy (pp. 75–96). London: Sage.CrossRef Bobrow, D. B. (2006). Policy design: Ubiquitous, necessary and difficult. In B. G. Peters & J. Pierre (Eds.), Handbook of public policy (pp. 75–96). London: Sage.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Boccaletti, S., Latora, V., Moreno, Y., Chavez, M., & Hwang, D. U. (2006). Complex networks: Structure and dynamics. Physics Reports, 424(4–5), 175–308.CrossRef Boccaletti, S., Latora, V., Moreno, Y., Chavez, M., & Hwang, D. U. (2006). Complex networks: Structure and dynamics. Physics Reports, 424(4–5), 175–308.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brodbeck, F. C., Kerschreiter, R., Mojzisch, A., Frey, D., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2002). The dissemination of critical, unshared information in decision making groups: The effects of prediscussion dissent. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 35–56.CrossRef Brodbeck, F. C., Kerschreiter, R., Mojzisch, A., Frey, D., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2002). The dissemination of critical, unshared information in decision making groups: The effects of prediscussion dissent. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 35–56.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Burt, R. S. (1980). Models of network structure. Annual Review of Sociology, 6, 79–141.CrossRef Burt, R. S. (1980). Models of network structure. Annual Review of Sociology, 6, 79–141.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Camagni, R. (1995). Global network and local milieu: Towards a theory of economic space. In S. Conti, E. Malecki, & P. Oinas (Eds.), The industrial enterprise and its environment: spatial perspectives (pp. 195–214). Aldershot: Avebury. Camagni, R. (1995). Global network and local milieu: Towards a theory of economic space. In S. Conti, E. Malecki, & P. Oinas (Eds.), The industrial enterprise and its environment: spatial perspectives (pp. 195–214). Aldershot: Avebury.
Zurück zum Zitat Carter, P. (2012). Policy as palimpsest. Policy & Politics, 40(3), 423–443.CrossRef Carter, P. (2012). Policy as palimpsest. Policy & Politics, 40(3), 423–443.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Champalle, C., Ford, J. D., & Sherman, M. (2015). Prioritizing climate change adaptations in Canadian Arctic communities. Sustainability, 7(7), 9268–9292.CrossRef Champalle, C., Ford, J. D., & Sherman, M. (2015). Prioritizing climate change adaptations in Canadian Arctic communities. Sustainability, 7(7), 9268–9292.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Conklin, J. (2005). Dialogue mapping: Building shared understanding of wicked problems. New York: Wiley. Conklin, J. (2005). Dialogue mapping: Building shared understanding of wicked problems. New York: Wiley.
Zurück zum Zitat Craft, J., Howlett, M., Crawford, M., & McNutt, K. (2013). Assessing policy capacity for climate change adaptation: Governance arrangements, resource deployments, and analytical skills in Canadian infrastructure policy making. Review of Policy Research, 30(1), 42–65.CrossRef Craft, J., Howlett, M., Crawford, M., & McNutt, K. (2013). Assessing policy capacity for climate change adaptation: Governance arrangements, resource deployments, and analytical skills in Canadian infrastructure policy making. Review of Policy Research, 30(1), 42–65.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dowding, K. (1995). Model or metaphor? A critical review of the policy network approach. Political Studies, 43(1), 136–158.CrossRef Dowding, K. (1995). Model or metaphor? A critical review of the policy network approach. Political Studies, 43(1), 136–158.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Feitelson, E. (2003). Packaging policies to address environmental concerns. In D. A. Hensher & K. J. Button (Eds.), Handbook of transport and the environment (pp. 757–769). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRef Feitelson, E. (2003). Packaging policies to address environmental concerns. In D. A. Hensher & K. J. Button (Eds.), Handbook of transport and the environment (pp. 757–769). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fenton, N., & Neil, M. (2001). Making decisions: Using Bayesian nets and MCDA. Knowledge-Based Systems, 14(7), 307–325.CrossRef Fenton, N., & Neil, M. (2001). Making decisions: Using Bayesian nets and MCDA. Knowledge-Based Systems, 14(7), 307–325.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks. Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215–239.CrossRef Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks. Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215–239.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Freeman, L., Borgatti, S., & White, D. (1991). Centrality in valued graphs: A measure of betweenness based on network flow. Social Networks, 13, 141–154.CrossRef Freeman, L., Borgatti, S., & White, D. (1991). Centrality in valued graphs: A measure of betweenness based on network flow. Social Networks, 13, 141–154.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Givoni, M. (2014). Addressing transport policy challenges through policy-packaging. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 60, 1–8.CrossRef Givoni, M. (2014). Addressing transport policy challenges through policy-packaging. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 60, 1–8.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Givoni M, Macmillen J, Banister D (2010) From individual policies to policy packaging. In European transport conference (ETC), Scotland. Givoni M, Macmillen J, Banister D (2010) From individual policies to policy packaging. In European transport conference (ETC), Scotland.
Zurück zum Zitat Givoni, M., Macmillen, J., Banister, D., & Feitelson, E. (2013). From policy measures to policy packages. Transport Reviews, 33(1), 1–20.CrossRef Givoni, M., Macmillen, J., Banister, D., & Feitelson, E. (2013). From policy measures to policy packages. Transport Reviews, 33(1), 1–20.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Grabosky, P. (1995). Counterproductive Regulation. International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 23(1995), 347–369.CrossRef Grabosky, P. (1995). Counterproductive Regulation. International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 23(1995), 347–369.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gunningham, N., Grabosky, P., & Sinclair, D. (1998). Smart regulation: Designing environmental policy. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Gunningham, N., Grabosky, P., & Sinclair, D. (1998). Smart regulation: Designing environmental policy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Gunningham, N., & Sinclair, D. (1999). Regulatory pluralism: Designing policy mixes for environmental protection. Law and Policy, 21(1), 49–76.CrossRef Gunningham, N., & Sinclair, D. (1999). Regulatory pluralism: Designing policy mixes for environmental protection. Law and Policy, 21(1), 49–76.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hacker, J. S. (2005). Policy drift: The hidden politics of US welfare state retrenchment. In W. Streek & K. Thelen (Eds.), Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies (pp. 40–82). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hacker, J. S. (2005). Policy drift: The hidden politics of US welfare state retrenchment. In W. Streek & K. Thelen (Eds.), Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies (pp. 40–82). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Hanne, T. (2001). Intelligent strategies for meta multiple. Criteria Decision Making. Boston: Kluwer.CrossRef Hanne, T. (2001). Intelligent strategies for meta multiple. Criteria Decision Making. Boston: Kluwer.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hermans, L. M. (2011). An approach to support learning from international experience with water policy. Water Resources Management, 25(1), 373–393.CrossRef Hermans, L. M. (2011). An approach to support learning from international experience with water policy. Water Resources Management, 25(1), 373–393.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hermans, L. M., & Cunningham, S. W. (2013). Actor models for policy analysis. In W. A. H. Thissen & W. E. Walker (Eds.), Public policy analysis (pp. 185–213). New York: Springer.CrossRef Hermans, L. M., & Cunningham, S. W. (2013). Actor models for policy analysis. In W. A. H. Thissen & W. E. Walker (Eds.), Public policy analysis (pp. 185–213). New York: Springer.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hollingshead, A. B. (1996). The rank-order effect in group decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68(3), 181–193.CrossRef Hollingshead, A. B. (1996). The rank-order effect in group decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68(3), 181–193.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hou, Y., & Brewer, G. A. (2010). Substitution and supplementation between co-functional policy instruments: Evidence from state budget stabilization practices. Public Administration Review, 70(6), 914–924.CrossRef Hou, Y., & Brewer, G. A. (2010). Substitution and supplementation between co-functional policy instruments: Evidence from state budget stabilization practices. Public Administration Review, 70(6), 914–924.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Howlett, M. (2010). Designing public policies: Principles and instruments. Milton Park: Taylor & Francis. Howlett, M. (2010). Designing public policies: Principles and instruments. Milton Park: Taylor & Francis.
Zurück zum Zitat Howlett, M., & del Rio, P. (2015). The parameters of policy portfolios: Verticality and horizontality in design spaces and their consequences for policy mix formulation. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33(5), 1233–1245.CrossRef Howlett, M., & del Rio, P. (2015). The parameters of policy portfolios: Verticality and horizontality in design spaces and their consequences for policy mix formulation. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33(5), 1233–1245.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Howlett, M., & Goetz, K. H. (2014). Introduction: time, temporality and timescapes in administration and policy. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 80(3), 477–492.CrossRef Howlett, M., & Goetz, K. H. (2014). Introduction: time, temporality and timescapes in administration and policy. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 80(3), 477–492.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Howlett, M., Kim, J., & Weaver, P. (2006). Assessing instrument mixes through program-and agency-level data: Methodological issues in contemporary implementation research. Review of Policy Research, 23(1), 129–151.CrossRef Howlett, M., Kim, J., & Weaver, P. (2006). Assessing instrument mixes through program-and agency-level data: Methodological issues in contemporary implementation research. Review of Policy Research, 23(1), 129–151.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Howlett, M., & Lejano, R. P. (2013). Tales from the crypt: The rise and fall (and rebirth?) of policy design. Administration & Society, 45(3), 357–381.CrossRef Howlett, M., & Lejano, R. P. (2013). Tales from the crypt: The rise and fall (and rebirth?) of policy design. Administration & Society, 45(3), 357–381.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Howlett, M., Mukherjee, I., & Woo, J. J. (2015). From tools to toolkits in policy design studies: The new design orientation towards policy formulation research. Policy & Politics, 43(2), 291–311.CrossRef Howlett, M., Mukherjee, I., & Woo, J. J. (2015). From tools to toolkits in policy design studies: The new design orientation towards policy formulation research. Policy & Politics, 43(2), 291–311.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Howlett, M., & Rayner, J. (2007). Design principles for policy mixes: Cohesion and coherence in ‘new governance arrangements’. Policy and Society, 26(4), 1–18.CrossRef Howlett, M., & Rayner, J. (2007). Design principles for policy mixes: Cohesion and coherence in ‘new governance arrangements’. Policy and Society, 26(4), 1–18.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Howlett, M., & Rayner, J. (2013). Patching vs packaging in policy formulation: Assessing policy portfolio design. Politics and Governance, 1(2), 170.CrossRef Howlett, M., & Rayner, J. (2013). Patching vs packaging in policy formulation: Assessing policy portfolio design. Politics and Governance, 1(2), 170.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hunt, J. D., Bañares-Alcántara, R., & Hanbury, D. (2013). A new integrated tool for complex decision making: Application to the UK energy sector. Decision Support Systems, 54(3), 1427–1441.CrossRef Hunt, J. D., Bañares-Alcántara, R., & Hanbury, D. (2013). A new integrated tool for complex decision making: Application to the UK energy sector. Decision Support Systems, 54(3), 1427–1441.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Janis, I. L. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and Fiascoes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Janis, I. L. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and Fiascoes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Zurück zum Zitat Jenkins-Smith, H. C., & Sabatier, P. A. (1999). The advocacy coalition framework: An assessment. In P. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 117–166). Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Jenkins-Smith, H. C., & Sabatier, P. A. (1999). The advocacy coalition framework: An assessment. In P. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 117–166). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Zurück zum Zitat John, P. (1998). Analysing public policy. London: Pinter. John, P. (1998). Analysing public policy. London: Pinter.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones, P., Kelly, C., May, A., & Cinderby, S. (2009). Innovative approaches to option generation. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 9(3), 237–258. Jones, P., Kelly, C., May, A., & Cinderby, S. (2009). Innovative approaches to option generation. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 9(3), 237–258.
Zurück zum Zitat Justen, A., Fearnley, N., Givoni, M., & Macmillen, J. (2014). A process for designing policy packaging: Ideals and realities. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 60, 9–18. Justen, A., Fearnley, N., Givoni, M., & Macmillen, J. (2014). A process for designing policy packaging: Ideals and realities. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 60, 9–18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kao, A., & Poteet, S. R. (2007). Overview. In A. Kao & S. R. Poteet (Eds.), Natural language processing and text mining (pp. 1–7). London: Springer.CrossRef Kao, A., & Poteet, S. R. (2007). Overview. In A. Kao & S. R. Poteet (Eds.), Natural language processing and text mining (pp. 1–7). London: Springer.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kelly, C., May, A., & Jopson, A. (2008). The development of an option generation tool to identify potential transport policy packages. Transport Policy, 15(6), 361–371.CrossRef Kelly, C., May, A., & Jopson, A. (2008). The development of an option generation tool to identify potential transport policy packages. Transport Policy, 15(6), 361–371.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kern, F., & Howlett, M. (2009). Implementing transition management as policy reforms: A case study of the Dutch energy sector. Policy Sciences, 42(4), 391–408.CrossRef Kern, F., & Howlett, M. (2009). Implementing transition management as policy reforms: A case study of the Dutch energy sector. Policy Sciences, 42(4), 391–408.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Krishen, A. S., Raschke, R. L., Kachroo, P., Mejza, M., & Khan, A. (2014). Interpretation of public feedback to transportation policy: A qualitative perspective. Transportation journal, 53(1), 26–43.CrossRef Krishen, A. S., Raschke, R. L., Kachroo, P., Mejza, M., & Khan, A. (2014). Interpretation of public feedback to transportation policy: A qualitative perspective. Transportation journal, 53(1), 26–43.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Larson, J. R., Jr., Foster-Fishman, P. G., & Keys, C. B. (1994). Discussion of shared and unshared information in decision-making groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 446–461.CrossRef Larson, J. R., Jr., Foster-Fishman, P. G., & Keys, C. B. (1994). Discussion of shared and unshared information in decision-making groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 446–461.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Majone, G. (2006). Agenda setting. In M. Moran et al. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public policy (pp. 228–250). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Majone, G. (2006). Agenda setting. In M. Moran et al. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public policy (pp. 228–250). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Marsh, D., & McConnell, A. (2010). Towards a framework for establishing policy success. Public Administration, 88(2), 564–583.CrossRef Marsh, D., & McConnell, A. (2010). Towards a framework for establishing policy success. Public Administration, 88(2), 564–583.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat May, P. J. (1981). Hints for crafting alternative policies. Policy Analysis, 7(2), 227–244. May, P. J. (1981). Hints for crafting alternative policies. Policy Analysis, 7(2), 227–244.
Zurück zum Zitat May, A. D., & Roberts, M. (1995). The design of integrated transport strategies. Transport Policy, 2(2), 97–105.CrossRef May, A. D., & Roberts, M. (1995). The design of integrated transport strategies. Transport Policy, 2(2), 97–105.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McKee, T. E. (2003). Rough sets bankruptcy prediction models versus auditor signalling rates. Journal of Forecasting, 22, 569–586.CrossRef McKee, T. E. (2003). Rough sets bankruptcy prediction models versus auditor signalling rates. Journal of Forecasting, 22, 569–586.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McPherson, A. F., & Raab, C. D. (1988). Governing education: A sociology of policy since 1945. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. McPherson, A. F., & Raab, C. D. (1988). Governing education: A sociology of policy since 1945. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1990). The economics of modern manufacturing: Technology, strategy and organization. American Economic Review, 80(3), 511–528. Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1990). The economics of modern manufacturing: Technology, strategy and organization. American Economic Review, 80(3), 511–528.
Zurück zum Zitat Milo, R., Shen-Orr, S., Itzkovitz, S., Kashtan, N., Chklovskii, D., & Alon, U. (2002). Network motifs: Simple building blocks of complex networks. Science, 298, 824.CrossRef Milo, R., Shen-Orr, S., Itzkovitz, S., Kashtan, N., Chklovskii, D., & Alon, U. (2002). Network motifs: Simple building blocks of complex networks. Science, 298, 824.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mingers, J., & Rosenhead, J. (2004). Problem structuring methods in action. European Journal of Operational Research, 152(3), 530–554.CrossRef Mingers, J., & Rosenhead, J. (2004). Problem structuring methods in action. European Journal of Operational Research, 152(3), 530–554.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Montibeller, G., Belton, V., Ackermann, F., & Ensslin, L. (2008). Reasoning maps for decision aid: An integrated approach for problem-structuring and multi-criteria evaluation. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 59(5), 575–589.CrossRef Montibeller, G., Belton, V., Ackermann, F., & Ensslin, L. (2008). Reasoning maps for decision aid: An integrated approach for problem-structuring and multi-criteria evaluation. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 59(5), 575–589.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nash, A. (2009). Web 2.0 applications for improving public participation in transport planning. In Paper presented at the transportation research board 89th annual meeting, January 10–14, Washington, DC. Nash, A. (2009). Web 2.0 applications for improving public participation in transport planning. In Paper presented at the transportation research board 89th annual meeting, January 10–14, Washington, DC.
Zurück zum Zitat Newman, M. E. J., Barabasi, A. L., & Watts, D. J. (2006). The structure and dynamics of networks. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Newman, M. E. J., Barabasi, A. L., & Watts, D. J. (2006). The structure and dynamics of networks. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2007). Instrument mixes for environmental policy. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2007). Instrument mixes for environmental policy. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
Zurück zum Zitat Orren, K., & Skowronek, S. (1998). Regimes and regime building in American government: A review of literature on the 1940s. Political Science Quarterly, 113(4), 689–702.CrossRef Orren, K., & Skowronek, S. (1998). Regimes and regime building in American government: A review of literature on the 1940s. Political Science Quarterly, 113(4), 689–702.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Painter, M., & Pierre, J. (2005). Unpacking policy capacity: Issues and themes. In M. Painter & J. Pierre (Eds.), Challenges to state policy capacity (pp. 1–18). Palgrave: Basingstoke.CrossRef Painter, M., & Pierre, J. (2005). Unpacking policy capacity: Issues and themes. In M. Painter & J. Pierre (Eds.), Challenges to state policy capacity (pp. 1–18). Palgrave: Basingstoke.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Peters, G. (1998). Policy networks: Myth, metaphor and reality, comparing policy networks. London: Open University Press. Peters, G. (1998). Policy networks: Myth, metaphor and reality, comparing policy networks. London: Open University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Rayner, J., Howlett, M., Wilson, J., Cashore, B., & Hoberg, G. (2001). Privileging the subsector: Critical sub-sectors and sectoral relationships in forest policy-making. Forest Policy and Economics, 2(3), 319–332.CrossRef Rayner, J., Howlett, M., Wilson, J., Cashore, B., & Hoberg, G. (2001). Privileging the subsector: Critical sub-sectors and sectoral relationships in forest policy-making. Forest Policy and Economics, 2(3), 319–332.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rhodes, R., & Marsh, D. (1992). Policy networks in British politics (pp. 1–26). Oxford: Clarendon Press. Rhodes, R., & Marsh, D. (1992). Policy networks in British politics (pp. 1–26). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Rittel, H. W., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169.CrossRef Rittel, H. W., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Robinson, J., Bradley, M., Busby, P., Connor, D., Murray, A., Sampson, B., et al. (2006). Climate change and sustainable development: Realizing the opportunity. Ambio, 35(1), 2–8.CrossRef Robinson, J., Bradley, M., Busby, P., Connor, D., Murray, A., Sampson, B., et al. (2006). Climate change and sustainable development: Realizing the opportunity. Ambio, 35(1), 2–8.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Roy, B. (1996). Multicriteria methodology for decision aiding. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRef Roy, B. (1996). Multicriteria methodology for decision aiding. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision making with dependence and feedback: The analytic network process. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications. Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision making with dependence and feedback: The analytic network process. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.
Zurück zum Zitat Sawyer, J. E. (1997). Information sharing and integration in multifunctional decision-making groups. In Presented at annual meeting of the society of judgment and decision making, Philadelphia, PA. Sawyer, J. E. (1997). Information sharing and integration in multifunctional decision-making groups. In Presented at annual meeting of the society of judgment and decision making, Philadelphia, PA.
Zurück zum Zitat Seltzer, E., & Mahmoudi, D. (2013) Citizen participation, open innovation, and crowdsourcing challenges and opportunities for planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 28(1), 3–18.CrossRef Seltzer, E., & Mahmoudi, D. (2013) Citizen participation, open innovation, and crowdsourcing challenges and opportunities for planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 28(1), 3–18.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sheffey, S., Tindale, R. S., & Scott, L. A. (1989). Information sharing and group decision-making. In Presented at midwestern psychological association, Chicago, IL. Sheffey, S., Tindale, R. S., & Scott, L. A. (1989). Information sharing and group decision-making. In Presented at midwestern psychological association, Chicago, IL.
Zurück zum Zitat Shum, S. J. B., Selvin, A. M., Sierhuis, M., Conklin, J., Haley, C. B., & Nuseibeh, B. (2006). Hypermedia support for argumentation-based rationale: 15 years on from gIBIS and QOC. In A. Dutoit, R. McCall, I. Mistrik, & B. Paech (Eds.), Rationale management in software engineering (pp. 111–132). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRef Shum, S. J. B., Selvin, A. M., Sierhuis, M., Conklin, J., Haley, C. B., & Nuseibeh, B. (2006). Hypermedia support for argumentation-based rationale: 15 years on from gIBIS and QOC. In A. Dutoit, R. McCall, I. Mistrik, & B. Paech (Eds.), Rationale management in software engineering (pp. 111–132). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Stirling, A. (2003). Renewables, sustainability and precaution: Beyond environmental cost-benefit and risk analysis. Issues in Environmental Science and Technology, 19, 113–134.CrossRef Stirling, A. (2003). Renewables, sustainability and precaution: Beyond environmental cost-benefit and risk analysis. Issues in Environmental Science and Technology, 19, 113–134.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Taeihagh, A. (2011). A novel approach for the development of policies for socio-technical systems. Oxford: University of Oxford. Taeihagh, A. (2011). A novel approach for the development of policies for socio-technical systems. Oxford: University of Oxford.
Zurück zum Zitat Taeihagh, A., Bañares-Alcántara, R., & Millican, C. (2009a). Development of a novel framework for the design of transport policies to achieve environmental targets. Computers & Chemical Engineering. doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2009.01.010. Taeihagh, A., Bañares-Alcántara, R., & Millican, C. (2009a). Development of a novel framework for the design of transport policies to achieve environmental targets. Computers & Chemical Engineering. doi:10.​1016/​j.​compchemeng.​2009.​01.​010.
Zurück zum Zitat Taeihagh, A., Wang, Z., & Bañares-Alcántara, R. (2009b). Why conceptual design matters in policy formulation: A case for an integrated use of complexity science and engineering design. In European conference on complex systems (ECCS2009), UK, September 2009. Taeihagh, A., Wang, Z., & Bañares-Alcántara, R. (2009b). Why conceptual design matters in policy formulation: A case for an integrated use of complexity science and engineering design. In European conference on complex systems (ECCS2009), UK, September 2009.
Zurück zum Zitat Taeihagh, A., Givoni, M., & Bañares-Alcántara, R. (2013). Which policy first? A network-centric approach for the analysis and ranking of policy measures. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 40(4), 595–616. doi:10.1068/b38058.CrossRef Taeihagh, A., Givoni, M., & Bañares-Alcántara, R. (2013). Which policy first? A network-centric approach for the analysis and ranking of policy measures. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 40(4), 595–616. doi:10.​1068/​b38058.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Taleb, N. N. (2007). Black swans and the domains of statistics. The American Statistician, 61(3), 198–200.CrossRef Taleb, N. N. (2007). Black swans and the domains of statistics. The American Statistician, 61(3), 198–200.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Thelen, Kathleen. (2004). How institutions evolve: The political economy of skills in Germany, Britain, the United States And Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Thelen, Kathleen. (2004). How institutions evolve: The political economy of skills in Germany, Britain, the United States And Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Uschold, M., & Gruninger, M. (1996). Ontologies: Principles, methods and applications. Knowledge Engineering Review, 11(2), 93–136.CrossRef Uschold, M., & Gruninger, M. (1996). Ontologies: Principles, methods and applications. Knowledge Engineering Review, 11(2), 93–136.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Van der Heijden, J. (2011). Institutional layering: A review of the use of the concept. Politics, 31(1), 9–18.CrossRef Van der Heijden, J. (2011). Institutional layering: A review of the use of the concept. Politics, 31(1), 9–18.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Van der Lei, T. E., Enserink, B., Thissen, W. A., & Bekebrede, G. (2011). How to use a systems diagram to analyse and structure complex problems for policy issue papers. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 62(7), 1391–1402.CrossRef Van der Lei, T. E., Enserink, B., Thissen, W. A., & Bekebrede, G. (2011). How to use a systems diagram to analyse and structure complex problems for policy issue papers. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 62(7), 1391–1402.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat van Waarden, F. (1992). Dimensions and types of policy networks. European Journal of Political Research, 21(1–2), 29–52.CrossRef van Waarden, F. (1992). Dimensions and types of policy networks. European Journal of Political Research, 21(1–2), 29–52.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Walker, W. E. (2000). Uncertainty: The challenge for policy analysis in the 21st century. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corp. Walker, W. E. (2000). Uncertainty: The challenge for policy analysis in the 21st century. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corp.
Zurück zum Zitat Walker, W. E., Lempert, R. J., & Kwakkel, J. H. (2013). Deep uncertainty. Encyclopedia of operations research and management science (pp. 395–402). New York: Springer.CrossRef Walker, W. E., Lempert, R. J., & Kwakkel, J. H. (2013). Deep uncertainty. Encyclopedia of operations research and management science (pp. 395–402). New York: Springer.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Watthayu, W., & Peng, Y. (2004). A Bayesian network-based framework for multi-criteria decision making. In Proceedings of the 17th international conference on multiple criteria decision analysis. Watthayu, W., & Peng, Y. (2004). A Bayesian network-based framework for multi-criteria decision making. In Proceedings of the 17th international conference on multiple criteria decision analysis.
Zurück zum Zitat Wittenbaum, G. M. (2000). The bias toward discussing shared information: Why are high status group members immune? Communication Research, 27(3), 379–401.CrossRef Wittenbaum, G. M. (2000). The bias toward discussing shared information: Why are high status group members immune? Communication Research, 27(3), 379–401.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wu, X., Ramesh, M., & Howlett, M. (2015). Policy capacity: A conceptual framework for understanding policy competences and capabilities. Policy and Society, 34(3), 165–171.CrossRef Wu, X., Ramesh, M., & Howlett, M. (2015). Policy capacity: A conceptual framework for understanding policy competences and capabilities. Policy and Society, 34(3), 165–171.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Network-centric policy design
verfasst von
Araz Taeihagh
Publikationsdatum
18.01.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Policy Sciences / Ausgabe 2/2017
Print ISSN: 0032-2687
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0891
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-016-9270-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2017

Policy Sciences 2/2017 Zur Ausgabe