Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen
Network impact is not easily measurable or cross-checkable and outcomes are subject to chance, antecedent conditions or leakage from other areas; there is little control over who benefits ultimately from such programmes, and cost benefits are not precise. However, if network rhetoric is not to mislead, more understanding is required about network performance. This chapter surveys interviewees’ perceptions of network performance in case areas and correlates results with case networks. Findings suggest high-reputational networks had low effectiveness scores, as actors esteem networks that further their niche organisational self-interests. As Chaps. 5 and 6 demonstrate, network connectivity was low despite the policy rhetoric for ‘joined-up working’. It then cautiously assesses case network outcomes at three levels, using network performance variables. Finally, it identifies interviewees’ preferred outcomes.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
East End Life. (2005, 24 January–6 February). Local area partnerships. Tower Hamlets: Municipal Newspaper, p. 11.
Fox, P. (2008). Stocktake of the Great Yarmouth local strategic partnership: A consultation paper. From the interim local government re-organization adviser to the GYBC. Retrieved from http://www.communityconnections.org.uk/
Great Yarmouth Local Strategic Partnership (GYLSP). (2005a, December 8). Minutes of the Social Forum.
Great Yarmouth Local Strategic Partnership (GYLSP). (2005b, September 15). Minutes of the LSP Economic Forum.
Great Yarmouth Local Strategic Partnership (GYLSP). (2006, March 9). Minutes of the Economic Forum.
Great Yarmouth Local Strategic Partnership (GYLSP). (2008a, September 11). Minutes of the LSP Economic Forum.
Great Yarmouth Local Strategic Partnership (GYLSP). (2008b). Great Yarmouth Neighbourhood Renewal Fund final report on 2006–2008 achievement. Great Yarmouth.
London Borough of Tower Hamlets (LBTH). (2002). Community economic development plan, 2002–06. Retrieved from http://www.towerhamlets.gov.uk/
London Borough of Tower Hamlets (LBTH). (2008, May 6th). Report of the scrutiny working group evaluating Neighbourhood Renewal Funding. Overview and Scrutiny Committee Agenda Item 9.3., pp. 105–144.
London Borough of Tower Hamlets (LBTH). (2010). Overview & scrutiny committee, 9 March 2010, supplemental agenda 9.1 report of the scrutiny review working group on reducing worklessness amongst young adults 18–24.
PWC. (2014). Best value inspection of London Borough of Tower Hamlets report 16 October 2014. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. Retrieved from http://pwc.co.uk
Tyler, P. (2011). What should be the long-term strategy for places with patterns of decline and underperformance. In P. Lawless, H. G. Overman, & P. Tyler (Eds.), Strategies for underperforming places (pp. 36–51). SERC Policy Paper 6. London: SERC.
- Network Impact: Performance and Outcomes
J. M. Hurst
- Palgrave Macmillan UK
- Chapter 7
Entwicklung einer Supply-Strategie bei der Atotech Deutschland GmbH am Standort Feucht